Commentary by Maxwell C. Bridges
11. September 2010
The videos in "New 9 11 Analysis Reveals Use of Hidden Technology" provide an almost plausible hypothesis for the computer generate imagery (CGI). From the same identical WTC building perspective, we see three different versions of the same scene:
#1 is from the helicopter in the morning, shows the NY harbor background, does ~not~ show the approaching plane, and does ~not~ have reactions from the pilot or on-board reporter about an approaching plane until after the towers explode.
#2 was aired that evening, shows sky instead of NY harbor background, has local (emotionally reacting) talking heads provide the soundtrack, displays more obnoxious bottom banners, and depicts a plane flying a trajectory into the tower and the resulting explosion.
#3 is a hybrid of #1 & #2, shows the NY harbor background, no soundtrack, and depicts an orb that bends light on its surface, instead of a plane, flying a trajectory into the towers and the resulting explosion.
The salient point to remember is that these three versions prove that digital manipulation of video images occurred on 9/11, regardless of how digital artifacts are explained.
I am keeping an open-mind about the significance of the flying orb that supposedly reveals the use of hidden technology, as explained in the videos.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xgv70paJZeU
Occam Razor is often thrown at us. Along those lines I throw back that it seems to me that the three videos represent simply a version history that was leaked or slipped out accidentally. Video #1 was the original. Video #3 was probably before #2; the digital manipulators were using an orb in the software to define the flight trajectory that would later be the plane. Maybe they were having issues with colors and shadows of their stock CGI plane to look right coming over the NY harbor background. So some Einstein on the video forging team suggested masking out the background as if it were the sky and putting a nasty tall network banner at the bottom. They were certainly rushed in the creation of this. I could well imagine that the definition of the orb height in the software was set to be the height of the hole and plane. They superimposed their CGI plane right onto of the CGI orb, associated them with one another, and got the CGI plane to fly the trajectory of the CGI orb. (The physical hole in the building was caused by a bomb, which of course we already knew were in the buildings.) In the heat of the rushed video editing moment, maybe they forget to set the visual properties of the orb to hidden in the video software.
Unfortunately, if my hypothesis about software orbs is true, then it... uh, ... somewhat contradicts the featured 9/11 video that escalates the significance of the orb into being the use of a hidden technology from Tesla or Area 51. (I am open-minded enough to believe that top-secret remote-controlled anti-gravity propelled drones probably exist, but that doesn't mean they were employed in this instance and hidden with CGI fakery.)
I need to be careful in how I dissect this featured 9/11 video. I believe it is a clever PSYOPS disinformation piece meant to kill several birds with one stone.
- Tie the 9/11 truth movement to UFO's or "top-secret remote-controlled anti-gravity propelled drones"? Check.
- "September Clues" is part of the content, so that when the new technology hypothesis of this video is laughed out of court, so will it? Check.
- Have a significant amount of truth and facts about digital manipulation in the first 2/3 to make it compelling and that can be "guilt by association" discredited later? Check.
Yes, the videos are very worthwhile exploring, but if you keep in mind my plausible "video software orb artifact" hypothesis, when you get into video 3, you'll be either (a) laughing at the climatic build up to top-secret anti-gravity orbs, (b) mad about how this disinformation is going smear, dupe and transform public discussion on the very real fact of CGI manipulation on 9/11, or (c) both.
An interesting consequence of this mistake of "plane on orb" is that it fuels the "pod on the planes" conspiracy theory. And now is intent on fueling (and discrediting) "top-secret remote-controlled anti-gravity propelled drones" masked by CGI planes.
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
No comments:
Post a Comment