The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.



Vatic Note:   We have speculated through a variety of evidence since 9-11, that Rothschild's Israel did 9-11 and even bragged about how it was good for Israel that it happened. I do not want to rehash all the evidence pointing in that direction, but this belows makes a great case for what we have said all along.  

One point I do wish to make,  these Israeli's are not the Jews of the Bible, they are the ashkenazi Jews of Europe who migrated into Eastern Europe and were Khazars, who then transplanted to Israel after Britain ensured Israel's existance and many came from Britain, France, Germany and America. 

It's complicated, but if you have been following our trail of discovery, you will know that even many of the royal Muslim leaders are also Khazars who were also placed in their positions by the British after WW I, and that is why so many are allies of Israel.  

So, please do not blame the real Jews who are primarily in America and Middle East.  If their last name is German sounding, then they are the khazars.  Goldstein, Rosenberg, etc.  These names are simply being used as examples.  

This is a good read and well worth the effort.  If you did not have an opinion before reading this, you certainly will after reading the length of the FBI REPORT  filed about the dancing Israeli's, and especially how many pages were redacted in meeting the FOIA request. 

"All war is based on deception." - Sun Tzu
"By way of deception, thou shalt do war." - former motto of the Mossad

Wednesday, August 17, 2011

The official 2001 FBI docs on Urban Moving Systems and the 9-11-2001 Dancing Israelis incident

The official 2001 FBI docs on Urban Moving Systems and the 9-11-2001 Dancing Israelis incident 

Comment #2 goes over how anyone can get their own copies of these documents on a CD from the FBI (for those skeptics who claim this is "disinfo" - as if I have any time to slug this stuff together).  Here is the boilerplate letter I received from the FBI after making the initial request and asking for a fee waiver (my personal info has been whited out).

I've saved many the trouble of getting their own documents by posting them on Scribd.com, links are in the notes area (in RED).  Article begins here:


Section 5, page 42

 Above:  A snippet from the 2001 FBI files on Urban Moving Systems and the 9-11 Dancing Israelis incident.  An employee of UMS dishes on the boss (Dominik Suter?) who not only cheats customers but seems to harbor a huge grudge against the United States.  

Here are videos for those unfamiliar with the story:


The controversy around Urban Moving Systems (active as a business since approximately 1996) centers around the fact that it was a Mossad front company, and whether or not the "employees" (agents) knew what was about to go down on September 11th.  There were also, according to the FBI report, traces of explosive in the van used in the Dancing Israelis incident.  Were members of this group involved in rigging the towers for demolition?  Were they part of a Sayeret Yahalom demolition team? (Hat tip to Niqnaq on that one).

Section 1, page 35

In section 5, page 25 of the FBI report, a male eyewitness who was painting the interior of an apartment spots the Dancing Israelis on a nearby roof "less than 5 minutes" after the first plane hits the WTC.  The location of the roof, The Doric Apartments at 100 Manhattan Avenue in Union City, NJ, is a 5 minute drive from Urban Moving Systems at 3 W 18th Street in Weehauken.  This contradicts the statements of the Israelis in the 4th video (starting at 3:55), who claim they began driving to that point after the first plane hit the towers. 

Section 1, pages 36-37
There were a number of reasons I retrieved and posted the 4 page police report from the East Rutherford, NJ P.D. and these FBI documents on the 9-11-2001 Dancing Israelis incident (links are below).  If any 9-11 researchers had seen them, they failed to make them available for public scrutiny.  As a consequence, some individuals have concluded that the Dancing Israelis were an "urban legend", based only on researchers' opinions and a slew of seemingly disparate facts.

Section 5, page 41

Fill out an FOIA request, or write a letter, and these public records are yours for a few dollars, or free.  So why have we not seen (until now) official documentation on these suspicious events - events that apparently never got a mention in the 9-11 Commission Report?

Section 5, pages 62-63

The FBI's investigation of the Dancing Israelis is close to 550 pages long - redacted pages (not included in the above count), had they been made available, would bring the actual report closer to 1800 pages.  Of the released pages, many are partially blanked out.  The investigation won't be completely declassified until 2030 at the earliest; however it appears that date was changed to 2035 (see above stamps that appear on most pages).
Section 5, page 30
 The report is in 6 sections. The PDF "search" option does not seem to be working.  A brief synopsis of some findings are below, section by section.
Section 1, page 33

Because of time constraints, I have not vetted everything.  Please note in the comments area any section/page of interest found in these documents.  I have posted some snippets, however, I may have missed a few things, and would appreciate any insights, help etc.

Section 5, page 47

From the official East Rutherford, New Jersey police report, page 4 - suspect claims they were in Manhattan on the West Side Highway during the attack on the WTC (stated as "the incident")

Section 1, page 65
Above:  A female witness at 100 Manhattan Avenue spots the Israelis "high fiving" each other while watching the WTC burn.  Were they really happy to see the WTC burn, or were they just fans of Seattle's "High Five'n White Guys"?:

The first 9 links below this article under "Related posts" are my own independent research.  Some of these articles contain evidence that some actors in this group are still active in the US.

The Doric Apartments, 100 Manhattan Ave, Union City, NJ - "...the Doric stands on the cliffs of Union City offering non-obstructed breathtaking views of the New York City's skyline" - quote from Doric's website

One view of Manhattan from the Doric Apartments - from Panaramio.com and Google Maps

The Doric Apartments' garage rooftop parking area where the Dancing Israelis were spotted on 9-11-01.  Below, a promo video for the Doric Apartments.


FBI documents on Urban Moving Systems and the Dancing Israelis (these notes will be updated as time permits)

Regarding the Dancing Israelis connection to the Mossad, here's an article from the Jewish Daily Forward.

For an interesting analysis of the information in these documents, please first see this brief intro, then the following article:

The "Dancing Israelis" FBI Report - Debunked.

A concise video of the same analysis is here on YouTube.

UPDATE:  On Scribd, the documents are available for reading, however Scribd is now charging for downloads.  Free downloads are available via this blog.

Section 1 (full text at this link)

Section 1, page 7

Section 1, page 12.  Flyer found for party at the Garage on 99 7th Avenue in Manhattan.  The date "7-11" (exactly 2 months before 9-11) is prominent.  Is the address (99 7th Avenue - 99 = 9x11) significant?  Keren is a common Israeli women's name. What is being covered up on the right side of the flyer?   Below a snippet from a Google search for DJ VanJee that refers to Jaffa, a city located in Israel.

Section 1, page 23.  An "unscheduled" UMS van is spotted in Plymouth, MA on 9-11-2001 at 6:45 a.m.

Section 1, page 30. AA flight 11 was scheduled to depart Boston's Logan Airport at 7:45 a.m.

 p. 36 and p. 52-53 - An "unscheduled" Urban Moving Systems van is stopped by Pennsylvania State Police as it is traveling toward the Shanksville, PA hijacked flight 93 crash site:
Section 1, page 36

Section 1, page 30

p. 36 - An "unscheduled" Urban Moving Systems van is found in Nashua, NH on 9-11:

Section 1, page 36

Section 1, page 34  Airline tickets with immediate travel dates found in NJ van.

Section 1, page 39

p. 61-77 - Tenants at 100 Manhattan Avenue apartments are questioned about sightings of Israelis prior to 9-11.

Section 1, page 61.  One of the 5 Dancing Israelis was spotted at 100 Manhattan Ave. on 9-10-01.  Was he helping the mysterious couple (below) move out of their apartment?

Section 1, page 71 - Manager at 100 Manhattan Ave.
regarding tenants moving out using a UMC truck on 9-10-01

Section 1, page 73 - Urban Moving sighted at 100 Manhattan Ave. 9-10-01

Section 1, page 73.  Did the mysterious tenant who moved on 9-10-01 "work" at the WTC?   

Hoboken PATH Station
1 Hudson Place, Hoboken, NJ 07030.
Served by Newark-World Trade Center, Hoboken - 33rd Street, and Hoboken-World Trade Center lines. 

Section 1, page 96 - a few of the odd photos found

Section 1, page 100 - flight itinerary - 12 Sept departure

Section 1, page 112 - Letter posted from Charlotte, NC.  The Fox News video below at the 1:26 mark reports the presence of Israeli Mossad in North Carolina.

Are the numbers 6 and 8 significant (68 cents postage, sticker with 8 legged figure juggling 6 balls)?

Do some research on the zip + 4 number ("28210-5700") and you might find it links back to Union City, NJ.

pages 128-129 - addresses in Missouri and Texas

Section 2 (full text at this link)

Section 2 covers insurance papers for Urban Moving Systems.
p. 35 includes VIN numbers for all UMS vehicles, including the famous white van.

p. 77 is a report of said van at Liberty State Park, NJ.

Section 3 (full text at this link)

Section 3, page 28.  A 9-16-01 memo details a new UMS warehouse location at 73-75 Gould Street in Bayonne, NJ.  I exposed this warehouse and the UMS connection to Israeli mall sales of Zoomcopters in an article in 2009
9-11, Mossad Mall Spies, Zoomcopters and Dominik Suter

Section 4 (full text at this link)

Section 5 (full text at this link)

P 21:  female employee of UMS arrives at work at 8:58 am (shown on punched time card). A co-worker brings her some cookies - she estimates this happened about 5 minutes after she clocked in (9:03)  She talks with co-worker for "a few more minutes" and then hears someone in the building shout "Oh my God a plane just hit the World Trade Center."   She then heads into the dispatch room of Urban Moving Systems (where the shout came from) and sees "a still picture on a computer screen of a plane hitting one tower".

p. 25:  A painter at the Doric Towers, 100 Manhattan Ave, Union City, NJ is informed by a partner of the disaster "less than 5 minutes" after the first plane hits the north tower".  He "stands up from painting the baseboard, looks out of the window, and notices 3 young men taking video and still photographs from atop the roof of the parking garage adjoining Doric Towers. (ed. note:  Urban Moving Systems is a 5 minute drive from 100 Manhattan Ave.)

Section 5, page 27 - cigarette butts as evidence
Section 6 (full text at this link)

p 8:  foreign names and names of obscure towns in India and Nepal.

p 30:  report on Israeli art vendor arrested in Mercer county.  Found traveling in the vicinity of the FAA center in Pomona, NJ and also taking pictures of bridges and freeways:
Section 6, page 30


Below, video on Israeli "art sales": 

p 33: four Israeli nationals arrested by Mt. Holly Police dept on 8 14 2001

p 38:  FBI declares Israelis innocent

p 40:  phone number found in notes connected to individual in S. America with "ties to Islamic militants in the ME"

P 41:  another phone number is connected to a hash dealer in NY - this info is considered moot.

p 43:  FBI admits wide discrepancies in suspects stories

Section 6, page 45 - witness describes video camera

Section 6, page 47  Dancing Israelis, Classic International Movers and the 19 hijackers

Or did they go directly to the Doric apartments, a 16 minute drive, arrival time 8:04 a.m.?  The van was spotted at the Doric at about 8 a.m. by a witness interviewed by the FBI.

p 63: FBI references antiwar.com

p 89:  items not claimed by suspects destroyed

And the aftermath continues:

The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

Koch-Connected Nonprofits Use ‘Dark Money’ to Fight Political Disclosure

Vatic Note:  This is so blatant, that indeed, I do believe a special prosecutor should be appointed.   Is there one that I trust?  Is there one that will stand against the globalists? It may well be, that we have to have one of our neighbors run for President and make a commitment to ourselves that NO PROFESSIONAL POLITICIAN should be elected to public office.   Only then can we be sure that the "right" thing will be done.  

If there is an assassination AGAIN then at least we know who did the first one now and we can go after them for the next one, if it occurs.   We have to do something if we are to send a message that justice must never be ignored and make that clear as Iceland did, which I now realize was exceedingly brave of them as a nation.  They proved it can be done.  Read this below, and we all know who the Koch brothers are and what foreign entity they represent. 

Koch-Connected Nonprofits Use ‘Dark Money’ to Fight Political Disclosure
| November 29, 2014 

As the Internal Revenue Service contemplates new rules to illuminate “dark money” in politics, a little-known nonprofit group is fighting back using money traceable to billionaire brothers Charles and David Koch, drug makers and the cable television industry.


The group, American Commitment, received 87 percent of its $13 million in funding between 2011 and 2013 from three Koch-connected nonprofits: the Freedom Partners Chamber of Commerce, Center to Protect Patient Rights and Free Enterprise America, according to tax filings reviewed by the Center for Public Integrity.

The Freedom Partners Chamber of Commerce—which has been called “the Koch brothers’ secret bank” by Politico—has given $6.4 million to American Commitment, including $140,000 in 2013, according to tax records.
The Center to Protect Patient Rights—headed by Koch-connected political consultant Sean Noble—contributed about $4.8 million to American Commitment in 2012.

And another Koch network group headed by Noble, Free Enterprise America, contributed $103,000 to American Commitment in 2011—nearly half of the $216,500 American Commitment reported raising that year.

Meanwhile, additional tax records show two major trade associations are also among American Commitment’s donors: the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America and the National Cable and Telecommunications Association, both of which share policy positions with American Commitment.

 In 2013, PhRMA contributed $50,000 to American Commitment. That’s up from the $25,000 the drug lobby group gave in 2012. And the National Cable and Telecommunications Association has contributed $20,000 to American Commitment—$10,000 in both 2012 and 2013.
Donors to American Commitment

Source: Center for Public Integrity analysis of IRS filings covering financial activities from 2011 through 2013
Source: Center for Public Integrity analysis of IRS filings covering financial activities from 2011 through 2013
As a “social welfare” nonprofit organized under Sec. 501(c)(4) of the tax code, American Commitment is not required to publicly disclose its donors, even though it overtly supports political candidates.

But separate IRS filings show the bulk of American Commitment’s money has come from these nonprofits, which are legally required to disclose grants they provide to other nonprofit organizations.

American Commitment itself disclosed, as required by law, that in 2013, it received between $100,000 and $150,000 each from four unnamed donors.
Together, those four donors—one of which appears to have been the Freedom Partners Chamber of Commerce—accounted for half of American Commitment’s $1 million in income last year, according to records filed with the IRS earlier this week.

Led by Phil Kerpen—a veteran of Americans for Prosperity, the Club for Growth and the Cato Institute—American Commitment has vigorously opposed efforts to force donor disclosure on social welfare nonprofit groups.

It has derided liberal politicians for what it calls “shameful efforts to amend the Constitution to empower politicians to regulate political speech” and “backdoor regulatory efforts to limit the First Amendment at federal agencies.”

Earlier this year, after the IRS unveiled a proposal to regulate politically active nonprofits organized under Sec. 501(c)(4) of the tax code, American Commitment co-wrote a letter to the agency’s commissioner calling for the new rules to be “withdrawn and abandoned.”

According to its website, it’s also helped thousands of people flood the inboxes of their lawmakers with the message: “Don’t let the IRS gut the First Amendment!”
Given its involvement in elections, American Commitment ranks high among social welfare nonprofits that would be affected by any new IRS rules governing so-called dark money—cash from publicly undisclosed donors used to boost or bash political candidates.

Ahead of the 2014 midterms, American Commitment promoted Republican U.S. Senate candidate Thom Tillis of North Carolina in radio ads. In 2013, it backed Republican US Senate candidate Steve Lonegan in his race against Democrat Cory Booker. And Sen. Jeff Flake (R-AZ) was among politicians American Commitment supported in 2012.

Campaign finance reform activists for years have called upon the tax agency to take a more aggressive stance regarding politically active nonprofits, which gained the ability to fund advertisements explicitly calling for the election or defeat of lawmakers in the wake of the US Supreme Court’s Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission decision in 2010.

Groups such as Crossroads GPS on the right, which was co-founded by GOP strategist Karl Rove, and Patriot Majority USA on the left, which is run by allies of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) have proliferated—all while legally keeping their donors’ names secret.

The IRS—which, earlier this year, postponed a public hearing on its highly contentious plan—has vowed to issue a new draft of proposed regulations for social welfare nonprofits in early 2015.

Industry lobbying groups such as PhRMA and the National Cable and Telecommunications Association (NCTA) have also found an ally in American Commitment.

One of NCTA’s top issues: opposing “Net neutrality” policies that would regulate the Internet like a utility—a move the trade group says would be “disastrous.”
American Commitment’s Kerpen, meanwhile, has argued that “regulating and taxing the Internet is obviously a terrible idea.” Joy Sims, an NCTA spokeswoman, declined to comment about the group’s donation to American Commitment.

American Commitment further describes itself as “committed to fully repealing” President Barack Obama’s health care law and replacing it in a way that “empowers patients and doctors” and unleashes “American ingenuity and creativity to cure diseases.”
Robert Zirkelbach, a spokesman for PhRMA—which supported the passage of Obama’s Affordable Care Act but has also funneled money to groups like American Commitment that want it scrapped—aid the trade group often gives out money to “organizations that share PhRMA’s goals of improving the quality of patients’ lives” and “supporting the discovery of new treatments and cures.”
Other donors to American Commitment remain unknown—exactly how the group wants them to be.
“We agree with the Warren Court’s landmark 1958 ruling in NAACP v. Alabama that protecting the privacy of our members is critical to their core First Amendment rights of free speech and free association,” Kerpen wrote in an email to the Center for Public Integrity.

(Update, 7:02 p.m., Nov. 20: This story has been updated to include Kerpen’s reference to the NAACP v. Alabama case.)

In recent years, the American Future Fund has spent tens of millions of dollars advocating against federal lawmakers, including about $81,000 in late 2013 against Rep. Collin Peterson, the ranking Democratic member of the House Agriculture Committee.

Like American Commitment, it has done so without disclosing its funders.

The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

Iraq and Syria Follow Lebanon's Precedent

Vatic Note: This was fascinating and very very educational.  I knew a lot about the British involvement in dividing up the Ottoman empire after WW I, but I had no idea about the details of that venture.   This gives us the big picture and yet a detailed and serious picture of what they did in Lebanon.

This can then be overlaid onto Syria and Iraq.  Remember, they are both heavily endowed with energy resources as is Gaza and the Ukraine, so now you know why the Western nations, especially Britain, were so involved in the past.  Today, its the foreign occupied USA, Rothschild, Britain  and Israel, our foreign occupier. I intend to follow this with great interest to see just how close he is to the end results.  

Like I keep saying, this is not a fast food info site, its an educational site and this below is just one more piece of information that we did not know, but do now.  Keep this in mind as things unfold over there.  Remember, UNITED WE STAND, AND DIVIDED WE FALL.  

Iraq and Syria Follow Lebanon's Precedent 
By George Friedman,  Stratford Geopolitical Weekly, August 26, 2014

Lebanon was created out of the Sykes-Picot Agreement. This agreement between Britain and France reshaped the collapsed Ottoman Empire south of Turkey into the states we know today —

Lebanon, Syria and Iraq, and to some extent the Arabian Peninsula as well. For nearly 100 years, Sykes-Picot defined the region. A strong case can be made that the nation-states Sykes-Picot created are now defunct, and that what is occurring in Syria and Iraq represents the emergence of post-British/French maps that will replace those the United States has been trying to maintain since the collapse of Franco-British power.

The Invention of Middle East Nation-States

Sykes-Picot, named for French diplomat Francois Georges-Picot and his British counterpart, Sir Mark Sykes, did two things. First, it created a British-dominated Iraq. Second, it divided the Ottoman province of Syria on a line from the Mediterranean Sea east through Mount Hermon. Everything north of this line was French. Everything south of this line was British. The French, who had been involved in the Levant since the 19th century, had allies among the region's Christians. They carved out part of Syria and created a country for them. Lacking a better name, they called it Lebanon, after the nearby mountain of the same name.
The British named the area to the west of the Jordan River after the Ottoman administrative district of Filistina, which turned into Palestine on the English tongue. However, the British had a problem. During World War I, while the British were fighting the Ottoman Turks, they had allied with a number of Arabian tribes seeking to expel the Turks. Two major tribes, hostile to each other, were the major British allies. The British had promised postwar power to both. It gave the victorious Sauds the right to rule Arabia — hence Saudi Arabia.

The other tribe, the Hashemites, had already been given the newly invented Iraqi monarchy and, outside of Arabia, a narrow strip of arable ground to the east of the Jordan River. For lack of a better name, it was called Trans-Jordan, or the other side of the Jordan. In due course the "trans" was dropped and it became Jordan.

And thus, along with Syria, five entities were created between the Mediterranean and Tigris, and between Turkey and the new nation of Saudi Arabia. This five became six after the United Nations voted to create Israel in 1947. The Sykes-Picot agreement suited European models and gave the Europeans a framework for managing the region that conformed to European administrative principles. The most important interest, the oil in Iraq and the Arabian Peninsula, was protected from the upheaval in their periphery as Turkey and Persia were undergoing upheaval. This gave the Europeans what they wanted.

What it did not do was create a framework that made a great deal of sense to the Arabs living in this region. The European model of individual rights expressed to the nation-states did not fit their cultural model. For the Arabs, the family — not the individual — was the fundamental unit of society. Families belonged to clans and clans to tribes, not nations. The Europeans used the concept of the nation-state to express divisions between "us" and "them." To the Arabs, this was an alien framework, which to this day still competes with religious and tribal identities.

The states the Europeans created were arbitrary, the inhabitants did not give their primary loyalty to them, and the tensions within states always went over the border to neighboring states. The British and French imposed ruling structures before the war, and then a wave of coups overthrew them after World War II. Syria and Iraq became pro-Soviet states while Israel, Jordan and the Arabians became pro-American, and monarchies and dictatorships ruled over most of the Arab countries. These authoritarian regimes held the countries together.

Reality Overcomes Cartography

It was Lebanon that came apart first. Lebanon was a pure invention carved out of Syria. As long as the Christians for whom Paris created Lebanon remained the dominant group, it worked, although the Christians themselves were divided into warring clans. But after World War II, the demographics changed, and the Shiite population increased.

Compounding this was the movement of Palestinians into Lebanon in 1948. Lebanon thus became a container for competing clans. Although the clans were of different religions, this did not define the situation. Multiple clans in many of these religious groupings fought each other and allied with other religions.
Moreover, Lebanon's issues were not confined to Lebanon. The line dividing Lebanon from Syria was an arbitrary boundary drawn by the French. Syria and Lebanon were not one country, but the newly created Lebanon was not one country, either. In 1976 Syria — or more precisely, the Alawite dictatorship in Damascus — invaded Lebanon. Its intent was to destroy the Palestinians, and their main ally was a Christian clan. The Syrian invasion set off a civil war that was already flaring up and that lasted until 1990.
Lebanon was divided into various areas controlled by various clans. The clans evolved. The dominant Shiite clan was built around Nabi Berri. Later, Iran sponsored another faction, Hezbollah. Each religious faction had multiple clans, and within the clans there were multiple competitors for power. From the outside it appeared to be strictly a religious war, but that was an incomplete view. It was a competition among clans for money, security, revenge and power. And religion played a role, but alliances crossed religious lines frequently.
The state became far less powerful than the clans. Beirut, the capital, became a battleground for the clans.

The Israelis invaded in order to crush the Palestinian Liberation Organization, with Syria's blessing, and at one point the United States intervened, partly to block the Israelis. When Hezbollah blew up the Marine barracks in Beirut in 1983, killing hundreds of Marines, U.S. President Ronald Reagan, realizing the amount of power it would take to even try to stabilize Lebanon, withdrew all troops. He determined that the fate of Lebanon was not a fundamental U.S. interest, even if there was a Cold War under way.

 The complexity of Lebanon goes far beyond this description, and the external meddling from Israel, Syria, Iran and the United States is even more complicated. The point is that the clans became the reality of Lebanon, and the Lebanese government became irrelevant. An agreement was reached between the factions and their patrons in 1989 that ended the internal fighting — for the most part — and strengthened the state.

But in the end, the state existed at the forbearance of the clans. The map may show a nation, but it is really a country of microscopic clans engaged in a microscopic geopolitical struggle for security and power. Lebanon remains a country in which the warlords have become national politicians, but there is little doubt that their power comes from being warlords and that, under pressure, the clans will reassert themselves.

Repeats in Syria and Iraq

A similar process has taken place in Syria. The arbitrary nation-state has become a region of competing clans. The Alawite clan, led by Bashar al Assad (who has played the roles of warlord and president), had ruled the country. An uprising supported by various countries threw the Alawites into retreat. The insurgents were also divided along multiple lines. Now, Syria resembles Lebanon.

There is one large clan, but it cannot destroy the smaller ones, and the smaller ones cannot destroy the large clan. There is a permanent stalemate, and even if the Alawites are destroyed, their enemies are so divided that it is difficult to see how Syria can go back to being a country, except as a historical curiosity. Countries like Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Israel and the United States might support various clans, but in the end, the clans survive.

Something very similar happened in Iraq. As the Americans departed, the government that was created was dominated by Shia, who were fragmented. To a great degree, the government excluded the Sunnis, who saw themselves in danger of marginalization. The Sunnis consisted of various tribes and clans (some containing Shiites) and politico-religious movements like the Islamic State. They rose up in alliance and have now left Baghdad floundering, the Iraqi army seeking balance and the Kurds scrambling to secure their territory.

It is a three-way war, but in some ways it is a three-way war with more than 20 clans involved in temporary alliances. No one group is strong enough to destroy the others on the broader level. Sunni, Shiite and Kurd have their own territories. On the level of the tribes and clans, some could be destroyed, but the most likely outcome is what happened in Lebanon: the permanent power of the sub-national groups, with perhaps some agreement later on that creates a state in which power stays with the smaller groups, because that is where loyalty lies.
The boundary between Lebanon and Syria was always uncertain. The border between Syria and Iraq is now equally uncertain. But then these borders were never native to the region. The Europeans imposed them for European reasons.

Therefore, the idea of maintaining a united Iraq misses the point. There was never a united Iraq — only the illusion of one created by invented kings and self-appointed dictators. The war does not have to continue, but as in Lebanon, it will take the exhaustion of the clans and factions to negotiate an end.
The idea that Shia, Sunnis and Kurds can live together is not a fantasy.

The fantasy is that the United States has the power or interest to re-create a Franco-British invention crafted out of the debris of the Ottoman Empire. Moreover, even if it had an interest, it is doubtful that the United States has the power to pacify Iraq and Syria. It could not impose calm in Lebanon. The triumph of the Islamic State would represent a serious problem for the United States, but no more than it would for the Shia, Kurds and other Sunnis. As in Lebanon, the multiplicity of factions creates a countervailing force that cripples those who reach too far.

There are two issues here. The first is how far the disintegration of nation-states will go in the Arab world. It seems to be under way in Libya, but it has not yet taken root elsewhere. It may be a political formation in the Sykes-Picot areas. Watching the Saudi peninsula will be most interesting. But the second issue is what regional powers will do about this process. Turkey, Iran, Israel and the Saudis cannot be comfortable with either this degree of fragmentation or the spread of more exotic groups. The rise of a Kurdish clan in Iraq would send tremors to the Turks and Iranians.

The historical precedent, of course, would be the rise of a new Ottoman attitude in Turkey that would inspire the Turks to move south and impose an acceptable order on the region. It is hard to see how Turkey would have the power to do this, plus if it created unity among the Arabs it would likely be because the memories of Turkish occupation still sting the Arab mind.

All of this aside, the point is that it is time to stop thinking about stabilizing Syria and Iraq and start thinking of a new dynamic outside of the artificial states that no longer function. To do this, we need to go back to Lebanon, the first state that disintegrated and the first place where clans took control of their own destiny because they had to. We are seeing the Lebanese model spread eastward. It will be interesting to see where else its spreads.

The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.


John Moore: Ferguson “War Games” Scripted, Choreographed By The White House

Vatic Note: In the first protest/demonstration, there were foreign occupying government agents who were stirring up the pot and were brought in from somewhere else.  This is exactly what they did in every single Middle East country the powers that  be took over.   Same with the Ukraine and since they have war gamed it all now, they are finally getting around to us. 

I know the black leaders are smart enough to know who the bad guys really are and how horrible these foreigners have been to blacks from day one when they first started kidnapping them out of Africa and bringing them to America as slaves.  These are the same khazar players from back then.  They are not your friends.  Your best hope is to stay united, no matter what. 

They need a civil war in order to declare an emergency and put in Martial law, collect the guns and begin to take over for real.   America is the last bastion for standing against these khazar Zionists and their owners, the bloodlines.  Their best and only bet was to try and pit blacks against whites using the militarized and probably mind controlled police in that state since the governor there cooperates with the feds, like a whore on a holiday.  

What we can do now is to pressure the congress with the information we have found finding that this whole thing is a false flag being used to start a war so we will be weakened and disarmed when they start their needed WW III that we are designated to lose. 

John Moore: Ferguson “War Games” Scripted, Choreographed By The White House
By Susan Duclos,  Before It's News,  Novermber 26, 2014

I have been in contact with a source which, along with Sgt. Maj. Dan Page on the John Moore Show below, confirm that while many of the protesters in Ferguson are from Ferguson, Missouri, those choreographing events are government agents, professional provocateurs, all playing from the same “script.”

Sgt. Maj. Page states to Moore that what we are seeing is a “orchestrated nationwide event that is coming right out of Washington, DC. … Warfare on the American people.”  

This matches exactly what my source familiar with the Ferguson “plans” emailed to me on Tuesday, which in part states “The enemy is the government who is causing this entire game. It is a “war game” to them, all written and scripted and has been for years.“ (VN:  what he means is "The enemy is the "foreign occupied and controlled" government..... CONTROLLED BY MEANS OF BLACKMAIL, THREATS and bribery if they are dual citizens of both Israel and America.)

My source follows up with information about what is next in the “playbook”:

The New AG and Obama will preach about it being ok to peacefully demonstrate. This is all staged as the proper thing to do would be to stop all protesting immediately and put a curfew of 6PM in. They will not do this as they want to get to Martial Law and they are pushing for more destruction. This limit will be reached after a “shoot-out which will come. After there is a growing spread of the rioting in to other major, pre planned and staged cities which we already named last week. They will reach “impact point”, declare Martial law.


There may be a few wild cards as people are unpredictable and some are unstable, so their behavior can not be exactly planned for but expect a few nut jobs to go crazy with assault weapons. They call these “wild card players.” They always work towards the means. To be clearer. These nut cases will help make the False Justification for the Declaration

Page goes on to inform listeners what was observed in Ferguson, as well as the type of issues that are being seen among protesters and police, in Ferguson still. Page claims there have been multiple attacks among Caucasians that have not been reported.

Two noteworthy points here before listening to the John Moore Show below; 1) My source rarely agrees with Mr. Moore, yet in this, the information provided by both is almost identical and; 2) over the last weeks my source has provided me with multiple warnings about what is coming, with exact dates, all of which played out exactly as I was warned…… this is why I am making his warning over what is coming, available now, as well as the purpose behind these events.

"They are seeing what it takes to start violence between white and blacks as you will see in the coming days, again all planned out ahead."

My source also assures me that martial law, nationwide, is NOT coming yet, this is more of a beta-test, for lack of a better word, to prepare for a bigger event in the near future.

SOURCE:  http://www.allnewspipeline.com/Inside_Sources_Ferguson_War_Game.php

The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

USDA on board with shipping U.S. chickens to China for processing, then re-entry to States for human consumption

Vatic Note:  Once you read this below, you will understand why the cabal wants slave labor in every western country, since it will save on shipping and other transportation costs and risks, adding more and more to their profit agenda.   Once they slave us all that are remaining after the purge, they won't have to chip the processing over to a slave labor country such as China.

What surprises me about China is how and why their people so passively have accepted their slave status. They are billions in number against only a few million maybe, of the cabal who are in control.  I have not studied Chinese history but I am sure the answer is in there somewhere.   If anyone has any information on that issue, please share it so we can follow up on it for our readers. 

Our corporations used to have "some" sense of corporate citizenship, but its obvious from this below and other blatant examples, that the Corporate citizenship they used to exhibit has all gone by the way side.  They are moving rapidly toward fascism globally.  In checking the boards of directors and the sale of the stock of these companies, we find it to be dropping into fewer and fewer hands.

Its becoming clear that the problem lies in who are the ultimate owners today and who serve on the boards of Directors giving policy decisions to their managers.  Rothschilds international bankers, illum bloodlines and their minions are becoming more and more the few hands these companies are falling into. 

USDA on board with shipping U.S. chickens to China for processing, then re-entry to States for human consumption

USDA on board with shipping U.S. chickens to China for processing, then re-entry to States for human consumption

“Chinese chicken” will soon have a whole new meaning, as the U.S. Department of Agriculture recently gave the green-light to four chicken processing plants in China, allowing chicken raised and slaughtered in the U.S. to be exported to China for processing, and then shipped back to the U.S. and sold on grocery shelves here.

Furthermore, the imported processed poultry will not require a country-of-origin label nor will U.S. inspectors be on site at processing plants in China before it is shipped to the United States for human consumption.

Food safety experts worry about the quality of chicken processed in a country notorious for avian influenza and food-borne illnesses. And they predict that China will eventually seek to broaden the export rules to allow chickens born and raised in China.

“Economically, it doesn’t make much sense,” said Tom Super, spokesman for the National Chicken Council, in a recent interview with the Houston Chronicle. “Think about it: A Chinese company would have to purchase frozen chicken in the U.S., pay to ship it 7,000 miles, unload it, transport it to a processing plant, unpack it, cut it up, process/cook it, freeze it, repack it, transport it back to a port, then ship it another 7,000 miles. I don’t know how anyone could make a profit doing that.”
Bureau of Labor Statistics data estimates that American poultry processors are paid roughly $11 per hour on average. In China, reports have circulated that the country’s chicken workers can earn significantly less—$1 to 2 per hour—which casts doubt on Super’s economic feasibility assessment.
This process is already being used for U.S. seafood. According to the Seattle Times, domestically caught Pacific salmon and Dungeness crab are currently being processed in China and shipped back to the U.S., all because of significant cost savings:
…fish processors in the Northwest, including Seattle-based Trident Seafoods, are sending part of their catch of Alaskan salmon or Dungeness crab to China to be filleted or de-shelled before returning to U.S. tables.
“There are 36 pin bones in a salmon and the best way to remove them is by hand,” says Charles Bundrant, founder of Trident, which ships about 30 million pounds of its 1.2 billion-pound annual harvest to China for processing. “Something that would cost us $1 per pound labor here, they get it done for 20 cents in China.”
China has an infamous reputation as one of the world’s worst food safety offenders. (VN: What do they expect with those wages, anyone with half a brain knows that quality will suffer, you get what you pay for. But now the companies do not give a damn, they only care about profits and we have to eat and they are destroying our farmers and ranchers so they can have a monopoly on food production. Fair markets have gone away and market manipulations have taken over along with consolidation of competition ) Earlier this year, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a report on a Chinese chicken jerky manufacturer that created dog treats tied to more than 500 dogs’ deaths.

Food Safety News aims to spread awareness of the pending USDA agreement and stop Chinese-processed chicken from ever reaching supermarkets or school lunchrooms.

Food Inc.: A Participant Guide: How Industrial Food is Making Us Sicker, Fatter, and Poorer-And What You Can Do About It

The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.