Showing posts with label zs_911_How. Show all posts

2023-11-11

9/11 FGNW Exotic Nuclear Weapons

Clerk Note: This article sums up neatly why and how exotic nuclear means were deployed in the WTC dustification. Once you see it, you can't unsee it. Be sure to click on all of the Easter-Egg reference.

+++

9/11 FGNW Exotic Nuclear Weapons

by Maxwell C. Bridges
2023-11-11

Fourth generation nuclear weapons (FGNW) were used in the destruction of the World Trade Center (WTC) on September 11, 2001. The evidence for nuclear components leaks out of the entire 9/11 record. The overkill energy of the observed sudden complete decimation of the towers is a clue, purposely missed.

9/11 FGNW Prima Facie Case

Clerk Note: This article makes the prima facie case that Fourth Generation Nuclear Weapons (FGNW) were deployed in the annihilation of the World Trade Center (WTC) on 9/11.

+++

9/11 FGNW Prima Facie Case

By: Maxwell C. Bridges
Date: 2018-02-11

"A prima facie case is a cause of action or defense that is sufficiently established by a party's evidence to justify a verdict in his or her favor, provided such evidence is not rebutted by the other party."

Episode 308 – 9/11 Trillions: Follow The Money

Clerk Note: If you don't follow the money, you'll never understand 9/11 and the wars it inflicted upon the world.

+++

Episode 308 – 9/11 Trillions: Follow The Money

Link: https://www.corbettreport.com/episode-308-911-trillions-follow-the-money/

By: Corbett Report
Date: 2015-09-12

Beyond Misinformation: 9/11 FGNW

Vatic Note: It has been quite awhile since Mr. Bridges (Mr. Bruecke) added content to this blog, and it is wonderful to see that it is an original work. To what did he attribute his delay? Burn-out, frustration, procrastination, and the responsibilities of real life.

Well, it appears that I may or may not get this up since the PTB keep preventing me from scheduling this great write up. Stay with us and we will keep trying. Not much need for a vatic note since he did an excellent job of saying all that had to be said.

Beyond Misinformation: 9/11 FGNW

http://maxwellbridges.blogspot.com/2016/03/beyond-misinformation-911-fgnw.html
By: Maxwell C. Bridges
Date: 2016-03-11

This article makes the case that Fourth Generation Nuclear Devices (FGND) were used on September 11, 2001 at the World Trade Center. In doing so, it discusses why the leading theory of Nano-Thermite proposed by many influential leaders in the 9/11 Truth Movement does not go the whole distance and is therefore wrong. This work demonstrates evolution in the beliefs of the author when presented with new information, although much of this article's content has been published previously.

Nuclear 2001-09-11

By: Maxwell C. Bridges
Date: 2013-11-11
Link: http://maxwellbridges.blogspot.com/2013/11/nuclear-2001-09-11.html

Bruecke Note: This article addresses the issue of what destructive force could have been employed to bring down the World Trade Center towers. The predominant belief within the 9/11 Truth movement appears to be that nuclear devices were ~not~ used, and that conventional chemical based explosives and incendiaries, including some form of thermite, were the primary destructive mechanisms.

But here, Mr. Bridges looks at the reports that substantiates those beliefs, finds them untrustworthy, and points out the deliberate disinformation that has steered our understanding. He documents some of the key aspects of the destruction that can't be explained (e.g., duration of under-rubble hot-spots, tritium measurements, vehicle damage, etc.) without the involvement of some other force.

Instructions: Because some sections are long and induce lots of scrolling, all section titles are hyperlinked to show or hide their content. The controls below show or hide the content of all sections.

Show All / Hide All
While this article provides a rational sequencing of the sections for the nuclear argument being made, it can also serve as a reference piece where sections are read out-of-sequence. For this reason, some seeming repetition does occur to give context to readers who skim, skip, and hop.

1. Introduction

Mark Twain once wrote:

It is easier to fool someone than it is to convince them that they've been fooled.

This is one of many reasons that make discussing the details of September 11, 2001 so difficult: we've all been fooled by some aspect of it. To top this off, purposeful, crafty disinformation was created, was promoted by mainstream media, and was injected into the 9/11 Truth Movement (9/11TM) to dupe even the best of us idiots.

Apologies in advance: this article itself might be serving up its own share of misinformation, so readers are encouraged to prudentially consume this with a healthy dose of distrust. Verify it, nugget by nugget. And because I don't relish being the sole duped useful idiot on the subject, please correct me where I've been misinformed.

Nuclear weapons were used on 9/11

This article proves the nuclear 9/11 premise by reaching into the maw of disinformation sources and preserving the nuggets of truth. That such nugget-mining efforts haven't already been exerted is testament to the infiltration depths of disinformation efforts. The nuclear argument is cummulative and not completely destroyed should individual nuggets be proven inapplicable or wrong. More importantly, when not proven otherwise, nuggets of truth remain and must be addressed in any theory-du-jour.

Executive Summary

A re-configuration of the neutron bomb ( or ERW: enhanced radiation weapon) was deployed on September 11, 2001. Such neutron devices (a) are a variant of fusion, (b) expel the lion's share of its nuclear yield as energetic neutrons, (c) can direct those neutrons and subsequently some of the blast and heat wave, and (d) may ~not~ leave significant levels of long-lasting, lingering alpha, beta, or gamma radiation. If not measured promptly (<72 hours), such radiation from the neutron devices dissipates quickly. The phrase is coined "neutron nuclear DEW" (directed energy weapon) to describe it. More than several were deployed per WTC tower.

9/11 Neutron Nuclear DEW (Part 2)

Clerk Update: This is an earlier version of what is not musings into Fourth Generation Nuclear Devices. The following article does not hold completely, but does provide a solid foundation of truth.

http://cotocrew.wordpress.com/2012/12/21/911-neutron-nuclear-dew2/

By: Señor El Once
Date: 2012-12-21

{This is Part 2 to "9/11 Neutron Nuclear DEW" (2012-11-22).}

Truth is a diamond that is surely pure
Truth's an antidote, the virus curer
Truth is the lock on the door - not the keys
Truth is the confession that brings you ease
Truth is the answer to the main question
Truth is the part you forget to mention
~Franklin Ryk 1998 (@ 12 yrs)

Please forgive me for this minor detour in topic from the recent "slaughter of lambkins" and how it represents a new thesis of the Helgian Dialectic, for which there will be an antithesis and final synthesis to lead the sheep astray. We can already see them going after guns and the internet.

I feel compelled to bring up a 9/11 topic mostly just to hedge my bets in case the world really does end on 2012-12-21 as per the Mayan Calendar. I will want to be able to stand before the Supreme Architect of the Universe and say that I sought to reveal (9/11) truth right up until the end.

When, as I expect, we wake up on 2012-12-22, this article about events from 2001-09-11 won't be totally out of place in the sense: "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it" (George Santayana). Participants of this forum already speculate about heinous misdeeds to come, some of it with nuclear aspirations.

9/11 Vatic Special 2012

Bruecke Note: This is retroactively posted on 9/11/2012. It is a duplicate placed here, mostly so that it could be found in the archives under this date.

This Vatic 9/11/2012 Special intended for the eleventh anniversary is late, because the Vatic Partners are a bit burned out and bummed out. After eleven years, the 9/11 Truth Movement's biggest success is a Colorado PBS station that broadcast "9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out".

I certainly respect the courage and the efforts to air this production, and it has given rise to at least three real-life opportunities for me to engage in 9/11 discussions in person where the topic was broached by others. This is the good that it brought.

The bad? Not only did that 9/11 production not go far enough, but it clamped a Denver-boot on it to park meaningful contemplation in the realm of controlled demolition with incendiaries and explosives. It wasn't. 9/11 was nuclear.

In 2010, the Vatic Project said:

The 9/11 Special does not shirk from saying that 9/11 was a nuclear event, that corporate media fooled the world with computer generated images (CGI), and that US Government/Military Insiders, Mossad/Israel, and zionists within the banks and media are the culprits.

In 2011 after reader Dr. Judy Wood's textbook, the Vatic Project amended the above with:

"9/11 used cold-fusion or nuclear reactors to generate the power for DEW that supplied the accuracy and umpth to pulverize the internals of the towers".

In 2012, the Vatic Project takes two steps backward to go one forward:

9/11 deployed multiple neutron nuclear directed energy (DEW) [or neu nookiedoo or enhanced radiation weapons (ERW)] in most of the buildings in the WTC complex. We no longer advocate the No Plane Theory (NPT) with regards to the towers; we advocate the No Commerical Plane Theory (NCPT), which says the speed & precision of the aircraft at low altitude excludes the alledged model but not a special plane-looking-missile. For similar reasons, the Pentagon plane was not the alledged aircraft [thereby adhering to NCPT], and the Vatic Project endorses the CIT flyover theory. The corporate media was involved in fooling the world and did pull some CGI tricks, but we were duped into believing the extent of such media manipulation with computer generated images (CGI) that lead to NPT. The video of the last twelve seconds of UA175 shows with 3D modeling how the videos of the seemingly different flight paths does correspond to a single flight path, thereby destroying our previous NPT and CGI beliefs. We still belief that US Government/Military Insiders, Mossad/Israel, and zionists within the banks and media are the culprits.

We apologize if our wafflings in 9/11 beliefs misled you, or if anything written above proves our duping on the subject sometime in the future. We are only human, and the disinformation has been very crafty to lead us astray. Yes, please do not trust our judgment in this matter, but instead verify for yourselves.

In 2011, the Vatic Project was promoting Dr. Judy Wood's textbook, "Where did the Towers Go?" In 2012, the book remains an excellent addition to any serious 9/11 researcher's library, but with serious caveats. Her collection of 9/11 pictorial evidence, as well as the correlation of after-math photos to map locations is most impressive. However, now we see that her book does have a few errors and omissions, with her tiny brush-off of nuclear suspicions being a glaring one. Her downplaying of hot-spots (and acceptance without challenge of a government report on satellite infrared hot-spots) might even be an example of blatant disinformation. She may bring hurricane Erin to our attention for the wrong reasons and misses the opportunity to expound upon its ramifications: the revealing of active media complicity and of the government's ability to steer the weather. I also have to fault Dr. Wood for a very poor "literature review" in her high-quality scholarly effort. She essentially re-purposed information from her website, much of it stagnant since 2006. She did not take the opportunity in her book to debunk valid criticism of the themes and analysis presented on her web pages (such as Dr. Jenkins). The work of the Anonymous Physicist at the very least would have merited some discussion by the good doctor.

The really important breakthrough in 2012 was Jeff Prager's Nuclear 9/11 Dust Analysis [8MB] as well as his two part eMagazine of a few hundred pages: Part 1 [86MB] and Part 2 [56MB]. I must borrow an expression from Mr. Chandler of his first impressions of Dr. Wood's textbook: "Extravagant use of color. Somebody put a bunch of money behind this project." A tip of our Fedora to Dr. James Fetzer for bringing Mr. Prager's work to our attention. I expect we'll find errors in Mr. Prager's compilation, but not enough to take nuclear 9/11 aspirations off of the table. The proof is in the dust.

Dr. Wood and Mr. Prager have overlapping concepts. One of those is that they both in effect advocate directed energy weapons. The difference is that Dr. Wood makes a wide and rather conspicuous circle around nuclear hijinx. It is somewhat glaring that nuclear methods aren't given more consideration when trying to account for the energy requirements of pulverization and dustification, when surely her research into Star Wars would have brought up Project Excalibur.

This is where Mr. Prager's work can bridge us, while clearing up misconceptions about what a directed energy weapon would look like, would be capable of, and would produce in terms of short-lived and lingering side-effects. Look into neutron bombs.

The Vatic 9/11/2012 Special is intended to serve as a 9/11 Reference. As before, these rabbit holes of 9/11 neu nookiedoo and "whodunnit" are very deep and twisted.

For those interested, an excellent debate on the subject transpire in the comment section across several articles from Truth & Shadows between Señor El Once and hybridrogue1.

Señor El Once : 2012-09-11 Compelling evidence of a fission pathway [Jeff Prager]

Señor El Once : 2012-09-12 Bashing Dr. Jones

Señor El Once : 2012-10-04 Responding to Dr. Jones [from 9/11 Blogger 2012-09-30]

For your own peace of mind, satisfy for yourself whether or not they have merit. At risk is our entire system of justice.

Why should you care about this eleven year old event today? You should care that the true 9/11 perpetrators are brought to justice, because left unchecked gives them and their successors free reign (again and again) to manipulate us and the world into other wrongful wars and crimes against humanity. Nations fall if justice is not pursued. Only we can save it.

Among the most basic of your take-away action items from this Vatic 9/11 Special, is that you need to be part of the voice to demand an independent investigation of 9/11. After that, you need to be questioning and denouncing all foreign & domestic policy and the right-left political games that are based on the lies of 9/11 ("... because we were attacked on 9/11(?)...") and that seem to scapegoat another [country, ethnicity, religion].

Here are some quick links to help you navigate the 9/11 Special.Do a right-click from your browser and open them in new tabs.

9/11 Neutron Nuclear DEW

Bruecke Note: The link to the source article probably does not work. An attempt was made to have this posted on COTO with the publication date of 2012-11-22, but the moderators have never approved its publication, while other "actors" spin the evidence blocks to fit more benign theory stacks and complain about Señor El Once's presence. This posting has been pre-dated to now fit better with the Vatic 9/11 Special for 2012.

http://cotocrew.wordpress.com/2012/11/22/neutron-nuclear-dew/

By: Señor El Once
Date: 2012-11-22

9/11 Tetris

In the game of 9/11 Tetris, the pieces of evidence come down at weird intervals and angles and must be oriented into a "theory stack" that leaves the fewest and smallest gaps. A given piece of evidence might fit equally well in multiple theory stacks. However, all of the valid evidence must be accounted for in a reasonable manner. And to make the game more challenging, disinformation is part of the mix. A piece of evidence coming from a disinformation source is not invalidate by this association. With regards to 9/11 and the shock-&-awe global agenda that 9/11 put into effect, one could argue that all sources of information are in some ways disinformation. Remember that in order to be credible and hence successful, all disinformation must have copious amounts of truth. Owing to this and that some truths are inconvenient to the agenda, some disinformation is fashioned as a straw-man, such that when the deceit of the disinformation vehicle is discovered or purposely exposed, all "Nuggets of Truth" contained therein might be knocked from the table in the hopes of no further public consideration.

When contemplating the WTC destruction, I champion today neutron nuclear directed energy weapons (DEW), which Mr. HybridRogue1 has assisted in crafting the label "neu nookiedoo". The sources for my bastard beliefs are:

(1) Dr. Judy Wood's 2010 textbook, "Where Did The Towers Go?" and her website. Yes, it has disinformation, but it also has the best collection of pictorial evidence and nuggets of truth that need to be addressed by any 9/11 theory-du-jour.

(2) Mr. Jeff Prager's presentation, Nuclear 9/11 Dust Analysis [8MB]. Also his two part eMagazine of a few hundred pages Part 1 [86MB] and Part 2 [56MB]. Disinformation probably exists here, too.

(3) The omissions, misdirections, and logic errors of Dr. Steven Jones starting with his paper "Hard Evidence Rebudiates the Hypothesis that Mini-Nukes were used on the WTC Towers" and extending into his research into nano-thermite.

Allow me to start with #3, because this represents heresy for the orthodox 9/11 Truth Movement (9/11TM) that will be hard to get passed. Try.

Nuclear 9/11 by Jeff Prager

Bruecke Note: This is retroactively posted on 9/11/2012. These are extracts from the conclusions to different parts of the two eMagazine files (several hundred pages). They help prove that 9/11 was a nuclear event.

http://www.datafilehost.com/download-79644cfa.html
or "1 - 162 • 911 America Nuked.pdf" [Part 1] [86 MB]

and

http://www.datafilehost.com/download-51eec327.html
or "Prager_163 - 247 • 911 America Nuked.pdf" [Part 2]. [56 MB]

By: Jeff Prager
Date: 2012

Page 52: Part One Conclusions

1. Leukemia, non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma and Multiple Myeloma, three rare cancers, have increased dramatically and in an unprecedented number, frequency and rapidity in very young age groups never seen before.
2. All three of these cancers, increasing together in a select population have previously always indicated radiation exposure. The CDC study (K25 Workers), Chernobyl, Nagasaki and Hiroshima data are all conclusive and in agreement on this issue as well.
[See: Robert W. Miller, M.D., and William J. Blot, Ph.D., and others, US National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council, Japanese National Institute Of Health Of The Ministry Of Health And Welfare, Atomic Radiation, Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Also see Ionizing Radiation 911, parts 1, 2 and 3 linked on a previous page. Also see: CDC study of K25 workers linked previously]
3. Increases in these cancers using September 11th as the ‘start date,’ specifically and most importantly; Leukemia, non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma and Multiple Myeloma along with increases in esophageal, prostate & thyroid cancers with all of them very rapid increases often in young and otherwise healthy people indicates clearly, without ambiguity and with certainty that further study into a radioactive component of some type and design is critically required.
4. The government, in all its wisdom, decided not to cover cancer in the Zadroga Bill while cancer deaths in First Responders are exploding like the Twin Towers on 911.
5. The EPA, Congress and the military and other governmental and environmental agencies responsible for the disaster cleanup knew from the very beginning that the dust in New York City was highly toxic, caustic and contained 100s of known human poisons. Very few people knew it was radioactive. My personal opinion is that certain members of government and private organizations knew.
6. I believe it was known early on by the mainstream medical community that radiation was a factor. I emailed over 500 oncologists or people in the Oncology Departments at Sloan Kettering and Mount Sinai Hospitals, Cancer Section, with copies of pages 19-42 of the free eMagazine titled, “Dust” and I also posted it to the CDC and NISOH web sites (link for source to original ‘short’ document below) on March 14th, 2011, in a reformatted style to accommodate CDC and NIOSH web site requirements.
Source: http://www.datafilehost.com/download-94750b11.html
7. Parts 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 will show that there are and were bombs tested that were ‘salted’ such or designed such that over 97% of their radiation was eliminated from the detonation. There was radiation, but not much, not easily measurable without sophisticated equipment, certainly not with a Geiger Counter, and not long-lasting. And it wasn’t alpha, beta or gamma radiation; these are the types we usually measure. But enough to kill people, as we’re seeing now. It was neutron radiation.
8. The following chapters will prove a lot more. The reasoning by Dr. Jones and others used to explain the high levels of tritium are scientific frauds and we prove that here.
After Conclusions - Me and Dr. Jones
9. Although Dr. Jones addressed the following issues partially, loosely, imperfectly in a fragmented manner using poor science that is just good enough to fool most people, he failed to adequately and properly address the increased uranium, thorium (two elements found only in radioactive form) tritium and the high levels of zinc, barium, strontium, vanadium, and especially potassium and sodium (these 2 are crucial) among other elements found in the dust as the levels increase and decrease together across 35 sampled locations by the USGS. Dr. Jones failed to use the Product Momentum Correlation and the ‘t’ test statistic, formulas he’s intimately familiar with, to discuss the various levels of these elements as they are seen in the dust, “together”.
Nano Technology
10. Forty years of technology has come and gone since 1961 (up until 2001) so we’ll also examine nano-technology ijn susequent chapters because the nuclear industry grabbed hold of miniaturization even more quickly then the Metastable Intermolecular Compound (nanothermite or MIC) industry and well before. Why wouldn’t they? Atomic grenades were coming down the pike. It was only a matter of time. The Davy Crockett, as you’ll see in the next chapter, was a watermelon-sized nuclear bomb launched from a 3-man tripod style grenade launcher. 40 years later we have apples. But very, very special apples based on a deuterium-tritium design.
Dr. Stephen Jones himself studied Muon Catalyzed Fusion for the US Department of Energy in critical detail and is intimately knowledgeable in this area.
This report will further show that Dr. Jones’ studies in muon catalyzed fusion involved deuterium, uranium and tritium which produce uranium and tritium as a by-product of fission and fusion and were both found in high amounts in NYC. This report will suggest that Dr. Jones should be fully aware of the nuclear component to the events of 911 based on the reasoning presented herein. Since he’s obviously not and further seeks to hide the nculear component the only logical explanation is that he’s been tasked with covering it up.
11. Lawrence Livermore has a long history of developing new materials, fabrication techniques, and characterization and diagnostic methods to address the important national problems it is asked to solve. From miniaturizing nuclear weapons in the late 1950s to proving fusion ignition on a laboratory scale five decades later, Livermore’s can-do attitude consistently meets with success. 911 is certainly proof of that.

Nuclear 9/11 Dust Analysis

Bruecke Note: This is retroactively posted on 9/11/2012. It is an extract from a PDF file that correlates data from the USGS survey of the 9/11 dust to prove that 9/11 was a nuclear event.

http://www.datafilehost.com/download-b128ac41.html [8MB]

By: Jeff Prager
Date: 2012-06

The graph of Thorium versus Lithium including the Girder Coatings has exactly the same form as the graph showing Thorium versus Uranium, also including the Girder Coatings. Without the two Girder Coatings the correlation of Thorium to Lithium in the dust is completely linear.

We therefore have compelling evidence that this fission pathway of Uranium to Thorium and Helium, with subsequent decay of the Helium into Lithium, has indeed taken place. It is out of the question that all of these correlations which are the signature of a nuclear explosion could have occurred by chance. This is impossible.

The presence of rare Trace elements such as Cerium, Yttrium and Lanthanum is enough to raise eyebrows in themselves, let alone in quantities of 50ppm to well over 100ppm. When the quantities then vary widely from place to place but still correlate with each other according to the relationships expected from nuclear fission, it is beyond ALL doubt that the variations in concentration are due to that same common process of nuclear fission.

When we find Barium and Strontium present, in absolutely astronomical concentrations of over 400ppm to over 3000ppm, varying from place to place but varying in lockstep and according to known nuclear relationships – the implications are of the utmost seriousness.

The presence of Thorium and Uranium correlated to each other by a clear mathematical power relationship – and to other radionucleide daughter products – leaves nothing more to be said.

This type of data has probably never been available to the public before. It is an unprecedented insight into the action of a nuclear device. Nuclear weapon scientists around the world will have seized this data to analyze it and try and determine exactly what type of device produced it.

September 11th, 2001, was the first Nuclear event within a major United States city and a global financial center of the world and this is the biggest secret of this century, until now.

The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

2012-04-11

9/11 Nuclear Powered DEW & Video Fakery

Bruecke Note: What follows are some highlights of one-side of an intelligent exchange about 9/11 spread across a couple of forums. [Clicking on the titles expands/collapses the section; clicking on the dates takes you to the original discussion in content.]
Señor El Once is the duped useful idiot on the topics of nuclear-powered DEW [directed energy weapons] and video manipulation [pixels of planes, no real planes]. Mr. HybridRogue1 tries to dissuade Señor El Once of this view and believes that nano-thermite explains all of the destruction and after effects. Unfortunately, mathematics applied to the duration of the under-rubble hot-spots proves that massively enormous quantities of the incendiary material would be required, above and beyond what was consumed in the pulverization of the towers. Doesn't seem quite so Occam Razor, and doesn't account for the radiation measurements (and the dog-and-pony-show to get nuclear means taken off of the table.)
http://truthandshadows.wordpress.com/2012/02/27/documentary-a-noble-lie-exposes-oklahoma-city-bombing-as-government-black-op/

http://truthandshadows.wordpress.com/2012/01/11/when-did-they-know-truth-leaders-on-how-they-awakened-to-the-911-lie
By: Maxwell C. Bridges = Señor El Once
Date: 2012-04-11

9/11 Nuggets from Clues Forum

Bruecke Note: September Clues is a 9/11 rabbit hole filled with nuggets of truth that must be mined, but it is also disinformation, as indeed everything we've come to know and understand about 9/11 is in part. Our task is to mine, refine, and re-purpose those nuggets of truth. With September Clues and its clues forum, the nefarious agenda doesn't limit itself to imposing on the 9/11 imagery the distrust but verify a "Ronnie Raygun" paraphrase; no, the agenda makes clear that those making a 9/11 hypothesis based on imagery will see the voracity of that imagery cast into doubt, some valid, some not, but with the stink of taint moving all images to be thrown out.

The following is an edited and mostly one-sided rabbit-hole discussion where the forces of one alleged disinformation entity (the Clues Forum) were pitted against another alleged disinformation entity (Dr. Wood's textbook) to see if the former could find the taint in a set of images used by the latter and legitimately take down some of the latter's hypothesis. Find some taint indeed they did do to a limited degree, making a chink in the book and proving a starting point where tainted images may have duped the author of the latter, misled thinking, and entered the latter's conclusions. Further disinfo revelations of the former is how the Clues Forums works very hard to invalidate imagery leaving a large vacuum in methods deployed on 9/11 that they lamely fill with... conventional demolition and explosives.

Rather than grilling the red meat put before those Dr. Wood haters on the Clues forum, banishment was offered as a reward.

http://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?p=2365468#p2365468

By: Maxwell C. Bridges
Date: 2012-02-22

Hide All / Expand All

Herr der Elf : Red-meat for this forum

2012-02-19

by Herr der Elf February 19th, 2012, 3:00 am

To the gracious participants of the clues forum,

I respectfully ask your indulgence. I am "Herr der Elf" here, because it is easier to type than the "Señor El Once" I use over at Craig McKee's "Truth & Shadows blog" http://truthandshadows.wordpress.com/2012/01/11/when-did-they-know-truth-leaders-on-how-they-awakened-to-the-911-lie.

I am the resident champion there of both September Clues and Dr. Wood, although I do it in an admittedly left- and back-handed manner.

I objectively review all that I can; I think for myself; I stand on the shoulders of others and mine, re-fine, and re-purpose nuggets of truth from the dross of disinformation.

Disclaimer: I do not know Dr. Wood and have no association with her or her textbook; Mr. Shack I only know from cyberspace.

I have been in email contact with Mr. Shack and requested the assistance of him and the Clues Team. I am hoping that you could focus your digital-artifact-seeking-eyes on a select group of images acknowledged by everyone in the 9/11 Truth Movement... but particularly by Dr. Judy Wood.

In preparation for that, Mr. Shack sent me some links to review, which includes this very thread (the middle link to CGI COLLAPSE FOOTAGE). From Mr. Shack:

simonshack wrote:My historical outlook concerning the Judy Wood character: THE KOOKIE CLUB:
viewtopic.php?p=2365280#p2365280

Here is why I believe the Ground Zero imagery cannot be trusted: OLIVER STONE'S RUBBLE FIELD:
viewtopic.php?p=2353367#p2353367

Here is why I believe that the entire pool of WTC collapse imagery is a fraud:
CGI COLLAPSE FOOTAGE
viewtopic.php?f=17&t=802

Here is proof that the rubble imagery is also untrustworthy: FAKING THE RUBBLE
viewtopic.php?f=17&t=489

And here is further proof of the same: THE HEROIC FIREFIGHTERS
viewtopic.php?f=19&t=458

I'm sorry to have to ask you to spend time looking out all these links, but I reckon that this is a necessary requirement for anyone asking me to allow my forum to indulge in an umpteenth, circular debate of the technicalities of the WTC collapse - such as those infesting most 9/11 truth forums.

I have reviewed them (mostly). They all have merit. You have sold me on the updated "Ronnie Ray-Gun" paraphrase to distrust but verify when it comes to all 9/11 imagery.

Mr. Shack wrote:

simonshack wrote:I do believe most longtime Cluesforum members share my views about Judy Wood, i. e. - that her gatekeeping role is to uphold at all costs the credibility of the 9/11 imagery - as she specifically struggles to 'make some sense' of the physically impossible/ ridiculous visuals of the ("dustifying") tower collapses proposed by the media.

I disagree with this characterization of Dr. Wood's efforts. It can easily be proven wrong. If Dr. Wood's purpose was "to uphold... the credibility of the 9/11 imagery", then we would see all of the images that she collected re-used elsewhere. We see some, because the borrowing went from established 9/11 sources to Dr. Wood and everyone else. The more curious cases are the images that she borrows and nobody else does, like the anomalous damage to vehicles. These are avoided by the mainstream leaders of 9/11; these don't get an explanation in their versions of what happened.

The above paragraph takes nothing away from any of the discoveries of 9/11 image tainting and the possibility that tainted images made it into Dr. Wood's work (as well as everyone else's). It would be a case of Dr. Wood being duped, just like the world was duped.

In fact, it was the Anonymous Physicist who suggested that Dr. Wood's purpose was to take all of the evidence of 9/11 being a nuclear event and wrap it under some zany theme. (I use the term "nuclear event" to include potentially multiple milli-nuclear devices as well as nuclear and/or cold fusion reactors to power DEW devices.) Thus, Dr. Wood's purpose wouldn't be "to uphold... the credibility of the 9/11 imagery", but to garbage-in/garbage-out misinterpret the significance of what was depicted.

Mr. Shack, you write:

simonshack wrote:Is anyone going to tell Judy that she is looking at CGI imagery?
Needless to say, for any scientist to base a thesis on fake imagery... isn't very scientific at all!

To your first sentence: I don't have direct contact with Dr. Wood, but will mention it to those I think might.

To your second sentence: Very poor... no, "lame"... framing on your part. Did she know the images were tainted? The vast majority of the 9/11 truth movement are not suspecting image/video manipulation, so we should be gracious and give her the benefit of the doubt. Basing a scientific thesis on tainted information does indeed call the thesis into question; only after answering the "what did she know and when did she know it" questions can any sort of innocence or guilt be affixed to the scientist. So, please. Let us be courteous and mindful by separating the thesis from the scientist.

9/11 How

Bruecke Note: Updated for 9/11/2012 with Prager links at the top.

Part 1: Jeff Prager eMagazine [86MB]
Part 2: Jeff Prager eMagazine [56MB]

Credibility of Toronto 9/11 hearings jeopardized by replacing of Pentagon witness

http://truthandshadows.wordpress.com/2011/08/28/credibility-of-toronto-911-jeopardized-by-replacing-of-pentagon-witness/

By: Craig McKee
Date: 2011-08-28

It appears that the organizers of the Toronto 9/11 hearings have utterly caved to pressure and thrown fairness and common sense under the bus in the process.

April Gallop, who was injured in the Pentagon on Sept. 11, 2001 along with her infant son, has been removed from the list of witnesses at the upcoming hearings (Sept. 8-11), to be replaced by an “unconfirmed” witness. If that replacement is assigned to make the case that a 757 did, in fact, hit the Pentagon then truthers everywhere should scream bloody murder.

I really hope that the disappearance of Gallop’s name from the schedule on torontohearings.org has some innocent explanation (no official reason has been given), but I’m not optimistic. Her appearance was to have been in video form.

Quest for consensus: Toronto 9/11 hearings navigate Pentagon minefield

http://truthandshadows.wordpress.com/2011/09/05/quest-for-consensus-toronto-911-hearings-navigate-pentagon-minefield/

By: Craig McKee
Date: 2011-09-05

For Graeme MacQueen, the word is – or should be – consensus.

MacQueen, a member of the steering committee for the Toronto 9/11 Hearings (Sept. 8-11), says the event was conceived as an opportunity to reach people who are not yet convinced that 9/11 was an inside job, and to show how the evidence does not support the official story. He says the fight over whether a 757 did or did not hit the Pentagon should be put on the back burner so that the hearings can succeed in raising awareness with the public and the media.

“The movement has been tearing itself apart with respect to what hit the Pentagon,” MacQueen said in an interview. “It doesn’t make sense.”

Peeling the 9/11 Onion: Layers of Plots within Plots

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/08/14/peeling-the-911-onion-layers-of-plots-within-plots/

By: Jim Fetzer (with Preston James)
Date: 2011-08-14

One of the primary means of immobilizing the American people politically today is to hold them in a state of confusion in which anything can be believed and nothing can be known… nothing of significance, that is.– E. Martin Schotz, HISTORY WILL NOT ABSOLVE US (1996)

9/11 appears to have been a classic “false flag” operation in which an attack is planned by one source but blamed upon another. In this case, the evidence suggests neo-cons in the Department of Defense and their allies in the Mossad were actually responsible for the execution of the atrocities of 9/11. That story was buried, however, in a surfeit of alternative explanations for which the evidence was far more tenuous but which were of much greater political utility. And in each case, qualified experts uncovered evidence that induced sincere but false beliefs that they were “the real deal”.

The situation encountered with regard to 9/11 turns out to be far more sophisticated than the efforts that were made to divert attention from the conspirators in the case of the assassination of JFK, where “Track #1”, as we might call it, implicated Lee Harvey Oswald as “the lone assassin”. Track #2 suggested that he working for Fidel Castro and that Cuba had done it. Track #3 was redirected domestically to encompass the mob, while Track #4 targeted the Soviet Union. But these were superficial distractions for which most of the evidence was flimsy and inconclusive. 9/11 presents a greater challenge to unpack, because in this case, planted evidence was more extensive and appeared to be real.

9/11: A Time For Truth

http://www.activistpost.com/2011/09/911-time-for-truth.html

By: Ethan Jacobs, J.D.
Date: 2011-09-06

Now is the time to support the Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth’s 10th Anniversary Campaign by making a donation at Remember Building 7. Remember Building 7 will use the donations for a historic nationwide ad campaign in the month of October showing the American people the unmistakable footage of Building 7's demolition and forcing the mainstream media to finally discuss the issue. The campaign will be a three-pronged blitz of TV, print, and out-of-home advertising. New York City subways will be flooded with poster ads, while TV ads saturate every major cable channel. Print ads will appear in several national publications and in local newspapers in Boston, Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco and Dallas.

1,548 Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth recently released a must-see, 15-minute documentary entitled Solving the Mystery of World Trade Center 7. Why did they focus on the destruction of 47-story modern steel skyscraper WTC Building 7, which imploded despite the fact that it was not hit by a plane? Because it proves beyond any reasonable doubt that the World Trade Center buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition.

9/11 Disinformation Whores

Bruecke Note: With the 10-year anniversary of 9/11 upon us, the corporate media is continuing its conspiratorial role in keeping the world and us from the truth. A prime example is Jonathon Kay, author of Among the Truthers: A Journey Through America’s Growing Conspiracist Underground.and in my humble opinion a Jewish disinformation whore extraordinaire, who has made his rounds to various programs recently. Does he discuss legitimate points brought up by the 9/11 Truth Movement, like observable and measurable 100 feet of free-fall in WTC-7? No. Instead, he prefers ad hominem of 9/11 truthers in the form of a psychological analysis, liberally paraphrased: "9/11 Conspiracy Truthers are highly educated, rational, and fucking loony."

Mr. Kay first came to my attention as being on some sort of propaganda tour with this "On Point" NPR special program. Mr. Kay and Mr. James Meigs ( editor-in-chief of Popular Mechanics magazine and wrote forward and afterward the Popular Mechanics’ book and 9/11 hit-piece Debunking 9/11 Myths: Why Conspiracy Theories Can’t Stand Up to the Facts) were given the first 15 minutes to lay the ground work. The substitute moderator, Jane Clayson, showed her bias in the framing of her questions. The one member of the 9/11 Truth Movement she invited, Kevin Ryan, was given all of 5 minutes of air time, where he had to dodge mal-framed questions and keep our focus on salient points. Then the program returned with more Kay/Meigs over-generalizations, guilt-by-association, and smear regarding how crazy those damn 9/11 truthers are.
http://onpoint.wbur.org/2011/08/25/conspiracy-theories-and-the-sept-11-terrorist-attacks

The comments to this are starting to wane at over 3,000. On Point and NPR were taken to task for this dreadful hatchet job.

We should be learning with someone like Mr. Kay, whenever they say something like "it wasn't Israel and that just shows the level of bigoted jew-hating in the 9/11 Truth Movement", by golly, that is a flag to look into Israel and certainly Mossad's potential role.

Canadian Public Broadcasting was in the tour. Canadian Public Broadcasting TV Station TVO Interviewed AE911Truth's Richard Gage, AIA, Barrie Zwicker (Towers of Deception), Author Paul Zarembka on the program "The Agenda" with Steve Paikin.

The first part is all Mr. Jonathon Kay, and he doesn't disappoint in giving wave-off's where he doesn't want the public to look, like into Mossad. He does his best to frame 9/11 Truthers. The first part lays the propaganda on so heavy, it is hard to stomach, but worth viewing to learn all of the areas where he doesn't want the public to look.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Imj7GwcFW1E&feature=player_embedded

Of course, Mr. Kay gets his clock cleaned in part 2.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dHbZi80IBNU&feature=player_embedded

Steve Paikin, the moderator, showed where his biases lie in the framing of his questions and trying to corner certain panelists (e.g., Paul Zarembka) into donning labels, that while true are also loaded.

Mr. Gage did the best at steering the discussion to rational areas. However, they program did not purchase enough satellite time, so he was out of the picture for the later discussions.

Barrie Zwicker did the best job of clean Mr. Kay's clock. However, he weakened his argument by taking Mr. Kay's book personally. Although this was justified, Mr. Zwicker's focus on himself prevented him from enlightening us to the lies of Mr. Kay that were larger in nature.

Mr. Kay has been elsewhere on his media tour. The trend line involves how Mr. Kay frames 9/11 truthers as crazy, frames opponents as "jew haters", etc. He is such an overt example of Cass Sunstein influence.

The New 9/11 Bait and Switch?

http://www.pakalertpress.com/2011/07/21/the-new-911-bait-and-switch/

By: Zen Gardner
Date: 2011-07-21

This clip below is from Vanity Fair, of all things. It claims that the ties of 9/11 to Saudi Arabia are not just notable, but makes the case that those connections were deliberately skirted by the Bush administration following the infamous false flag attack, throughout the investigation and that there could be something big to it.

Zionist Rulers of Saudi Arabia

Duh. But nice to see someone investigating this, and they do a pretty good job….maybe.

The MSM hardly EVER touches the fact that there are huge doubts about and gaping holes in the 9/11 NWO takeover exercise cover-up story. So what are they up to?

Take a look. The only time the MSM injects some truth is to direct, that is mis-direct, public attention from the real issue or culprit and to attempt to defuse growing discontent. Anyone doing any serious research on the events of 9/11 will come to the conclusion that it was carried out by an Israeli-American cabal–at the least, and that virtually nothing adds up to give any indication whatsoever that the official story has any basis in fact.

Talk about conspiracy theory. The powers that be take the cake. Every time.

9/11: Inside Story on the Missing Tapes - This is a mind blower!!!

Vatic Note: This is a MUST read if you had any doubts about who did 9-11. This will solve that problem promptly. What a hero this woman is. My only question is, "Why is she still alive to continue to spill the beans?" No one else was afforded that luxury. Interesting.

Bruecke Note (2011-08-03 9:11): Vatic stole my thunder that was in the publishing queue for 2011-08-11. With the cat out of the bag, I move my note here to this version of the re-posted article.

This article exposes some nuggets of truth in the form of the security tapes at the WTC. If I have a point of contention, it would be the emphasis on "controlled demolition" and "nano-thermite." Yes, the demolition was indeed controlled, but in my hair-splitting here it is that "controlled demolition" as a phrase takes on its own connotations and meaning implying conventional mechanisms. Not that the NIST report is good for much, but their debunking of controlled demolition based on the decibel signatures of the collapse is begrudgingly somewhat valid; they wouldn't have used such a lame argument if they didn't have it on good authority that conventional mechanisms weren't deployed.

The article's foray into nano-thermite, which for all I know was indeed found in the dust, is how the message is steered from conventional mechanisms towards exotic mechanisms, whereby nano-thermite is implied as being the primary destructive mechanism. "Stop. Go no further. Limit your definition of exotic to thermite."

Alas, from my research and understanding, I think that nano-thermite was a secondary mechanism, possibly used to cut the bolts connecting the pre-assembled steel wall panels to one another that we see falling to the ground and on the ground in neat sections. So, as the article states, crews working regular graveyard hours over the course of a few weeks could accomplish this task.

The pulverization of concrete, drywall, and office content I believe were caused by directed energy weapons (one placed high and another low.) They turned residual water molecules in content instantly into steam whose rapidly expanding volume blew apart content, turning it into pulverized dust and steam. The energy source for DEW may have been nuclear which would thereby account for the residual radiation measured at the WTC. Because the nuclear mechanism was an energy source for DEW as opposed to a destructive bomb, its radiation signature was different from that of a nuclear blast and allowed govt agents to frame this as not being a nuclear weapon.

9/11: Inside Story on the Missing Tapes
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/08/01/127327/
The Missing Security Tapes from the World Trade Center
by Susan Lindauer, former U.S. Asset and 9/11 Whistleblower, Veterans Today on line
8/1/11

Late on the night of August 23, 2001, at about 3 a.m. security cameras in the parking garage of the World Trade Center captured the arrival of two or three truck vans.

Visual examination determined the vans were separate and unique from trucks used by janitorial services, including different colors and devoid of markings. More curious, all the janitorial trucks had pulled out of the Towers by about 2:30 a.m—about half an hour before the second set of vans arrived.
According to my high level State Department source with a top security clearance, who disclosed the unusual nightly activity, no vans matching that description had entered the World Trade Center at such an hour in any of the weeks or months prior to that date. It was a unique event.

Security cameras caught the vans leaving the Towers at approximately 5 a.m—before the first wave of AAA personality types on Wall Street, driving Mercedes and BMWs, arrived to track the markets.

Pages

2023-11-11

9/11 FGNW Exotic Nuclear Weapons

2018-02-17

9/11 FGNW Prima Facie Case

2018-02-11

Episode 308 – 9/11 Trillions: Follow The Money

2016-03-13

2013-12-09

1. Introduction

Nuclear weapons were used on 9/11

Executive Summary

2012-12-21

2012-09-11

2012-04-11

2012-03-12

Herr der Elf : Red-meat for this forum

2012-02-19

2011-09-11

2011-08-03