Alert: Palestine is Finally Here! 5 Shots In Back At Close Range, Helmet Cam Footage Shows Cops Murder A Man For “Illegally Camping”

*** they have taken this down 3 times now since I put  it up at around 3:15.  They do not want us to know about the connection of all these murders of our citizens, unarmed, elderly, children, and unarmed women, to the Israeli training program for "MILITARIZING" OUR LAW ENFORCEMENT because  soldiers are refusing to fire upon Americans, unlike our law enforcement.  they are going to have to choose soon, because paybacks are hell.  

5 Shots In Back At Close Range, Helmet Cam Footage Shows Cops Murder A Man For “Illegally Camping”

Vatic Note:  Nothing has made me madder than watching this murder of this 40 year old homeless man who was unarmed.  We have another blog coming up  in which we discover that these cops who are being "miliarized" are being trained by Israel in Israel, and that is why we are seeing all these murders of unarmed, and harmless people that these cops, if they were normal cops trained as our cops used to be,  would have had no problem bringing him down and arresting him without undue violence, so its part intentionally of the intimidation process.

He was "HOMELESS", OLDER, and loaded down with equipment.  They had a dog who could have  brought him down by himself if necessary.  Now I know why they started out earlier with the taser guns.  It was to desensitize these cops in shooting other non dangerous citizens, and the purpose is to teach the average citizen to obey unquestioningly, orders given by authority figures.  Israel's IDF are cowards, and so badly so, that they aim their guns at 4 year old kids who are unarmed. This is who is training our cops. Are they making cowards out of our cops? We have never seen anything like this and we should make sure those cops know that it will not go unanswered.  Time to beware.

From now on we need to start taking these cops names and identifying where they live, IF THAT IS THE WAY THEY WANT TO PLAY IT.  If they are no longer peace officers here to protect us, the public, rather, to repress us as a police state, than its time to change the rules of the game for sure.  NM does not surprise me.   They have more globalists that come from NM than any other state.   Well, maybe New York is worse, since Bloomberg did the same thing in sending NY cops to Tel Aviv  for training on civilian populations.

If there was any doubt about Israel, khazars, zionists and Rothschild, this should end it now.  They are the foreign occupiers of our government, through blackmail, bribes, and threats, along with assassinations. Ask Wellstone.  Our reps are now afraid to stand for our Constitution and our people.   Fear can work both ways if necessary.   Where do those dual Israeli citizens live???  Just asking. Anybody can shoot anybody in the back.... regardless of who you are.

5 Shots In Back At Close Range, Helmet Cam Footage Shows Cops Murder A Man For “Illegally Camping” 
admin, Liberty Crier,  March 23, 2014


James M. Boyd seemed to think he had a deal. The 38-year-old homeless man – whose illegal camping in the foothills had drawn Albuquerque police – told officers on Sunday that he was ready to walk off the mountain. Instead, he was carried off, fatally wounded after officers opened fire.

Boyd, in a long confrontation with police, ended up face down in the dirt, a splotch of blood visible on his back, a police dog on his leg. He held a knife in each hand. But before that, there appeared to be a chance he’d cooperate, according to video released by APD on Friday.

“All right, don’t change up the agreement,” Boyd says, as officers have their guns trained on him. “I’m going to try to walk with you.” Boyd picks up his backpack and belongings, and he looks ready to start walking. There are no knives in his hands at this point. “Do it!” an officer says on the video.

A flash-bang device is thrown at Boyd’s feet, disorienting him. Officers yell at him to get on the ground, and a dog and officer approach him. Boyd takes two knives out of his pockets and appears to wave them. Then Boyd starts turning away from the officers. That’s when shots ring out and he hits the ground. Officers continue to yell at him to drop the knives. “Please don’t hurt me anymore. I can’t move,” Boyd says as he lies on the ground.

Officers fire bean-bag rounds at him as he’s on the ground, then let loose a police dog, which grabs his leg and shakes it. He doesn’t move. Then officers approach and cuff him, blood on the rock above him. He died the next day at the hospital.

Read more at http://libertycrier.com/helmet-cam-footage-shows-cops-murder-man-illegally-camping/#juyBzPIrBPV33FQj.99

The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.


Vatic Note:  The reason is easily seen,  this film they are discussing, interferes with the ADL khazars plans for depopulation.  Its not only about killing off the elderly, or the permanently handicapped, but to also  reduce dramatically the rate of births to replace those that die.  What better way than through Sterilization (Gates) and abortion (ADL).  They have it written in the protocols their disdain for the goyim and use of violence to affect the change they want.

Just  read that Abe is retiring in 2015 and he just announced his retirement.  He is not the problem, its mossad sticking in agents to the ADL and the SPLC to spy on Americans and other nations.   Also, he has no business sticking his non resident/non citizen nose in our affairs.  Below it shows that these khazars holy books say that its the khazars duty to fully exterminate all goyim.  That explains the 63 million Christians they murdered in Russia, and 3 million in Germany.

He uses his lobbying power, money for campaigns and influence that should make him register as a foreign agent.  He sits on our Homeland Security citizens board.  Remember its DHS that does  those drills at the same time the actual terrorist attack is occurring.  Israel perfected that technique. Read this below and see just how much they disdain us gentiles.

Given all of this above, it does not surprise me that he has used that old worn out canard about the holocaust that has had more holes put into it, then an old worn out shoe. Turns out the Zionists had a big role in the holocaust which was exposed by the real Jews holy Rabbi, in a letter he wrote in 1948.  No wonder he is retiring.  Every time he opens his mouth he proves those right who say he is simply shoring up the elements of his agenda for depopulation of the goyim and this is one of them.

I admit it, I was one of Israel's staunchest supporters most of my life, until I read what they did to the USS liberty and 9-11, and that ended also when I found out they are not Jews and treat those who are, as cattle and beat them whenever they can.   The real Jews have had to seek asylum in London and New York.   Israel is not the Khazars land.  It belongs to the real Jews and Palestinians.  Its ironic, those who believe him anymore are decreasing rapidly.  Its all "DECEPTION".   After reading this, I now understand those khazars who believe they are better than any goyim on the planet.

By Rev. Ted Pike, 14 Nov 11
                                                          ADL director Abraham Foxman
Abe Foxman, director of the Jewish Anti-Defamation League, has been working for years to defame Christian conservatives as anti-Semites.
He has finally gotten their attention by claiming that Ray Comfort’s powerful, pro-life film 180 insults the memory of Jewish holocaust dead. Foxman calls it “one of the most offensive and outrageous abuses of the memory of the Holocaust we have seen in years.”
Filmmaker Ray Comfort, who is himself Jewish, struggles to understand Foxman’s rage. His film does honor the Jewish dead. It affirms the establishment dogma that 6 million Jews were systematically murdered by the Nazis and decries modern ignorance of it. Comfort and evangelical pro-lifers are predominantly pro-Israel.
Comfort is astonished that ADL considers his film “perverse.” ADL's press release says that "to consider the killing of innocent Jews during the holocaust to be the same as the killing of fetuses" is "a cynical abuse of the memory" of those Jews killed in the Holocaust.
Why do ADL/Foxman consider the film so disrespectful? Foxman says it tries “to assert a moral equivalency between the Holocaust and abortion.” In other words, he objects because this film makes the slaughter of 54,000,000 babies in America as evil as the genocide of 6 million Jews.  (VN : What the author misses here is the fact that Abe is comparing 54,000,000 goyim babies "....which are not worth the life of one Khazar"  and that is why he is mad.  That is what these khazars always say. )
More to the point, Comfort considers the deaths and sufferings of Gentiles as important as that of Jews. It appears that to Foxman, only Jewish suffering is really worthy of lament and memorial. He does not consider death for hundreds of millions of Gentile babies worldwide (which he denigrates as "fetuses") to be important – certainly not “equivalent” to Jewish deaths.
Judaism’s (VN: khazars) Sacred Hatred
As a devout Orthodox Jew (See ADL's Foxman: Man of Faith?) Foxman accepts the ethics of modern Judaism’s sacred texts – the Talmud and Zohar (Kabbalah) – not the Bible.  (VN: The real Jews use the Bible's old Testament, and the Torah.  They do not use the Babylonian Talmud pagan document that says you cannot rape a child under 3.5 years old.) These are the most important authorities of Judaism. Shocking but true, they say the life of a Gentile has virtually no value compared to that of a Jew. The Talmud says “the seed of a goy is worth the same as that of a beast.”(1) (Kuthuboth 3b)
The Talmud teaches that the Jew is inherently pure compared to a Gentile. Chagigah 15b says the sins of a Jew cannot contaminate him any more than dirt on the shell of a nut. (2) The Talmud says a Gentile “who strikes an Israelite acts as if he slaps the face of God’s divine majesty.” (3) (Sanhedrin 58b). A Gentile is not a “man.” The Talmud says in Kerithoth 6b:
“Ye are my flock, the flock of my pasture are men.” (Ezekiel 34:31) You are thus called men, but the goyim [Gentiles] are not called men. (4)
God created them in the form of men for the glory of Israel . . .for the sole end of ministering unto them [the Jews] day and night. Nor can they ever be relieved of this service. It is becoming to the son of a king [an Israelite] that animals in their natural form and animals in the form of human beings should minister unto him. (5) (Midrash Talpioth, folio 225a)."
As a result, the Jewish Encyclopedia, pg. 176, repeats as fact a benediction from the Talmud, “Blessed be thou who hast not made me a goy.”
The Zohar, the Talmud’s mystical companion, dehumanizes non-Jews still more.

Skull and Bones Society

Vatic Note:  Remember, JFK gave a very  direct and accurate speech in 1961, warning us about secret societies and their intentions, through international sources,  to bring down the United States of America.  He began dismantling this conspiracy and he was killed before he could finish.  This is one of those secret societies he talked about and it was one of the most powerful ones around.   How do we know?  

Read this below and see how many of the very few members of that group, made it into the White House, Congress, and the administration, over these many years and over many administrations, regardless of left or right.   Further, they infiltrate every occupation on the planet that directly affects the global agenda, science,  university professors,  military, intel,  etc.  JFK listed them out for us. 

These exposes are not "fast food reads",  they require a commitment on your part, to discovering and exposing the truth.  So far we have had no one counter the evidence we have discovered about these groups, secret societies,  global plans to dominate the planet, using these secret societies to act as a shadow government within governments.   

That is how they are able to conspire, coordinate, plan, carry out those plans through "need to know" protocols for those they control within the government.  Its ingenius, actually.  Psychopathic, yes, but brilliant just the same.  Too bad they lack basic humanity, or they could  have done great things for the nations they came from.  

They have a weakness and they are so arrogant, they never try to find out what it is.  That weakness results in their "NEVER" retaining control over these many thousands of years and never achieving the global dominance they aspire to.  And you can see it coming again.  Already they are having trouble.... nukes that won't work,  bugs that are not killing masses of population, etc.  So, they need to identify why they fail so often. 

Skull and Bones Society
by Eric Dubay, Bibliotecapleyades

The Skull and Bones secret society was officially founded at Yale University in 1832, but finds its roots in German Freemasonry, and takes its symbology from the Pirates/Brotherhood of Death.

Like the Masons, Bonesmen choose their own initiates, and the only way to enter the Brotherhood is to be “tapped” by an existing member.

Only 15 members are accepted each year which is absolutely amazing considering the number of important historical figures who just happen to be Skull and Bonesmen.

For instance, U.S. Presidents William H. Taft, George Herbert Walker Bush, and George Walker Bush were all three members of Skull and Bones.


The following U.S. Senators: Prescott Bush, John Kerry, David Boren, Jonathan Bingham, John Chaffe, John Sherman Cooper, James Buckley, Chauncey Depew, Frank Bosworth Brandegee, Robert A. Taft, William Maxwell Evarts, and John Heinz were all Skull and Bonesmen.


Governors Averill Harriman, William Bissell, William Henry Gleason, Simeon Eben Baldwin, and David Boren were Bonesmen and so were Congressmen Frank Bosworth Brandegee, Howard M. Baldrige, and Jonathan Brewster Bingham.


Supreme Court Justices Morrison Waite, Potter Stewart, William Taft, Simeon Eben Baldwin, and Edward Baldwin Whitney were all Bones brothers.


Also Pierre Jay, the first chairman of the New York Federal Reserve, and George L. Harrison, president of the NY Federal Reserve, were both Bonesmen.

“Investigations revealed that the main purpose of the Skull and Bones is to get as many embers as possible into strategically placed positions of power. Robbins stated that President Bush has ‘tapped’ five Bonesmen to join his administration. One of them is current Securities and Exchange Commissioner William Donaldson (Class of 1953). Donaldson will answer no questions about the Bones.”
Fritz Springmeier, “Bloodlines of the Illuminati

Right down the line almost every Bonesman has proven unbelievably successful in his chosen profession.

The Truth About the Drug Companies: How They Deceive Us and What to Do About It

Vatic Note:  Well, its about time the industry began truth assessment from within instead of just from outside the industry.   Having said that, what we have posted over time about the health care industry, drugs, and vaccines, have proven that whatever harm is being done, is being done intentionally to use soft kill in population reduction.

These "Skull and Bones" graduates, are in medicine and drug companies as much as they are in government.   Same with other industries, so they are fulfilling their agenda through a variety of secret societies and JFK warned us about that and he said "They are ruthless and brutal".

Then read the protocols where they clearly state that using violence on the population is a must since the masses only understand and respond as desired when violence is the tool used to control. Keep all that in mind as you read this. 

Its like passing laws forcing the population to wear "seatbelts", but when you take a hard look at the new vehicles being produced, low to the ground, fibreglass bodies, not steel, and small in size, then add in the seat belt to keep the driver and passanger in place no matter what, its a guaranteed death trap.

Population reduction through manipulation of the materials used, design choice of close to the ground, while trucks are up high, and finally, the  seat belt to ensure you are kept in place, that is a guaranteed death penalty for wearing it.  That is called a "soft kill" technique.  Its intentional and planned that way. Safety be damned.

We are being betrayed all over the place, in our air, water, food, and now drug safety.   We should not be subjected to the ads these drug companies run.  Doctors know what is good for us, not the drug companies.

Let me tell you why this is happening..... we are converting our economy from a manufacturing/agricultural base to a "create false needs" economy since all manufacturing and agriculture has gone overseas  to South America for farming and asia for manufacturing.  Unless we decide to voluntarily become a slave country, there will be no more manufacturing jobs here.  What does that leave us?  

We need sick people  to raise the GDP in the medical profession, we need war to increase profits in ag and  manufacturing.  WE need crimes so privately owned prisons can make profits, hire in local and state communities to provide jobs for locals to keep us happy, and working.   That is exactly why our legislature was pushed to make many civil offenses, criminal.  

We have the largest prison population in the world.   Why?  Because civil offenses are now crimes and prison is now the penalty  Example:   IRS  was civil and used to be heard by a tax court with civil penalties, but now, criminal.  Same with criminalizing drug use.   I am waiting for Jay walking to be a death penalty offense.  Just think about all the chemicals the illum families could sell  with such an increase in death penalty offenses.      

Health Corruption Top MD Reveals Corruption in Health Care
by admin,  Want To Know

The Truth About the Drug Companies: How They Deceive Us and What to Do About It

"The combined profits for the ten drug companies in the Fortune 500 ($35.9 billion) were more than the profits for all the other 490 businesses put together ($33.7 billion) [in 2002]. Over the past two decades the pharmaceutical industry has moved very far from its original high purpose of discovering and producing useful new drugs. 

Now primarily a marketing machine to sell drugs of dubious benefit, this industry uses its wealth and power to co-opt every institution that might stand in its way, including the US Congress, the FDA, academic medical centers, and the medical profession itself."
    -- Dr. Marcia Angell, former editor in chief of the New England Journal of Medicine on health corruption

In this book, her most recent, Marcia Angell explores pharmaceutical research, deplores the rapidly expanding involvement (and distortion of truth) of Big Pharma, and implores us all (physicians, patients, politicians) to do something about it. The dust-jacket blurb asserts that Angell, "during her two decades at The New England Journal of Medicine had a front-row seat on the growing corruption of the pharmaceutical industry." 

Since leaving the Journal, she's gone behind the curtains of Big Pharma, Big University, and Big Faculty. Drawing on her own work and on her thoughtful analysis of research, company financial statements, and investigative reports into drug development and marketing, Angell writes with the unambiguous and unyielding style that Journal readers came to expect and trust.

The current slide toward the commercialization and corruption of clinical research coincided with the election of President Ronald Reagan in 1980 and the passage of the Bayh-Dole Act, a new set of laws that permitted and encouraged universities and small businesses to patent discoveries from research sponsored by the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Research paid for by the public to serve the public instantly became a private, and salable good – one that is producing drug sales of more than $200 billion a year.

Commercialization had both specific and broad effects. Readers of this journal and others are familiar with investigations into the control that research sponsors at pharmaceutical companies exert on the design and analysis of clinical trials (including the distortion of primary outcome measures in trials) and the issue of reporting, nonreporting, and biased reporting of results. 

Angell reminds us of the increasingly cozy relationships between big industry and the faculties of universities. Not only are narcissistic donors renaming the medical schools; they are buying access to the best minds of their faculties. Angell's examples of the large consulting fees paid by industry to individual faculty members and to NIH scientists and directors are astounding.

The broader effects are felt in the commercialization of universities, medical faculties, and our profession. In 2000, in a letter written in response to Angell's Journal editorial, "Is Academic Medicine for Sale?" a reader supplied the answer: "No. The current owner is very happy with it." The increasing intrusion of industry into medical education and the almost complete domination of continuing medical education (especially regarding drugs) by the marketing departments of large pharmaceutical companies are a scandal.

The same companies also spend heavily to lobby governments. According to Angell, Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, the pharmaceutical industry's U.S. trade association has "the largest lobby in Washington," which in 2002 employed 675 lobbyists (including 26 former members of Congress) at a cost of more than $91 million. The result has been above-average growth in corporate profits during both Republican and Democratic administrations. 

The most recent and perplexing lobbying effort caused Congress explicitly to prohibit Medicare from using its huge purchasing power to get lower prices for drugs, thus opening up a dollar pipeline, in the form of higher drug prices, directly from taxpayers to corporate coffers. These changes, along with the cave-in by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1997 that permitted direct-to-consumer advertising to bypass mention in their ads of all but the most serious side effects, have further augmented profits. The overall effect has been a corruption not only of science but also of the dissemination of science.

Angell documents that, contrary to what they claim, large pharmaceutical companies have "paltry output" in innovative research. In fact, as permitted by Bayh-Dole, pharmaceutical companies buy discoveries coming out of the basic-science enterprises, including universities and publicly funded granting agencies. 

The real costs of research on drugs by pharmaceutical companies are much less than the oft-quoted $800 million or so per new drug brought to market. Most of their research is on me-too drugs – unoriginal, tax-deductible (and thus paid for in lost taxes by the public), and mostly unnecessary. The Big Pharma companies are, in essence, manufacturing and marketing companies.

Angell's concluding chapter, the least convincing in an otherwise fascinating and penetrating book, contains the solutions, all of them predictable: control me-too drugs, re-empower the FDA, oversee Big Pharma's clinical research, curb patent length and abuse, keep Big Pharma out of medical education, make company financial statements transparent (so we can tell what the costs of research really are, as distinct from marketing), and impose price controls or guidelines. 

Granted, the problems are so prevalent and the corporate tentacles so entwined with our way of being that it is hard to see what else to recommend.

But perhaps Angell is right. We must change the way we manage research and the development and distribution of new drugs. Not only are health and health care at risk, but so are the research enterprise and the reputations of universities and governments. The integrity of scientific research is too important to be left to the invisible hand of the marketplace.

Book review written by John Hoey, M.D., former editor-in-chief of the Canadian Medical Association Journal

The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.


Hitler’s Jewish Soldiers (Part I): A Very Complex Issue.

Vatic Note: What a fascinating presentation and revelation about who were the so called "problem Jews" in Germany during this WW II period of time. This is an excellent research and write up by Jonas Alexis of Veterans today.   How did these "Jews"  find their way into Hitler's army?  It turns out that the problem Jews discussed below were the Khazars, especially the money changers.  

The dispora Jews, and those khazars who were truly converted, joined to fight the enemies of Germany and that "enemy" included the pagan khazars that migrated in from the east. You will recognize that when you read the description of where they came from originally and the harm they did that turned off the German population.   They had a history of doing that everywhere they migrated to, even from Mongolia where they got kicked out, and into khazaria where they did even worse. 

What is also obvious is "its what is happening right now in the entire world  with their racism and disdain for anyone not khazarian and that includes real Jews".  Notice below their deep involvement in Communism, which is what is happening here, and their attack on Christianity.  Hitler's reaction to them was more about the communism they were trying to promote than about their race per se.  Rather it was their behavior.

What an amazing realization it is to discovered this piece of history  that no one ever writes about  or talks about. What I realized with this piece below is that the entire issue of "Nazi Germany and the "Jews" was a whole lot more complicated than I had ever realized.  I have lived a long time and this  is the first exposure I have had to this kind of information with respect to WW II and the so called Nazis.  Its a lot more complicated than I realized.  Its also playing out here, exactly the same way today, that it did in WW II.  Its strange to see it so clearly. 

I found this so fascinating that I had to put it up for public view.   Please take the time to read this.   Its leading us further forward to realize just how strong the connection is between the German royal family of Britain who are khazars,  and the khazars in  Germany during WW II, since it was Britain that wanted Germany economically brought down so Britain could dominate the foreign trade economy in Europe.

And Remember, Rothschild is khazar, so he had no love lost for anyone but his own people  and elite class that these khazars married into.  We did a slew of blogs on this subject. And now we all know that Rothschild runs Britain and is now trying to run the world through his non-geographic country comprised of secret governments within governments of most nations to garner control and eventually domination of the globe.  It all fits and hasn't changed since WW II.

Hitler’s Jewish Soldiers (Part I)

A few days ago, Paul Kendal of the British newspaper the Telegraph wrote that in 1941 a medical officer by the name of Major Leo Skurnik received an Iron Cross from the German high command. Skurnik happened to be a Jew (VN: Khazar). Kendal wrote,
“And Skurnik was not the only Jew fighting on the side of the Germans. More than 300 found themselves in league with the Nazis when Finland, who had a mutual enemy in the Soviet Union, joined the war in June 1941.”[1]

Yet Kendal, without serious self-examination, propounded, “The alliance between Hitler and the race he vowed to annihilate — the only instance of Jews fighting for Germany’s allies — is one of the most extraordinary aspects of the Second World War, and yet hardly anyone, including many Finns, know anything about it.”[2]

The serious historical questions which Kendal failed to posit and which are largely and sometimes deliberately ignored by the Holocaust establishment are simply these: If Hitler’s goal was to annihilate an entire race, how is it possible that there were thousands upon thousands of people of Jewish descent in Nazi Germany?

Is it historically and intellectually satisfying to maintain both contradictory positions at the same time and in the same respect? Is it rationally sound to say that those Jewish people were simply dupes and simply didn’t know Hitler’s real intention? Didn’t they know that their ultimate doom was concentration camps? What actually made them join the Third Reich?

Those are some of the many questions that I asked one writer who happened to publish a widely read book on Nazi Germany. The book is published by the University of California.

In our long private conversation, he kept positing that it was Hitler’s intent to exterminate the Jews of Europe, but throughout his analysis, he failed to seriously deal with the puzzling situation that people of Jewish descent in Nazi Germany posed a serious threat to the prevailing thesis that the Hitler wanted to exterminate all Jews of Europe.

Jewish historian Walter Laqueur attempted to answer this nagging dichotomy last year. He admitted that there were indeed people of Jewish descent in Nazi Germany, but argued that 
“Nazi policy toward half- and quarter-Jews (Mischlinge of the first and second degree) was contradictory and changed over time. Half-Jews who were not brought up as Jews (Geltungsjuden) were not deported and killed: There were legal problems, and Hitler, who did not want to be bothered by lawyers, declared that he would take a binding decision only after the final victory.
“Those of military age had to serve in the army both at the beginning of the war and its end when the armed forces were depleted. But in between they were excluded from military service, and they were not permitted to serve in positions of command.”[3]
Is this historically accurate? What, then, is the background of all these complex issues and how can one confront some of the prevailing claims of the Holocaust establishment?

Jewish historian Bryan Mark Rigg maintains in his study Hitler’s Jewish Soldiers that “numerous areas relating to the Holocaust and the Nazi era in general remain largely unexplained or poorly understood.”[4]

These areas are poorly understood because theories that are inconsistent with the prevailing vision of the Holocaust establishment—even when based on historical documentation—are dismissed without examination. It is no accident that Laqueur called Rigg’s study “malevolent, more often ignorant, and breathtakingly obtuse in its conclusions.”[5]

Much of Rigg’s sources are from archival documents and personal interviews with those who said they were of Jewish descent in Nazi Germany, but since Laqueur does not seem to be interested in serious research like this, he dismisses Rigg by name-calling.

Rigg argues that “tens of thousands of men of Jewish descent served in the Wehrmacht during Hitler’s rule,” and according to his best estimate, the number of soldiers of Jewish extraction—a group he terms Mischlinge—was more than 150,000.[6] He warns readers, however, that:
“previous estimates varied and future scholars may devise more advanced computations to produce a more precise figure. All such efforts should lead to the same significant conclusion: the number of Mischlinge in the Wehrmacht was far greater than anyone previously imagined.”[7]
Albert S. Lindemann
Officers such as Bernhard Losener were well aware that if Hitler “treated half-Jews as Jews, the armed forces would probably lose 45,000 soldiers.”[8]

Hitler “allowed some Mischlinge to apply for exemptions under section 7 of the supplementary decrees of November 1935. In some cases, if Hitler approved, the Mischlinge was allowed to call himself or herself an Aryan.”[9]

Similarly, Jewish historian Sarah Gordon notes,

“In Germany some Jews even supported Hitler despite his anti-Semitism…Max Naumann, the head of the Association of German National Jews, ardently solicited support from the Nazi party after Hitler had come to power, pointing out the national loyalty of his members and their service to the German nation.
“Gerhart Hauptmann, a Nobel Prize recipient for literature, even voted for Hitler. Many Jews were quite comfortable living in Germany despite latent anti-Semitism, whether intellectual or social.”[10]

Hitler “played a direct role” in allowing such Jews to remain in his service.[11] Those Mischlinge families “had lived in Germany for generations, and most had lost all contact with their Jewish heritage. They had helped develop German society, fought in her wars, and furthered her culture. Some had not known of their Jewish heritage until Hitler came to power.”[12]

Historian Albert S. Lindemann of the University of California states that some Jews supported the Third Reich “at its creation; they had prospered materially in it, and they remained reticent to criticize it in a fundamental way.”[13]

What’s more startling is that Hitler “even allowed some to become high-ranking officers. Generals, admirals, navy ship captains, fighter pilots, and many ordinary soldiers served with Hitler’s personal approval.”[14] More importantly,“Many German Jews and Mischlinge thought that Hitler based his anti-Semitic tirades on Ostjuden [German and Eastern Jews] who had emigrated from the ‘land of Bolshevism.’ (VN:  These are the Khazars, or Ashkenazi Jews, who were not real Jews.)

The Nazis reinforced this preconception when they issued decrees against Ostjuden in 1933 and later when they forced eighteen thousand of them to leave the Reich in 1938.....                                            
Howard M. Sachar

“Dr. Max Naumann, a Jew and a retired World War I army major and founder of the militant right-wing organization of National German Jews, wrote Hitler on 20 March 1935 that he and his followers had fought to keep Ostjuden out of Germany. Naumann felt that these ‘hordes of half-Asian Jews’ were ‘dangerous guests’ in Germany and must be ‘ruthlessly expelled.’”[15]

Academically and economically, those Ostjuden made little progress largely because they learned “Polish Talmudic barbarism, as contrasted with refined German Bildung (education).”[16] Lindemann writes that
“Western Jews often described Ostjuden as parasitic and filled with hatred of non-Jews, those specifically Jewish qualities that were the source of the most insistent and hostile remarks by anti-Semites about Jews generally.”[17]

The Ostjuden were humiliated by the German Jews, who viewed them as “irrational, mystical,” and believed that their “superstitious religion…no longer had a place in a world based on reason and scientific knowledge.”[18]

Therefore, for the fully assimilated German Jews, “Hitler’s anti-Semitism” was “a reaction to the culture of the Ostjuden.”[19] Karl Marx himself despised the Ostjuden.[20] (VN: These were the khazars)

It was no accident, then, that a group of wealthy intellectual Jews who were already immersed in Enlightenment thought and practice would despise some German Jews because of their “primitive lifestyle.”[21]

Wolf Zuelzer, “a 75 percent Jew,” declared that “for the majority of German Jews, the Orthodox Ostjuden dressed in his caftan, fur hat and ritual side-locks was a frightening apparition from the Dark Ages.”[22]

As a result, at the dawn of the twentieth century, “many of the local Jewish communities in Germany refused to allow Eastern Jews to vote in community elections on the grounds that they were not German nationals.”[23]

Robert Braun, a Mischlinge, noted, “Generally, Mischlinge are very anti-Semitic.”[24] Unsurprisingly, a number of Jewish groups strongly supported National Socialism, because they saw the Ostjuden
“as a grave danger to their social standing who, if allowed to stay in Germany, would only intensify anti-Semitic feelings. In several public statements during the 1920s and 1930s, liberal German Jews labeled Ostjuden ‘inferior’ and asked for state assistance to combat their immigration…Robert Braun recalled that his Jewish father, Dr. R. Leopold Braun, was an anti-Semite who did not like Ostjuden.”[25]

Declassified Documents, CIA Chief, Top Generals on Remote Viewing

Vatic Note:  Remote Viewing was developed first by the Russians many years ago along with other psychic programming.  We pooh-poohed it  for a long time, but now the CIA and military have caught up with the Russians.  After reading this, I wondered,  hmmm, is this connected in anyway with "psychic powers"?  If so do we have to be psychic to do remote viewing or does remote viewing make us psychic???

The other question we have to ask is "Is this real?"  You will find that the author below questioned that as well.   Did the government hide this program or was it a set up to keep us distracted?   I dont' know yet, but I believe its sufficient to put up for consideration.  There is no way to know at this point without firm confirmation.  It could be a ploy to make us believe they can watch us from far away which would make us behave that would save them a ton of money on military, intel, private contractors, etc, since we would be watching ourselves.

I find that to be very plausible, knowing just how deceitful these people are.  It makes our job a lot harder when you don't know what is disinfo and what is real and they are trying to hide what is real under a disinfo tag.   Its a lot harder.  Will continue to pursue this and will post when I find out more.  

Declassified Documents, CIA Chief, Top Generals on Remote Viewing
by Admin,  "Want to Know"

What is Remote Viewing?

Remote viewing involves a set of precise protocols used by the U.S. military and CIA to develop psychic spies. As bizarre as it may seem, through remote viewing and other secret projects, the U.S. government has dabbled in ESP and the psychic realm for many decades. Though the existence of remote viewing projects was officially denied until 1995, secret documents now declassified show the first government-sponsored remote viewing program was approved in 1970.

Remote viewing is a technique whereby trained individuals enter into a meditative state to access subtle levels of consciousness in which they are able to sense remote locations and describe what they see there, sometimes with a remarkable degree of accuracy. The ability to view objects remotely has clear advantages for intelligence gathering. A good example of how this is done can be seen in the four-minute news clip on remote viewing at the link below.

For a more detailed description of remote viewing and how it is accomplished, see the excellent explanation on the website of the International Remote Viewing Association available here.

Think of the possibilities if anyone were able to develop remote viewing abilities. If you lost your car keys, you might be able to then find them. An abducted child or stolen car could be found. And if remote viewing is possible, what other psychic abilities might also be accessible to us all? Could it be that our consciousness has much more power than we might have imagined, and that life is far grander than most would ever suspect?

Is Remote Viewing Real?

If you research remote viewing in any depth, besides finding excellent information supporting this exciting phenomenon, you will also likely encounter numerous statements like that of the wikipedia entry on the subject which claim that "the [remote viewing] program was terminated in 1995 after it failed to produce any useful intelligence information."

Government disinformation campaigns don't want us to believe that remote viewing was successful, despite the fact that their own declassified documents show without a doubt the amazing results of some top remote viewers. Many remote viewers involved in these secret programs have also gone public stating that the program was a mind-boggling success.

For a nine-page sample from one declassified remote viewing document which shows amazing accuracy in a remote viewing experiment conducted from a submarine, read the October 1978 document available here. This sample comes from an excellent 118-page declassified document summarizing the results of the entire remote viewing program to that date. For the entire summary report, click here. The conclusions section on page 70 of this report contains the quote:

With experienced subjects, the accuracy and reliability of the phenomenon can also be characterized roughly by a two-thirds factor. That is, approximately two-thirds of a given transcript about a given site is correct, roughly two-thirds of a series of transcripts can be blind-matched by a judge to the correct target out of a list, etc.

Note that the remote viewers are simply handed a blank sheet of paper and given the coordinates of a target location for which they have no knowledge. If they get any significant part of the target description right, it's quite remarkable. To be able two-thirds of the time to correctly identify the target is simply stunning! Below is an example of a remote viewing session by Pat Price. Note that because he missed other objects away from the crane, this session was described as a failure! For more on this session and its scientific and spiritual implications, click here.


Remote viewing of a secret Russian crane by Pat Price (actual crane on left)

Remote Viewing Documents Declassified

Kept top secret for "national security" reasons, hundreds of thousands of pages of remote viewing documents were carefully stored away as the nation's remote viewers gradually refined their ability to produce drawings of what they saw at a distant location. The existence of the program was flatly denied. Finally in 1995, a small percentage of these documents were released to the public through the FOIA (Freedom of Information Act), proving the existence of the program. Even this small percentage released amounts to nearly 100,000 pages of official remote viewing documents.

Unfortunately, the documents were released in a completely random form. Yet thanks to the tireless efforts of a courageous researcher in cataloging this invaluable cache, they are now available in a cataloged and searchable form. To order one or more CDs from a seven-CD set of all these documents now arranged and searchable, click here. For a description of the contents of these CDs, click here. For free access to many of the declassified documents, videos of demonstrations with Uri Geller, and lots more great remote viewing material, click here.

These declassified documents, the experiences of the remote viewers described below, and so much more show that just as the U.S. government officially denied the existence of the remote viewing program for decades, current claims that the program was ineffective are almost certainly disinformation. Could it be that those in power don't want us to know just how powerful our minds are?

The Remote Viewers

Joseph McMoneagle is the respected man considered by many to be the best military remote viewer. Joseph has written an incredibly engaging autobiography going into great detail about his rich experiences in the program and his amazing successes even in real operational environments with accurately finding and describing incredibly important targets. To purchase McMoneagle's riveting Stargate Chronicles, click here. For a Washington Post article describing McMoneagle's amazing talent, click here. His personal website with lots more on remote viewing is available here.

The most famous of all remote viewers was a flamboyant civilian by the name of Ingo Swann. This remarkable man was noted for predicting in 1973 what NASA's pioneer probes to Jupiter would find once they reached the gaseous planet for the first close-up view ever. Swann sealed copies of his predictions in envelopes and gave them to many noted scientists who were later astounded at his near 100% accuracy. He also scared military security by being able to literally read files locked in a thick safe on a secure base. For more on Swann, click here and here.

Swann authored or co-authored over a dozen books, which you can find at this link. Yet when he presented his autobiography titled Penetration to his publisher, the publisher refused, so he published the book himself. Yet all copies that he published seemed to strangely disappear from bookshelves in very short order. To this day, the least expensive copies of the book sell for hundreds of dollars online. Yet you can obtain a free pdf of the book on WantToKnow.info at this link. If you want to know some of the deepest secrets of the U.S. government, this is the book.

Remote Viewing Background, Military Supporters, and Documentary

The original impetus for U.S. remote viewing programs was the discovery by military and intelligence services in the 1960s that the Soviets were spending millions of dollars and having considerable success in using ESP and psychic spies to break through U.S. security barriers. Not wanting to be left behind in any spying or intelligence capability, no matter how exotic, top government officials contracted in 1972 with SRI (Stanford Research Institute) to develop the first of several remote viewing programs which operated under code names such as Project Scanate, Project Grill Flame, and the Stargate Project.

CIA Director Admiral Stansfield Turner and several top generals eventually became strong supporters of the remote viewing program as an effective means to develop psychic spies. Though the official existence of this project was kept secret and even denied until 1995, millions of dollars were poured into what became a major government undertaking using both military and civilian personnel.

Through these remote viewing programs, a set of scientifically based protocols were developed by which many people, even those without prior psychic abilities, were able to describe remote objects with some accuracy. For more declassified government documents on remote viewing, click here. For an eye-opening documentary, including interviews with CIA Director Stansfield, top generals, and key individuals in the remote viewing programs, see the link below:

It's interesting to note that several key players in the remote viewing programs were high level Scientologists. For more on this, click here. For an excellent, well researched document showing the strange and convoluted relationship between remote viewing and Scientology, click here.

Could it be that remote viewing is a skill which anyone can develop? Could it be that we all naturally have psychic abilities which can be explained scientifically that we have not developed simply because we didn't know the possibility exists? Could it be that certain elements of the power elite of our world don't want us to know just how powerful each one of us is, so that we continue to believe that they are the ones with power? To further educate yourself on the exciting topics of remote viewing, psychic spies, and secret mind control projects see the section below.

What you can do:
  • For a thorough, revealing timeline on remote viewing and psychic spies, click here.
  • Read declassified CIA documents about serious experiments and research into ESP at this link. Pages 10 - 22 are most relevant. The title of this CIA documents is "Experimental Analysis of Extrasensory Perception." The revealing page 18 is available here.
  • Inform your media and political representatives of this important information on remote viewing. To contact those close to you, click here. Urge them to bring greater public awareness to the topics of remote viewing, psychic spies, and mind control.
  • Read summaries of revealing major media reports on mind control available here.
  • Visit our comprehensive Mind Control Information Center at this link.
  • Spread this inspiring news on remote viewing to your friends and colleagues, and bookmark this article on key news websites using the "Share This" icon on this page, so that we can fill the role at which the major media is sadly failing. Together, we can make a difference.
  • We need your support. Please help our work to grow and thrive by donating at this link.

Finding Balance: WantToKnow.info Inspiration Center
WantToKnow.info believes it is important to balance disturbing cover-up information with inspirational writings which call us to be all that we can be and to work together for positive change. Please visit our Inspiration Center at this link for an abundance of uplifting material.

The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.


UFOs Disabling Nuclear Missiles: Former Senator Says Veterans' Testimony is the "Smoking Gun" Confirming a U.S. Government Cover-up

Vatic Note:  Very interesting.   I missed this when it first came out and I believe it predates Murchochs purchase of the WSJ, which adds to the possible veracity of the presentation.   Senator Gravel was a senator from Alaska and has a great deal of credibility from the days of old.  He ran for President a couple of elections back and was considered credible on  the level of Kucinich.  So  read and see if this may explain why no nuke "false flags" over the past 12 years.

Still sick, will update when I am feeling better.  Thanks for your patience.

UFOs Disabling Nuclear Missiles: Former Senator Says Veterans' Testimony is the "Smoking Gun" Confirming a U.S. Government Cover-up
by Admin, Wall Street Journal

WASHINGTON, May 7, 2013 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The following was released today by Robert Hastings:

In an interview with ABC News/Yahoo! News last Friday, former U.S. Senator Mike Gravel (D-Alaska) said statements by U.S. Air Force nuclear missile launch officers--regarding mysterious aerial objects interfering with the functionality of American ICBMs--make clear that top government officials are lying to the public when they claim to have no knowledge of national security-related UFO incidents.

Gravel first gained national recognition in 1971, by placing the still-classified Pentagon Papers--which documented U.S. government malfeasance during the Vietnam War--into the public record.

Gravel said the revelations by former/retired Captains Robert Salas, Bruce Fenstermacher, and David Schindele, as well as retired Security Policeman Sgt. David Scott, are "the smoking gun of the whole issue" of government secrecy on UFOs.

The interview may be viewed at http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/power-players-abc-news/former-sen-mike-grave l-says-white-house-suppressing-112957111.html?vp=1.

On September 27, 2010, Captain Salas co-hosted the "UFOs and Nukes" press conference with noted researcher Robert Hastings, during which seven USAF veterans revealed ongoing UFO activity at U.S. nuclear weapons sites during the Cold War era.

That media event was extensively and favorably covered by hundreds of news organizations worldwide, including CNN, which streamed the proceedings live.

The full-length video of the press conference appears at http://www.ufohastings.com/

The latest testimony--about UFOs knocking ICBMs offline--was heard by Senator Gravel and five other former members of congress at the "Citizen Hearing on Disclosure" organized by Stephen Bassett at the National Press Club last week.

Hastings decided not to participate in that event, saying, "It's unfortunate that Bassett chose to mingle the highly credible testimony of the missile launch officers, and the missile security guard, with questionable claims made by some of the other witnesses at the hearing. 

That is counter-productive if one is attempting to educate the public about the UFO reality and undercuts the legitimacy of the Disclosure process that he supposedly wants to bring about."

Hastings has interviewed over 140 U.S. military veterans regarding their involvement in nukes-related UFO incidents over the years. His summary of their tape recorded accounts may be found in UFOs and Nukes: Extraordinary Encounters at Nuclear Weapons Sites, which is available at his website, www.ufohastings.com, for $23.95. (Scalpers resell it at Amazon for $85 and up.)

"An advanced, outside third party has been tampering with American and Russian nukes," Hastings says.

CONTACT: Robert Hastings, ufohastings@aol.com
SOURCE: Robert Hastings
Web site: http://www.ufohastings.com
The Wall Street Journal news department was not involved in the creation of this content.

The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

Brzezinski mapped out the battle for Ukraine in 1997

Vatic Note:  Zbig is a khazar globalist and always has been.  He works for Rockefeller/Rothschild, and Soros when called upon to do so.   I am very sick putting this up and its not because of the article.... its because I truly am sick and hopefully will recover by tomorrow where I can finish my vatic note.  Thank you and bless you for all of your support.

Brzezinski mapped out the battle for Ukraine in 1997
By Chris Ernesto, Antiwar.com,  Sun Mar 16, 2014 1:33AM GMT

Former US national security adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski
Former US national security adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski

Why would the United States run the risk of siding with anti-Semitic, neo-Nazis in Ukraine?

One of the keys may be found by looking back at Zbigniew Brzezinski’s 1997 book, The Grand Chessboard in which he wrote, “Ukraine, a new and important space on the Eurasian chessboard, is a geopolitical pivot because its very existence as an independent country helps to transform Russia. Without Ukraine, Russia ceases to be a Eurasian empire.”

“However, if Moscow regains control over Ukraine, with its 52 million people and major resources as well as access to the Black Sea, Russia automatically again regains the wherewithal to become a powerful imperial state, spanning Europe and Asia.”

The former national security advisor to Jimmy Carter from 1977 to 1981 and top foreign policy advisor to Barack Obama, Brzezinski wrote that US policy should be “unapologetic” in perpetuating “America’s own dominant position for at least a generation and preferably longer still.”

Brzezinski delved into the importance of little known Ukraine by explaining in his 1997 book, “Geopolitical pivots are the states whose importance is derived not from their power and motivation but rather from their sensitive location… which in some cases gives them a special role in either defining access to important areas or in denying resources to a significant player.”

“Ukraine, Azerbaijan, South Korea, Turkey and Iran play the role of critically important geopolitical pivots,” he wrote in The Grand Chessboard, a book viewed by many as a blueprint for US world domination.

Brzezinski wrote that Eurasia is “the chessboard on which the struggle for global primacy continues to be played,” and that “it is imperative that no Eurasian challenger emerges, capable of dominating Eurasia and thus also of challenging America.”

Understanding Brzezinski’s long-term view of Ukraine makes it easier to comprehend why the US has given $5 billion to Ukraine since 1991, and why today it is hyper-concerned about having Ukraine remain in its sphere of influence.   (VN: it also explains why Israel gave 1 billion dollars to Georgia to invade Odessa in Russia, and then Israel also, along with Bush, supplied troops  as well, called advisors, some of whom were captured and that is how we knew about Israels involvement, but then they have many agents on the inside of Russia.  Zbig is a khazar and should not be mistaken for an American who cares about America.  He doesn't, only in so far as he can use us to achieve Israel/Rothschilds  objectives without spending their own money or their childrens blood.)

It may also help explain why in the past year the US and many of its media outlets have feverishly demonized Vladimir Putin.

By prominently highlighting the mistreatment of [an] activist group…, incessantly condemning Russia’s regressive position on gay rights, and excessively focusing on substandard accommodations at the Sochi Olympic Games, the Obama administration has cleverly distracted the public from delving into US support of the ultra-nationalist, neo-Nazi factions of the Ukrainian opposition, and has made it palatable for Americans to accept the US narrative on Ukraine.

Interestingly enough, it was Brzezinski who first compared Putin to Hitler in a March 3 Washington Post Editorial. Hillary Clinton followed-up the next day with her comments comparing the two, followed by John McCain and Marco Rubio who on March 5 agreed with Clinton’s comments comparing Putin and Hitler.

Apparently Brzezinski still continues to influence US political speak.

In his book, Brzezinski contends that “America stands supreme in the four decisive domains of global power: militarily… economically… technologically… and culturally.”  (VN:  Yes, that is what he wrote for public consumption, however, you cannot globalize without merging all nations into one glob of sameness.  He gives a blueprint in that book for how to do that.  He needs Russia and the USA on the same footing and westernized so the globalists have sameness throughout the  world, with a one world slave work force of seriously depopulated nations all melded into one. Haven't you noticed how Putin is talking about Russia being more American then America?  That helps prove his move toward sameness as we previously showed on this blog. He is definitely talking the zionists talking points. )

While this may have been accurate in 1997, it can be argued that today, other than militarily, the US no longer reigns supreme in these domains.  (VN: that has been the intent all along, but that would not have gone down politically, and he needed to distributed his working paper in book form, to his global constituents. Do not let this very brilliant tool of rockefeller/rothschild fool you. )

So late last year when Ukraine’s now-ousted president Viktor Yanukovych surprisingly canceled plans for Ukrainian integration into the European Union in favor of stronger ties with Russia, the US may have viewed Ukraine as slipping even further out of its reach.

At that point, with the pieces already in place, the US moved to support the ousting of Yanukovych, as evidenced by the leaked phone conversation between US Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland and US Ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt. When peaceful protests were not effective in unseating Yanukovych, the violence of the ultra-nationalist Svoboda party and Right Sector was embraced, if not supported by the west.

In today’s Ukraine, the US runs the risk of being affiliated with anti-Semitic neo-Nazis, a prospect it probably feels can be controlled via a friendly western media. But even if the risk is high, the US likely views it as necessary given the geopolitical importance of Ukraine, as Brzezinski mapped out in 1997.

The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.