Bruecke Note: Sorry for the length of this posting below the "read more" link. Since finishing reading Dr. Judy Wood's textbook on 9/11 (an excellent reference to any serious 9/11 researchers library), I have become convinced that directed energy weapons (DEW), as opposed to milli-nukes, is more Occam Razor for explaining the energy requirements of the destruction of building (while not burning paper that blew everywhere). DEW and Dr. Wood's have been ridiculed unmercifully and haven't really gotten their day in the court (of public opinion). I, too, was duped at one point into ridiculing it & her (for which I am ashamed and apologize). The following article puts a lot of pieces together for me.
Bruecke Update: In some late breaking news convincing me to schedule this article for today (2011-07-22), my newer "DupedUsefulI" avatar was banned late last night from Let's Roll Forums [LRF]. (The thread with my last public posting.) My previous "Herr der Elf" avatar was banned several months ago in a thread about Dr. Wood's textbook. Evidently, I was the only one with the cajones to purchase her book, read it, and give it an objective book review. My opponents gave their book reviews from the lofty position of never having seen it, and couldn't be bothered to graciously accept my offer to overcome this impediment by allowing me to purchase it for them.The common denominator between these two banning acts was my poking into DEW as logically explaining 9/11 evidence.
Mostly to disprove the need for milli-nukes or DEW, LRF has been championing the "hollow towers theory" (e.g., the towers were never really finished on the inside, never had concrete poured for most of the floors, never fleshed-out with drywall and bathrooms, or never occupied to reported levels). Alas, the massive amounts of spewed & pulverized debris from the earliest phases of the tower's demise disproves this premise of a lack of concrete or drywall or content. The most "solid" piece of evidence they provided for hollow towers was a late 1970's picture of an early morning sun streaming light through the towers and only showing the inner spindle of the center core and no cubicles or other things on various floors. Alas, the Physics 102 concept of optical light refraction disproves this, because what one also doesn't see due to the very same light refraction are the massive vertical columns of the outer structure that we know were there; thus this photo can't be use to definitively prove towers hollow of content.
[Hollow towers is separate from pre-demolition efforts, under-occupancy, and VicSim and may (or may not) still be in play as valid parts of the 9/11 towers ruse.]
Just prior to my banishment, I received this link, which is a very powerful summary of the suppression of DEW. It Occam Razor explains why LRF might not be all that receptive to my participation, even aside from DEW proving the "hollow towers theory" hollow Enjoy.
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=151&Itemid=60
By: CB_Brooklyn and Andrew Johnson
Date: 2009
Lenin, the first Communist dictator after the takeover of Russia in 1917, is widely credited with the following quotation, "The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves."
There are three basic versions of the 9/11 events. Although differences and/or overlapping may occur, the following three versions generally describe what most people believe:
1. OGCT. This is known as the “Official Government Conspiracy Theory”. This version states that a guy from a cave in Afghanistan conspired with 19 boxcutter-wielding Muslims to hijack airplanes, outwit the USA’s entire multi-trillion dollar defense system, and cause the Twin Towers to collapse. This is the version pushed by the government and media as being the truth of 9/11.
2. APCT. I call this the “Alternate Propaganda Conspiracy Theory”. This version states that, more or less, there were hijackings on 9/11, but the planes might have been taken under remote control to ensure they crashed as planned. Airplanes most likely crashed at the Pentagon and Shanksville, but planes definitely did crash into the Twin Towers. The Twin Towers and WTC 7 collapsed from conventional explosives and thermite, and molten metal was found in the rubble. This is the version pushed by the government and media as being the “wacko conspiracy theory” that the “truth movement” believes.
3. REAL. This, simply, is the REAL version, backed by actual evidence, Laws of Physics, and common sense: There were no hijackings, no plane crashes, the corporate media broadcasted cartoons of an airplane impacting the South Tower, and the WTC complex (not just the Towers and WTC 7) was destroyed with Directed Energy Weapons (DEW). The government and media steer clear of these.
Refer to the Lenin-credited quote above.
Is it possible the “truth movement” has been run by the 9/11 perpetrators since day one?
Is it possible that certain individuals have been planted to steer the “truth movement” away from the perpetrators? Is it possible these plants have affiliations with directed energy weapons (DEW)?
Is it even possible that some of these plants are “in on it” while others got suckered in? You be the judge.
***Former Transportation Secretary, Norman Mineta, has ties to the Directed Energy Professional Society (DEPS).
Mineta was Vice President of Lockheed Martin, a sponsor of DEPS.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Mineta
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/sponsors.html
Mineta ensured minimal interference with the DEW by grounding as many commercial airliners as possible during the timeframe of the towers’ destruction.
Mineta steered the “truth movement” toward hijackings and plane crashes by spreading the “Cheney stand down order” hoax.
http://www.9-11commission.gov/archive/hear..._2003-05-23.htm
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3722436852417384871
***Former BYU physics professor, Steven Jones, has done research at Los Alamos where directed energy weapons are researched.
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/atomic...ic/jones_cv.htm
Jones steered the “truth movement” toward thermite/conventional explosives/molten metal theories. Jones’ molten metal evidence has been shown to be fabricated.
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/inde...id=91&Itemid=60
Jones ridicules the directed energy weapon and TV-Fakery theories with statements such as ”These two are noted for their no-planes-hit-the-Towers theories and for promoting the notion of ray-beams from space knocking down the Towers.”
http://judicial-inc.biz/Steven_Jones_quits_911.htm
***Physicist Greg Jenkins’ has connections to the NSA and DEW:
"This work was supported in part by NSF grant DMR-9705129 and by funding from the NSA."
http://www.physics.buffalo.edu/cerne/reprints/ybco_prl.pdf
Jenkins’ papers were listed in an annual report which also listed at least one manufacturer of directed energy weapons (Rockwell).
http://www.csr.umd.edu/csrpage/publication...nnualreport.pdf
http://www.globalsecurity.org/space/system...at-overview.htm
Jenkins steered the “truth movement” away from directed energy weapons by conducting an ambush interview of Dr Judy Wood. (However, a read of the transcript reveals Dr Wood won the debate hands down.)
http://drjudywood.com/articles/transcript/...transcript.html
***Official at the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Van Romero, has ties to the Directed Energy Professional Society (DEPS).
Romero participated in events at DEPS before and after 9/11.
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/DEMSconf03.html
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/EduWksp00.html
Romero steered the “truth movement” toward standard controlled demolition by stating "It could have been a relatively small amount of explosives placed in strategic points"
http://911research.wtc7.net/disinfo/retractions/romero.html
Romero is a controlled demolitions expert. Scroll down a little and note the photo. Does Romero actually think this was caused by a “relatively small amount of explosives”?
***Former Director of the Star Wars program, Robert Bowman, is about as close to directed energy weapons as one can get.
Bowman steered the “truth movement” toward hijackings, and NORAD standing down.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5gio_iR2WE
Although he is in Jim Fetzer’s Scholars group, I have not heard him speaking about Dr Wood’s DEW evidence. I do remember, however, an interview where Bowman states that he “doesn’t fall for conspiracy theories” with regard to controlled demolition.
Bowman has a PhD in Nuclear Engineering. How can he possibly call this a conspiracy theory?
Also of note is the following:
The government contracted with several sponsors of the Directed Energy Professional Society for the NIST (NCSTAR 1) Report:
Boeing - Gold Level Current/Founding Sponsor
Applied Research Associates (ARA) - Silver Level Founding Sponsor
Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) - Silver Level Current Sponsor
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/sponsors.html
Dr Judy Wood has discovered that ARA and SAIC are manufacturers of Directed Energy Weapons and have expertise in Psychological Operations (PSYOPS).
http://drjudywood.com/articles/ARA/ARA.html
Dr Wood also discovered two images on ARA’s website that are similar to the World Trade Center. She details this in her Appeal to NIST’s denial of her Request for Correction.
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/apics/Appeal_03.jpg
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/apics/Appeal_04.jpg
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_WoodAppeal.html
The New York Times is a mainstream media source. Do they tell the truth of 9/11 or do they hide it? Why on earth would they help the “truth movement” by publishing evidence of explosives?
The New York Times steered the “truth movement” towards explosives demolitions by publishing the WTC Task Force Interviews.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/html...es_full_01.html
However, they redacted evidence for Directed Energy Weapons.
http://killtown.blogspot.com/2006/02/911-r...inside-wtc.html
Who's Popular On Corporate Media? Who's Not?
*William Rodriguez - publicly speaks up against DEW / TV-Fakery
http://www.911researchers.com/node/555#comment-4089
*David Ray Griffin - pro Global Government (aka New World Order)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-TZypcH9eg
*Steven Jones - pro explosives-demolition, pro thermite, pro molten metal
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ayYXNo0i_Cs
*Kevin Barrett - supports Steven Jones
http://drjudywood.com/articles/a/KB/Barrett_Kevin.html
*Robert Bowman - expert on NORAD’s jet-scrambling procedures
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5gio_iR2WE
*Judy Wood - never invited to discuss the DEW evidence, despite her filing of an actual court case
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html
*Morgan Reynolds - never invited back after discussing TV-Fakery on FOX News
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=reQZT9Hzvt8
Reynolds also filed a court case
http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&...e1=federal_case
*Jerry Leaphart - mainstream attorney never invited to discuss his clients’ (Wood/Reynolds) 9/11 legal actions
In an interview with Kevin Barrett, trial attorney Jerry Leaphart has said:
"What I can tell you and the listeners, Kevin, is this. There is more admissible evidence associated with the theory that the World Trade Center was destroyed by directed energy weapons than there is admissible evidence for any single other theory out there that has been promulgated."
MP3 Clip: http://drjudywood.com/media/070727_JerryLeaphartRFC_Adm.mp3
Full Show: http://drjudywood.com/media/070727_JerryLeaphartRFCs.mp3
============================================
============================================
============================================
The following is a timeline relating to promotion of the Alternate Propaganda Conspiracy Theory by government plants and the media, and suppression of the REAL version by government plants and media. Also included is suppression of free energy research.
More material may be added.
1978 (circa) - Steven Jones
Jones conducts post-doctoral research at Los Alamos.
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/atomic...ic/jones_cv.htm
Los Alamos is a center known for research on unconventional weaponry, including directed energy weapons. Los Alamos is under the supervision and is funded by the Department of Energy (DEO).
http://www.answers.com/los%20alamos%20lab
1989, March 23 - Stanley Pons / Martin Fleischmann / Steven Jones
Drs Pons and Fleischmann (P&F) hold a press conference revealing their discovery of excess heat (free energy) from Cold Fusion experiments. This press conference followed an announcement from Jones claiming his intention to go public with his own Cold Fusion experimentation, which discounted the excess heat.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F4NtIqsqTE8
http://www.911researchers.com/node/125
Jones learnt of P&F from an informant at the DOE. P&F decided to go public first to avoid being cheated, but were ridiculed by the media due to their Cold Fusion process not yet being perfected. Jones sabotaged research and development of free energy technologies, in order to keep us addicted to oil.
1991, June - Eugene Mallove / Steven Jones
Dr Mallove’s book “Fire from Ice: Searching for the Truth Behind the Cold Fusion Furor” is published.
http://www.amazon.com/Fire-Ice-Searching-S...s/dp/0471531391
Republished 1999 (paperback). In print and available for purchase:
http://www.amazon.com/Fire-Ice-Searching-B...n/dp/1892925028
The book includes much detail of Jones’ damage to Cold Fusion research. Aside from P&F, Jones’ name is mentioned more than any other individual. Jones’ Cold Fusion deceptions mirror his 9/11 deceptions in many ways.
1993 - Eugene Mallove
Dr Mallove is interviewed on TV news program.
http://www.livevideo.com/video/landing/EE0...old-fusion.aspx
Mallove discusses his book, and says goodbye to the oil age.
1993 - Steven Jones
Jones has affiliations with Los Alamos at least through 1993.
http://profjones.com/index.php?p=about
Relevant quote: “Spokesman for LAMPF Experiment #727 and co-spokesman for LAMPF Experiments #963 and #1151 (1982 - 1993).”
LAMPF = Los Alamos Meson Physics Facility
1999 - Directed Energy Professional Society (DEPS)
DEPS is founded. From their website:
DEPS Mission: The Directed Energy Professional Society (DEPS) was founded in 1999 to foster research and development of Directed Energy (DE) technology for national defense and civil applications through professional communication and education. We intend to be recognized as the premier organization for exchanging information about and advocating research, development and application of Directed Energy.
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/DEPSinfo.html
Silver Level Founding Sponsor: Applied Research Associates, Inc. (ARA)
Silver Level Current Sponsor: Science Applications International Corp. (SAIC)
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/sponsors.html
ARA and SAIC (as well as other DEPS sponsors) would later be contracted by NIST to assist in the WTC investigation.
Dr Judy Wood has discovered that ARA/SAIC have expertise in the manufacturer of Directed Energy Weapons as well as Psychological Operations (PSYOPS).
http://drjudywood.com/articles/ARA/ARA.html
Things to consider: Why would NIST contract with them?
2000, August 18 - Van Romero
Romero is Vice President at the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Research and Economic Development Department. He taught courses and published papers on explosives and is considered an expert in controlled demolitions.
http://infohost.nmt.edu/~red/van.html
Romero was a Roundtable Discussion moderator in DEPS event: “The Future of Directed Energy Education: From Vocational Schools Through Universities”
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/EduWksp00.html
Things to consider: Van Romero has directed energy weapon connections.
2000, Winter - DEPS’ Newsletter “Wave Front”
The first article in Volume 1, Issue 1 of Wave Front starts with the following quote:
"Lasers in space, lasers in the stratosphere, lasers
on and over the battlefield - we're at the
beginning of an evolutionary new wave of
weaponry."
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/graphics/wavefront2.pdf
Things to consider: DEPS is most definitely involved with the development of directed energy weapons.
2001, September 11 - Norman Mineta
At 9:45AM, former Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta orders all civilian aircraft to land as soon as possible.
http://www.9-11commission.gov/archive/hear..._2003-05-23.htm
Also at 9:45AM, the Senior FAA Manager orders all aircraft to land.
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/context...a945slineyorder
Eighteen minutes later, at 10:03AM, the South Tower is destroyed.
At 10:28AM, the North Tower is destroyed.
Three minutes later, at 10:31AM, military flights resume.
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/context...standdownlifted
Mineta was Vice President of Lockheed Martin.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Mineta
Lockheed Martin is a Gold Level Founding and Current Sponsor of the Directed Energy Professional Society.
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/sponsors.html
Things to consider: Airplanes did not hit the towers. Why would Mineta ground airplanes shortly before the South Tower was destroyed? Why were military planes let back up three minutes after the North Tower was destroyed? Did they want as few planes in the air as possible during the timeframe of the towers’ destruction for least interference with a DEW?
2001, September 11 - Van Romero
The Albuquerque Journal publishes article “Explosives Planted In Towers, N.M. Tech Expert Says” where explosives expert Romero, says:
"My opinion is, based on the videotapes, that after the airplanes hit the World Trade Center there were some explosive devices inside the buildings that caused the towers to collapse"
"It could have been a relatively small amount of explosives placed in strategic points"
http://911research.wtc7.net/disinfo/retractions/romero.html
Things to consider: Remember that Romero has affiliations with DEPS and is an explosives expert. Was he planted to steer the “truth movement” towards controlled demolitions? Did he actually think the WTC destruction was caused by a “relatively small amount of explosives”?
http://i87.photobucket.com/albums/k126/CB_...gy-Releases.jpg
2001, September 21 - Van Romero
Romero retracts his previous statement and sides with the official account.
The Albuquerque Journal publishes article “Fire, Not Extra Explosives, Doomed Buildings, Expert Says” which quotes Romero:
"Certainly the fire is what caused the building to fail,"
http://911research.wtc7.net/disinfo/retractions/romero.html
Things to consider: He may have retracted it, but the “truth movement” promote his original comments as “expert opinion”.
2001, October 16 - Van Romero
New Mexico Tech is named one of 16 “hot schools” for that Fall in the Wall Street Journal
http://infohost.nmt.edu/mainpage/news/2001/wsj.html
Things to consider: A reward for steering the “truth movement”?
2002, January 11 - Van Romero
Romero appointed National Chairman of the National Domestic Preparedness Consortium (NDPC)
http://infohost.nmt.edu/mainpage/news/2002/11jan05.html
Things to consider: Another reward?
2002, September 18 - Van Romero
New Mexico Tech receives $15 million grant for anti-terrorism program, funded through U.S. Justice Department's (DOJ) Domestic Preparedness Training and Technical Assistance Program.
http://infohost.nmt.edu/mainpage/news/2002/25sept03.html
Things to consider: Yet, another reward?
2003, March 26 - Van Romero
Romero attends DEPS’ “Directed Energy Modeling & Simulation Conference 2003” where he participates in the presentation “Platform Independent Interface for using Supercomputers in the Modeling and Simulation of Directed Energy Weapons”
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/DEMSconf03.html
Things to consider: Romero presents material relating to directed energy weapons!
2003, May 23 - Norman Mineta
Mineta tells the 9/11 Commission that he witnesses (what the “truth movement” calls) a stand down order issued by Dick Cheney.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3722436852417384871
http://www.9-11commission.gov/archive/hear..._2003-05-23.htm
Things to consider: How could Mineta issue a stand down order if there were no hijackings? Is it propaganda designed to mislead the “truth movement”? Let’s remember Mineta’s connection to the Directed Energy Professional Society.
2003, December 18 - Van Romero
Romero is one of “six lobbyists who made an impact in 2003” in an article in Influence magazine.
Other quotes from the article include:
“From his perch 2,000 miles outside of the Beltway, this physics Ph.D. understands exactly how Washington works.”
“A major chunk of his job involves lobbying for federal government funding, and if the 2003 fiscal year was any indication, Romero is a superstar.”
http://infohost.nmt.edu/mainpage/news/2003/18dec01.html
Things to consider: Again, more recognition
2004 (early) - Eugene Mallove
Dr Mallove writes an open letter to the world asking for Cold Fusion and Zero Point Energy research funds.
http://www.pureenergysystems.com/obituarie...0513/index.html
Things to consider: Dr Mallove knows the importance of CF/ZPE research and development.
2004, February 3 - Eugene Mallove
Dr Mallove is interviewed on “Coast to Coast” radio program.
http://www.checktheevidence.com/audio2/Dr%...2003%202004.mp3
Things to consider: Dr Mallove wants to educate people of the importance of CF/ZPE research and development.
2004, May 24 - Eugene Mallove / Steven Jones
Dr Mallove is murdered, allegedly by two people during a robbery.
http://www.eugenemallove.org
http://drjudywood.com/media/070703_Fetzer-RussGerst-CF.mp3
http://drjudywood.com/media/070710_DDuo_StevenGreer.mp3
http://drjudywood.com/media/070710_DDuo_ReynoldsGerst.mp3
Things to consider: Eugene Mallove’s work interfered with Steven Jones’ deceptions.
2004, November 11 - Kevin Ryan / David Ray Griffin / Steven Jones
Former Underwriters Laboratories (UL) chemist, Kevin Ryan, emails NIST questioning their statements regarding the WTC steel. Ryan carbon copies the email to David Ray Griffin, and gets fired from UL.
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041112144051451
The “truth movement” would later learn that David Ray Griffin is pro-Global Government (aka New World Order)
Things to consider: Ryan’s firing sends a signal to all professors and scientists within the “truth movement” on the dangers of speaking up. Could this have been staged? Ryan is a strong supporter of Steven Jones and co-editor of Jones’ journal.
2005, July - Judy Wood
Dr Judy Wood anonymously publicizes first draft of her paper “A Refutation of the Official Collapse Theory”, more commonly known as the Billiard Ball Example, or BBE.
http://drjudywood.com/articles/BBE/BilliardBalls.html
Using basic Laws of Physics, this paper proves that freefall progressive collapse of the WTC is not possible unless the underlying floors start moving before upper floors.
Things to consider: Although not understood within the “truth movement”, Dr Wood’s paper is proof that the government’s account is false. However, it received no media coverage whatsoever.
2005, August 12 - Patricia Ondrovic
The New York Times publishes EMT Patricia Ondrovic’s WTC Task Force Interview (along with about 500 others) on their website.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/html...es_full_01.html
These testimonies are scoured by the “truth movement” and evidence for explosives is discovered. However, a later interview with Ondrovic confirms that supporting testimony for directed energy weapons was redacted from her transcript.
http://killtown.blogspot.com/2006/02/911-r...inside-wtc.html
Things to consider: Does the New York Times tell the truth about 9/11? Why on earth would they publish evidence for explosives? Is it designed to steer the “truth movement” towards the controlled demolition theory? Ondrovic’s transcript contains over twenty blacked-out lines!
2005, August - Steven Jones / Judy Wood
Jones publishes first version of “Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?” on Brigham Young University’s website.
http://physics911.net/stevenjones
Jones calls his paper a hypothesis, and promotes “explosive-demolitions” and “molten metal”. Molten metal was later proven a hoax.
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/inde...id=91&Itemid=60
Things to consider: Jones’ hypothesis mysteriously comes out after Wood’s proof but somehow Jones’ gets the attention.
2005, November 14 - Steven Jones / Judy Wood
Jones goes on mainstream media (MSNBC).
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10053445
Jones promotes “explosives demolition” by calling it a “hypothesis to be tested”, and promotes the “molten metal” hoax.
Things to consider: Dr Wood receives no media coverage for her proof, but Jones goes on corporate mainstream TV with his “hypothesis to be tested” and “molten metal”.
2006, February 10 - Patricia Ondrovic / Killtown
Killtown interviews Patricia Ondrovic.
http://killtown.blogspot.com/2006/02/911-r...inside-wtc.html
Ondrovic confirms she witnessed cars blowing up and that she had mentioned it in her WTC Task Force interview. However, it has been redacted from the New York Times transcript.
Things to consider: Cars blowing up supports Dr Wood’s DEW theory.
2006, February 28 - Judy Wood / Michael Zebuhr / Steven Jones
Dr Wood and Mr Zebuhr conduct demonstrations on molten aluminum that refute Steven Jones’ claims.
http://drjudywood.com/articles/aluminum/Aluminum_Glows.html
Michael Zebuhr was a student of Dr Wood at Clemson University and a student member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth.
2006, March 18/19 - Michael Zebuhr / Steven Jones
Michael Zebuhr is murdered, allegedly by two people during a robbery.
On March 18 he was shot twice in the head and on March 19 he died.
http://michaelzebuhr.blogspot.com/
http://drjudywood.com/articles/aluminum/glowing.html
Things to consider: Michael Zebuhr’s work interfered with Steven Jones deceptions.
2006, June 7 - Judy Wood
Dr Wood attends 2006 Society for Experimental Mechanics Annual Conference and makes presentation entitled “The World Trade Center Towers as Bio-inspired Structures: Characteristics of their Design and Demise”.
http://scholarsfor911truth.org/PPT_Present...s.html#JudyWood
Things to consider: Despite her presentation proving the government’s account of 9/11 false, no media outlet reports it.
2006, June 20 - Alex Jones / Steven Jones
Alex Jones’ Infowars publishes article entitled “Scientific Analysis Proves Towers Brought Down By Incendiaries - Steven Jones' analysis on WTC steel about to be released”
http://www.infowars.com/articles/sept11/sc...ncendiaries.htm
Infowars receives more traffic than most, if not all, 9/11 sites. They are well known for promoting Steven Jones and opposing DEW and TV-Fakery.
Things to consider: Where are when were Jones’ findings released? Answer: they weren’t.
2006, June 25 - Steven Jones
Jones attends the “Americans Scholars Symposium” (ASS) and discusses evidence for thermite.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5004704309041471296
This was taped and later aired on C-SPAN, a mainstream source.
Things to consider: Jones continues to be recognized for his “hypothesis to be tested”.
2006, August 1 - Kevin Barrett / Steven Nass / Steven Jones
The New York Times publishes article detailing Representative Nass’ attempts to have Barrett fired from the University of Wisconsin-Madison due to his 9/11 related coursework in his class “Islam: Religion and Culture”.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/01/education/01madison.html
Things to consider: This sends a signal to all professors and scientists in the world on the dangers of speaking up. Could this have been staged? Barrett is a strong supporter of Steven Jones.
2006, August 23 - Morgan Reynolds / Judy Wood / Steven Jones
Drs Reynolds and Wood publish their paper “Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Disintegrate? A peer-review of Steven E. Jones' 9/11 Research”
http://drjudywood.com/articles/why/why_indeed.html
2006, August 28 - David Ray Griffin
An Associated Press article reveals Griffin to be pro-Global Government.
http://64.233.169.104/search?q=cache:_vfWA...news/48456.html
Global Government is also known as New World Order; something that George Bush Sr called for in a speech to a Joint Session of Congress on September 11, 1990.
http://www.911researchers.com/node/439
Griffin is known for pushing “explosives demolition” and molten metal, and has been on corporate media numerous times.
Things to consider: What is a pro-New World Order person doing in the “truth movement”? Why would the corporate media promote Griffin?
2006 (late) - 911Blogger.com
911Blogger requires all blogs to be “approved” before showing up.
[NEED SOURCE]
The moderators systematically censor directed energy weapons and WTC no-plane theories.
Things to consider: 911Blogger is one of the highest traffic 9/11 sites on the internet.
2006, September 10 - Morgan Reynolds
Dr Reynolds appears on mainstream media (FOX News)
http://youtube.com/watch?v=reQZT9Hzvt8
Reynolds pushes TV-Fakery and encourages people to look at the evidence for themselves. Reynolds has never appeared on corporate media since.
Things to consider: If TV-Fakery was really “crazy disinfo”, why didn’t FOX discredit the “truth movement” by inviting him back?
2006, October - Eric Salter / Steven Jones
Jones’ “Journal of 9/11 Studies” site posts Salter’s anti-TV-Fakery paper
http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200610/Salter.pdf
This strawman paper does not refute the TV-Fakery smoking gun proof: It is physically impossible for an aluminum airplane with a plastic nosecone to glide into a steel and concrete building.
Things to consider: 911Blogger “regulars” were overwhelmed with glee by the release of this paper.
2006, October 17 - Judy Wood / Morgan Reynolds
Drs Wood and Reynolds publicize first version of “The Star Wars Beam Weapons” paper.
http://drjudywood.com/articles/DEW/StarWarsBeam1.html
Wood and Reynolds reveal this paper at an early stage for self preservation.
Things to consider: This paper was attacked from the get-go.
2006, November 20 - Steven Jones / James Fetzer / Judy Wood / Morgan Reynolds
Jones includes the following in an email to Dr Fetzer. (Emphasis added.)
"I will also observe that there is a group of 9/11 researchers, including Reynolds, Wood, Haupt and Holmgren, who take the approach of personalized attacks on any other researcher who dares to suggest that real planes hit the Towers. Really - they support the "no-planes-hit-Towers" notion so strongly that they resort to personal attacks on anyone who challenges their pet theory. As I have done."
“The current "pet theory" that I have challenged is one now supported by you and (not surprisingly) Wood and Reynolds - the idea that "space beams" or "energy beams" were directed at the Towers to bring them down.”
http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/JonesResponse.html
Jones ridicules the DEW / TV-Fakery theories in an attempt to discourage people from taking it seriously. Jones uses the term “space beam” even though Wood and Reynolds have never said the weapon must be in space.
http://drjudywood.com/articles/DEW/StarWarsBeam7.html#DEW
Things to consider: Jones worked at Los Alamos where directed energy weapons are researched.
2006, November 25 - James Fetzer / Steven Jones / Judy Wood
Dr Fetzer includes the following in an open letter on the Scholars website. (Emphasis added.)
“Although [Judy Wood] did not commit herself to that specific hypothesis, she also suggested that directed energy could have come from above, such as from a space-based satellite using a mirror to direct energy. That has led to a veritable propaganda blitz attacking us both for considering "space beam" weaponry!”
“I had become aware of [Jones] strenuous objections to having "star wars beam weapons" hypotheses mentioned on our home page. (Judy’s use of "star wars" was a subtle intimation of its probable origins, but Steve has used "space beams" in order to denigrate it!)”
http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/ScholarsAnniversary.html
Things to consider: Fetzer is on to what Jones is doing.
2006, December 6 - Steven Jones / James Fetzer / Judy Wood / Morgan Reynolds
Jones includes the following in an email announcing his resignation from Scholars for 9/11 Truth (Emphasis added):
“Of late, [Jim Fetzer] refers often to his association now with Judy Wood and Morgan Reynolds. These two are noted for their no-planes-hit-the-Towers theories and for promoting the notion of ray-beams from space knocking down the Towers.
I join Kevin Ryan and many others in withdrawing from the group so that my name will not be attached to the personalized attacks and ray-beams-from-space stuff on www.st911.org.”
“We won’t spend much time on ray-beams from space knocking down the Towers!”
“I support this statement made recently by Dr. Frank Legge, Kevin Ryan, Victoria Ashley, and other (previous) members of the Scholars for 9/11 Truth: "...As of this date the web site continues to promote assertions which [are] unsupported by the evidence (ray-beams from space caused the demolitions, mini-nukes were used in the WTC towers, real commercial jets did not hit the WTC towers, etc.)...."”
http://judicial-inc.biz/Steven_Jones_quits_911.htm
Things to consider: Jones continues ridiculing.
2006, December 14 - Judy Wood / Morgan Reynolds / Steven Jones
Drs Wood and Reynolds publish their paper “The Scientific Method Applied to the Thermite Hypothesis”.
http://drjudywood.com/articles/scientific/...ificMethod.html
2006, December 29 - Alex Floum / Fred Burks / James Fetzer
Dr Fetzer writes an open letter to the Truth community detailing, among other issues, theft of the Scholars for 9/11 Truth domain name by Burks and/or Floum.
http://911scholars.org/SiteThreatened.html
Until Nov 2007, Floum was a moderator at 911Blogger; a site that censors DEW/TV-Fakery and promotes Steven Jones, molten metal, thermite, and real plane crashes. Floum is an attorney.
2007, January 4 - Morgan Reynolds / Kee Dewdney
Dr Reynolds is booted from the Scientific Panel Investigating Nine Eleven.
http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&...ds_booted_spine
The Founder of SPINE, Dewdney, ejected Reynolds due to his Sept 10, 2006 TV-Fakery comments on FOX News.
Things to consider: Punishment for speaking on taboo (and truthful) subjects?
2007, January 10 - Greg Jenkins / Judy Wood
Jenkins interviews Dr Wood on video.
http://drjudywood.com/articles/transcript/...transcript.html
This was not an official National Press Club interview. It was unscheduled, unauthorized, and conducted at 11:00PM. Wood did not intend to be interviewed at this 9/11 Truth event.
Jenkins previous research was funded by the NSA, as shown here:
"This work was supported in part by NSF grant DMR-9705129 and by funding from the NSA."
http://www.physics.buffalo.edu/cerne/reprints/ybco_prl.pdf
http://www.physics.buffalo.edu/cerne/reprints/au_prb.pdf
Jenkins’ papers were listed in an annual report which also listed at least one manufacturer of directed energy weapons (Rockwell).
http://www.csr.umd.edu/csrpage/publication...nnualreport.pdf
http://www.globalsecurity.org/space/system...at-overview.htm
Things to consider: Why did Jenkins promote this video? Was he trying to make the “truth movement” look good? What is someone with NSA affiliations doing in the “truth movement”? When one reads the transcript of the interview, its obvious Dr Wood wins the debate hands down.
2007, February - Greg Jenkins / Steven Jones
Jones’ “Journal of 9/11 Studies” site posts Jenkins anti-DEW paper
http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/...ory-Jenkins.pdf
Things to consider: By the size of this paper, it’s obvious that Jenkins spent a lot of time on it. Why would he do this? Why is someone with NSA/DEW connections trying to discredit the DEW theory?
2007, March 8 - Morgan Reynolds / Jerry Leaphart
Dr Reynolds files a Request for Correction (RFC) with the government regarding the 9/11 NIST Report (NCSTAR1).
http://drjudywood.com/pdf/070308_MR_RFC.pdf
Reynolds’ RFC reveals evidence of fake airplane crash videos at the WTC, and requests the NIST Report be corrected due to false and misleading statements.
This RFC utilizes the Data Quality Act, a law uncovered by Reynolds’ attorney, Jerry Leaphart.
Things to consider: An official legal document prepared by a former high level government insider and a mainstream attorney and no media outlet reports it! Why?
2007, March 16 - Judy Wood / Jerry Leaphart
Dr Wood files a Request for Correction (RFC) with the government regarding the 9/11 NIST Report (NCSTAR1).
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_Wood_RFC.html
The NIST website (at present) has a visually distorted version of the RFC.
http://www.ocio.os.doc.gov/ITPolicyandProg...K/PROD01_004678
Dr Wood reveals evidence of Directed Energy Weapons at the WTC and shows NCSTAR 1 to be false, deceptive and misleading.
Wood explains that since NIST did not analyze the Towers’ destruction, they cannot claim (scientifically, legally, or otherwise) that they “collapsed”.
The RFC utilizes the Data Quality Act, a law uncovered by Wood’s attorney, Jerry Leaphart.
Things to consider: An official legal document prepared by a former university mechanical engineering professor and a mainstream attorney no media outlet reports it! Why?
2007, March 27 - Steven Jones
Jones’ team files a press release titled “Independent Investigators Release Suppressed Blueprints of Destroyed World Trade Center Tower”.
http://stj911.org/press_releases/blueprints.html
They push “explosives demolition”, “collapse”, and “molten metal”.
Comments: Isn’t it strange how this appeared just eleven days after Dr Wood’s official and legal filing of Request for Correction with NIST?
2007, March 29 - Judy Wood
Dr Wood files Supplement #1 to her Request for Correction to NIST.
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_W...supplement.html
2007, April 14 - Steven Jones
Jones and his team file press release titled “Scholars and Family Members Submit Request for Correction to 9/11 NIST Report”.
http://stj911.org/press_releases/NIST.html
The press release and RFC promote “explosives demolition”, but make no mention of thermite or molten metal.
Things to consider: Strange how Jones hides evidence of thermite and molten metal that he claims to have. Why didn’t Jones send his RFC “return receipt requested” like Wood and Reynolds have? Jones’ RFC isn’t even dated! Real legal, huh???
2007, April 16 - Judy Wood
Several of Dr Wood’s instructors were killed at Virginia Polytechnic Institute.
NBC News & Chicago Sun-Times ran reports on the REAL BALLISTICS Monday night before the official story cemented into place Tuesday morning.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tHw3Z7itSbM
Things to consider: Why didn’t the police close off the area after the massacre? Perhaps they already knew who the perpetrators were? Dr Wood’s instructors were killed exactly one month after her RFC was filed.
2007, April 20 - Judy Wood
Dr Wood files Supplement #2 to her Request for Correction to NIST.
http://www.ocio.os.doc.gov/ITPolicyandProg...K/PROD01_004118
2007, April 25 - Judy Wood / Jerry Leaphart
Dr Wood, with Mr Leaphart, file Qui Tam case under seal.
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/unseal...orig_filing.jpg
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html
Dr Wood sues the private contractors hired by NIST alleging they conspired to hide evidence of directed energy weapons at the WTC. Included in the suit are ARA, SAIC, and Boeing, sponsors of the Directed Energy Professional Society.
This case is filed under seal and therefore not known to the public.
2007, May 1 - Morgan Reynolds
Dr Reynolds files Supplement to Request for Correction with NIST
http://drjudywood.com/pdf/070501_MORsup1_to_RFC.pdf
2007, May 16 - Judy Wood / Greg Jenkins
Dr Wood posts first version of her paper, “Molecular Dissociation: from Dust to Dirt”:
http://drjudywood.com/articles/dirt/dirt1.html
Dr Wood got the idea for this paper from the information that Jenkins tried to avoid in the January 2007 ambush interview.
Things to consider: We all thank Jenkins for the information!
2007, May 28 - Steven Jones / ae911truth.org
Jones’ crew files press release titled “"Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth" Announces Website Launch”
http://stj911.org/press_releases/AE911Trut...essRelease.html
ae911truth is a strong promoter of explosives demolitions of the Towers and WTC 7. They also promote the molten metal hoax, and support Jones. They make no mention of the damage to WTC 3, WTC 4, WTC 5, and WTC 6, all of which exhibit signs of damage from directed energy weapons.
ae911truth is covered in the mainstream media.
[NEED SOURCE, SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE???]
Things to consider: It’s strange how this organization came out of nowhere after Wood and Reynolds filed their RFCs, and after Wood’s new Dust to Dirt paper. Just as puzzling is the fact that ae911truth was in the mainstream media while Wood/Reynolds’ legal filings were not.
2007, June 14, 2007 - John Del Giorno / Jeff Hill
Del Giorno was the camera operator on the WABC 7 chopper on 9/11, and caught one of the two live “second plane impacts”.
9/11 researcher Jeff Hill calls Del Giorno for some information. Del Giorno says he’ll call back, but never does.
http://www.shure.proboards19.com/index.cgi...read=1192128055
Things to consider: Why didn’t he call back?
2007 - June 29 - Morgan Reynolds
NIST asks for ‘more time’ to respond to Reynolds’ RFC.
http://www.ocio.os.doc.gov/ITPolicyandProg...K/PROD01_003259
NISTs typical response time is 60 days.
2007, June 29 - Judy Wood
NIST asks for ‘more time’ to respond to Wood’s RFC.
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_letter.html
NISTs typical response time is 60 days.
2007, July 26 - Judy Wood / Andrew Johnson / Ambrose Lane
Dr Wood and Mr Johnson are scheduled to be interviewed on Mr Lane’s XM Radio show “The Power”.
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/inde...task=view&id=43
Before interview time, XM cancelled the show and fired Lane.
2007, July 27 - Judy Wood
NIST denies Dr Wood’s RFC. However, they confirm the statement from the NIST Report that they didn’t analyze the “collapses”.
"As stated in NCSTAR 1, NIST only investigated the factors leading to the initiation of the collapses of the WTC towers, not the collapses themselves."
http://drjudywood.com/pdf/070727_PROD01_003222.pdf
Dr Wood is the ONLY 9/11 Research Scientist to get NIST to confirm the statement in their own report on not analyzing the “collapses”.
Things to consider: An official government document prepared by NIST declining Dr Wood’s Request for Correction, and no media outlet reports it! If the DEW theory had no merit, why didn’t the government and media discredit the “truth movement” by publicizing this?
2007, August 22 - Judy Wood
Dr Wood files Appeal with NIST regarding their RFC response.
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_WoodAppeal.html
NIST posts a low quality black and white version.
http://www.ocio.os.doc.gov/ITPolicyandProg...K/PROD01_004121
http://www.ocio.os.doc.gov/ITPolicyandProg...K/PROD01_004122
Things to consider: Why did NIST convert Dr Wood’s original document to a low quality version before posting to their website?
2007, September 12 - Judy Wood
The US District Court in Southern New York unseals Dr Wood’s Qui Tam case.
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/unseal...orderunseal.jpg
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html
2007, September 28 - Morgan Reynolds
NIST declines Dr Reynolds’ RFC.
http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&...t_denies_prelim
Things to consider: An official government document prepared by NIST declining Dr Reynolds’ Request for Correction, and no media outlet reports it! If the TV-Fakery/No-Plane theory had no merit, why didn’t the government and media discredit the “truth movement” by publicizing this? NISTs typical response time is 60 days. Why did NIST need 6 and a half months?
2007, September 25 - David Ray Griffin
Griffin makes presentation in Ohio.
http://www.columbus911truth.org/2007/09/27...a-huge-success/
He states his belief in “Global Government” (aka New World Order).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-TZypcH9eg
2007, September 29 - James Fetzer / Judy Wood
Dr Fetzer files press release detailing Dr Wood’s RFC Appeal.
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_ji..._wtc_report.htm
2007, October 4 - Kevin Ryan / Steven Jones / Greg Jenkins
911Blogger posts Ryan’s blog which promotes Jenkins’ new anti-DEW theory paper on Jones “Journal of 9/11 Studies” site:
http://www.911blogger.com/node/11830
Things to consider: Is it coincidence than this anti-DEW paper came out just five days after Dr Fetzer’s pro-DEW theory press release?
2007, October 8 - Paul Smith / Jeff Hill / John Del Giorno
Paul Smith was the WABC Chopper 7 pilot. The camera operator, John Del Giorno, was called by Jeff Hill four months earlier.
Smith is run over and killed by a taxi, which swerved after being cutoff by a “black car”.
http://www.shure.proboards19.com/index.cgi...ge=1#1192129204
Things to consider: Is Smith’s death a random event? Or is there more to it?
2007, October 9 - ae911truth
Ae911truth is mentioned in Raw Story, a top left-wing alternate news site.
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/911_Truthers...slams_1009.html
Things to consider: The media continues to push the molten metal hoax.
2007, October 11 - Judy Wood / Jerry Leaphart / James Fetzer
Dr Wood publicizes the September 12, 2007 unsealing of her court case against the private contractors hired by NIST. She and Mr Leaphart appear on Dr Fetzer’s Dynamic Duo radio show, and Fetzer publishes a press release.
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_ji...r_files__22.htm
http://tinyurl.com/3dmpqo (MP3 of show)
2007, October 26 - Morgan Reynolds
Dr Reynolds files Appeal with NIST regarding their RFC response.
http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&...ge1=nist_appeal
2008, January 14 2008 - Dr Judy Wood
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
Bruecke Update: In some late breaking news convincing me to schedule this article for today (2011-07-22), my newer "DupedUsefulI" avatar was banned late last night from Let's Roll Forums [LRF]. (The thread with my last public posting.) My previous "Herr der Elf" avatar was banned several months ago in a thread about Dr. Wood's textbook. Evidently, I was the only one with the cajones to purchase her book, read it, and give it an objective book review. My opponents gave their book reviews from the lofty position of never having seen it, and couldn't be bothered to graciously accept my offer to overcome this impediment by allowing me to purchase it for them.The common denominator between these two banning acts was my poking into DEW as logically explaining 9/11 evidence.
Mostly to disprove the need for milli-nukes or DEW, LRF has been championing the "hollow towers theory" (e.g., the towers were never really finished on the inside, never had concrete poured for most of the floors, never fleshed-out with drywall and bathrooms, or never occupied to reported levels). Alas, the massive amounts of spewed & pulverized debris from the earliest phases of the tower's demise disproves this premise of a lack of concrete or drywall or content. The most "solid" piece of evidence they provided for hollow towers was a late 1970's picture of an early morning sun streaming light through the towers and only showing the inner spindle of the center core and no cubicles or other things on various floors. Alas, the Physics 102 concept of optical light refraction disproves this, because what one also doesn't see due to the very same light refraction are the massive vertical columns of the outer structure that we know were there; thus this photo can't be use to definitively prove towers hollow of content.
[Hollow towers is separate from pre-demolition efforts, under-occupancy, and VicSim and may (or may not) still be in play as valid parts of the 9/11 towers ruse.]
Just prior to my banishment, I received this link, which is a very powerful summary of the suppression of DEW. It Occam Razor explains why LRF might not be all that receptive to my participation, even aside from DEW proving the "hollow towers theory" hollow Enjoy.
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=151&Itemid=60
By: CB_Brooklyn and Andrew Johnson
Date: 2009
Lenin, the first Communist dictator after the takeover of Russia in 1917, is widely credited with the following quotation, "The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves."
There are three basic versions of the 9/11 events. Although differences and/or overlapping may occur, the following three versions generally describe what most people believe:
1. OGCT. This is known as the “Official Government Conspiracy Theory”. This version states that a guy from a cave in Afghanistan conspired with 19 boxcutter-wielding Muslims to hijack airplanes, outwit the USA’s entire multi-trillion dollar defense system, and cause the Twin Towers to collapse. This is the version pushed by the government and media as being the truth of 9/11.
2. APCT. I call this the “Alternate Propaganda Conspiracy Theory”. This version states that, more or less, there were hijackings on 9/11, but the planes might have been taken under remote control to ensure they crashed as planned. Airplanes most likely crashed at the Pentagon and Shanksville, but planes definitely did crash into the Twin Towers. The Twin Towers and WTC 7 collapsed from conventional explosives and thermite, and molten metal was found in the rubble. This is the version pushed by the government and media as being the “wacko conspiracy theory” that the “truth movement” believes.
3. REAL. This, simply, is the REAL version, backed by actual evidence, Laws of Physics, and common sense: There were no hijackings, no plane crashes, the corporate media broadcasted cartoons of an airplane impacting the South Tower, and the WTC complex (not just the Towers and WTC 7) was destroyed with Directed Energy Weapons (DEW). The government and media steer clear of these.
Refer to the Lenin-credited quote above.
Is it possible the “truth movement” has been run by the 9/11 perpetrators since day one?
Is it possible that certain individuals have been planted to steer the “truth movement” away from the perpetrators? Is it possible these plants have affiliations with directed energy weapons (DEW)?
Is it even possible that some of these plants are “in on it” while others got suckered in? You be the judge.
***Former Transportation Secretary, Norman Mineta, has ties to the Directed Energy Professional Society (DEPS).
Mineta was Vice President of Lockheed Martin, a sponsor of DEPS.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Mineta
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/sponsors.html
Mineta ensured minimal interference with the DEW by grounding as many commercial airliners as possible during the timeframe of the towers’ destruction.
Mineta steered the “truth movement” toward hijackings and plane crashes by spreading the “Cheney stand down order” hoax.
http://www.9-11commission.gov/archive/hear..._2003-05-23.htm
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3722436852417384871
***Former BYU physics professor, Steven Jones, has done research at Los Alamos where directed energy weapons are researched.
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/atomic...ic/jones_cv.htm
Jones steered the “truth movement” toward thermite/conventional explosives/molten metal theories. Jones’ molten metal evidence has been shown to be fabricated.
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/inde...id=91&Itemid=60
Jones ridicules the directed energy weapon and TV-Fakery theories with statements such as ”These two are noted for their no-planes-hit-the-Towers theories and for promoting the notion of ray-beams from space knocking down the Towers.”
http://judicial-inc.biz/Steven_Jones_quits_911.htm
***Physicist Greg Jenkins’ has connections to the NSA and DEW:
"This work was supported in part by NSF grant DMR-9705129 and by funding from the NSA."
http://www.physics.buffalo.edu/cerne/reprints/ybco_prl.pdf
Jenkins’ papers were listed in an annual report which also listed at least one manufacturer of directed energy weapons (Rockwell).
http://www.csr.umd.edu/csrpage/publication...nnualreport.pdf
http://www.globalsecurity.org/space/system...at-overview.htm
Jenkins steered the “truth movement” away from directed energy weapons by conducting an ambush interview of Dr Judy Wood. (However, a read of the transcript reveals Dr Wood won the debate hands down.)
http://drjudywood.com/articles/transcript/...transcript.html
***Official at the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Van Romero, has ties to the Directed Energy Professional Society (DEPS).
Romero participated in events at DEPS before and after 9/11.
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/DEMSconf03.html
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/EduWksp00.html
Romero steered the “truth movement” toward standard controlled demolition by stating "It could have been a relatively small amount of explosives placed in strategic points"
http://911research.wtc7.net/disinfo/retractions/romero.html
Romero is a controlled demolitions expert. Scroll down a little and note the photo. Does Romero actually think this was caused by a “relatively small amount of explosives”?
***Former Director of the Star Wars program, Robert Bowman, is about as close to directed energy weapons as one can get.
Bowman steered the “truth movement” toward hijackings, and NORAD standing down.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5gio_iR2WE
Although he is in Jim Fetzer’s Scholars group, I have not heard him speaking about Dr Wood’s DEW evidence. I do remember, however, an interview where Bowman states that he “doesn’t fall for conspiracy theories” with regard to controlled demolition.
Bowman has a PhD in Nuclear Engineering. How can he possibly call this a conspiracy theory?
Also of note is the following:
The government contracted with several sponsors of the Directed Energy Professional Society for the NIST (NCSTAR 1) Report:
Boeing - Gold Level Current/Founding Sponsor
Applied Research Associates (ARA) - Silver Level Founding Sponsor
Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) - Silver Level Current Sponsor
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/sponsors.html
Dr Judy Wood has discovered that ARA and SAIC are manufacturers of Directed Energy Weapons and have expertise in Psychological Operations (PSYOPS).
http://drjudywood.com/articles/ARA/ARA.html
Dr Wood also discovered two images on ARA’s website that are similar to the World Trade Center. She details this in her Appeal to NIST’s denial of her Request for Correction.
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/apics/Appeal_03.jpg
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/apics/Appeal_04.jpg
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_WoodAppeal.html
The New York Times is a mainstream media source. Do they tell the truth of 9/11 or do they hide it? Why on earth would they help the “truth movement” by publishing evidence of explosives?
The New York Times steered the “truth movement” towards explosives demolitions by publishing the WTC Task Force Interviews.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/html...es_full_01.html
However, they redacted evidence for Directed Energy Weapons.
http://killtown.blogspot.com/2006/02/911-r...inside-wtc.html
Who's Popular On Corporate Media? Who's Not?
*William Rodriguez - publicly speaks up against DEW / TV-Fakery
http://www.911researchers.com/node/555#comment-4089
*David Ray Griffin - pro Global Government (aka New World Order)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-TZypcH9eg
*Steven Jones - pro explosives-demolition, pro thermite, pro molten metal
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ayYXNo0i_Cs
*Kevin Barrett - supports Steven Jones
http://drjudywood.com/articles/a/KB/Barrett_Kevin.html
*Robert Bowman - expert on NORAD’s jet-scrambling procedures
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5gio_iR2WE
*Judy Wood - never invited to discuss the DEW evidence, despite her filing of an actual court case
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html
*Morgan Reynolds - never invited back after discussing TV-Fakery on FOX News
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=reQZT9Hzvt8
Reynolds also filed a court case
http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&...e1=federal_case
*Jerry Leaphart - mainstream attorney never invited to discuss his clients’ (Wood/Reynolds) 9/11 legal actions
In an interview with Kevin Barrett, trial attorney Jerry Leaphart has said:
"What I can tell you and the listeners, Kevin, is this. There is more admissible evidence associated with the theory that the World Trade Center was destroyed by directed energy weapons than there is admissible evidence for any single other theory out there that has been promulgated."
MP3 Clip: http://drjudywood.com/media/070727_JerryLeaphartRFC_Adm.mp3
Full Show: http://drjudywood.com/media/070727_JerryLeaphartRFCs.mp3
============================================
============================================
============================================
The following is a timeline relating to promotion of the Alternate Propaganda Conspiracy Theory by government plants and the media, and suppression of the REAL version by government plants and media. Also included is suppression of free energy research.
More material may be added.
1978 (circa) - Steven Jones
Jones conducts post-doctoral research at Los Alamos.
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/atomic...ic/jones_cv.htm
Los Alamos is a center known for research on unconventional weaponry, including directed energy weapons. Los Alamos is under the supervision and is funded by the Department of Energy (DEO).
http://www.answers.com/los%20alamos%20lab
1989, March 23 - Stanley Pons / Martin Fleischmann / Steven Jones
Drs Pons and Fleischmann (P&F) hold a press conference revealing their discovery of excess heat (free energy) from Cold Fusion experiments. This press conference followed an announcement from Jones claiming his intention to go public with his own Cold Fusion experimentation, which discounted the excess heat.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F4NtIqsqTE8
http://www.911researchers.com/node/125
Jones learnt of P&F from an informant at the DOE. P&F decided to go public first to avoid being cheated, but were ridiculed by the media due to their Cold Fusion process not yet being perfected. Jones sabotaged research and development of free energy technologies, in order to keep us addicted to oil.
1991, June - Eugene Mallove / Steven Jones
Dr Mallove’s book “Fire from Ice: Searching for the Truth Behind the Cold Fusion Furor” is published.
http://www.amazon.com/Fire-Ice-Searching-S...s/dp/0471531391
Republished 1999 (paperback). In print and available for purchase:
http://www.amazon.com/Fire-Ice-Searching-B...n/dp/1892925028
The book includes much detail of Jones’ damage to Cold Fusion research. Aside from P&F, Jones’ name is mentioned more than any other individual. Jones’ Cold Fusion deceptions mirror his 9/11 deceptions in many ways.
1993 - Eugene Mallove
Dr Mallove is interviewed on TV news program.
http://www.livevideo.com/video/landing/EE0...old-fusion.aspx
Mallove discusses his book, and says goodbye to the oil age.
1993 - Steven Jones
Jones has affiliations with Los Alamos at least through 1993.
http://profjones.com/index.php?p=about
Relevant quote: “Spokesman for LAMPF Experiment #727 and co-spokesman for LAMPF Experiments #963 and #1151 (1982 - 1993).”
LAMPF = Los Alamos Meson Physics Facility
1999 - Directed Energy Professional Society (DEPS)
DEPS is founded. From their website:
DEPS Mission: The Directed Energy Professional Society (DEPS) was founded in 1999 to foster research and development of Directed Energy (DE) technology for national defense and civil applications through professional communication and education. We intend to be recognized as the premier organization for exchanging information about and advocating research, development and application of Directed Energy.
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/DEPSinfo.html
Silver Level Founding Sponsor: Applied Research Associates, Inc. (ARA)
Silver Level Current Sponsor: Science Applications International Corp. (SAIC)
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/sponsors.html
ARA and SAIC (as well as other DEPS sponsors) would later be contracted by NIST to assist in the WTC investigation.
Dr Judy Wood has discovered that ARA/SAIC have expertise in the manufacturer of Directed Energy Weapons as well as Psychological Operations (PSYOPS).
http://drjudywood.com/articles/ARA/ARA.html
Things to consider: Why would NIST contract with them?
2000, August 18 - Van Romero
Romero is Vice President at the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Research and Economic Development Department. He taught courses and published papers on explosives and is considered an expert in controlled demolitions.
http://infohost.nmt.edu/~red/van.html
Romero was a Roundtable Discussion moderator in DEPS event: “The Future of Directed Energy Education: From Vocational Schools Through Universities”
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/EduWksp00.html
Things to consider: Van Romero has directed energy weapon connections.
2000, Winter - DEPS’ Newsletter “Wave Front”
The first article in Volume 1, Issue 1 of Wave Front starts with the following quote:
"Lasers in space, lasers in the stratosphere, lasers
on and over the battlefield - we're at the
beginning of an evolutionary new wave of
weaponry."
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/graphics/wavefront2.pdf
Things to consider: DEPS is most definitely involved with the development of directed energy weapons.
2001, September 11 - Norman Mineta
At 9:45AM, former Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta orders all civilian aircraft to land as soon as possible.
http://www.9-11commission.gov/archive/hear..._2003-05-23.htm
Also at 9:45AM, the Senior FAA Manager orders all aircraft to land.
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/context...a945slineyorder
Eighteen minutes later, at 10:03AM, the South Tower is destroyed.
At 10:28AM, the North Tower is destroyed.
Three minutes later, at 10:31AM, military flights resume.
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/context...standdownlifted
Mineta was Vice President of Lockheed Martin.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Mineta
Lockheed Martin is a Gold Level Founding and Current Sponsor of the Directed Energy Professional Society.
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/sponsors.html
Things to consider: Airplanes did not hit the towers. Why would Mineta ground airplanes shortly before the South Tower was destroyed? Why were military planes let back up three minutes after the North Tower was destroyed? Did they want as few planes in the air as possible during the timeframe of the towers’ destruction for least interference with a DEW?
2001, September 11 - Van Romero
The Albuquerque Journal publishes article “Explosives Planted In Towers, N.M. Tech Expert Says” where explosives expert Romero, says:
"My opinion is, based on the videotapes, that after the airplanes hit the World Trade Center there were some explosive devices inside the buildings that caused the towers to collapse"
"It could have been a relatively small amount of explosives placed in strategic points"
http://911research.wtc7.net/disinfo/retractions/romero.html
Things to consider: Remember that Romero has affiliations with DEPS and is an explosives expert. Was he planted to steer the “truth movement” towards controlled demolitions? Did he actually think the WTC destruction was caused by a “relatively small amount of explosives”?
http://i87.photobucket.com/albums/k126/CB_...gy-Releases.jpg
2001, September 21 - Van Romero
Romero retracts his previous statement and sides with the official account.
The Albuquerque Journal publishes article “Fire, Not Extra Explosives, Doomed Buildings, Expert Says” which quotes Romero:
"Certainly the fire is what caused the building to fail,"
http://911research.wtc7.net/disinfo/retractions/romero.html
Things to consider: He may have retracted it, but the “truth movement” promote his original comments as “expert opinion”.
2001, October 16 - Van Romero
New Mexico Tech is named one of 16 “hot schools” for that Fall in the Wall Street Journal
http://infohost.nmt.edu/mainpage/news/2001/wsj.html
Things to consider: A reward for steering the “truth movement”?
2002, January 11 - Van Romero
Romero appointed National Chairman of the National Domestic Preparedness Consortium (NDPC)
http://infohost.nmt.edu/mainpage/news/2002/11jan05.html
Things to consider: Another reward?
2002, September 18 - Van Romero
New Mexico Tech receives $15 million grant for anti-terrorism program, funded through U.S. Justice Department's (DOJ) Domestic Preparedness Training and Technical Assistance Program.
http://infohost.nmt.edu/mainpage/news/2002/25sept03.html
Things to consider: Yet, another reward?
2003, March 26 - Van Romero
Romero attends DEPS’ “Directed Energy Modeling & Simulation Conference 2003” where he participates in the presentation “Platform Independent Interface for using Supercomputers in the Modeling and Simulation of Directed Energy Weapons”
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/DEMSconf03.html
Things to consider: Romero presents material relating to directed energy weapons!
2003, May 23 - Norman Mineta
Mineta tells the 9/11 Commission that he witnesses (what the “truth movement” calls) a stand down order issued by Dick Cheney.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3722436852417384871
http://www.9-11commission.gov/archive/hear..._2003-05-23.htm
Things to consider: How could Mineta issue a stand down order if there were no hijackings? Is it propaganda designed to mislead the “truth movement”? Let’s remember Mineta’s connection to the Directed Energy Professional Society.
2003, December 18 - Van Romero
Romero is one of “six lobbyists who made an impact in 2003” in an article in Influence magazine.
Other quotes from the article include:
“From his perch 2,000 miles outside of the Beltway, this physics Ph.D. understands exactly how Washington works.”
“A major chunk of his job involves lobbying for federal government funding, and if the 2003 fiscal year was any indication, Romero is a superstar.”
http://infohost.nmt.edu/mainpage/news/2003/18dec01.html
Things to consider: Again, more recognition
2004 (early) - Eugene Mallove
Dr Mallove writes an open letter to the world asking for Cold Fusion and Zero Point Energy research funds.
http://www.pureenergysystems.com/obituarie...0513/index.html
Things to consider: Dr Mallove knows the importance of CF/ZPE research and development.
2004, February 3 - Eugene Mallove
Dr Mallove is interviewed on “Coast to Coast” radio program.
http://www.checktheevidence.com/audio2/Dr%...2003%202004.mp3
Things to consider: Dr Mallove wants to educate people of the importance of CF/ZPE research and development.
2004, May 24 - Eugene Mallove / Steven Jones
Dr Mallove is murdered, allegedly by two people during a robbery.
http://www.eugenemallove.org
http://drjudywood.com/media/070703_Fetzer-RussGerst-CF.mp3
http://drjudywood.com/media/070710_DDuo_StevenGreer.mp3
http://drjudywood.com/media/070710_DDuo_ReynoldsGerst.mp3
Things to consider: Eugene Mallove’s work interfered with Steven Jones’ deceptions.
2004, November 11 - Kevin Ryan / David Ray Griffin / Steven Jones
Former Underwriters Laboratories (UL) chemist, Kevin Ryan, emails NIST questioning their statements regarding the WTC steel. Ryan carbon copies the email to David Ray Griffin, and gets fired from UL.
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041112144051451
The “truth movement” would later learn that David Ray Griffin is pro-Global Government (aka New World Order)
Things to consider: Ryan’s firing sends a signal to all professors and scientists within the “truth movement” on the dangers of speaking up. Could this have been staged? Ryan is a strong supporter of Steven Jones and co-editor of Jones’ journal.
2005, July - Judy Wood
Dr Judy Wood anonymously publicizes first draft of her paper “A Refutation of the Official Collapse Theory”, more commonly known as the Billiard Ball Example, or BBE.
http://drjudywood.com/articles/BBE/BilliardBalls.html
Using basic Laws of Physics, this paper proves that freefall progressive collapse of the WTC is not possible unless the underlying floors start moving before upper floors.
Things to consider: Although not understood within the “truth movement”, Dr Wood’s paper is proof that the government’s account is false. However, it received no media coverage whatsoever.
2005, August 12 - Patricia Ondrovic
The New York Times publishes EMT Patricia Ondrovic’s WTC Task Force Interview (along with about 500 others) on their website.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/html...es_full_01.html
These testimonies are scoured by the “truth movement” and evidence for explosives is discovered. However, a later interview with Ondrovic confirms that supporting testimony for directed energy weapons was redacted from her transcript.
http://killtown.blogspot.com/2006/02/911-r...inside-wtc.html
Things to consider: Does the New York Times tell the truth about 9/11? Why on earth would they publish evidence for explosives? Is it designed to steer the “truth movement” towards the controlled demolition theory? Ondrovic’s transcript contains over twenty blacked-out lines!
2005, August - Steven Jones / Judy Wood
Jones publishes first version of “Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?” on Brigham Young University’s website.
http://physics911.net/stevenjones
Jones calls his paper a hypothesis, and promotes “explosive-demolitions” and “molten metal”. Molten metal was later proven a hoax.
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/inde...id=91&Itemid=60
Things to consider: Jones’ hypothesis mysteriously comes out after Wood’s proof but somehow Jones’ gets the attention.
2005, November 14 - Steven Jones / Judy Wood
Jones goes on mainstream media (MSNBC).
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10053445
Jones promotes “explosives demolition” by calling it a “hypothesis to be tested”, and promotes the “molten metal” hoax.
Things to consider: Dr Wood receives no media coverage for her proof, but Jones goes on corporate mainstream TV with his “hypothesis to be tested” and “molten metal”.
2006, February 10 - Patricia Ondrovic / Killtown
Killtown interviews Patricia Ondrovic.
http://killtown.blogspot.com/2006/02/911-r...inside-wtc.html
Ondrovic confirms she witnessed cars blowing up and that she had mentioned it in her WTC Task Force interview. However, it has been redacted from the New York Times transcript.
Things to consider: Cars blowing up supports Dr Wood’s DEW theory.
2006, February 28 - Judy Wood / Michael Zebuhr / Steven Jones
Dr Wood and Mr Zebuhr conduct demonstrations on molten aluminum that refute Steven Jones’ claims.
http://drjudywood.com/articles/aluminum/Aluminum_Glows.html
Michael Zebuhr was a student of Dr Wood at Clemson University and a student member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth.
2006, March 18/19 - Michael Zebuhr / Steven Jones
Michael Zebuhr is murdered, allegedly by two people during a robbery.
On March 18 he was shot twice in the head and on March 19 he died.
http://michaelzebuhr.blogspot.com/
http://drjudywood.com/articles/aluminum/glowing.html
Things to consider: Michael Zebuhr’s work interfered with Steven Jones deceptions.
2006, June 7 - Judy Wood
Dr Wood attends 2006 Society for Experimental Mechanics Annual Conference and makes presentation entitled “The World Trade Center Towers as Bio-inspired Structures: Characteristics of their Design and Demise”.
http://scholarsfor911truth.org/PPT_Present...s.html#JudyWood
Things to consider: Despite her presentation proving the government’s account of 9/11 false, no media outlet reports it.
2006, June 20 - Alex Jones / Steven Jones
Alex Jones’ Infowars publishes article entitled “Scientific Analysis Proves Towers Brought Down By Incendiaries - Steven Jones' analysis on WTC steel about to be released”
http://www.infowars.com/articles/sept11/sc...ncendiaries.htm
Infowars receives more traffic than most, if not all, 9/11 sites. They are well known for promoting Steven Jones and opposing DEW and TV-Fakery.
Things to consider: Where are when were Jones’ findings released? Answer: they weren’t.
2006, June 25 - Steven Jones
Jones attends the “Americans Scholars Symposium” (ASS) and discusses evidence for thermite.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5004704309041471296
This was taped and later aired on C-SPAN, a mainstream source.
Things to consider: Jones continues to be recognized for his “hypothesis to be tested”.
2006, August 1 - Kevin Barrett / Steven Nass / Steven Jones
The New York Times publishes article detailing Representative Nass’ attempts to have Barrett fired from the University of Wisconsin-Madison due to his 9/11 related coursework in his class “Islam: Religion and Culture”.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/01/education/01madison.html
Things to consider: This sends a signal to all professors and scientists in the world on the dangers of speaking up. Could this have been staged? Barrett is a strong supporter of Steven Jones.
2006, August 23 - Morgan Reynolds / Judy Wood / Steven Jones
Drs Reynolds and Wood publish their paper “Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Disintegrate? A peer-review of Steven E. Jones' 9/11 Research”
http://drjudywood.com/articles/why/why_indeed.html
2006, August 28 - David Ray Griffin
An Associated Press article reveals Griffin to be pro-Global Government.
http://64.233.169.104/search?q=cache:_vfWA...news/48456.html
Global Government is also known as New World Order; something that George Bush Sr called for in a speech to a Joint Session of Congress on September 11, 1990.
http://www.911researchers.com/node/439
Griffin is known for pushing “explosives demolition” and molten metal, and has been on corporate media numerous times.
Things to consider: What is a pro-New World Order person doing in the “truth movement”? Why would the corporate media promote Griffin?
2006 (late) - 911Blogger.com
911Blogger requires all blogs to be “approved” before showing up.
[NEED SOURCE]
The moderators systematically censor directed energy weapons and WTC no-plane theories.
Things to consider: 911Blogger is one of the highest traffic 9/11 sites on the internet.
2006, September 10 - Morgan Reynolds
Dr Reynolds appears on mainstream media (FOX News)
http://youtube.com/watch?v=reQZT9Hzvt8
Reynolds pushes TV-Fakery and encourages people to look at the evidence for themselves. Reynolds has never appeared on corporate media since.
Things to consider: If TV-Fakery was really “crazy disinfo”, why didn’t FOX discredit the “truth movement” by inviting him back?
2006, October - Eric Salter / Steven Jones
Jones’ “Journal of 9/11 Studies” site posts Salter’s anti-TV-Fakery paper
http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200610/Salter.pdf
This strawman paper does not refute the TV-Fakery smoking gun proof: It is physically impossible for an aluminum airplane with a plastic nosecone to glide into a steel and concrete building.
Things to consider: 911Blogger “regulars” were overwhelmed with glee by the release of this paper.
2006, October 17 - Judy Wood / Morgan Reynolds
Drs Wood and Reynolds publicize first version of “The Star Wars Beam Weapons” paper.
http://drjudywood.com/articles/DEW/StarWarsBeam1.html
Wood and Reynolds reveal this paper at an early stage for self preservation.
Things to consider: This paper was attacked from the get-go.
2006, November 20 - Steven Jones / James Fetzer / Judy Wood / Morgan Reynolds
Jones includes the following in an email to Dr Fetzer. (Emphasis added.)
"I will also observe that there is a group of 9/11 researchers, including Reynolds, Wood, Haupt and Holmgren, who take the approach of personalized attacks on any other researcher who dares to suggest that real planes hit the Towers. Really - they support the "no-planes-hit-Towers" notion so strongly that they resort to personal attacks on anyone who challenges their pet theory. As I have done."
“The current "pet theory" that I have challenged is one now supported by you and (not surprisingly) Wood and Reynolds - the idea that "space beams" or "energy beams" were directed at the Towers to bring them down.”
http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/JonesResponse.html
Jones ridicules the DEW / TV-Fakery theories in an attempt to discourage people from taking it seriously. Jones uses the term “space beam” even though Wood and Reynolds have never said the weapon must be in space.
http://drjudywood.com/articles/DEW/StarWarsBeam7.html#DEW
Things to consider: Jones worked at Los Alamos where directed energy weapons are researched.
2006, November 25 - James Fetzer / Steven Jones / Judy Wood
Dr Fetzer includes the following in an open letter on the Scholars website. (Emphasis added.)
“Although [Judy Wood] did not commit herself to that specific hypothesis, she also suggested that directed energy could have come from above, such as from a space-based satellite using a mirror to direct energy. That has led to a veritable propaganda blitz attacking us both for considering "space beam" weaponry!”
“I had become aware of [Jones] strenuous objections to having "star wars beam weapons" hypotheses mentioned on our home page. (Judy’s use of "star wars" was a subtle intimation of its probable origins, but Steve has used "space beams" in order to denigrate it!)”
http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/ScholarsAnniversary.html
Things to consider: Fetzer is on to what Jones is doing.
2006, December 6 - Steven Jones / James Fetzer / Judy Wood / Morgan Reynolds
Jones includes the following in an email announcing his resignation from Scholars for 9/11 Truth (Emphasis added):
“Of late, [Jim Fetzer] refers often to his association now with Judy Wood and Morgan Reynolds. These two are noted for their no-planes-hit-the-Towers theories and for promoting the notion of ray-beams from space knocking down the Towers.
I join Kevin Ryan and many others in withdrawing from the group so that my name will not be attached to the personalized attacks and ray-beams-from-space stuff on www.st911.org.”
“We won’t spend much time on ray-beams from space knocking down the Towers!”
“I support this statement made recently by Dr. Frank Legge, Kevin Ryan, Victoria Ashley, and other (previous) members of the Scholars for 9/11 Truth: "...As of this date the web site continues to promote assertions which [are] unsupported by the evidence (ray-beams from space caused the demolitions, mini-nukes were used in the WTC towers, real commercial jets did not hit the WTC towers, etc.)...."”
http://judicial-inc.biz/Steven_Jones_quits_911.htm
Things to consider: Jones continues ridiculing.
2006, December 14 - Judy Wood / Morgan Reynolds / Steven Jones
Drs Wood and Reynolds publish their paper “The Scientific Method Applied to the Thermite Hypothesis”.
http://drjudywood.com/articles/scientific/...ificMethod.html
2006, December 29 - Alex Floum / Fred Burks / James Fetzer
Dr Fetzer writes an open letter to the Truth community detailing, among other issues, theft of the Scholars for 9/11 Truth domain name by Burks and/or Floum.
http://911scholars.org/SiteThreatened.html
Until Nov 2007, Floum was a moderator at 911Blogger; a site that censors DEW/TV-Fakery and promotes Steven Jones, molten metal, thermite, and real plane crashes. Floum is an attorney.
2007, January 4 - Morgan Reynolds / Kee Dewdney
Dr Reynolds is booted from the Scientific Panel Investigating Nine Eleven.
http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&...ds_booted_spine
The Founder of SPINE, Dewdney, ejected Reynolds due to his Sept 10, 2006 TV-Fakery comments on FOX News.
Things to consider: Punishment for speaking on taboo (and truthful) subjects?
2007, January 10 - Greg Jenkins / Judy Wood
Jenkins interviews Dr Wood on video.
http://drjudywood.com/articles/transcript/...transcript.html
This was not an official National Press Club interview. It was unscheduled, unauthorized, and conducted at 11:00PM. Wood did not intend to be interviewed at this 9/11 Truth event.
Jenkins previous research was funded by the NSA, as shown here:
"This work was supported in part by NSF grant DMR-9705129 and by funding from the NSA."
http://www.physics.buffalo.edu/cerne/reprints/ybco_prl.pdf
http://www.physics.buffalo.edu/cerne/reprints/au_prb.pdf
Jenkins’ papers were listed in an annual report which also listed at least one manufacturer of directed energy weapons (Rockwell).
http://www.csr.umd.edu/csrpage/publication...nnualreport.pdf
http://www.globalsecurity.org/space/system...at-overview.htm
Things to consider: Why did Jenkins promote this video? Was he trying to make the “truth movement” look good? What is someone with NSA affiliations doing in the “truth movement”? When one reads the transcript of the interview, its obvious Dr Wood wins the debate hands down.
2007, February - Greg Jenkins / Steven Jones
Jones’ “Journal of 9/11 Studies” site posts Jenkins anti-DEW paper
http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/...ory-Jenkins.pdf
Things to consider: By the size of this paper, it’s obvious that Jenkins spent a lot of time on it. Why would he do this? Why is someone with NSA/DEW connections trying to discredit the DEW theory?
2007, March 8 - Morgan Reynolds / Jerry Leaphart
Dr Reynolds files a Request for Correction (RFC) with the government regarding the 9/11 NIST Report (NCSTAR1).
http://drjudywood.com/pdf/070308_MR_RFC.pdf
Reynolds’ RFC reveals evidence of fake airplane crash videos at the WTC, and requests the NIST Report be corrected due to false and misleading statements.
This RFC utilizes the Data Quality Act, a law uncovered by Reynolds’ attorney, Jerry Leaphart.
Things to consider: An official legal document prepared by a former high level government insider and a mainstream attorney and no media outlet reports it! Why?
2007, March 16 - Judy Wood / Jerry Leaphart
Dr Wood files a Request for Correction (RFC) with the government regarding the 9/11 NIST Report (NCSTAR1).
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_Wood_RFC.html
The NIST website (at present) has a visually distorted version of the RFC.
http://www.ocio.os.doc.gov/ITPolicyandProg...K/PROD01_004678
Dr Wood reveals evidence of Directed Energy Weapons at the WTC and shows NCSTAR 1 to be false, deceptive and misleading.
Wood explains that since NIST did not analyze the Towers’ destruction, they cannot claim (scientifically, legally, or otherwise) that they “collapsed”.
The RFC utilizes the Data Quality Act, a law uncovered by Wood’s attorney, Jerry Leaphart.
Things to consider: An official legal document prepared by a former university mechanical engineering professor and a mainstream attorney no media outlet reports it! Why?
2007, March 27 - Steven Jones
Jones’ team files a press release titled “Independent Investigators Release Suppressed Blueprints of Destroyed World Trade Center Tower”.
http://stj911.org/press_releases/blueprints.html
They push “explosives demolition”, “collapse”, and “molten metal”.
Comments: Isn’t it strange how this appeared just eleven days after Dr Wood’s official and legal filing of Request for Correction with NIST?
2007, March 29 - Judy Wood
Dr Wood files Supplement #1 to her Request for Correction to NIST.
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_W...supplement.html
2007, April 14 - Steven Jones
Jones and his team file press release titled “Scholars and Family Members Submit Request for Correction to 9/11 NIST Report”.
http://stj911.org/press_releases/NIST.html
The press release and RFC promote “explosives demolition”, but make no mention of thermite or molten metal.
Things to consider: Strange how Jones hides evidence of thermite and molten metal that he claims to have. Why didn’t Jones send his RFC “return receipt requested” like Wood and Reynolds have? Jones’ RFC isn’t even dated! Real legal, huh???
2007, April 16 - Judy Wood
Several of Dr Wood’s instructors were killed at Virginia Polytechnic Institute.
NBC News & Chicago Sun-Times ran reports on the REAL BALLISTICS Monday night before the official story cemented into place Tuesday morning.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tHw3Z7itSbM
Things to consider: Why didn’t the police close off the area after the massacre? Perhaps they already knew who the perpetrators were? Dr Wood’s instructors were killed exactly one month after her RFC was filed.
2007, April 20 - Judy Wood
Dr Wood files Supplement #2 to her Request for Correction to NIST.
http://www.ocio.os.doc.gov/ITPolicyandProg...K/PROD01_004118
2007, April 25 - Judy Wood / Jerry Leaphart
Dr Wood, with Mr Leaphart, file Qui Tam case under seal.
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/unseal...orig_filing.jpg
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html
Dr Wood sues the private contractors hired by NIST alleging they conspired to hide evidence of directed energy weapons at the WTC. Included in the suit are ARA, SAIC, and Boeing, sponsors of the Directed Energy Professional Society.
This case is filed under seal and therefore not known to the public.
2007, May 1 - Morgan Reynolds
Dr Reynolds files Supplement to Request for Correction with NIST
http://drjudywood.com/pdf/070501_MORsup1_to_RFC.pdf
2007, May 16 - Judy Wood / Greg Jenkins
Dr Wood posts first version of her paper, “Molecular Dissociation: from Dust to Dirt”:
http://drjudywood.com/articles/dirt/dirt1.html
Dr Wood got the idea for this paper from the information that Jenkins tried to avoid in the January 2007 ambush interview.
Things to consider: We all thank Jenkins for the information!
2007, May 28 - Steven Jones / ae911truth.org
Jones’ crew files press release titled “"Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth" Announces Website Launch”
http://stj911.org/press_releases/AE911Trut...essRelease.html
ae911truth is a strong promoter of explosives demolitions of the Towers and WTC 7. They also promote the molten metal hoax, and support Jones. They make no mention of the damage to WTC 3, WTC 4, WTC 5, and WTC 6, all of which exhibit signs of damage from directed energy weapons.
ae911truth is covered in the mainstream media.
[NEED SOURCE, SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE???]
Things to consider: It’s strange how this organization came out of nowhere after Wood and Reynolds filed their RFCs, and after Wood’s new Dust to Dirt paper. Just as puzzling is the fact that ae911truth was in the mainstream media while Wood/Reynolds’ legal filings were not.
2007, June 14, 2007 - John Del Giorno / Jeff Hill
Del Giorno was the camera operator on the WABC 7 chopper on 9/11, and caught one of the two live “second plane impacts”.
9/11 researcher Jeff Hill calls Del Giorno for some information. Del Giorno says he’ll call back, but never does.
http://www.shure.proboards19.com/index.cgi...read=1192128055
Things to consider: Why didn’t he call back?
2007 - June 29 - Morgan Reynolds
NIST asks for ‘more time’ to respond to Reynolds’ RFC.
http://www.ocio.os.doc.gov/ITPolicyandProg...K/PROD01_003259
NISTs typical response time is 60 days.
2007, June 29 - Judy Wood
NIST asks for ‘more time’ to respond to Wood’s RFC.
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_letter.html
NISTs typical response time is 60 days.
2007, July 26 - Judy Wood / Andrew Johnson / Ambrose Lane
Dr Wood and Mr Johnson are scheduled to be interviewed on Mr Lane’s XM Radio show “The Power”.
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/inde...task=view&id=43
Before interview time, XM cancelled the show and fired Lane.
2007, July 27 - Judy Wood
NIST denies Dr Wood’s RFC. However, they confirm the statement from the NIST Report that they didn’t analyze the “collapses”.
"As stated in NCSTAR 1, NIST only investigated the factors leading to the initiation of the collapses of the WTC towers, not the collapses themselves."
http://drjudywood.com/pdf/070727_PROD01_003222.pdf
Dr Wood is the ONLY 9/11 Research Scientist to get NIST to confirm the statement in their own report on not analyzing the “collapses”.
Things to consider: An official government document prepared by NIST declining Dr Wood’s Request for Correction, and no media outlet reports it! If the DEW theory had no merit, why didn’t the government and media discredit the “truth movement” by publicizing this?
2007, August 22 - Judy Wood
Dr Wood files Appeal with NIST regarding their RFC response.
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_WoodAppeal.html
NIST posts a low quality black and white version.
http://www.ocio.os.doc.gov/ITPolicyandProg...K/PROD01_004121
http://www.ocio.os.doc.gov/ITPolicyandProg...K/PROD01_004122
Things to consider: Why did NIST convert Dr Wood’s original document to a low quality version before posting to their website?
2007, September 12 - Judy Wood
The US District Court in Southern New York unseals Dr Wood’s Qui Tam case.
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/unseal...orderunseal.jpg
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html
2007, September 28 - Morgan Reynolds
NIST declines Dr Reynolds’ RFC.
http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&...t_denies_prelim
Things to consider: An official government document prepared by NIST declining Dr Reynolds’ Request for Correction, and no media outlet reports it! If the TV-Fakery/No-Plane theory had no merit, why didn’t the government and media discredit the “truth movement” by publicizing this? NISTs typical response time is 60 days. Why did NIST need 6 and a half months?
2007, September 25 - David Ray Griffin
Griffin makes presentation in Ohio.
http://www.columbus911truth.org/2007/09/27...a-huge-success/
He states his belief in “Global Government” (aka New World Order).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-TZypcH9eg
2007, September 29 - James Fetzer / Judy Wood
Dr Fetzer files press release detailing Dr Wood’s RFC Appeal.
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_ji..._wtc_report.htm
2007, October 4 - Kevin Ryan / Steven Jones / Greg Jenkins
911Blogger posts Ryan’s blog which promotes Jenkins’ new anti-DEW theory paper on Jones “Journal of 9/11 Studies” site:
http://www.911blogger.com/node/11830
Things to consider: Is it coincidence than this anti-DEW paper came out just five days after Dr Fetzer’s pro-DEW theory press release?
2007, October 8 - Paul Smith / Jeff Hill / John Del Giorno
Paul Smith was the WABC Chopper 7 pilot. The camera operator, John Del Giorno, was called by Jeff Hill four months earlier.
Smith is run over and killed by a taxi, which swerved after being cutoff by a “black car”.
http://www.shure.proboards19.com/index.cgi...ge=1#1192129204
Things to consider: Is Smith’s death a random event? Or is there more to it?
2007, October 9 - ae911truth
Ae911truth is mentioned in Raw Story, a top left-wing alternate news site.
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/911_Truthers...slams_1009.html
Things to consider: The media continues to push the molten metal hoax.
2007, October 11 - Judy Wood / Jerry Leaphart / James Fetzer
Dr Wood publicizes the September 12, 2007 unsealing of her court case against the private contractors hired by NIST. She and Mr Leaphart appear on Dr Fetzer’s Dynamic Duo radio show, and Fetzer publishes a press release.
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_ji...r_files__22.htm
http://tinyurl.com/3dmpqo (MP3 of show)
2007, October 26 - Morgan Reynolds
Dr Reynolds files Appeal with NIST regarding their RFC response.
http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&...ge1=nist_appeal
2008, January 14 2008 - Dr Judy Wood
Appears on Ambrose Lane show with Andrew Johnson to discuss her latest research: Hutchison Effect and 9/11. On 18th Jan, John Hutchison also joins the program:
2008, May 19 - Dr Judy Wood
Dr Wood posts new research linking Hurricane Erin into the events on 9/11. The study references "field effects" in relation to Erin and the Hutchison Effect:
2008, May 29 - Dr Judy Wood and John Hutchison
They give presentations in Portland, OR regarding 9/11, The Hutchison Effect and Field Effects.
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
5 comments:
Alas, the massive amounts of spewed & pulverized debris from the earliest phases of the tower's demise disproves this premise of a lack of concrete or drywall or content.
...
assuming the vids and photos that were broadcast were not fake. simon shack says they are all fake. if they were showing fake planes, why stop there, sweeten the colapse vids with some hollywood smoke to cover squibs from CDIs demolition. . also - maybe the paper came out of a paper spewing machine, like the fake smoke machine.
to me Judy is disinfo meant to make all no planers look nuts and offer up an explanation for the lack of debris, personally i like Phil Jayhans empty
towers theory a lot more. ultimately it doesn't matter what brought them down, they are gone. the real question is who brought them down
You wrote:
"to me Judy is disinfo"
And where do you get this impression?
The point of the linked article is that a concerted effort was put into place to misrepresent Dr. Wood and "to make [her] look nuts".
I don't see where DEW or exotic weapons are mutually exclusive with no planes, so I fail to see how she makes them look nuts.
The extent of the fakery that you mention verges on disinfo to my understanding today. Why not fake the "the massive amounts of spewed & pulverized debris" in the videos you seemingly ask? I don't know how you'd get the dust all over the rubble pile, ground, and in the air and into people's offices, apartments, and shops if you faked it.
With it being a new(er) technology that they didn't necessarily want to expose to the world for scrutiny particularly should elements of it not go off according to plan, I'm sure control of the media and message included having some fake scenes prepare or some faking options handy that could distract from glaring anomalies.
The hardest thing for me to accept was that no planes hit the WTC towers or the Pentagon. I accepted it only after seeing every premise for the planes theory proven impossible.
The earliest "no-plane" videos I saw showed some kind of unidentifiable ball hitting one of the towers. The clearest image of the "ball" offered clear proof that several videos had been altered to "prove" the planes theory. Then I discovered that the videos showing a ball were also faked.
You can see where this is heading. Eventually, only two theories remained: Either something was planted in the buildings (favored by the corporate media)or something unseen hit the buildings (opposed by same).
I also find it intriguing that every DEW expert who debunked the DEW theory managed to resist the temptation to do what all scholars do: cite their credentials in the area under discussion.
I'm very open Judy's theories and DEW, i just think empty, gutted, evacuated towers, pre toasted cars without plates being towed in is more satisfying. to me the most important question is not 'how' but 'who' and I've concluded Rothschild ordered it (as well as Katrina and BP Gulf mess) as part of his UN NWO. they are all bank jobs
Anonymous wrote:
"i just think empty, gutted, evacuated towers, pre toasted cars without plates being towed in is more satisfying. "
It might be too late to ask for clarification of "more satisfying", and that might be more tongue in cheek.
I could be convinced of "gutted and evacuated" towers as in, when tenants left, their space was pre-demolished and no replacement tenants found... except SimTenants or Govt (banking) front companies.
But "empty" -- as in they were never fleshed out and completed on the inside and were never really occupied -- is a bit of a stretch. I could see this up to a point, particularly when it came to some of the govt front companies. Hollow tower theories that try to argue 100% of the office space was never made habitable is doomed to be debunked. Now 30-70% not being ever made functional as office space or habitable? if they can find the evidence, I'll believe it. But I've studied this, and they haven't, so I don't.
And for other reasons, the promoters of hollow towers (Let's Roll Forums) has been a proven gatekeeper on other fronts.
Anonymous wrote:
"to me the most important question is not 'how' but 'who' and I've concluded Rothschild ordered it (as well as Katrina and BP Gulf mess) as part of his UN NWO. they are all bank jobs"
For the first decade, "how" was the most important question. Had we gotten traction with "how", "who" would fall into place... supposedly.
Bank jobs? Yep.
The billions in gold bullion in the vaults below WTC-4 were stolen... except for the millions found -- get this -- in a truck in one of the tunnels below the complex.
Billions of laundered money (transactions from Bush I and how he bankrupted Russia) were cleared in the relaxed trading rules in the days/week after 9/11.
$2.3 trillion in transactions that the Pentagon couldn't account for on the 10th of September disappeared with the Office of Naval Intelligence, its records, and personnel were wiped out as the only people who moved into the newly renovated wing that was hit "by a plane".
The destroyed SEC records in WTC-7 got Enron off the hook for the billions of fraud in the California energy trading debacle, not to mention many other wealthy Bush backers getting off the hook for their trading misdeeds.
The put options on the two airlines involved in 9/11 is a finger print that the banking elite was in the know.
The infusion of the laundered money into the economy mentioned above contributed to the housing bubble and other economic woes. Banks are limited in how much they can lend with respect to how much are in savings. The surge in the laundered money meant more could be lent, but to lend more means reducing lending qualifications. This wouldn't have been so bad had the banksters not been gaming the system from the get-go for when they knew the music would top. Adjustable Rate Mortgages (ARM), a new financial construct, is a clue with regards to how they were going to screw us and when the music would stop. They knew rates would go up and that the barely qualified borrows wouldn't be able to afford the new rates. They'd default and be foreclosed on, leading to acquisitions for pennies on the dollar of brick-and-mortar establishments.
Massive amounts of wealth changed hands in the Bush years. Bush's true intentions are shown in how his one regret was not being able to privatize social security. Excuse me? When most Americans with retirement funds saw them cut in half or quarter due to their reliance on stocks & bonds, Bush could only think about doing the same for social security?!
Who the banksters and elite are bears even closer scrutiny, like with respect to how much is old money and controlled by the same family blood lines for generations.
Post a Comment