There will be no blogs done for Saturday, and will begin again on Dec 20, Sunday, with New blogs for your review. OUR FUNDRAISING WILL CONTINUE THROUGH SATURDAY'S DOWN DAY, so please, if you can afford it, we would appreciate any donations you may have to help us stay on the net to continue our work. The donation button is off to the right of this blog.
We have some really updated material coming up that is so comprehensive, that its taking a long time for me to confirm before publishing, so it will be worth it when its done. Stay tuned. In the mean time we thank you for all your support over these 6 years, both in reading our info blogs and in donating to keep us going in our mission to expose and bring truth to America and the globe. We could not have done so without your support. God Bless you all and your families as well.
FUND RAISING TIME AGAIN.
We are now asking you once again, to contribute toward our deficit of $240 that we need by the 1st of the month. That is 11 days away,
we are beginning now, so we make it by that time. We are so grateful for your support in so many ways.
If
you can afford it please donate off to the right of the blog. God
Bless you and your family in all things. So stay with us til the first and hopefully, you will be able to contribute so we can continue our work in educating, researching and informing.
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
"It is the greatest of all mistakes to do nothing because you can only do a little." ~ Sydney Smith
2015-12-19
2015-12-18
Hawaii under martial law was like ‘military dictatorship’ (1941-1944)
Vatic Note: This is up just to give us a feeling of what Martial law really is, rather than the romantic version of protecting the citizens of a nation. This below shows that it will depend on those controlling the military that will determine the manner is which such martial law is conducted. Or at least those "giving the orders to the soldiers in the field". Martial Law is a complete and total lose of all rights, and freedoms, so listen, read carefully what happened in Hawaii, and keep it all in mind when they decide to bring the hammer down on us.
This surprised me so much, since I don't ever remember being taught about this is history classes and yet, it was such a major big part of the conditions the civilians had to live under for most of WW II. Granted, something had to be done since the attacks on Pearl Harbor cost the US Military so many lives, but then we find out that Franklin D Roosevelt (ROSENFELD) knew all about the attack before it ever occurred and could have stopped it before it happened.... but chose not to, since the objective was to get the US into WW II on the side of Britain who actually started the war. We did blogs on both facts stated above.
Hawaii was not a state at the time, so loyalty, with so many Japanese living there was probably an issue, so to some degree, its understandable that Martial Law was declared. But its not understandable, the conditions the military set, while the citizens were under martial law. It was conducted more like a military dictatorship, then as a protection for the population at large. Was that the reason for it being used? To establish such a dictatorship? You read and decide. Could this happen today now that Hawaii is offically a state of our Union???
FUND RAISING TIME AGAIN.
We are now asking you once again, to contribute toward our deficit of $250 that we need by the 1st of the month. That is 13 days away, we are beginning now, so we make it by that time. We are so grateful for your support in so many ways.
If you can afford it please donate off to the right of the blog. God Bless you and your family in all things. So stay with us til the first and hopefully, you will be able to contribute so we can continue our work in educating, researching and informing.
Hawaii under martial law was like ‘military dictatorship’ (1941-1944)
https://alethonews.wordpress.com/2014/12/10/hawaii-under-martial-law-was-like-military-dictatorship-1941-1944/
By Admin, Aletho News, December 10, 2014
For three years Hawaiians lived under repressive Army rule and without any constitutional protections
HAWAII — Islanders suffered under nearly three years of martial law from 1941-1944; so oppressive that it was later described by a federal judge as a “military dictatorship.” All manner of civilian liberties were replaced by oppressive military orders enforced by American soldiers.
The dark period of Hawaiian history began on December 7, 1941, with the massive surprise attack of Japanese bombers on the U.S. Naval Base Pearl Harbor. The air raid successfully sunk or grounded 18 ships and killed 2,403 Americans.
As the smoke billowed from the harbor, Lieutenant General Walter Short met with Territorial Governor Joseph Poindexter to convince him to declare martial law. Being coerced through tactics discussed below, Gov. Poindexter reluctantly ceded power to the military — temporarily, or so he thought.
In declaring martial law, all forms of civilian law were suspended. An entire new system of justice and order was instituted and controlled at the absolute discretion of Lt. Gen. Short — the newly declared “Military Governor” of the islands.
The transfer of power meant that all civilian courts would be closed, and all government functions — federal, territorial, and municipal — would be placed under military control. The U.S. Constitution was suspended and civilians no longer guaranteed any individual rights or protections from the government. Civilians had no freedom of speech, self-defense, assembly, or protections from from unreasonable search and seizures, inter alia.
Lt. General Short, in his first proclamation as Military Governor on December 7th, 1941, stated that [7]:
The Military Governor’s subsequent orders were designed to “discourage concerted action of any kind.” Saloons were ordered to be closed, as well as schools, theaters — anywhere there might be a “concentration of people.” [6]
Civilians were given strict curfews. The streets were ordered to be cleared between the hours of 9:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. under penalty of arrest. All persons of Japanese descent had to be in their homes by 8:00 p.m. [6]
Everyone over the age of six years was fingerprinted, registered, and ordered to carry around military-issued ID cards. [11] Using the extensive registration program, the military drew up intelligence reports on 450,000 Hawaiians. [8]
Stringent censorship of the media went into immediate effect. The Military Governor required that newspapers be made illegal unless they were granted a license to operate. All newspapers and radio stations were shut down for a time. Any publication not printed exclusively in English was denied a license and considered illegal. [6]
The local telephone company was taken over by the military. [6] All outgoing mail was read and censored by the military. All long-distance telephone calls to the mainland were required to be spoken in English and censored. The military government monitored the content and morale of the population this way. [11]
Travel between the islands was restricted. Use of civilian short-wave radio was restricted. Photo materials were restricted to limit photography. [6]
The newspapers that were allowed to reopen with licenses were forced to print military orders and military-controlled news. The Honolulu Advertiser and the Honolulu Star-Bulletin both published an order directed at every inhabitant of the island:
Civilian ownership of firearms was prohibited except to those specially authorized [6]. Every male islander was ordered to construct a bomb shelter [9]. Approximately 300,000 acres of private land was confiscated by the military — land, farms, buildings [8]
Civilians were not permitted to switch jobs, and had their wages frozen. U.S. Dollars were confiscated and new money was issued — only valid in Hawaii. Citizens were not allowed to carry more than $200 on them for any reason. [11]
The wages of Japanese nationals were capped at $200 per month, with the rest being forced into bank accounts, with weekly withdrawal limits of $50. [9]
Businesses were tightly controlled; they were ordered to shut down daily by 4:30 p.m. Goods on the shelves were inventoried by the military. [9] Liquor sales were banned. Gasoline was rationed. [6]
One of the more onerous measures was the nightly “blackout” of all civilian lights, ostensibly to mitigate the effectiveness of a potential enemy air raid. Every light bulb and every flame was ordered to be extinguished after dark. Even a lit cigarette, a kitchen stove burner, or an illuminated radio dial was grounds for an arrest. It was ordered that all residential doors and windows be covered. Car headlights were to be painted blue to dim the beams. [11]
“We couldn’t see each other nor anything on the table so we literally had to feel our way through the meal,” wrote Honolulu resident Richard Wrenshall wrote in a 1942 letter. “If you reached out for something you’d be liable to stick your finger in the butter or in somebody’s eye.” [11]
Military Governor Green reported that the Army Corps of Engineers had a roving band of armed individuals calling themselves the “vigilance committee” which frequently shot at lights wherever they could be seen and “terrorized” the public. [6]
Of great controversy and consequence was the suspension of the writ of habeas corpus — the common-law court doctrine requiring a party holding a prisoner to demonstrate the legal and jurisdictional basis for continuing to hold the prisoner. With all civilian due process suspended, arrestees could be held without charges or trial; without legal representation, witnesses, a defense, or a jury. [2]
Breaking the blackout order brought about stiff fines or jail time. Numerous violators were thrown before a military judge, Lt. Col. Neal D. Franklin, who swiftly sentenced them to 100 days in jail or minimum fines of $100. A Japanese person might be given as much as 1,000 days imprisonment or up to $1,000 fines. It was reported that a Shinto priest was fined $500 for not extinguishing the “eternal flame” on his temple altar. [9]
The military courts were eager to impose fines for those who broke the military governor’s general orders. However, some individuals who couldn’t pay fines were instead given a “credit” following a forced donation of their blood. The practice was jokingly referred to as being “fined a bucket of blood.” [6]
People of Japanese descent — even American citizens — were looked at with suspicion and scorn by their government and their neighbors alike. Aside from the repressive military orders used to control their lives, thousands of Hawaiian Issei were arrested and shipped off to internment camps for the duration of the war. [13]
The oppression of civil rights was so thorough that it became a main theme in the 1942 platform of one of the major political parties on the islands [7]. The platform stated:
“Civilian government has been successfully maintained and its responsibilities carried out by civilian authorities in other parts of the English-speaking world under conditions of much more severe strain than exist in Hawaii,” he wrote. “The idea that restoring the responsibility of civil government and the jurisdiction of the courts would hamper the defense of the territory by the Army and Navy is repugnant of every concept of American democracy and reflects upon the capacity of the people of Hawaii for self-government and self-discipline.” [7]
Finally, in April 1944, Federal Judge Delbert E. Metzger overturned
the suspension of the writ of habeas corpus, citing that martial law
“ceases and becomes unlawful as soon as the civilian government is
capable and willing to resume its normal functions.” [3]
Despite the ruling, martial law was enforced for six more months. General Richardson defiantly stated after the ruling that regular blackouts would continue to be enforced as of 10 p.m. that same evening. “Violations of general orders will continue to be tried in provost courts,” he pronounced. [3]
Richardson knew he would be free of consequence, since he had already been granted an executive pardon by President Roosevelt after Judge Metzger had held him in contempt of court on a previous case involving violations of the writ of habeas corpus. [3]
Judge Metzger argued that civilian law should be restored and was sufficient to protect the population. He said: “If present laws do not give the nation the fullest desirable protection against subversive or suspicious Japanese aliens, clearly it is the duty of the army and navy to ask a legislative curb and procedure instead of holding by force of arms an entire population under a form of helpless and unappealable subjugation called martial law.” [4]
Technically, martial law was terminated in Hawaii on October 24, 1944, in Roosevelt’s Presidential Proclamation 2627. While Roosevelt granted that “the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus” was restored, his declaration maintained that civilians were still thoroughly under the control of military commanders, and civilian freedoms were still heavily restricted. It was declared:
Judge McLaughlin, said in a speech that “[Maj. Gen. Short] set up an unconstitutional provost court system to try, without constitutional safeguards, anybody for anything — and they did it, too.”
Evidence explained by Judge McLaughlin revealed that there were some dubious efforts on the part of the military to influence the “civilian” decision to declare martial law. The military’s treachery was described in Hawaii Under Army Rule [7]:
{ Support Police State USA }
SOURCES
1. Tremaine, Frank. “Martial Law Proclaimed For Hawaii.” The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette [Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania] 11 Dec. 1941: 2. Web. [http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1129&dat=19411211&id=l5RRAAAAIBAJ&sjid=LWoDAAAAIBAJ&pg=2442,5301386]
2. Anthony, Joseph Garner. “Martial Law in Hawaii.” California Law Review, Vol. 30. May 1942. Web. [http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/californialawreview/vol30/iss4/1]
3. Associated Press. “Judge Invalidates Martial Law in Hawaiian Islands.” The Evening Independent [St. Petersburg, Florida] 14 April 1944: 9. Web. [http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=950&dat=19440414&id=GmpIAAAAIBAJ&sjid=CVUDAAAAIBAJ&pg=4284,6259680]
4. Johnston, Richard W. “Army Defies Ban On Hawaii Martial Law.” San Jose Evening News [San Jose, California] 14 April 1944: 7. Web. [http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1977&dat=19440413&id=JygiAAAAIBAJ&sjid=FKQFAAAAIBAJ&pg=986,1109323]
5. Associated Press. “Martial Law Ends in Hawaii. The Deseret News [Salt Lake City, Utah] 24 Oct. 1944: 1. Web. [http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=336&dat=19441024&id=tU5SAAAAIBAJ&sjid=xnwDAAAAIBAJ&pg=3153,5465917]
6. Green, Major General Thomas H. “Martial Law in Hawaii, December 7, 1941–April 4, 1943.” Unpublished manuscript. Library of Congress [Washington, D.C.]. Web. [http://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/Martial-Law_Green.pdf]
7. Anthony, Joseph Garner. Hawaii Under Army Rule. Stanford University Press [Stanford, California] 1947. [books.google.com/books?id=V66lAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA109&lpg=PA109]
8. Polmar, Norman. “World War II: The Enclyclopedia of the War Years, 1941-1945.” Random House [New York] 1996. [books.google.com/books?id=30gRAGjXrIIC&pg=PA372&lpg=PA372]
9. Dunford, Bruce. “Blackout, Martial Law After Japanese Attack.” The Observer-Reporter [Greene County, Pennsylvania] 9 Dec. 1996: A6. Web. [http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=2519&dat=19961209&id=Al5eAAAAIBAJ&sjid=2GENAAAAIBAJ&pg=2763,1190314]
10. Commission on Wartime Relocation and Internment of Civilians. “Personal Justice Denied.” 1997. Web. [http://www.archives.gov/research/japanese-americans/justice-denied/]
11. Borreca, Richard. “Martial Law Held Sway in Isles for Three Years.” The Star Bulletin [Honolulu, Hawaii] 13 Sept. 1999. Web. [http://archives.starbulletin.com/1999/09/13/special/story5.html]
12. Borreca, Richard. “Christmas 1941 in Hawaii Was Not a Time to Rejoice.” The Star Bulletin [Honolulu, Hawaii] 13 Sept. 1999. Web. [http://archives.starbulletin.com/1999/09/13/special/]
13. Soga, Keiho. “The Untold Story: Internment of Japanese Americans in Hawaii.” University of Hawaii Press {Honolulu, Hawaii] 31 Oct. 2007. [Amazon.com]
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
This surprised me so much, since I don't ever remember being taught about this is history classes and yet, it was such a major big part of the conditions the civilians had to live under for most of WW II. Granted, something had to be done since the attacks on Pearl Harbor cost the US Military so many lives, but then we find out that Franklin D Roosevelt (ROSENFELD) knew all about the attack before it ever occurred and could have stopped it before it happened.... but chose not to, since the objective was to get the US into WW II on the side of Britain who actually started the war. We did blogs on both facts stated above.
Hawaii was not a state at the time, so loyalty, with so many Japanese living there was probably an issue, so to some degree, its understandable that Martial Law was declared. But its not understandable, the conditions the military set, while the citizens were under martial law. It was conducted more like a military dictatorship, then as a protection for the population at large. Was that the reason for it being used? To establish such a dictatorship? You read and decide. Could this happen today now that Hawaii is offically a state of our Union???
FUND RAISING TIME AGAIN.
We are now asking you once again, to contribute toward our deficit of $250 that we need by the 1st of the month. That is 13 days away, we are beginning now, so we make it by that time. We are so grateful for your support in so many ways.
If you can afford it please donate off to the right of the blog. God Bless you and your family in all things. So stay with us til the first and hopefully, you will be able to contribute so we can continue our work in educating, researching and informing.
Hawaii under martial law was like ‘military dictatorship’ (1941-1944)
https://alethonews.wordpress.com/2014/12/10/hawaii-under-martial-law-was-like-military-dictatorship-1941-1944/
By Admin, Aletho News, December 10, 2014
For three years Hawaiians lived under repressive Army rule and without any constitutional protections
Police State USA
HAWAII — Islanders suffered under nearly three years of martial law from 1941-1944; so oppressive that it was later described by a federal judge as a “military dictatorship.” All manner of civilian liberties were replaced by oppressive military orders enforced by American soldiers.
The dark period of Hawaiian history began on December 7, 1941, with the massive surprise attack of Japanese bombers on the U.S. Naval Base Pearl Harbor. The air raid successfully sunk or grounded 18 ships and killed 2,403 Americans.
As the smoke billowed from the harbor, Lieutenant General Walter Short met with Territorial Governor Joseph Poindexter to convince him to declare martial law. Being coerced through tactics discussed below, Gov. Poindexter reluctantly ceded power to the military — temporarily, or so he thought.
In declaring martial law, all forms of civilian law were suspended. An entire new system of justice and order was instituted and controlled at the absolute discretion of Lt. Gen. Short — the newly declared “Military Governor” of the islands.
The transfer of power meant that all civilian courts would be closed, and all government functions — federal, territorial, and municipal — would be placed under military control. The U.S. Constitution was suspended and civilians no longer guaranteed any individual rights or protections from the government. Civilians had no freedom of speech, self-defense, assembly, or protections from from unreasonable search and seizures, inter alia.
Lt. General Short, in his first proclamation as Military Governor on December 7th, 1941, stated that [7]:
I shall therefore shortly publish ordinances governing the conduct of the people of the Territory with respect to the showing of lights, circulation, meetings, censorship, possession of arms, ammunition, and explosives, the sale of intoxicating liquors and other subjects.Poindexter relayed his decision to the mainland, which was affirmed with approval from the President of the United States [7]:
In order to assist in repelling the threatened invasion of our island home, good citizens will cheerfully obey this proclamation and the ordinances to be published; others will be required to do so. Offenders will be severely punished by military tribunals or will be held in custody until such time that the civil courts are able to function.
The Military Governor’s subsequent orders were designed to “discourage concerted action of any kind.” Saloons were ordered to be closed, as well as schools, theaters — anywhere there might be a “concentration of people.” [6]
Civilians were given strict curfews. The streets were ordered to be cleared between the hours of 9:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. under penalty of arrest. All persons of Japanese descent had to be in their homes by 8:00 p.m. [6]
Everyone over the age of six years was fingerprinted, registered, and ordered to carry around military-issued ID cards. [11] Using the extensive registration program, the military drew up intelligence reports on 450,000 Hawaiians. [8]
Stringent censorship of the media went into immediate effect. The Military Governor required that newspapers be made illegal unless they were granted a license to operate. All newspapers and radio stations were shut down for a time. Any publication not printed exclusively in English was denied a license and considered illegal. [6]
The local telephone company was taken over by the military. [6] All outgoing mail was read and censored by the military. All long-distance telephone calls to the mainland were required to be spoken in English and censored. The military government monitored the content and morale of the population this way. [11]
Travel between the islands was restricted. Use of civilian short-wave radio was restricted. Photo materials were restricted to limit photography. [6]
The newspapers that were allowed to reopen with licenses were forced to print military orders and military-controlled news. The Honolulu Advertiser and the Honolulu Star-Bulletin both published an order directed at every inhabitant of the island:
The Army demands the aid and assistance of every person in the Territory… If you are ordered by military personnel to obey a certain command, that order must be obeyed instantly and without question. [9]Days after martial law had gone into effect, the United Press reported that “cases of non-cooperation” were “severely dealt with” according to military authorities [1].
Civilian ownership of firearms was prohibited except to those specially authorized [6]. Every male islander was ordered to construct a bomb shelter [9]. Approximately 300,000 acres of private land was confiscated by the military — land, farms, buildings [8]
Civilians were not permitted to switch jobs, and had their wages frozen. U.S. Dollars were confiscated and new money was issued — only valid in Hawaii. Citizens were not allowed to carry more than $200 on them for any reason. [11]
The wages of Japanese nationals were capped at $200 per month, with the rest being forced into bank accounts, with weekly withdrawal limits of $50. [9]
Businesses were tightly controlled; they were ordered to shut down daily by 4:30 p.m. Goods on the shelves were inventoried by the military. [9] Liquor sales were banned. Gasoline was rationed. [6]
One of the more onerous measures was the nightly “blackout” of all civilian lights, ostensibly to mitigate the effectiveness of a potential enemy air raid. Every light bulb and every flame was ordered to be extinguished after dark. Even a lit cigarette, a kitchen stove burner, or an illuminated radio dial was grounds for an arrest. It was ordered that all residential doors and windows be covered. Car headlights were to be painted blue to dim the beams. [11]
“We couldn’t see each other nor anything on the table so we literally had to feel our way through the meal,” wrote Honolulu resident Richard Wrenshall wrote in a 1942 letter. “If you reached out for something you’d be liable to stick your finger in the butter or in somebody’s eye.” [11]
Military Governor Green reported that the Army Corps of Engineers had a roving band of armed individuals calling themselves the “vigilance committee” which frequently shot at lights wherever they could be seen and “terrorized” the public. [6]
Of great controversy and consequence was the suspension of the writ of habeas corpus — the common-law court doctrine requiring a party holding a prisoner to demonstrate the legal and jurisdictional basis for continuing to hold the prisoner. With all civilian due process suspended, arrestees could be held without charges or trial; without legal representation, witnesses, a defense, or a jury. [2]
Breaking the blackout order brought about stiff fines or jail time. Numerous violators were thrown before a military judge, Lt. Col. Neal D. Franklin, who swiftly sentenced them to 100 days in jail or minimum fines of $100. A Japanese person might be given as much as 1,000 days imprisonment or up to $1,000 fines. It was reported that a Shinto priest was fined $500 for not extinguishing the “eternal flame” on his temple altar. [9]
The military courts were eager to impose fines for those who broke the military governor’s general orders. However, some individuals who couldn’t pay fines were instead given a “credit” following a forced donation of their blood. The practice was jokingly referred to as being “fined a bucket of blood.” [6]
People of Japanese descent — even American citizens — were looked at with suspicion and scorn by their government and their neighbors alike. Aside from the repressive military orders used to control their lives, thousands of Hawaiian Issei were arrested and shipped off to internment camps for the duration of the war. [13]
The oppression of civil rights was so thorough that it became a main theme in the 1942 platform of one of the major political parties on the islands [7]. The platform stated:
We deplore a system of government whereby the citizens of the Territory of Hawaii can be arrested and held for investigation, without bail, for offenses that have nothing to do with the operations of the military establishment.
We deplore the exercise of public authorities who are making unlawful searches and seizures in the homes of the people of the Territory of Hawaii without a search warrant…
We deplore the continued existence of the suspension of the writ of habeas corpus…It was evident that the continued suspension of civilian law was disconcerting to some on the mainland, including Secretary of the Interior Harold L. Ickes, who wrote on January 9th, 1943:
“Civilian government has been successfully maintained and its responsibilities carried out by civilian authorities in other parts of the English-speaking world under conditions of much more severe strain than exist in Hawaii,” he wrote. “The idea that restoring the responsibility of civil government and the jurisdiction of the courts would hamper the defense of the territory by the Army and Navy is repugnant of every concept of American democracy and reflects upon the capacity of the people of Hawaii for self-government and self-discipline.” [7]
“The Army went beyond the governor and
set up that which was lawful only in conquered enemy territory… they
threw the Constitution into the discard and set up a military
dictatorship.”
Despite the ruling, martial law was enforced for six more months. General Richardson defiantly stated after the ruling that regular blackouts would continue to be enforced as of 10 p.m. that same evening. “Violations of general orders will continue to be tried in provost courts,” he pronounced. [3]
Richardson knew he would be free of consequence, since he had already been granted an executive pardon by President Roosevelt after Judge Metzger had held him in contempt of court on a previous case involving violations of the writ of habeas corpus. [3]
Judge Metzger argued that civilian law should be restored and was sufficient to protect the population. He said: “If present laws do not give the nation the fullest desirable protection against subversive or suspicious Japanese aliens, clearly it is the duty of the army and navy to ask a legislative curb and procedure instead of holding by force of arms an entire population under a form of helpless and unappealable subjugation called martial law.” [4]
Technically, martial law was terminated in Hawaii on October 24, 1944, in Roosevelt’s Presidential Proclamation 2627. While Roosevelt granted that “the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus” was restored, his declaration maintained that civilians were still thoroughly under the control of military commanders, and civilian freedoms were still heavily restricted. It was declared:
The military commander will have authority to establish blackouts and curfew periods, organize air raid precautions, regulate the conduct of enemy aliens, take anti-espionage precautions in the military area, control the possession and use of weapons, set up ports and harbors protections, regulate travel and regulate the publication of newspapers “published in a foreign language or in duel languages.”
In addition he will have authority to regulate or prohibit the possession or use of radio transmission sets between the military area and points away from it. The authority conferred in the executive order will expire 30 days after the end of war with Japan. [5]After the war, federal district court magistrate Judge J. Frank McLaughlin condemned the conduct of martial law, saying, “Gov. Poindexter declared lawfully martial law but the Army went beyond the governor and set up that which was lawful only in conquered enemy territory namely, military government which is not bound by the Constitution. And they… threw the Constitution into the discard and set up a military dictatorship.” [12]
Judge McLaughlin, said in a speech that “[Maj. Gen. Short] set up an unconstitutional provost court system to try, without constitutional safeguards, anybody for anything — and they did it, too.”
Evidence explained by Judge McLaughlin revealed that there were some dubious efforts on the part of the military to influence the “civilian” decision to declare martial law. The military’s treachery was described in Hawaii Under Army Rule [7]:
Judge McLaughlin outlined how it was done, pointing out that the proclamation of martial law was prepared by the Army months in advance of December 7, 1941, and noted that the proclamation “was in the hands of the publishers for printing that afternoon some substantial period of time before the governor’s proclamation was signed and received for publication.”
Commenting on Secretary Patterson’s letter to Representative Andrews and a public statement by General Richardson on the same subject, Judge McLaughlin said:
“…They did not, of course, mention that the Army went back on its word to the Hawaiian legislature. They did not tell you that it had said one thing while preparing to do another thing. They did not tell you that they prepared Governor Poindexter’s proclamation for him and induced him to sign it, reluctantly. They did not tell you either that he finally agreed to do as they asked with the understanding that the effect of the proclamation would be for maybe 30 days…”
Judge McLaughlin concluded:
“Yes ‘they did it.’ They did it intentionally. They did it with design aforethought. They did it knowing disregard of the Constitution. They did it because Hawaii is not a State. They did it because they did not have faith that Americanism transcends race, class, and creed.”This period of events marked the longest period that Americans had ever been subjected to military rule, and as many commentators have pointed out, the conditions were more repressive than many actual combat zones.
{ Support Police State USA }
SOURCES
1. Tremaine, Frank. “Martial Law Proclaimed For Hawaii.” The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette [Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania] 11 Dec. 1941: 2. Web. [http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1129&dat=19411211&id=l5RRAAAAIBAJ&sjid=LWoDAAAAIBAJ&pg=2442,5301386]
2. Anthony, Joseph Garner. “Martial Law in Hawaii.” California Law Review, Vol. 30. May 1942. Web. [http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/californialawreview/vol30/iss4/1]
3. Associated Press. “Judge Invalidates Martial Law in Hawaiian Islands.” The Evening Independent [St. Petersburg, Florida] 14 April 1944: 9. Web. [http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=950&dat=19440414&id=GmpIAAAAIBAJ&sjid=CVUDAAAAIBAJ&pg=4284,6259680]
4. Johnston, Richard W. “Army Defies Ban On Hawaii Martial Law.” San Jose Evening News [San Jose, California] 14 April 1944: 7. Web. [http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1977&dat=19440413&id=JygiAAAAIBAJ&sjid=FKQFAAAAIBAJ&pg=986,1109323]
5. Associated Press. “Martial Law Ends in Hawaii. The Deseret News [Salt Lake City, Utah] 24 Oct. 1944: 1. Web. [http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=336&dat=19441024&id=tU5SAAAAIBAJ&sjid=xnwDAAAAIBAJ&pg=3153,5465917]
6. Green, Major General Thomas H. “Martial Law in Hawaii, December 7, 1941–April 4, 1943.” Unpublished manuscript. Library of Congress [Washington, D.C.]. Web. [http://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/Martial-Law_Green.pdf]
7. Anthony, Joseph Garner. Hawaii Under Army Rule. Stanford University Press [Stanford, California] 1947. [books.google.com/books?id=V66lAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA109&lpg=PA109]
8. Polmar, Norman. “World War II: The Enclyclopedia of the War Years, 1941-1945.” Random House [New York] 1996. [books.google.com/books?id=30gRAGjXrIIC&pg=PA372&lpg=PA372]
9. Dunford, Bruce. “Blackout, Martial Law After Japanese Attack.” The Observer-Reporter [Greene County, Pennsylvania] 9 Dec. 1996: A6. Web. [http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=2519&dat=19961209&id=Al5eAAAAIBAJ&sjid=2GENAAAAIBAJ&pg=2763,1190314]
10. Commission on Wartime Relocation and Internment of Civilians. “Personal Justice Denied.” 1997. Web. [http://www.archives.gov/research/japanese-americans/justice-denied/]
11. Borreca, Richard. “Martial Law Held Sway in Isles for Three Years.” The Star Bulletin [Honolulu, Hawaii] 13 Sept. 1999. Web. [http://archives.starbulletin.com/1999/09/13/special/story5.html]
12. Borreca, Richard. “Christmas 1941 in Hawaii Was Not a Time to Rejoice.” The Star Bulletin [Honolulu, Hawaii] 13 Sept. 1999. Web. [http://archives.starbulletin.com/1999/09/13/special/]
13. Soga, Keiho. “The Untold Story: Internment of Japanese Americans in Hawaii.” University of Hawaii Press {Honolulu, Hawaii] 31 Oct. 2007. [Amazon.com]
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
Illuminati Whistleblower "They Worship lucifer"
Vatic Note: This was a very interesting interview, especially about her and others experience as children, from certain bloodlines, with spirit beings in their awareness at young ages. What was interesting is her description of how they treat, train, and mind control these illum kids with special powers, and it was barbaric. But given the soul-less nature of these evil demons, it does not surprise me.
Do I believe all this? Some of it I do, the rest I have to dig deeper to decide. Will post updates as I confirm more of it. This could be just another way to scare us or instill fear or a sense of helplessness. I refuse to do any of it since I know we are powerful beings and with God on our side, and we show up, do the best we can, then He will take care of the rest. That is why the evil ones are afraid of Him.
FUND RAISING TIME AGAIN.
We are now asking you once again, to contribute toward our deficit of $250 that we need by the 1st of the month. That is 13 days away, we are beginning now, so we make it by that time. We are so grateful for your support in so many ways.
If you can afford it please donate off to the right of the blog. God Bless you and your family in all things. So stay with us til the first and hopefully, you will be able to contribute so we can continue our work in educating, researching and informing.
Illuminati Whistleblower "They Worship lucifer"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aGEYloihE9g
Published by XTRACT RADIO WITH HOST ''X'' PRESENT CAROLYN HAMLETT, on Jul 18, 2013
Carolyn reveals how the Illuminati worship lucifer and are setting the stage for the antichrist to take control of "the new world order". Carolyn discusses mind control, child abuse, satanic rituals and reveals how the illuminati really feel about Jesus Christ.
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."
Ephesians 6:12
Carolyn reveals how these un-seen demons flee at the name of Jesus Christ and how calling out his name or even thinking it can break one free from sleep paralysis, something to which many many people will attest.
This is a very interesting, informative and revealing interview that is
not to be missed!
http://www.latalkradio.com/Xtract.php
Beyond the Physical Realm (Carolyn Hamlett blog )
http://beyondthephysical.blogspot.com/
http://www.islandonlinenews.com/
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
Do I believe all this? Some of it I do, the rest I have to dig deeper to decide. Will post updates as I confirm more of it. This could be just another way to scare us or instill fear or a sense of helplessness. I refuse to do any of it since I know we are powerful beings and with God on our side, and we show up, do the best we can, then He will take care of the rest. That is why the evil ones are afraid of Him.
FUND RAISING TIME AGAIN.
We are now asking you once again, to contribute toward our deficit of $250 that we need by the 1st of the month. That is 13 days away, we are beginning now, so we make it by that time. We are so grateful for your support in so many ways.
If you can afford it please donate off to the right of the blog. God Bless you and your family in all things. So stay with us til the first and hopefully, you will be able to contribute so we can continue our work in educating, researching and informing.
Illuminati Whistleblower "They Worship lucifer"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aGEYloihE9g
Published by XTRACT RADIO WITH HOST ''X'' PRESENT CAROLYN HAMLETT, on Jul 18, 2013
Carolyn reveals how the Illuminati worship lucifer and are setting the stage for the antichrist to take control of "the new world order". Carolyn discusses mind control, child abuse, satanic rituals and reveals how the illuminati really feel about Jesus Christ.
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."
Ephesians 6:12
Carolyn reveals how these un-seen demons flee at the name of Jesus Christ and how calling out his name or even thinking it can break one free from sleep paralysis, something to which many many people will attest.
This is a very interesting, informative and revealing interview that is
not to be missed!
http://www.latalkradio.com/Xtract.php
Beyond the Physical Realm (Carolyn Hamlett blog )
http://beyondthephysical.blogspot.com/
http://www.islandonlinenews.com/
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
U.S. Department of Defense Makes $7-Billion Bet Against Saudi Arabia
Vatic Note: I just found this, so I have not had the chance to verify if this is for real, so please read, then go to the link I provided under the photo and click on it to listen. If this is for real, it will change the world and how it works and do so in ways that could be great for all of us. But first this has to be verified, so be patient as I am going to work on researching this and will let you know what I find out. You decide.
FUND RAISING TIME AGAIN.
We are now asking you once again, to contribute toward our deficit of $250 that we need by the 1st of the month. That is 13 days away, we are beginning now, so we make it by that time. We are so grateful for your support in so many ways.
If you can afford it please donate off to the right of the blog. God Bless you and your family in all things. So stay with us til the first and hopefully, you will be able to contribute so we can continue our work in educating, researching and informing.
U.S. Department of Defense Makes $7-Billion Bet Against Saudi Arabia
http://moneymorning.com/ext/articles/new-fuel/the-end-of-saudi-oil-regime.php?iris=437556
By MONEY MORNING STAFF REPORTS - 12/17/2015
The Saudi Royals...
For decades, they've ruled the global energy markets with an iron fist.
They've wielded so much power, the United States has been forced to tolerate their radical ties and human rights violations.
But not anymore...
A shocking discovery outside of Bern, Switzerland has unlocked a massive 36,000-year supply of free energy.
Suddenly, every major player on the planet is turning their back on Saudi Arabia's oil in favor of this revolutionary fuel.
In fact, the U.S. Department of Defense just invested $7 billion in a single day.
Apple, Google, and Facebook are spending billions to implement the technology behind this new fuel. And billionaires like Bill Gates and Warren Buffett are going all in.
The International Energy Agency predicts $48 trillion could flow into this tiny sector, making it the #1 energy source on the planet.
To get the video and listen to it, just go directly to http://pro.moneymappress.com/EADSLR3979/PEADRBBF/?iris=437556&h=true
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
FUND RAISING TIME AGAIN.
We are now asking you once again, to contribute toward our deficit of $250 that we need by the 1st of the month. That is 13 days away, we are beginning now, so we make it by that time. We are so grateful for your support in so many ways.
If you can afford it please donate off to the right of the blog. God Bless you and your family in all things. So stay with us til the first and hopefully, you will be able to contribute so we can continue our work in educating, researching and informing.
U.S. Department of Defense Makes $7-Billion Bet Against Saudi Arabia
http://moneymorning.com/ext/articles/new-fuel/the-end-of-saudi-oil-regime.php?iris=437556
By MONEY MORNING STAFF REPORTS - 12/17/2015
The Saudi Royals...
For decades, they've ruled the global energy markets with an iron fist.
They've wielded so much power, the United States has been forced to tolerate their radical ties and human rights violations.
But not anymore...
A shocking discovery outside of Bern, Switzerland has unlocked a massive 36,000-year supply of free energy.
Suddenly, every major player on the planet is turning their back on Saudi Arabia's oil in favor of this revolutionary fuel.
In fact, the U.S. Department of Defense just invested $7 billion in a single day.
Apple, Google, and Facebook are spending billions to implement the technology behind this new fuel. And billionaires like Bill Gates and Warren Buffett are going all in.
The International Energy Agency predicts $48 trillion could flow into this tiny sector, making it the #1 energy source on the planet.
To get the video and listen to it, just go directly to http://pro.moneymappress.com/EADSLR3979/PEADRBBF/?iris=437556&h=true
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
2015-12-17
VATIC ALERT: If A Doctor Wants Your Children To Have A Vaccine, Ask Them To complete and Sign This!
Vatic Note: This is a must do, if you want to protect your children from the "PHARMA FASCISTS". This below, lays a foundation for forcing Doctors BACK INTO THEIR TRADITIONAL ROLE AS FIDUCIARY CARETAKERS OF OUR PEOPLES HEALTH. If they sign this below, they and their attorneys can be sued for lying under a warrant such as this one about Vaccine Safety.
We have experienced too many false flags with respect to bioweapons used and then treated as if they were some natural disaster. Many proved it was deception and the benefit went to the drug companies.
FUND RAISING TIME AGAIN.
We are now asking you once again, to contribute toward our deficit of $250 that we need by the 1st of the month. That is 13 days away, so we are beginning now, so we make it by that time. We are so grateful for your support in so many ways.
If you can afford it please donate off to the right of the blog. God Bless you and your family in all things. So stay with us til the first and hopefully, you will be able to contribute so we can continue our work in educating, researching and informing.
If A Doctor Wants Your Children To Have A Vaccine, Ask Them Sign This!
http://politicalvelcraft.org/2010/09/27/if-a-doctor-wants-you-or-your-children-to-have-a-vaccine-ask-them-to-sign-this/
By Admin, Political Velcraft, Sept 27, 2010
I (Physician’s name, degree)_________________________, _____ am a
physician licensed to practice medicine in the State of
________________. My State license number is _______________ , and my DEA number is _______________. My medical specialty is ________________________
I have a thorough understanding of the risks and benefits of all the
medications that I prescribe for or administer to my patients. In the
case of (Patient’s
name) ___________________________ , age _________ , whom I have
examined, I find that certain risk factors exist that justify the
recommended vaccinations. The following is a list of said risk factors
and the vaccinations that will protect against them:
Risk Factor ____________________________________________
Vaccination ___________________________________________
Risk Factor ____________________________________________
Vaccination ___________________________________________
Risk Factor ____________________________________________
Vaccination ___________________________________________
Risk Factor ____________________________________________
Vaccination ___________________________________________
Risk Factor ____________________________________________
Vaccination ___________________________________________
Risk Factor ____________________________________________
Vaccination ___________________________________________
I am aware that vaccines typically contain many of the following fillers:
* aluminum hydroxide
* aluminum phosphate
* ammonium sulfate
* amphotericin B
* animal tissues: pig blood, horse blood, rabbit brain,
* dog kidney, monkey kidney,
* chick embryo, chicken egg, duck egg
* calf (bovine) serum
* betapropiolactone
* fetal bovine serum
* formaldehyde
* formalin
* gelatin
* glycerol
* human diploid cells (originating from human aborted fetal tissue)
* hydrolized gelatin
* mercury thimerosol (thimerosal, Merthiolate(r))
* monosodium glutamate (MSG)
* neomycin
* neomycin sulfate
* phenol red indicator
* phenoxyethanol (antifreeze)
* potassium diphosphate
* potassium monophosphate
* polymyxin B
* polysorbate 20
* polysorbate 80
* porcine (pig) pancreatic hydrolysate of casein
* residual MRC5 proteins
* sorbitol
* tri(n)butylphosphate,
* VERO cells, a continuous line of monkey kidney cells, and
* washed sheep red blood
and, hereby, warrant that these ingredients are safe for injection into the body of my patient. I have researched reports to the contrary, such as reports that mercury thimerosol causes severe neurological and immunological damage, and find that they are not credible.
I am aware that some vaccines have been found to have been contaminated with Simian Virus 40 (SV 40) and that SV 40 is causally linked by some researchers to non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and mesotheliomas in humans as well as in experimental animals. I hereby warrant that the vaccines I employ in my practice do not contain SV 40 or any other live viruses. (Alternately, I hereby warrant that said SV-40 virus or other viruses pose no substantive risk to my patient.)
I hereby warrant that the vaccines I am recommending for the care of (Patient’s name) _______________ _______________________ do not contain any tissue from aborted human babies (also known as “fetuses”).
In order to protect my patient’s well being, I have taken the following steps to guarantee that the vaccines I will use will contain no damaging contaminants.
STEPS TAKEN: ______________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
I have personally investigated the reports made to the VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) and state that it is my professional opinion that the vaccines I am recommending are safe for administration to a child under the age of 5 years.
The bases for my opinion are itemized on Exhibit A, attached hereto, — “Physician’s Bases for Professional Opinion of Vaccine Safety.” (Please itemize each recommended vaccine separately along with the bases for arriving at the conclusion that the vaccine is safe for administration to a child under the age of 5 years.)
The professional journal articles I have relied upon in the issuance of this Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine Safety are itemized on Exhibit B , attached hereto, — “Scientific Articles in Support of Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine Safety.”
The professional journal articles that I have read which contain opinions adverse to my opinion are itemized on Exhibit C , attached hereto, — “Scientific Articles Contrary to Physician’s Opinion of Vaccine Safety”
The reasons for my determining that the articles in Exhibit C were invalid are delineated in Attachment D , attached hereto, — “Physician’s Reasons for Determining the Invalidity of Adverse Scientific Opinions.”
Hepatitis B
I understand that 60 percent of patients who are vaccinated for Hepatitis B will lose detectable antibodies to Hepatitis B within 12 years. I understand that in 1996 only 54 cases of Hepatitis B were reported to the CDC in the 0-1 year age group. I understand that in the VAERS, there were 1,080 total reports of adverse reactions from Hepatitis B vaccine in 1996 in the 0-1 year age group, with 47 deaths reported.
I understand that 50 percent of patients who contract Hepatitis B develop no symptoms after exposure. I understand that 30 percent will develop only flu-like symptoms and will have lifetime immunity. I understand that 20 percent will develop the symptoms of the disease, but that 95 percent will fully recover and have lifetime immunity.
I understand that 5 percent of the patients who are exposed to Hepatitis B will become chronic carriers of the disease. I understand that 75 percent of the chronic carriers will live with an asymptomatic infection and that only 25 percent of the chronic carriers will develop chronic liver disease or liver cancer, 10-30 years after the acute infection. The following scientific studies have been performed to demonstrate the safety of the Hepatitis B vaccine in children under the age of 5 years.
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
In addition to the recommended vaccinations as protections against the above cited risk factors, I have recommended other non-vaccine measures to protect the health of my patient and have enumerated said non-vaccine measures on Exhibit D , attached hereto, “Non-vaccine Measures to Protect Against Risk Factors” I am issuing this Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine Safety in my professional capacity as the attending physician to (Patient’s name) ________________________________. Regardless of the legal entity under which I normally practice medicine, I am issuing this statement in both my business and individual capacities and hereby waive any statutory, Common Law, Constitutional, UCC, international treaty, and any other legal immunities from liability lawsuits in the instant case.
I issue this document of my own free will after consultation with competent legal counsel whose name is _____________________________, an attorney admitted to the Bar in the State of __________________ .
__________________________________ (Name of Attending Physician)
__________________________________ L.S. (Signature of Attending Physician)
Signed on this _______ day of ______________ A.D. ________
Witness: _______________________________ Date: _____________________
Notary Public: ___________________________Date: ______________________
Related articles
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
We have experienced too many false flags with respect to bioweapons used and then treated as if they were some natural disaster. Many proved it was deception and the benefit went to the drug companies.
FUND RAISING TIME AGAIN.
We are now asking you once again, to contribute toward our deficit of $250 that we need by the 1st of the month. That is 13 days away, so we are beginning now, so we make it by that time. We are so grateful for your support in so many ways.
If you can afford it please donate off to the right of the blog. God Bless you and your family in all things. So stay with us til the first and hopefully, you will be able to contribute so we can continue our work in educating, researching and informing.
If A Doctor Wants Your Children To Have A Vaccine, Ask Them Sign This!
http://politicalvelcraft.org/2010/09/27/if-a-doctor-wants-you-or-your-children-to-have-a-vaccine-ask-them-to-sign-this/
By Admin, Political Velcraft, Sept 27, 2010
Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine Safety
- American Psychological Association & Illuminati Coercion: Playing Lord Of The Rings!
- Connecting the Dots: Vaccines, Heavy Metals, GMOs and Brain Damage
Risk Factor ____________________________________________
Vaccination ___________________________________________
Risk Factor ____________________________________________
Vaccination ___________________________________________
Risk Factor ____________________________________________
Vaccination ___________________________________________
Risk Factor ____________________________________________
Vaccination ___________________________________________
Risk Factor ____________________________________________
Vaccination ___________________________________________
Risk Factor ____________________________________________
Vaccination ___________________________________________
I am aware that vaccines typically contain many of the following fillers:
* aluminum hydroxide
* aluminum phosphate
* ammonium sulfate
* amphotericin B
* animal tissues: pig blood, horse blood, rabbit brain,
* dog kidney, monkey kidney,
* chick embryo, chicken egg, duck egg
* calf (bovine) serum
* betapropiolactone
* fetal bovine serum
* formaldehyde
* formalin
* gelatin
* glycerol
* human diploid cells (originating from human aborted fetal tissue)
* hydrolized gelatin
* mercury thimerosol (thimerosal, Merthiolate(r))
* monosodium glutamate (MSG)
* neomycin
* neomycin sulfate
* phenol red indicator
* phenoxyethanol (antifreeze)
* potassium diphosphate
* potassium monophosphate
* polymyxin B
* polysorbate 20
* polysorbate 80
* porcine (pig) pancreatic hydrolysate of casein
* residual MRC5 proteins
* sorbitol
* tri(n)butylphosphate,
* VERO cells, a continuous line of monkey kidney cells, and
* washed sheep red blood
and, hereby, warrant that these ingredients are safe for injection into the body of my patient. I have researched reports to the contrary, such as reports that mercury thimerosol causes severe neurological and immunological damage, and find that they are not credible.
I am aware that some vaccines have been found to have been contaminated with Simian Virus 40 (SV 40) and that SV 40 is causally linked by some researchers to non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and mesotheliomas in humans as well as in experimental animals. I hereby warrant that the vaccines I employ in my practice do not contain SV 40 or any other live viruses. (Alternately, I hereby warrant that said SV-40 virus or other viruses pose no substantive risk to my patient.)
I hereby warrant that the vaccines I am recommending for the care of (Patient’s name) _______________ _______________________ do not contain any tissue from aborted human babies (also known as “fetuses”).
In order to protect my patient’s well being, I have taken the following steps to guarantee that the vaccines I will use will contain no damaging contaminants.
STEPS TAKEN: ______________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
I have personally investigated the reports made to the VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) and state that it is my professional opinion that the vaccines I am recommending are safe for administration to a child under the age of 5 years.
The bases for my opinion are itemized on Exhibit A, attached hereto, — “Physician’s Bases for Professional Opinion of Vaccine Safety.” (Please itemize each recommended vaccine separately along with the bases for arriving at the conclusion that the vaccine is safe for administration to a child under the age of 5 years.)
The professional journal articles I have relied upon in the issuance of this Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine Safety are itemized on Exhibit B , attached hereto, — “Scientific Articles in Support of Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine Safety.”
The professional journal articles that I have read which contain opinions adverse to my opinion are itemized on Exhibit C , attached hereto, — “Scientific Articles Contrary to Physician’s Opinion of Vaccine Safety”
The reasons for my determining that the articles in Exhibit C were invalid are delineated in Attachment D , attached hereto, — “Physician’s Reasons for Determining the Invalidity of Adverse Scientific Opinions.”
Hepatitis B
I understand that 60 percent of patients who are vaccinated for Hepatitis B will lose detectable antibodies to Hepatitis B within 12 years. I understand that in 1996 only 54 cases of Hepatitis B were reported to the CDC in the 0-1 year age group. I understand that in the VAERS, there were 1,080 total reports of adverse reactions from Hepatitis B vaccine in 1996 in the 0-1 year age group, with 47 deaths reported.
I understand that 50 percent of patients who contract Hepatitis B develop no symptoms after exposure. I understand that 30 percent will develop only flu-like symptoms and will have lifetime immunity. I understand that 20 percent will develop the symptoms of the disease, but that 95 percent will fully recover and have lifetime immunity.
I understand that 5 percent of the patients who are exposed to Hepatitis B will become chronic carriers of the disease. I understand that 75 percent of the chronic carriers will live with an asymptomatic infection and that only 25 percent of the chronic carriers will develop chronic liver disease or liver cancer, 10-30 years after the acute infection. The following scientific studies have been performed to demonstrate the safety of the Hepatitis B vaccine in children under the age of 5 years.
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
In addition to the recommended vaccinations as protections against the above cited risk factors, I have recommended other non-vaccine measures to protect the health of my patient and have enumerated said non-vaccine measures on Exhibit D , attached hereto, “Non-vaccine Measures to Protect Against Risk Factors” I am issuing this Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine Safety in my professional capacity as the attending physician to (Patient’s name) ________________________________. Regardless of the legal entity under which I normally practice medicine, I am issuing this statement in both my business and individual capacities and hereby waive any statutory, Common Law, Constitutional, UCC, international treaty, and any other legal immunities from liability lawsuits in the instant case.
I issue this document of my own free will after consultation with competent legal counsel whose name is _____________________________, an attorney admitted to the Bar in the State of __________________ .
__________________________________ (Name of Attending Physician)
__________________________________ L.S. (Signature of Attending Physician)
Signed on this _______ day of ______________ A.D. ________
Witness: _______________________________ Date: _____________________
Notary Public: ___________________________Date: ______________________
Related articles
- Why I Don’t Vaccinate- by Amy Goalen Whittam (crunchimomma.wordpress.com)
- Hepatitis B vaccine caused chronic fatigue syndrome – US Court
- Flu shots are medical procedures that come with deadly risks (naturalremediesblog.net)
- Fetal Deaths up 4000% after pregnant mothers took Flu Vaccine (real-agenda.com)
- Study: Patients more likely to listen to nurses about flu, pneumonia vaccinations (medcitynews.com)
- Breaking => U.S. Federal Court Rules Autism & Brain Damage Caused By Big Pharma Vaccine! (politicalvelcraft.org)
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
VATICAN SECRET EXPOSED December 23, 2015 PLANET X part 3 of 4
Vatic Note: We have a short vatic note tonight since this below in both video and writing, says it all. Its just that we don't know if its real or part of their 1966 Iron Mountain report recommending using bogus aliens to get us to agree to their New World Order. A satanic one at that. You read and decide.
FUND RAISING TIME AGAIN.
We are now asking you once again, to contribute toward our deficit of $250 that we need by the 1st of the month. That is 13 days away, so we are beginning now, so we make it by that time. We are so grateful for your support in so many ways.
If you can afford it please donate off to the right of the blog. God Bless you and your family in all things. So stay with us til the first and hopefully, you will be able to contribute so we can continue our work in educating, researching and informing.
VATICAN SECRET EXPOSED December 23, 2015 PLANET X part 3 of 4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zz0_vs3uOSw
Published by UFOgroup77NEWS on Aug 6, 2015,
Listen to the experts talk about the coming changes which some say are due to centuries old prophecies. The Vatican is said to know much more then most when it comes to future events. Have you ever heard of the Fatima Prophecies, Listen in as the experts connect the dots and include planet x into their calculations.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=Zz0_vs3uOSw
WATCH THE FULL PLAYLIST HERE: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list...
Video Source: http://ufonewsdaily.blogspot.com
Join the discussion at: http://ddsdtv.blogspot.com
If you would like additional information, we've provided links below to videos on this very subject matter.
DON'T SEE THE PLAYLIST YOU'RE LOOKING FOR?
LINK DOESN'T WORK?
THEN CLICK ON THE FOLLOWING LINK:
https://www.youtube.com/user/LeeCount...
"Miracles and the Paranormal": https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list...
"CIA Agents LEAK evidence on REAL UFOS & ALIENS": https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list...
"REAL UFO TECH the NASA ALIEN Conspiracy": https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list...
"Real ALIEN contact in COLORADO": https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list...
"Real ALIEN contact in HOLLAND": https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list...
"REAL ALIEN ABDUCTION CASES": https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list...
NEW VIDEOS will now be uploaded once a week. Thank you for your time, likes and subs.
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
FUND RAISING TIME AGAIN.
We are now asking you once again, to contribute toward our deficit of $250 that we need by the 1st of the month. That is 13 days away, so we are beginning now, so we make it by that time. We are so grateful for your support in so many ways.
If you can afford it please donate off to the right of the blog. God Bless you and your family in all things. So stay with us til the first and hopefully, you will be able to contribute so we can continue our work in educating, researching and informing.
VATICAN SECRET EXPOSED December 23, 2015 PLANET X part 3 of 4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zz0_vs3uOSw
Published by UFOgroup77NEWS on Aug 6, 2015,
Listen to the experts talk about the coming changes which some say are due to centuries old prophecies. The Vatican is said to know much more then most when it comes to future events. Have you ever heard of the Fatima Prophecies, Listen in as the experts connect the dots and include planet x into their calculations.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=Zz0_vs3uOSw
WATCH THE FULL PLAYLIST HERE: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list...
Video Source: http://ufonewsdaily.blogspot.com
Join the discussion at: http://ddsdtv.blogspot.com
If you would like additional information, we've provided links below to videos on this very subject matter.
DON'T SEE THE PLAYLIST YOU'RE LOOKING FOR?
LINK DOESN'T WORK?
THEN CLICK ON THE FOLLOWING LINK:
https://www.youtube.com/user/LeeCount...
"Miracles and the Paranormal": https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list...
"CIA Agents LEAK evidence on REAL UFOS & ALIENS": https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list...
"REAL UFO TECH the NASA ALIEN Conspiracy": https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list...
"Real ALIEN contact in COLORADO": https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list...
"Real ALIEN contact in HOLLAND": https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list...
"REAL ALIEN ABDUCTION CASES": https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list...
NEW VIDEOS will now be uploaded once a week. Thank you for your time, likes and subs.
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
A VATIC MUST READ: CNN Punished Its Own Journalist for Fulfilling a Core Duty of Journalism
Vatic Note: Well, if we do not apply the same law against the Khazar mafia with respect to crimes that they commit, as we would apply to ourselves, then we can expect unequal application of any other principles in any other occupation, if it does not fit with the khazar mafia agenda. This, below, is one good example. What is amazing is just how often we see this going on and we do nothing about it.
We should be raising holy hell over the actions against this journalist. It sounds like a test run, to me, of how we Americans will react if the police state that is emerging, takes over and fully controls the content and commentary of the press. If that is the case then they got what they wanted. I intend to call my senators to let them know, we want action against CNN for violating their protected, trusted role as overseer of our government.
Right now, they should be reporting to us about the take over of our government by a foreign nation and the pending coup that is in the works. But not one word about it, nor about all the false flags and obvious signs of it, by the mainstream press. This is truly nazi Germany and Zionist Israel (located in Switzerland at the time) in WW II, all over again.
FUND RAISING TIME AGAIN.
We are now asking you once again, to contribute toward our deficit of $250 that we need by the 1st of the month. That is 13 days away, so we are beginning now, so we make it by that time. We are so grateful for your support in so many ways.
If you can afford it please donate off to the right of the blog. God Bless you and your family in all things. So stay with us til the first and hopefully, you will be able to contribute so we can continue our work in educating, researching and informing.
CNN Punished Its Own Journalist for Fulfilling a Core Duty of Journalism
https://theintercept.com/2015/11/20/cnns-punishment-of-refugee-defending-journalist-highlights-media-abdication/
By Glen Greenwald, The intercept, November 20, 2015
CNN yesterday suspended its global affairs correspondent, Elise Labott, for two weeks for the crime of posting a tweet critical of the House vote to ban Syrian refugees. Whether by compulsion or choice, she then groveled in apology. This is the original tweet along with her subsequent expression of repentance:
This all happened after the Washington Post’s Erik Wemple complained that her original tweet showed “bias.” The claim that CNN journalists must be “objective” and are not permitted to express opinions is an absolute joke. CNN journalists constantly express opinions without being sanctioned.
Labott’s crime wasn’t that she expressed an opinion. It’s that she expressed the wrong opinion: After Paris, defending Muslims, even refugees, is strictly forbidden. I’ve spoken with friends who work at every cable network and they say the post-Paris climate is indescribably repressive in terms of what they can say and who they can put on air.
When it comes to the Paris attacks, CNN has basically become state TV (to see just how subservient CNN is about everything relating to terrorism, watch this unbelievable “interview” of ex-CIA chief Jim Woolsey by CNN’s Brooke Baldwin; or consider that neither CNN nor MSNBC has put a single person on air to dispute the CIA’s blatant falsehoods about Paris despite how many journalists have documented those falsehoods).
Labott’s punishment comes just five days after two CNN anchors spent six straight minutes lecturing French Muslim civil rights activist Yasser Louati that he and all other French Muslims bear “responsibility” for the attack (the anchors weren’t suspended for expressing those repulsive opinions).
The suspension comes just four days after CNN’s Jim Acosta stood up in an Obama press conference and demanded: “I think a lot of Americans have this frustration that they see that the United States has the greatest military in the world. … I guess the question is — and if you’ll forgive the language — is why can’t we take out these bastards?” (He wasn’t suspended.)
It comes five days after CNN anchor Christiane Amanpour mauled Obama on-air for not being more militaristic about ISIS (she wasn’t suspended); throughout 2013, Amanpour vehemently argued all over CNN for U.S. intervention in Syria (she wasn’t suspended).
Labott’s suspension also comes less than a year after Don Lemon demanded that Muslim human rights lawyer Arsalan Iftikhar state whether he supports ISIS (he wasn’t suspended); in 2010, Lemon strongly insinuated that all Muslims were responsible for the 9/11 attack when he defended opposition to an Islamic Community Center in lower Manhattan (he wasn’t suspended).
During the Occupy Wall Street protests, CNN host Erin Burnett continuously mocked the protesters while defending Wall Street (she wasn’t suspended) and also engaged in rank fearmongering over Iran (she wasn’t suspended). I could literally spend the rest of the day pointing to opinions expressed by CNN journalists for which they were not suspended or punished in any way.
By very stark contrast, career CNN producer Octavia Nasr was instantly fired in 2010 after 20 years with the network for the crime of tweeting a positive sentiment for a beloved Shiite imam who had just died, after neocons complained that he was a Hezbollah sympathizer. Earlier this year, Jim Clancy was forced to “resign” after 30 years with CNN for tweeting inflammatory criticisms of Israel. (VN: he should have sued in federal court and let the whole thing come out, where the alternative press could show just how bad its gotten and what we are doing about it. We should be CALLING OUR REPS AND SENATORS AND SCREAMING BLOODY MURDER AND IF THEY DO NOTHING, THEN VOTE AGAINST THEM, THEN WE GET THE TRAITORS WITH VOTE RIGGING.)
As I’ve pointed out over and over, “journalistic objectivity” is a sham for so many reasons, beginning with the fact that all reporting is suffused with subjective perspectives. “Objectivity” does not ban opinions; it just bans opinions that are particularly disfavored among those who wield the greatest power (obviously, no CNN journalist would be punished for advocating military action against ISIS, for instance).
But there’s a more important point here than CNN’s transparently farcical notion of “objectivity.” In the wake of Paris, an already ugly and quite dangerous anti-Muslim climate has exploded. The leading GOP presidential candidate is speaking openly of forcing Muslims to register in databases, closing mosques, and requiring Muslims to carry special ID cards.
Another candidate, Rand Paul, just introduced a bill to ban refugees almost exclusively from predominantly Muslim and/or Arab countries. Others are advocating exclusion of Muslim refugees (Cruz) and religious tests to allow in only “proven Christians” (Bush).
That, by any measure, is a crisis of authoritarianism. And journalists have historically not only been permitted, but required, to raise their voice against such dangers. Indeed, that is one of the primary roles of journalism: to serve as a check on extremism when stoked by political demagogues.
The two most respected American television journalists in the history of the medium are almost certainly Edward R. Murrow and Walter Cronkite. The legacies of both were shaped by their raising their voices in times of creeping radicalism and government overreach. Murrow repeatedly inveighed against the extremism of Congressional McCarthyism, while Cronkite disputed Pentagon claims that victory in the Vietnam War was near and instead called for its end: “The only rational way out then will be to negotiate, not as victors, but as an honorable people who lived up to their pledge to defend democracy, and did the best they could.” Neither could survive at the climate created at CNN:
As Murrow said in justifying his opposition to the Wisconsin Senator and his allies: “There is no way for a citizen of a republic to abdicate his [sic] responsibilities.”
It’s not hard to envision the impact that this CNN action will have on the next journalist who considers speaking up the way Labott (very mildly) just did: They know doing so could imperil their career. In the face of the kind of emerging extremism now manifest in the U.S. (and Europe), that journalistic climate neuters journalists, renders them impotent and their function largely irrelevant, and — by design or otherwise — obliterates a vital check on tyrannical impulses.
But that’s what happens when media outlets are viewed principally as corporate assets rather than journalistic ones: Their overriding goal is to avoid saying or doing anything that will create conflict between them and those who wield the greatest power.
* * * * *
I did two interviews yesterday where I was able more or less comprehensively to set forth my views on the behavior of the U.S. media following Paris, which I must admit — notwithstanding my very low expectations — has surprised (and horrified) me in terms of how subservient it is. First, there was this interview on Democracy Now (starting at 13:00; relevant segments are here and here), which generated more response than any I’ve ever done on that show, and this shorter one on France24.
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
We should be raising holy hell over the actions against this journalist. It sounds like a test run, to me, of how we Americans will react if the police state that is emerging, takes over and fully controls the content and commentary of the press. If that is the case then they got what they wanted. I intend to call my senators to let them know, we want action against CNN for violating their protected, trusted role as overseer of our government.
Right now, they should be reporting to us about the take over of our government by a foreign nation and the pending coup that is in the works. But not one word about it, nor about all the false flags and obvious signs of it, by the mainstream press. This is truly nazi Germany and Zionist Israel (located in Switzerland at the time) in WW II, all over again.
FUND RAISING TIME AGAIN.
We are now asking you once again, to contribute toward our deficit of $250 that we need by the 1st of the month. That is 13 days away, so we are beginning now, so we make it by that time. We are so grateful for your support in so many ways.
If you can afford it please donate off to the right of the blog. God Bless you and your family in all things. So stay with us til the first and hopefully, you will be able to contribute so we can continue our work in educating, researching and informing.
CNN Punished Its Own Journalist for Fulfilling a Core Duty of Journalism
https://theintercept.com/2015/11/20/cnns-punishment-of-refugee-defending-journalist-highlights-media-abdication/
By Glen Greenwald, The intercept, November 20, 2015
CNN yesterday suspended its global affairs correspondent, Elise Labott, for two weeks for the crime of posting a tweet critical of the House vote to ban Syrian refugees. Whether by compulsion or choice, she then groveled in apology. This is the original tweet along with her subsequent expression of repentance:
This all happened after the Washington Post’s Erik Wemple complained that her original tweet showed “bias.” The claim that CNN journalists must be “objective” and are not permitted to express opinions is an absolute joke. CNN journalists constantly express opinions without being sanctioned.
Labott’s crime wasn’t that she expressed an opinion. It’s that she expressed the wrong opinion: After Paris, defending Muslims, even refugees, is strictly forbidden. I’ve spoken with friends who work at every cable network and they say the post-Paris climate is indescribably repressive in terms of what they can say and who they can put on air.
When it comes to the Paris attacks, CNN has basically become state TV (to see just how subservient CNN is about everything relating to terrorism, watch this unbelievable “interview” of ex-CIA chief Jim Woolsey by CNN’s Brooke Baldwin; or consider that neither CNN nor MSNBC has put a single person on air to dispute the CIA’s blatant falsehoods about Paris despite how many journalists have documented those falsehoods).
Labott’s punishment comes just five days after two CNN anchors spent six straight minutes lecturing French Muslim civil rights activist Yasser Louati that he and all other French Muslims bear “responsibility” for the attack (the anchors weren’t suspended for expressing those repulsive opinions).
The suspension comes just four days after CNN’s Jim Acosta stood up in an Obama press conference and demanded: “I think a lot of Americans have this frustration that they see that the United States has the greatest military in the world. … I guess the question is — and if you’ll forgive the language — is why can’t we take out these bastards?” (He wasn’t suspended.)
It comes five days after CNN anchor Christiane Amanpour mauled Obama on-air for not being more militaristic about ISIS (she wasn’t suspended); throughout 2013, Amanpour vehemently argued all over CNN for U.S. intervention in Syria (she wasn’t suspended).
Labott’s suspension also comes less than a year after Don Lemon demanded that Muslim human rights lawyer Arsalan Iftikhar state whether he supports ISIS (he wasn’t suspended); in 2010, Lemon strongly insinuated that all Muslims were responsible for the 9/11 attack when he defended opposition to an Islamic Community Center in lower Manhattan (he wasn’t suspended).
During the Occupy Wall Street protests, CNN host Erin Burnett continuously mocked the protesters while defending Wall Street (she wasn’t suspended) and also engaged in rank fearmongering over Iran (she wasn’t suspended). I could literally spend the rest of the day pointing to opinions expressed by CNN journalists for which they were not suspended or punished in any way.
By very stark contrast, career CNN producer Octavia Nasr was instantly fired in 2010 after 20 years with the network for the crime of tweeting a positive sentiment for a beloved Shiite imam who had just died, after neocons complained that he was a Hezbollah sympathizer. Earlier this year, Jim Clancy was forced to “resign” after 30 years with CNN for tweeting inflammatory criticisms of Israel. (VN: he should have sued in federal court and let the whole thing come out, where the alternative press could show just how bad its gotten and what we are doing about it. We should be CALLING OUR REPS AND SENATORS AND SCREAMING BLOODY MURDER AND IF THEY DO NOTHING, THEN VOTE AGAINST THEM, THEN WE GET THE TRAITORS WITH VOTE RIGGING.)
As I’ve pointed out over and over, “journalistic objectivity” is a sham for so many reasons, beginning with the fact that all reporting is suffused with subjective perspectives. “Objectivity” does not ban opinions; it just bans opinions that are particularly disfavored among those who wield the greatest power (obviously, no CNN journalist would be punished for advocating military action against ISIS, for instance).
But there’s a more important point here than CNN’s transparently farcical notion of “objectivity.” In the wake of Paris, an already ugly and quite dangerous anti-Muslim climate has exploded. The leading GOP presidential candidate is speaking openly of forcing Muslims to register in databases, closing mosques, and requiring Muslims to carry special ID cards.
Another candidate, Rand Paul, just introduced a bill to ban refugees almost exclusively from predominantly Muslim and/or Arab countries. Others are advocating exclusion of Muslim refugees (Cruz) and religious tests to allow in only “proven Christians” (Bush).
That, by any measure, is a crisis of authoritarianism. And journalists have historically not only been permitted, but required, to raise their voice against such dangers. Indeed, that is one of the primary roles of journalism: to serve as a check on extremism when stoked by political demagogues.
The two most respected American television journalists in the history of the medium are almost certainly Edward R. Murrow and Walter Cronkite. The legacies of both were shaped by their raising their voices in times of creeping radicalism and government overreach. Murrow repeatedly inveighed against the extremism of Congressional McCarthyism, while Cronkite disputed Pentagon claims that victory in the Vietnam War was near and instead called for its end: “The only rational way out then will be to negotiate, not as victors, but as an honorable people who lived up to their pledge to defend democracy, and did the best they could.” Neither could survive at the climate created at CNN:
As Murrow said in justifying his opposition to the Wisconsin Senator and his allies: “There is no way for a citizen of a republic to abdicate his [sic] responsibilities.”
It’s not hard to envision the impact that this CNN action will have on the next journalist who considers speaking up the way Labott (very mildly) just did: They know doing so could imperil their career. In the face of the kind of emerging extremism now manifest in the U.S. (and Europe), that journalistic climate neuters journalists, renders them impotent and their function largely irrelevant, and — by design or otherwise — obliterates a vital check on tyrannical impulses.
But that’s what happens when media outlets are viewed principally as corporate assets rather than journalistic ones: Their overriding goal is to avoid saying or doing anything that will create conflict between them and those who wield the greatest power.
* * * * *
I did two interviews yesterday where I was able more or less comprehensively to set forth my views on the behavior of the U.S. media following Paris, which I must admit — notwithstanding my very low expectations — has surprised (and horrified) me in terms of how subservient it is. First, there was this interview on Democracy Now (starting at 13:00; relevant segments are here and here), which generated more response than any I’ve ever done on that show, and this shorter one on France24.
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
2015-12-16
A VATIC MUST READ: Guns Save 2,191 Lives Each Day In The US: FBI ~ 32 Guns Purchased Every Minute In The United States.
Vatic Note: This is where non compliance is a key element of resistance. If the powers that be ignore the "laws" of our nation and are not prosecuted, then we must do the same. What is good for the goose is good for the gander. If its against the law to buy weapons from private parties, then do so anyway. If we all do it, how will they enforce the law without cooperation from the masses?
To counter our efforts to arm ourselves, the powers that be, bought up the ammo companies and are going to use the ammo to negate the guns. It is important to dig through the ammo and test fire it to ensure its usability. There are other such "non-compliance" examples to do. If a law is used to harm the people then do not comply with it. Let me give you an example with respect to their "depopulation" plans.
Have you noticed that car manufacturers are now making new cars of fibre glass, and very very low to the ground, with much smaller engines out front. That means if their is an accident, its more likely the occupants may die, then simply get injured if hit from the front. So, what does the legal system do, to match that fact???? They say you MUST WEAR YOUR SEAT BELT OR YOU WILL BE FINED FOR VIOLATIONS. A seat belt in such a situation as described above, ensures you cannot get away from the small engine and steering wheel from crushing your chest.
In the past, when I owned a steel large automobile and seat belt wearing was voluntary, I got hit head on by a drunk driver in a truck. I was not wearing a seat belt and I got thrown off to the right into the passangers seat, and the steering wheel, cam back through the drivers seat. I would have been killed instantly had I been wearing a seat belt. That is how they are playing the game.
Its subtle and not blatantly obvious. If I had not had the experience I did, I would not have picked up on the changes so readily. Anyway, you read and decide.
Guns Save 2,191 Lives Each Day In The US: FBI ~ 32 Guns Purchased Every Minute In The United States.
http://politicalvelcraft.org/2014/09/24/everyday-in-the-usa-2191americans-use-their-gun-in-self-defense-fbi-there-are-32-guns-purchased-every-minute-in-the-united-states/
By Admin, Political Velcraft, Sept 24, 2014
USA — (Ammoland.com) Somewhere, everyday in the USA, 2100+ people use a gun for self defense, to stop a crime or save the lives of themselves or their family.
A man armed with a gun entered Burt’s Meat Market in Houston, Texas and demanded money from the teenage clerk on duty. When the clerk didn’t produce the money fast enough, the criminal fired a shot.
Store manager J.L. Nickel, who was in a nearby office, became aware of the robbery, retrieved a gun and fired at the robber. One of Nickel’s shots struck the thief, prompting him to flee.
(KPRC, Houston, Texas, 09/20/14).
About the Guns Save Lives Series:
Every few days AmmoLand Shooting Sports News will be featuring a new report of stories involving self defense with a hand gun. Be sure and share, like and Tweet these posts and help spread the truth that
“Guns Save Lives”.
See more at http://www.AmmoLand.com ( http://tiny.cc/s6ef2w )
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook
Ammoland
Gun Facts is a free e-book that debunks common myths about gun control. It is intended as a reference guide for journalists, activists, politicians, and other people interested in restoring honesty to the debate about guns, crime, and the 2nd Amendment.
Gun Facts has 112 pages of information. Divided into chapters based on gun control topics (assault weapons, ballistic finger printing, firearm availability, etc.), finding information is quick and easy.
Militias. Distrust of government. Abuse of power. The right to bear
arms. Not a day passed without a passionate article or an editorial on
the role of guns in American life.
The year was 1775. More than 200 years later, the seminal debate undertaken as John Adams, Thomas Jefferson and James Madison formulated the laws of the land still echoes. Is the Michigan Militia an aberration or the Constitution in action?
Is Gordon Liddy a dangerous demagogue or a devoted patriot? What exactly did the founding fathers mean when they penned the Second Amendment?
No sampler can do justice to the debate, but we hope the following scrapbook helps shed light on the relation between arms and liberty. Our sources were Alexander Hamilton, Madison and John Jay’s Federalist, “That Every Man Be Armed: The Evolution of a Constitutional Right,” by Stephen Halbrook, “The Road to the Bill of Rights,” by Craig Smith, and a collection of quotes compiled by Charles Curley.
TO TAKE ARMS AGAINST THE BRITISH
From “A Journal of the Times,” calling the citizens of Boston to arm themselves in response to British abuses of power, 1769:
“Instances of the licentious and outrageous behavior of the military conservators of the peace still multiply upon us, some of which are of such nature and have been carried to so great lengths as must serve fully to evince that a late vote of this town, calling upon the inhabitants to provide themselves with arms for their defense, was a measure as prudent as it was legal.
It is a natural right which the people have reserved to themselves, confirmed by the [English] Bill of Rights, to keep arms for their own defense, and as Mr. Blackstone observes, it is to be made use of when the sanctions of society and law are found insufficient to restrain the violence of oppression.”
ASSAULT RIFLES, COLONIAL STYLE
George Mason’s Fairfax County Militia Plan, 1775:
“And we do each of us, for ourselves respectively, promise and engage to keep a good firelock in proper order, & to furnish ourselves as soon as possible with, & always keep by us, one pound of gunpowder, four pounds of lead, one dozen gunflints, & a pair of bullet moulds, with a cartouch box, or powder horn, and bag for balls.”
GIVE ME FLINTLOCKS OR GIVE ME DEATH
Patrick Henry, 1775:
“They tell us that we are weak — unable to cope with so formidable an adversary. But when shall we be stronger? Will it be when we are totally disarmed, and when a British guard shall be stationed in every house? Three million people, armed in the holy cause of liberty, are invincible by any force which our enemy can send against us.”
THOUGHTS ON DEFENSIVE WAR
Thomas Paine, writing to religious pacifists in 1775:
“The supposed quietude of a good man allures the ruffian; while on the other hand, arms like laws discourage and keep the invader and the plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property. The balance of power is the scale of peace.
The same balance would be preserved were all the world destitute of arms, for all would be alike; but since some will not, others dare not lay them aside. Horrid mischief would ensue were one half the world deprived of the use of them; the weak would become a prey to the strong.”
SOUND BITES FROM BEFORE AND AFTER THE REVOLUTION
Samuel Adams:
“Among the natural rights of the colonists are these: first, a right to life, secondly to liberty, thirdly to property; together with the right to defend them in the best manner they can.”
John Adams:
“Arms in the hands of the citizens may be used at individual discretion for the defense of the country, the overthrow of tyranny or private self-defense.”
Thomas Jefferson:
“The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.”
Thomas Jefferson, in an early draft of the Virginia constitution:
“No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms in his own lands.”
WE HAVE SEEN THE ENEMY AND HE IS US
Patrick Henry:
“Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined. The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able may have a gun.”
TREAD LIGHTLY
Thomas Jefferson’s advice to his 15-year-old nephew:
“A strong body makes the mind strong. As to the species of exercise, I advise the gun. While this gives moderate exercise to the body, it gives boldness, enterprise and independence to the mind. Games played with the ball and others of that nature are too violent for the body and stamp no character on the mind. Let your gun therefore be the constant companion of your walks.”
Noah Webster, 1787:
“Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword, because the whole of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops.”
ON THE ROLE OF A MILITIA
James Madison, “The Influence of the State and Federal Governments Compared,” 46 Federalist New York Packet, January 29, 1788:
“Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of.
Notwithstanding the military establishments in the several kingdoms of Europe, which are carried as far as the public resources will bear, the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms.
And it is not certain that with this aid alone they would not be able to shake off their yokes. But were the people to possess the additional advantages of local governments chosen by themselves, that could collect the national will and direct the national force, and of officers appointed out of the militia, by these governments and attached both to them and to the militia, it may be affirmed with the greatest assurance that the throne of every tyranny in Europe would be speedily overturned in spite of the legions which surround it.”
Alexander Hamilton, “Concerning the Militia,” 29 Federalist Daily Advertiser, January 10, 1788:
“There is something so far-fetched and so extravagant in the idea of danger to liberty from the militia that one is at a loss whether to treat it with gravity or raillery. Where, in the name of common sense, are our fears to end if we may not trust our sons, our brothers, our neighbors, our fellow citizens? What shadow of danger can there be from men who are daily mingling with the rest of their countrymen and who participate with them in the same feelings, sentiments, habits and interests?
What reasonable cause of apprehension can be inferred from a power in the Union to prescribe regulations for the militia, and to command its services when necessary, while the particular states are to have the sole and exclusive appointment of the officers? If it were possible seriously to indulge a jealousy of the militia upon any conceivable establishment under the federal government, the circumstance of the officers being in the appointment of the states ought at once to extinguish it. There can be no doubt that this circumstance will always secure to them a preponderating infiuence over the militia.”
Richard Henry Lee, Additional Letters from the Federal Farmer, 1788:
“Militias, when properly formed, are in fact the people themselves and include all men capable of bearing arms. To preserve liberty it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them.”
Tench Coxe, writing as “the Pennsylvanian” in the Philadelphia Federal Gazette, 1788:
“The power of the sword, say the minority of Pennsylvania, is in the hands of Congress. My friends and countrymen, it is not so, for the powers of the sword are in the hands of the yeomanry of America from 16 to 60. The militia of these free commonwealths, entitled and accustomed to their arms, when compared with any possible army, must be tremendous and irresistible.
Who are the militia? Are they not ourselves? Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man against his own bosom? Congress has no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birthright of an American. The unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people.”
ANTECEDENTS
Connecticut gun code of 1650:
“All persons shall bear arms, and every male person shall have in continual readiness a good muskitt or other gunn, fitt for service.”
Article 3 of the West Virginia state constitution:
“A person has the right to keep and bear arms for the defense of self, family, home and state, and for lawful hunting and recreational use.”
Virginia Declaration of Rights 13 (June 12, 1776), drafted by George Mason:
“That a well-regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper, natural and safe defense of a free state; that standing armies, in time of peace, should be avoided as dangerous to liberty; and that, in all cases, the military should be under strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil power.”
A proposed amendment to the Federal Constitution, as passed by the Pennsylvania legislature:
“That the people have a right to bear arms for the defense of themselves and their own states or the United States, or for the purpose of killing game; and no law shall be passed for disarming the people or any of them, unless for crimes committed, or real danger of public injury from individuals.”
ROUGH DRAFT
An amendment to the Constitution, proposed by James Madison:
“The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed, a well-armed and well-regulated militia being the best security of a free country; but no person religiously scrupulous of bearing arms shall be compelled to render military service in person.”
THE FINAL DRAFT
The Second Amendment, as passed September 25, 1789:
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
WHAT BECOMES A LEGEND MOST
George Washington’s address to the second session of the First U.S. Congress:
“Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself. They are the American people’s liberty, teeth and keystone under independence. The church, the plow, the prairie wagon and citizens’ firearms are indelibly related.
From the hour the pilgrims landed to the present day, events, occurrences and tendencies prove that, to ensure peace, security and happiness, the rifle and pistol are equally indispensable. Every corner of this land knows firearms, and more than 99 and 99/100 percent of them by their silence indicate that they are in safe and sane hands.
The very atmosphere of firearms anywhere and everywhere restrains evil influence. They deserve a place of honor with all that’s good. When firearms go, all goes. We need them every hour.”
Each chapter lists common gun control myths, then lists a number of documented and cited facts (with nearly 500 detailed footnotes). Thus when a neighbor, editor or politician repeats some sound bite about firearm control policy, you can quickly find that myth then rebuke with real information.
What Adolph Hitler Said:
With that in mind, let me demonstrate conclusively that any restriction placed upon gun ownership is not only contrary to your best interest, but does in fact, increase the likelihood that you or a loved one will become the victim of a violent crime.
Criminologists are the experts who study crime, criminals and their motivation. Their entire career centers around the collection and analysis of statistics surrounding crime and the tools of crime. These are the people who make it their business to know and understand how, when, where, why and by whom guns (or any weapon, for that matter) are used. And, like anyone in any job, they learn more as they grow in the job. So, if the evidence were there to support gun control, wouldn’t you expect that at least a few Criminologists would have switched from opposing gun control to supporting it?
To counter our efforts to arm ourselves, the powers that be, bought up the ammo companies and are going to use the ammo to negate the guns. It is important to dig through the ammo and test fire it to ensure its usability. There are other such "non-compliance" examples to do. If a law is used to harm the people then do not comply with it. Let me give you an example with respect to their "depopulation" plans.
Have you noticed that car manufacturers are now making new cars of fibre glass, and very very low to the ground, with much smaller engines out front. That means if their is an accident, its more likely the occupants may die, then simply get injured if hit from the front. So, what does the legal system do, to match that fact???? They say you MUST WEAR YOUR SEAT BELT OR YOU WILL BE FINED FOR VIOLATIONS. A seat belt in such a situation as described above, ensures you cannot get away from the small engine and steering wheel from crushing your chest.
In the past, when I owned a steel large automobile and seat belt wearing was voluntary, I got hit head on by a drunk driver in a truck. I was not wearing a seat belt and I got thrown off to the right into the passangers seat, and the steering wheel, cam back through the drivers seat. I would have been killed instantly had I been wearing a seat belt. That is how they are playing the game.
Its subtle and not blatantly obvious. If I had not had the experience I did, I would not have picked up on the changes so readily. Anyway, you read and decide.
Guns Save 2,191 Lives Each Day In The US: FBI ~ 32 Guns Purchased Every Minute In The United States.
http://politicalvelcraft.org/2014/09/24/everyday-in-the-usa-2191americans-use-their-gun-in-self-defense-fbi-there-are-32-guns-purchased-every-minute-in-the-united-states/
By Admin, Political Velcraft, Sept 24, 2014
USA — (Ammoland.com) Somewhere, everyday in the USA, 2100+ people use a gun for self defense, to stop a crime or save the lives of themselves or their family.
“We believe that the American public deserve to understand that on the average, guns save 2,191 lives and are used to thwart crimes every day,” says Alan Gottlieb of the Second Amendment FoundationThis is just one of those stories;
Most times you won’t see these tales on the news as it does not fit the main stream media’s story line of “Guns and Gun Owners are Bad“.
A man armed with a gun entered Burt’s Meat Market in Houston, Texas and demanded money from the teenage clerk on duty. When the clerk didn’t produce the money fast enough, the criminal fired a shot.
Store manager J.L. Nickel, who was in a nearby office, became aware of the robbery, retrieved a gun and fired at the robber. One of Nickel’s shots struck the thief, prompting him to flee.
(KPRC, Houston, Texas, 09/20/14).
About the Guns Save Lives Series:
Every few days AmmoLand Shooting Sports News will be featuring a new report of stories involving self defense with a hand gun. Be sure and share, like and Tweet these posts and help spread the truth that
“Guns Save Lives”.
See more at http://www.AmmoLand.com ( http://tiny.cc/s6ef2w )
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook
Ammoland
Your Bill Of Rights Which Is The Predecessor/Foundation For The U.S. Constitution, Are Unalienable Rights, They Are NOT Inalienable Rights.
The Un and the In make all the difference in the world. Unalienable are from God ‘Natural’ and are permanently sovereign, they cannot be taken away. Inalienable are from governments ‘Law’ which are voted upon. Don’t let slick willie attorneys fool you otherwise.
Gun Facts is a free e-book that debunks common myths about gun control. It is intended as a reference guide for journalists, activists, politicians, and other people interested in restoring honesty to the debate about guns, crime, and the 2nd Amendment.
Gun Facts has 112 pages of information. Divided into chapters based on gun control topics (assault weapons, ballistic finger printing, firearm availability, etc.), finding information is quick and easy.
WHAT THE FOUNDING FATHERS SAID ABOUT GUNS
ever wonder what the second amendment really means?
The year was 1775. More than 200 years later, the seminal debate undertaken as John Adams, Thomas Jefferson and James Madison formulated the laws of the land still echoes. Is the Michigan Militia an aberration or the Constitution in action?
Is Gordon Liddy a dangerous demagogue or a devoted patriot? What exactly did the founding fathers mean when they penned the Second Amendment?
No sampler can do justice to the debate, but we hope the following scrapbook helps shed light on the relation between arms and liberty. Our sources were Alexander Hamilton, Madison and John Jay’s Federalist, “That Every Man Be Armed: The Evolution of a Constitutional Right,” by Stephen Halbrook, “The Road to the Bill of Rights,” by Craig Smith, and a collection of quotes compiled by Charles Curley.
TO TAKE ARMS AGAINST THE BRITISH
From “A Journal of the Times,” calling the citizens of Boston to arm themselves in response to British abuses of power, 1769:
“Instances of the licentious and outrageous behavior of the military conservators of the peace still multiply upon us, some of which are of such nature and have been carried to so great lengths as must serve fully to evince that a late vote of this town, calling upon the inhabitants to provide themselves with arms for their defense, was a measure as prudent as it was legal.
It is a natural right which the people have reserved to themselves, confirmed by the [English] Bill of Rights, to keep arms for their own defense, and as Mr. Blackstone observes, it is to be made use of when the sanctions of society and law are found insufficient to restrain the violence of oppression.”
ASSAULT RIFLES, COLONIAL STYLE
George Mason’s Fairfax County Militia Plan, 1775:
“And we do each of us, for ourselves respectively, promise and engage to keep a good firelock in proper order, & to furnish ourselves as soon as possible with, & always keep by us, one pound of gunpowder, four pounds of lead, one dozen gunflints, & a pair of bullet moulds, with a cartouch box, or powder horn, and bag for balls.”
GIVE ME FLINTLOCKS OR GIVE ME DEATH
Patrick Henry, 1775:
“They tell us that we are weak — unable to cope with so formidable an adversary. But when shall we be stronger? Will it be when we are totally disarmed, and when a British guard shall be stationed in every house? Three million people, armed in the holy cause of liberty, are invincible by any force which our enemy can send against us.”
THOUGHTS ON DEFENSIVE WAR
Thomas Paine, writing to religious pacifists in 1775:
“The supposed quietude of a good man allures the ruffian; while on the other hand, arms like laws discourage and keep the invader and the plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property. The balance of power is the scale of peace.
The same balance would be preserved were all the world destitute of arms, for all would be alike; but since some will not, others dare not lay them aside. Horrid mischief would ensue were one half the world deprived of the use of them; the weak would become a prey to the strong.”
SOUND BITES FROM BEFORE AND AFTER THE REVOLUTION
Samuel Adams:
“Among the natural rights of the colonists are these: first, a right to life, secondly to liberty, thirdly to property; together with the right to defend them in the best manner they can.”
John Adams:
“Arms in the hands of the citizens may be used at individual discretion for the defense of the country, the overthrow of tyranny or private self-defense.”
Thomas Jefferson:
“The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.”
Thomas Jefferson, in an early draft of the Virginia constitution:
“No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms in his own lands.”
WE HAVE SEEN THE ENEMY AND HE IS US
Patrick Henry:
“Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined. The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able may have a gun.”
TREAD LIGHTLY
Thomas Jefferson’s advice to his 15-year-old nephew:
“A strong body makes the mind strong. As to the species of exercise, I advise the gun. While this gives moderate exercise to the body, it gives boldness, enterprise and independence to the mind. Games played with the ball and others of that nature are too violent for the body and stamp no character on the mind. Let your gun therefore be the constant companion of your walks.”
Noah Webster, 1787:
“Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword, because the whole of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops.”
ON THE ROLE OF A MILITIA
James Madison, “The Influence of the State and Federal Governments Compared,” 46 Federalist New York Packet, January 29, 1788:
“Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of.
Notwithstanding the military establishments in the several kingdoms of Europe, which are carried as far as the public resources will bear, the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms.
And it is not certain that with this aid alone they would not be able to shake off their yokes. But were the people to possess the additional advantages of local governments chosen by themselves, that could collect the national will and direct the national force, and of officers appointed out of the militia, by these governments and attached both to them and to the militia, it may be affirmed with the greatest assurance that the throne of every tyranny in Europe would be speedily overturned in spite of the legions which surround it.”
Alexander Hamilton, “Concerning the Militia,” 29 Federalist Daily Advertiser, January 10, 1788:
“There is something so far-fetched and so extravagant in the idea of danger to liberty from the militia that one is at a loss whether to treat it with gravity or raillery. Where, in the name of common sense, are our fears to end if we may not trust our sons, our brothers, our neighbors, our fellow citizens? What shadow of danger can there be from men who are daily mingling with the rest of their countrymen and who participate with them in the same feelings, sentiments, habits and interests?
What reasonable cause of apprehension can be inferred from a power in the Union to prescribe regulations for the militia, and to command its services when necessary, while the particular states are to have the sole and exclusive appointment of the officers? If it were possible seriously to indulge a jealousy of the militia upon any conceivable establishment under the federal government, the circumstance of the officers being in the appointment of the states ought at once to extinguish it. There can be no doubt that this circumstance will always secure to them a preponderating infiuence over the militia.”
Richard Henry Lee, Additional Letters from the Federal Farmer, 1788:
“Militias, when properly formed, are in fact the people themselves and include all men capable of bearing arms. To preserve liberty it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them.”
Tench Coxe, writing as “the Pennsylvanian” in the Philadelphia Federal Gazette, 1788:
“The power of the sword, say the minority of Pennsylvania, is in the hands of Congress. My friends and countrymen, it is not so, for the powers of the sword are in the hands of the yeomanry of America from 16 to 60. The militia of these free commonwealths, entitled and accustomed to their arms, when compared with any possible army, must be tremendous and irresistible.
Who are the militia? Are they not ourselves? Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man against his own bosom? Congress has no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birthright of an American. The unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people.”
ANTECEDENTS
Connecticut gun code of 1650:
“All persons shall bear arms, and every male person shall have in continual readiness a good muskitt or other gunn, fitt for service.”
Article 3 of the West Virginia state constitution:
“A person has the right to keep and bear arms for the defense of self, family, home and state, and for lawful hunting and recreational use.”
Virginia Declaration of Rights 13 (June 12, 1776), drafted by George Mason:
“That a well-regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper, natural and safe defense of a free state; that standing armies, in time of peace, should be avoided as dangerous to liberty; and that, in all cases, the military should be under strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil power.”
A proposed amendment to the Federal Constitution, as passed by the Pennsylvania legislature:
“That the people have a right to bear arms for the defense of themselves and their own states or the United States, or for the purpose of killing game; and no law shall be passed for disarming the people or any of them, unless for crimes committed, or real danger of public injury from individuals.”
ROUGH DRAFT
An amendment to the Constitution, proposed by James Madison:
“The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed, a well-armed and well-regulated militia being the best security of a free country; but no person religiously scrupulous of bearing arms shall be compelled to render military service in person.”
THE FINAL DRAFT
The Second Amendment, as passed September 25, 1789:
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
WHAT BECOMES A LEGEND MOST
George Washington’s address to the second session of the First U.S. Congress:
“Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself. They are the American people’s liberty, teeth and keystone under independence. The church, the plow, the prairie wagon and citizens’ firearms are indelibly related.
From the hour the pilgrims landed to the present day, events, occurrences and tendencies prove that, to ensure peace, security and happiness, the rifle and pistol are equally indispensable. Every corner of this land knows firearms, and more than 99 and 99/100 percent of them by their silence indicate that they are in safe and sane hands.
The very atmosphere of firearms anywhere and everywhere restrains evil influence. They deserve a place of honor with all that’s good. When firearms go, all goes. We need them every hour.”
Each chapter lists common gun control myths, then lists a number of documented and cited facts (with nearly 500 detailed footnotes). Thus when a neighbor, editor or politician repeats some sound bite about firearm control policy, you can quickly find that myth then rebuke with real information.
What Adolph Hitler Said:
Gun Facts Version 6.1
“The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie: deliberate, continued, and dishonest; but the myth: persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.”
— John F. Kennedy
Forget everything that you’ve been told about guns.
Ignore the 2nd Amendment to the US Constitution.
Disregard all of the dramatic press reports. Regardless of how good the arguments on either side of this issue may seem to their proponents, most of them will have absolutely no effect upon their detractors. That is because they do not answer the single most important question to all involved.
Disregard all of the dramatic press reports. Regardless of how good the arguments on either side of this issue may seem to their proponents, most of them will have absolutely no effect upon their detractors. That is because they do not answer the single most important question to all involved.
What About ME?
What about ME? What about MY personal safety? What about MY children? What about MY family?
Regardless of which side of the fence you are on, it all comes down to
the question of your own personal safety and that of your loved ones.
Any argument that does not address this question will fall on deaf ears.
With that in mind, let me demonstrate conclusively that any restriction placed upon gun ownership is not only contrary to your best interest, but does in fact, increase the likelihood that you or a loved one will become the victim of a violent crime.
- 86% Of United kingdom Citizens Moving Forward To Reclaim Their Gun Rights!
- Freedom In England & Australia: Replacing Nazi Gun Control Tactics Of The Elite!
- Legal Action Taken By New Jersey Citizens Against Congressional Democrats For “Vote Fixing” Gun Bill Package!
- England’s Gun Ban Created More Batmans ~ In Fact 40% More: Handguns Were Banned Following The U.K. Dunblane Massacre
- Handguns Banned By England Following The U.K. Dunblane Massacre: Handguns In Crime Rose By 40% ~ CNN Hosts NWO Liar Piers Morgan
- Gun Control Myths: Murder Rates Sky Rocket In Gun Controlled England ~ Whereas America’s Murder Rates Are Dropping Significantly With “Shall Issue Laws” Gun Ownership.
The Criminologists’ Story
The most revealing fact in the gun-control
controversy is that among all of the criminologists who have ever
changed their opinion on gun control, EVERY LAST ONE has moved from a position supporting gun control to the side skeptical of gun control and not the other way around… NOT EVEN ONE! Think about the significance of that one simple fact.
Criminologists are the experts who study crime, criminals and their motivation. Their entire career centers around the collection and analysis of statistics surrounding crime and the tools of crime. These are the people who make it their business to know and understand how, when, where, why and by whom guns (or any weapon, for that matter) are used. And, like anyone in any job, they learn more as they grow in the job. So, if the evidence were there to support gun control, wouldn’t you expect that at least a few Criminologists would have switched from opposing gun control to supporting it?
Think about it…
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)