If all that is true, then it means that the CIA has accepted that Bin Ladens bogus killing in 2011 was outted on the net and so now they are attempting to control what we think about his early death. Bhuttos' rendition of his death seems the most plausible since she was assassinated right afterwards and the CIA still had need for him to be alive in order to continue the global elites agenda of terrorists threats to the US and to the globe in order to destroy the constitutional republican we currently have.
Also, if Bin Laden was killed by his body guards for the reward, as stated by Bhutto before her death, then this below is even more suspect since the body guards were Chechen. So why did he ask to be interviewed about this? What are we suppose to get out of this disclosure of Bin Laden dying a natural death? Lots of questions and no answers. What he is doing here is telling us something, everyone already knows... kind of like Wikileaks, and thus gains credibility by doing so, then he tells us what the powers that be want us to think. Even if true, why is he disclosing this now after 11 years of silence?
Finally, he says that the CIA killed his guards after he first disclosed that Bin Laden died a natural death, yet the CIA left him alive. Hmmm Something doesn't smell right here. Forgot, this ex-CIA agent also said BinLaden was dead probably in 2006 which is the 5 years prior to the "stated" killing, and yet Bhutto said on David Frost before 2006, that he was killed in 2001 in December. Big difference. Its another reason I am suspicious of this outting.
Former CIA Agent Claims America Did Not Kill Bin Laden
http://www.davidicke.com/headlines/66471-former-cia-agent-claims-america-did-not-kill-bin-ladent
by David Icke, Source: Russian TV, RU
In an interview with Russia’s Channel One, he said that the Americans simply found and opened the tomb of the leader of al-Qaeda.
The journalists of Channel One first met this man in 2008. At the time he was featured in the documentary “Plan Caucasus,” talking about the attempts of the western intelligence services in the early 1990′s to separate the Northern Caucasus and, in particular, Chechnya from Russia.
Chechen by nationality, Berkan Yashar is now a Turkish politician, but in those years he was one of the ideologists of Johar Dudayev. He asked for a meeting, promising to tell the truth about the death of Osama bin Laden whom he met in the early 90-ies in Chechnya.
“In September of 1992 I was in Chechnya, that’s when I first met the man whose name was Bin Laden. This meeting took place in a two-story house in the city of Grozny; on the top floor was a family of Gamsakhurdia, the Georgian president, who then was kicked out of his country.
We met on the bottom floor; Osama lived in the same building, “said Berkan Yashar. Berkan said he did not know why bin Laden visited while in Grozny, and said only one thing about his meetings: “Just wanted to talk.”
However, according to Channel One, in those years the former employee of Radio Liberty Berkan Yashar already had an operational name Abubakar, given to him by the CIA. According to Berkan, after that trip Chechen nationals appeared in Osama bin Laden’s circle. Berkan Yashar emphasized that they did not participate “directly in the terror bombings.”
“They protected bin Laden, it was his choice because he trusted them entirely, and knew that they would never betray,” said Yashar. According to Yashar he was not the only one who knew about it, but the Russian security services and the CIA were aware of this as well.
Answering the question whether he believed that the Americans killed Osama bin Laden in Pakistan, Berkan Yashar answered: “Even if the entire world believed I could not possibly believe it.” “I personally know the Chechens who protected him, they are Sami, Mahmood, and Ayub, and they were with him until the very end.
I remember that day very well, there were three sixes in it: 26 June 2006. These people, as well as two others from London and two Americans, all seven of them, saw him dead. He was very ill, he was skin and bones, very thin, and they washed him and buried him,” said Berkan Yashar.
Yashar stressed that although the two American Muslims and two British Muslims the guards of bin Laden and saw him dead, they did not participate in the funerals. “Only three Chechens buried him, according to his will,” said Yashar. Bin Laden was buried, according to Yashar, in the mountains on the Pakistan-Afghan border.
“There was no assault,” said Yashar. “I know the American operations from the inside: they find the grave, dig out bin Laden and tell everyone about this. They need to show how technologically the security services worked, how each step was controlled, and then present it as a great victory to show that taxpayers are not paying taxes for nothing. ”
Berkan now blames himself for the fact that the Chechens from the protection of bin Laden, “the terrorist number one” are no longer alive after the U.S. intelligence services began to tap Berkan’s telephone conversations. He said he was the first one who announced the date of death of bin Laden. “I was the first one who announced the date of his death in November of 2008 at a conference in Washington, not naming any names, and it looks like it was when the Americans began to track my contacts,” he said.
The last security guard Berkan saw Sami, who, according to him, a few days before bin Laden was declared killed, was kidnapped by the U.S. intelligence agencies. According to Berkan, most likely, it was him who disclosed to them the exact place of burial in the mountains on the Pakistan-Afghan border.
In any case, the last call from Sami was from Pakistan. Berkan explained why he informed the journalists of Channel One: he feared for his life. According to him, only wide publicity around the world can protect him from the CIA. However, just in case, the Turkish secret services, according to him, provided him with guards and weapons.
Sources:
Pravda.Ru
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
