Vatic Note: This is probably the very best example of proof of the war being conducting waged against the American people, using SOFT KILL methods which then protects the murderers from the risk of us fighting back, since they are cowards and afraid of loss of their lives.
But now you know why they insist on taking our guns. They will not be able to keep this up without taking our guns, since we will finally have enough of us losing serious loved ones to their undeclared, illegal war against us. The is a deep motivating situation for our people.
Its no different than if they went up to that loved one, pulled out a gun and shot them point blank. That is called a "Hard kill", but with cancer cells being dumped on us in the chemtrails, or implanted during treatment, its called a soft kill, no less lethal than a bullet, but not as obvious and certainly one of the most cowardly act around. But what can you expect from those who think nothing of sexually molesting children and then murdering them and drinking their blood.
Its the helpless and innocent that suffer the most at hands of these cowards, and unfortunately the system isn't working for us against the elite/khazar/bankers since they commit blatant crimes and never see the inside of a court room or jail..... but that is going to have to change, soon. We MUST do an "ICELAND" if we want to save the lives of our seniors, and the blood of our children to be used in bankers wars for profit.
Cancer industry now admits that chemo and radiation treatments generate huge repeat business and repeat profits
http://www.naturalnews.com/052239_cancer_industry_chemotherapy_repeat_business.html
by Julie Wilson, Staff Writer, Natural news, December 8, 2015
NaturalNews) Second cancers are on the rise in the United States,
according to a new study, which found that one in five new cases involve
someone who has had the disease before. The study also found that
second cancers, which don't include reoccurring cancers, but are a
completely new type of cancer, have increased 300 percent since the 1970s.
First-time cancers have also spiked, increasing 70 percent in the same time frame.
The Western world of medicine is going with their usual explanation, or rather lack thereof, claiming that they are unaware of the reason for the surge but pointing to the fact that people are living longer and are therefore more at risk for the disease.
But living into your 80s and 90s shouldn't guarantee that you'll get cancer.
While genetics are a factor, other influences such as your environment, the food you eat, the water you drink, the air you breathe, the vaccines you inject and even the kind of medical treatment you receive may contribute much more than your age when it comes to determining your risk for cancer.
Emerging research continues to show that pesticides, heavy metals and hormone mimickers such as BPA and BPS, as well as other environmental contaminants, greatly influence the risk of developing cancer.
For those who are unfortunate enough to receive a second cancer diagnosis, the treatment you received for your first cancer may ultimately be to blame.
"Radiation therapy was recognized as a potential cause of cancer many years ago," according to the ACS, which also admits that most types of leukemia, including acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), can all be caused by radiation.
Most cancers caused by radiation therapy develop within just a few years of being irradiated, with the disease peaking at five to nine years following exposure.
Similarly, chemotherapy drugs have also been linked to different kinds of second cancers, with the most common being myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and AML; ALL has also been linked to these cancer drugs.
Aside from radiation and chemotherapy, other causes include toxins present in tobacco smoke, and high levels of industrial-type chemicals such as benzene, a carcinogenic petrochemical that is widely used in plastics, synthetic fibers, rubber lubricants, resins, dyes, detergents, drugs and pesticides.
Nearly another 20,000 people are diagnosed annually with AML, with more than half of those cases ending in death, and approximately 6,000 people are diagnosed with ALL each year.
This means that at least 40,000 cancer occurrences may be directly attributed to cancer drugs.
Determining how many people perish from cancer drugs is extremely difficult, as most of the deaths are recorded as being from cancer, and not the treatment.
Remember, the cancer industry is one of the world's most lucrative businesses, generating $100 billion last year. Those profits are expected to increase at about 8 percent each year over the next three years as more and more Americans will be diagnosed and treated for cancer.
Sources:
Fortune.com
Cancer.org
Cancer.org
Cancer.org
Leukaemia.org.au
DHS.Wisconsin.gov
Cancer.org[PDF]
GCMAF.TimSmithMD.com
GCMAF.TimSmithMD.com
MSN.com
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
But now you know why they insist on taking our guns. They will not be able to keep this up without taking our guns, since we will finally have enough of us losing serious loved ones to their undeclared, illegal war against us. The is a deep motivating situation for our people.
Its no different than if they went up to that loved one, pulled out a gun and shot them point blank. That is called a "Hard kill", but with cancer cells being dumped on us in the chemtrails, or implanted during treatment, its called a soft kill, no less lethal than a bullet, but not as obvious and certainly one of the most cowardly act around. But what can you expect from those who think nothing of sexually molesting children and then murdering them and drinking their blood.
Its the helpless and innocent that suffer the most at hands of these cowards, and unfortunately the system isn't working for us against the elite/khazar/bankers since they commit blatant crimes and never see the inside of a court room or jail..... but that is going to have to change, soon. We MUST do an "ICELAND" if we want to save the lives of our seniors, and the blood of our children to be used in bankers wars for profit.
Cancer industry now admits that chemo and radiation treatments generate huge repeat business and repeat profits
http://www.naturalnews.com/052239_cancer_industry_chemotherapy_repeat_business.html
by Julie Wilson, Staff Writer, Natural news, December 8, 2015
NaturalNews) Second cancers are on the rise in the United States,
according to a new study, which found that one in five new cases involve
someone who has had the disease before. The study also found that
second cancers, which don't include reoccurring cancers, but are a
completely new type of cancer, have increased 300 percent since the 1970s.First-time cancers have also spiked, increasing 70 percent in the same time frame.
The Western world of medicine is going with their usual explanation, or rather lack thereof, claiming that they are unaware of the reason for the surge but pointing to the fact that people are living longer and are therefore more at risk for the disease.
But living into your 80s and 90s shouldn't guarantee that you'll get cancer.
While genetics are a factor, other influences such as your environment, the food you eat, the water you drink, the air you breathe, the vaccines you inject and even the kind of medical treatment you receive may contribute much more than your age when it comes to determining your risk for cancer.
Emerging research continues to show that pesticides, heavy metals and hormone mimickers such as BPA and BPS, as well as other environmental contaminants, greatly influence the risk of developing cancer.
For those who are unfortunate enough to receive a second cancer diagnosis, the treatment you received for your first cancer may ultimately be to blame.
Are cancer treatments causing more cancer?
A document[PDF] by the American Cancer Society titled "Second Cancers in Adults" admits that second cancers may be caused by cancer treatment."Radiation therapy was recognized as a potential cause of cancer many years ago," according to the ACS, which also admits that most types of leukemia, including acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), can all be caused by radiation.
Most cancers caused by radiation therapy develop within just a few years of being irradiated, with the disease peaking at five to nine years following exposure.
Similarly, chemotherapy drugs have also been linked to different kinds of second cancers, with the most common being myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and AML; ALL has also been linked to these cancer drugs.
Cancer drugs cause at least 40,000 cases of new cancer each year in the U.S.
To help put that into perspective, about 13,000 people are diagnosed each year with MDS.Aside from radiation and chemotherapy, other causes include toxins present in tobacco smoke, and high levels of industrial-type chemicals such as benzene, a carcinogenic petrochemical that is widely used in plastics, synthetic fibers, rubber lubricants, resins, dyes, detergents, drugs and pesticides.
Nearly another 20,000 people are diagnosed annually with AML, with more than half of those cases ending in death, and approximately 6,000 people are diagnosed with ALL each year.
This means that at least 40,000 cancer occurrences may be directly attributed to cancer drugs.
Determining how many people perish from cancer drugs is extremely difficult, as most of the deaths are recorded as being from cancer, and not the treatment.
Remember, the cancer industry is one of the world's most lucrative businesses, generating $100 billion last year. Those profits are expected to increase at about 8 percent each year over the next three years as more and more Americans will be diagnosed and treated for cancer.
Sources:
Fortune.com
Cancer.org
Cancer.org
Cancer.org
Leukaemia.org.au
DHS.Wisconsin.gov
Cancer.org[PDF]
GCMAF.TimSmithMD.com
GCMAF.TimSmithMD.com
MSN.com
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
No comments:
Post a Comment