2012-07-22

The Foreign Infiltrated & Controlled US Government - Unleashes more False Flags in the ME and Maybe the Olympics.

Vatic Note:  I have decided on this one to use a comment made by a "Veterans Today" reader instead of my vatic note.  That does not prohibit me from doing VN's throughout the article though, so you know.   Here is the commenters piece that I thought was great.  It was  better than the article.  This was pointed out to me by a regular visitor from New York and I wish to thank that person for sending this to us.  Here it is.....
~~~~~~

Interesting Article: From Henry Makow, 7/20/2012
********************************************************************************
Former Israeli commando Frank Lowy, 81, recently opened the Mega Mall adjacent to Olympic Stadium and Stratford subway station.  (VN:  that is in England)
Frank Lowy was Larry Silverstein’s partner in the World Trade Center on Sept 11. 2001.
Over two-thirds of all those attending the Olympics stadium are expected to transit through Westfield’s new “Stratford City Center.”
Lowy, a dual Australian and Israeli citizen, is co-founder of the Westfield Group, operator of over 100 shopping centers in Australia, New Zealand, the United States and UK. They also own Marriott Hotels.   Both these companies have suffered a long list of “terrorist attacks” for which large insurance claims were made.
A commercial promoting the London Underground as the main mode of transportation between different game sites in the Olympic village has marked the Stratford stadium with a red line connecting to it.……….continues………..
More ominous facts:
1) Insurance Companies To Pay Out At Least $7 Billion In Vested Interests in Case of Terrorism  (VN:  he is talking about the Olympics)
This also happened prior to the 9-11 and 7-7 terrorist attacks. Certain companies and individuals are going to capitalize from the death and misery. Misery sure does love Insurance company!
The state-backed (VN: That means tax payers are......covering up to $7 billion) British Insurance company Pool Re is covering up to $7 Billion on the Olympic terror threat. Pool Re Chief Executive Steve Atkins said his team had closely scrutinized its customers’ exposure to the Olympic Games. to prepare itself for a potential attack during the event.
Pool Re’s biggest loss to date is the 260 million pounds it paid out after the Bishopsgate bomb in the City of London in 1993, and another 240 million pound plunge from the 1996 Manchester bombing. It is also expected to lose tens of millions from the July 7th 2005 terrorist attacks. It seems like Lowy is going to be just like his friend Lucky Larry (Silverstein) in the aftermath of the 9-11 attacks!!!
2) Mossad and Shin Beit Running “Anti-Terror” Security Drills   (VN:  This does not need any commentary at all.   We understand what this means "perfectly".)
According to a May 2011 news article from Ynet News, the Mossad is involved in Olympics security. A source at the British Olympic Association said that “certain Israeli elements are advising us on securing the Olympic games.”
In addition, the Sayeret Yahalom (Hebrew language: יהל”ם – יחידה הנדסית למשימות מיוחדות) is a special elite combat engineering unit of the Israeli Engineering Corps of the Israel Defense Forces. The name “Yahalom” (Diamond in Hebrew) is an abbreviation of “Special Operations Engineering Unit”. They specialize in covert engineering missions that include everything from Commando and “Counter-Terrorism” missions, planting and defusing explosives (Explosive Ordinance Disposal), landmines, and unexploded ordinance both on land and at sea.
3.  spooks.jpeg3) “Spooks: Code 9″ Series Pre-programming?
The BBC-3 serial drama “Spooks: Code 9″, leaked classified information about a terrorist atrocity on August 10th 2008.
One of the MI-5 agents in the series explained the term “Code 9″ – “A nuclear attack on London. In bomb terms, the blast was relatively small – but the death toll wasn’t. Over one hundred thousand (100,000) incinerated and many more given a death sentence by radiation”.
Why did they call the series Spooks: Code 9? The original Spooks series was just called “Spooks”.
The word “Code” indicates that a coded message is being conveyed. Are the events the series fictionalizes being planned to happen in the real world?
In episode one of the series, one of the characters strangely asks to have five and a half hours (or 330 minutes) to find the killer of a colleague. Why exactly five and a half hours on the dot?
image177.jpg - The one-eye symbolism is the same symbolism as the all-seeing eye on the back of the US dollar and is a favourite symbol of the “Illuminati”. Underneath the One-eyed symbol, it says the word “WAR”.  (VN:  I have always said that Israel was conducting war against the United states people and now I include western countries.) 
The “Illuminati” are using this symbol to indicate that the events portrayed in the series, are planned to take place in the real world and in the foreseeable future.
These clues and the many others in previous articles may be harbingers of what is to come after the Olympics open July 27.  (VN: Funny about this code 9 or hidden message.  Remember all the movies done by the controllers of hollywood that are predictors of what they plan on doing to us???  Well I noticed something about those movies just the other day.  I was watching an old video and the title was "The Island"...... and it was spooky to watch since so much of the research I have found was in that movie about the future world they plan and our place in it for the non wealthy elite.  Then I began to remember all those movies,  "The Knowing", "The Event",  "The Soldier",  "The Apocalypse"  (remember we are being fed ice age again in all the khazar controlled opposition press).   etc etc are all two word movies.   I believe that is signaling someone to that point.   Just like the Baphomet goat sign.  Now that is out, they don't do it anymore, so maybe this is another way of communicating their intentions. Pay attention to movies titled "The ........ " and only two words.) 

US unleashes false-flag ops on PG again?

By Press TV (exclusive) with Gordon Duff, Correspondent

———————–

“When American intelligence officials not connected with the false-flag attack became aware of the scope of the plot, a conflict began between the JSOC (Joint Special Operations Command) and NSC (National Security Council), in effect the advisory board of Israeli/Americans that formulated policy and were, in fact, the inventors of, not just the “Global War on Terror,” but also stand accused of coordinating actual terror attacks against Americans.”

The US Fifth Fleet, based out of Bahrain, fired on a small sporting boat just outside the Dubai port of Jebel Ali. One passenger was killed and three others injured.

The boat, a 27-foot-long “Boston Whaler” type vessel with multiple outboard engines, docked in Dubai immediately afterwards. Observers noted one bodybag being removed by emergency response crews and two injured people being taken ashore.
US officials claim they had “issued warnings,” but failed to say what those warnings were.
This region of the Persian Gulf has very heavy boating and shipping traffic and is a center for sport fishing. It also hosts thousands of sail boats, luxury yachts, and sport fishing craft.
In 2005, Americans, garbed in “Islamic Guard” uniforms operating three Zodiac-type boats, approached American ships in the Persian Gulf. At the same time, radio traffic was generated under the identifier “rabbit” and was claimed to be containing threats and taunts against the American Navy.
These signals came from sources working with the US “false-flag” team, sources inside the security services of Bahrain.


Simultaneously, the government of Bahrain reported to their US-based liaison, not local commanders, that they had intelligence that local Shia clerics were working with the Republican Guard to stage an attack on facilities used by off-duty Americans.
However, USMC security forces had their own sources. Their informants inside the Bahraini security services told them of the White House involvement and named an American naval officer as liaison on this “false-flag” attack, intended to kill between 50 and 100 or more American military personnel.
When American intelligence officials not connected with the false-flag attack became aware of the scope of the plot, a conflict began between the JSOC (Joint Special Operations Command) and NSC (National Security Council), in effect the advisory board of Israeli/Americans that formulated policy and were, in fact, the inventors of, not just the “Global War on Terror,” but also stand accused of coordinating actual terror attacks against Americans.
Most of the NSC came directly from the Project for a New American Century (PNAC), a group that had openly advocated a “Pearl Harbor” type incident to push forward an “American agenda” in Central Asia. A current school of thought, one now very “mainstream” is that the PNAC and its successor, the Bush/Cheney NSC and JSOC, not only falsified intelligence on weapons of mass destruction and terrorist organizations, but also planned and executed, with help from several foreign intelligence agencies, MI6, the Mossad, the DVD, and others, actual terror attacks, including 9/11, 7/7, Bali, the USS Cole and others, some predating George W. Bush’s presidency and some continuing into the Obama administration.
This offers two directions for analysts, that Obama is continuing the tradition of false-flag attacks or that “privatization” of military and intelligence capabilities under Bush has undermined the authority of the US military and intelligence capabilities, allowing them to, in fact, attack the US and allies when such an attack serves the long-range goals of Washington “think tanks” that formulated “neocon” policies.
The biggest part of real evidence supports this last supposition, one beyond the scope of any domestic or international oversight and beyond the scope of any media organization to safely address. To verify this, we suggest that any correspondent, looking for answers, ask Dr. David Kelly. We can supply more names, many more, all reachable under similar circumstances.
HISTORY
The US claims they fired on the Dubai-based sport craft, thinking it was an “Iran’s Islamic Revolution Guards Corps” boat. Such boats are, at times, depicted as carrying Silkworm missiles, a feature easily identifiable from any distance as the missile is nearly as large as the boat itself.
As no such claim has been made and the boat is docked in Dubai, the issue of potential threat against an American Naval vessel is obviously unfounded. This leaves two assumptions, one that the Americans responsible operated outside command authority or that this was an attempt to precipitate a confrontation with Iran, a confrontation spoiled when the boat evaded destruction and managed to return to Dubai with survivors.
Were the boat to have sunk, reports may well have listed this as a “confirmed attack” much like the false stories, the US Navy used to cover the USS Liberty and Tonkin Gulf incidents, both “staged” attacks intended to bring the US into wars under contrived circumstances.
In 2005, the US Navy, under special authority of the JSOC, confirmed by high-level military and civilian officials, attempted a “false-flag” terror operation, using such a craft.
Confirmed sources at the White-House level tell us that the Bush administration attempted, in both 2005 and as late as 2008, to stage its own attack on American forces.
These are all consistent with the use of the Navy’s resources in “false-flag” incidents. Both Pearl Harbor and the sinking of the USS Maine were highly suspicious as was the sinking of the Lusitania in 1915 and the downing of PanAm flight 103 over Lockerbie.
Each of these other incidents, along with a dozen more, have aspects of cover-up and disinformation in their final analysis. What is established is a pattern of using the Navy’s resources of the US or US personnel overseas as pawns in globalist financial ventures, involving drugs, weapons trading, and oil.
We may have “ducked a bullet” today when the small craft from Dubai made it back to port.
EXPECTED FALSE FLAG
The “backchannel rumor mills” of the intelligence community still list the Olympics as a potential terror target. One story, already floated, blames the MI5 and MI6 for failure to monitor “Islamic terror networks” that never existed over an attack on the London Olympics that is yet to occur. If I am not mistaken, a committee to investigate potential Olympic-time attacks has already been notified and findings have been written, but not published.
This is convenient as such attacks have not yet happened and may never happen.
Do we then need another committee to investigate the waste of resources?
FALLOUT
The infamous “cat-and-mouse” games in the Persian Gulf in 2005 and 2008, some of which are confirmed to have been “American on American” or “American on Bahrani,” are, it seems, in motion again.
The Bahraini regime stands ready to help stage attacks on Americans, particularly after their violent suppression of their Shia majority using troops from Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Kuwait.
They have much to profit from if there is war against Iran.
We still have those who witnessed the Bush-era attempts to stage a war through false-flag attacks. In order to silence those involved, some were indicted on phony terror charges, security clearances were revoked, unusual death occurred, and others were simply silence under the aegis of career pressure.
Ain’t America a great place?  (VN:  It used to be when I was growing up and a young woman. Now that foreign infiltrators are running it, its turning into a country just like theirs..... an abomination to all of those around them, just like we are becoming.  Maybe if we took control of it back again, we could once again make it into something that reflects us as a nation  and not some other podunk country that murders its citizens and allies all for psychopathic gain.) 

The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

No comments: