What you see here is a photo of the crew when they were young back when this all happened. Match against that photo is a photo of each of them with one exception, whose photos are placed near the original young version of these astronauts, when they are older and still alive. It was pretty convincing to me, but then I am open to any other opinons or research done by others to confirm or debunk such contentions.
I just don't see a rationale for pretending the Challenger was terminated, and then giving them new identities while using their same names. Seems out of wack to me, but then no one has questioned it til now, I maybe the one off base here. Anyway, you read, follow the links and decide.
Surprise! The 1986 “Dead Challenger Crew” Still Alive And Well..
http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2015/04/surprise-the-1986-dead-challenger-crew-still-alive-and-well-3139958.html
By NESARA, Before Its News, April 18, 2015
I
would like to invite our readers to assess and evaluate for themselves
whether or not it is a realistic possibility that (almost) ALL of the
purported victims of the 1986 “Challenger disaster” are still alive and
well – by reading the last four pages or so of this thread, starting
from here – including this present post, which I submit as a ‘summary’
of sorts.
I find this particular line of research quite interesting,
insofar that it may help us all understand the mechanisms of ‘psy-op
vicsim creation’ – as well as the astonishing boldness (or carelessness
/ arrogance?) with which they are concocted and carried out.
To be
sure, out of the many topics debated on Cluesforum, this particular
investigation has had (as they always should) its fair share of
controversies – even within the ranks of our most trusted contributors;
I think that this ‘check-and-balance-methodology’ we keep observing on
this forum is all-positive and, in fact, essential to uphold a high
level of discourse and objectivity. So thanks to all.
Let
me now take you through the latest findings concerning the “Challenger
crew” which supposedly perished back in 1986. So far, we have been
concentrating on the two lady “crew members”, Judith Resnik and Sharon
‘Christa’ Mc Auliffe. We have seen that the two “female NASA martyrs”
appear to be still alive and well, both enjoying successful Law
University positions and careers – while (astonishingly enough) still
using pretty much their own names – i.e. the names & surnames with
which they briefly became international celebrities – as the “NASA
martyrs of the Challenger disaster”. So what about the five male
members of the “ill-fated crew”?
Well,
it so appears that four of them may possibly also still be quite alive
and well – but let’s take a look at them, one by one… Read More Here…
(VN: And see the other photos of the others that were suppose to have died. See what you think. This was poorly put together, but the photos of the aging astronauts are very good, and look like the astronauts as aged individuals. See if you agree by visiting the link below as provide. We don't know for a fact since I doubt we have their DNA on record during that period in our history, but we can at least question it. I just thought this was so typical of NASA, since they have been used by the military ever since JFK'S death and Johnson and Nixon's tenure as Presidents.)
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
No comments:
Post a Comment