Washington state sues lobbying group opposed to GMO food labeling effort

*** Fundraising time again.  First, we would like to thank those that contributed and brought our deficit down.  We are still at $170 needed to make it by the first.  We have 7 days left to meet our goal.  If you have benefited from our research and posting, and you can afford it, we encourage you to donate at the pay pal button to the right.  It's getting closer to the first and now we appeal to you who have read our work, but have not donated in the past, if you can afford it, to do so now.

We need your help in continuing this work, as time is getting much shorter now. We are not like the MSM who have advertising at their fingertips in order to meet their obligations.  We must depend on you, our readers, to ensure  our continuation.  Help us put the deficit above, to bed.

Bless all of you who read our work, comment, distribute it, and donate to our cause, and we ask everyone to donate something, no matter how small, off to the right with the donation button. Its how we stay alive doing this daily. We just cannot do this without you.

Vatic Note:  How come we have to get this news from a foreign press?   Something needs to be done about our press, and pronto as well.  I think we are all getting fed up with these people.  A third world war against the international bankers and their press and corporations needs to be conducted by the people of the various countries and be done globally.  We each fight and battle and take out those in each of our countries, like Argentina did, Iceland, and now Hungary, Ireland, etc....It is way past time.

My question is, "Why do these lobbyists feel they can violate criminally, campaign finance laws both federally and statewise?"  What has changed that gives them the impression that they can do whatever they want without accountability?   Is it the Luciferian religion that believes you can do whatever you want and its ok?   Or is  it the Talmud that gives you permission in advance to violate trust, laws, or moralilty, by forgiving any transgressions against the goyim before they are committed, allowing the transgressor a whole year to do their own will having been forgiven early???    I don't know the answer to that.

If anyone has any idea where this comes from, please share with us in the comment section. 
                                                       

Washington state sues lobbying group opposed to GMO food labeling effort
http://rt.com/usa/washington-lawsuit-gmo-label-288/
by Russia Today,  October 17, 2013
                                                       

A lobbying group for major US manufacturers has violated Washington state campaign finance law while opposing a ballot initiative that would require labeling genetically-modified foods, according to a lawsuit filed by the state attorney general Wednesday.

The Grocery Manufacturers of America (GMA) ran afoul of state law in collecting and spending $7.2 million against ballot initiative 522 - which voters will consider in November - while not disclosing the individual donors funneling contributions to the organization, alleged State Attorney General Bob Ferguson.
"Truly fair elections demand all sides follow the rules by disclosing who their donors are and how much they are spending to advocate their views," Ferguson said in a statement.

The measure would require the proper labeling of goods which contain ingredients with genetically-modified organisms (GMOs), as well as the labeling of seeds and seed products containing GMOs sold in the state.

With over $7 million spent, GMA is the largest donor to the “No on I-522” campaign. GMA and other opponents have raised over $17 million, spending $13 million thus far, in the effort to block labeling.

The “Yes on I-522” campaign has raised around $5.5 million in support of the labeling. They believe it is crucial for the public’s right to know what is in their food and say the labeling is a positive move considering the numerous questions surrounding the safety of GMOs to human health.

Ferguson’s office alleges GMA set up a “Defense of Brands Strategic Account” and asked its numerous high-powered members to contribute money in an effort to oppose the ballot initiative.

In the process of spending the money, GMA shielded contributors’ identification from public disclosures, the lawsuit alleges.

GMA has a total of 300 member organizations in its ranks.

The attorney general is seeking a temporary restraining order to force GMA to comply with disclosure laws. In addition, civil penalties are included in the suit.
GMA claimed to be surprised by the developments, though it did not say if it asked members to fund the drive to oppose I-522, which would have required a political action committee and disclosure of donors.

"GMA takes great care to understand and comply with all state election and campaign finance laws," the organization said. "GMA will review its actions in Washington state and relevant statutes and continue to cooperate with state authorities to fully resolve the issue as promptly as possible."
 
Supporters of the ballot initiative pushed a similar claim that was rejected by a Thurston County judge, who said the matter needed to go through the state Public Disclosure Commission, which Ferguson is representing in the suit filed Wednesday.

Washington’s consideration of a GMO labeling measure comes one year after a similar measure was rejected by California voters after companies like Monsanto contributed $44 million for "No on Prop 37.”
 
Proponents of the California labeling measure only raised $7.3 million in defeat.
Monsanto has contributed about $5 million in opposition to Washington’s I-522. Corporate giants Bayer, Dupont, BASF, and Dow have also contributed to block labeling.

In June, Connecticut became the first state to pass a labeling bill, though legislative requirements demand it would only go into effect once four states - including one adjacent to the state - passes similar regulations.

---

The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.