5 Dirty Tricks AIPAC Uses Against Congress

*** Well, they certainly did not want  you to read this one.  I have had nothing but trouble getting all three of these up and apparently they are blocking some viewers since the count shows virtually no readers for all three of the blogs we put up tonight so its coming down pretty quick.  If we have to move to a secure server to get away from this and google loses in court, then we will give you the info so you can stay with us.  Thanks for all your patience. They are apparently desperate and that is very very encouraging.  A true morale booster, makes ya want to fight back even harder.  The enemy is within our walls, SAVE AMERICAN LIVES, GET ISRAEL OUT OF OUR COUNTRY PERMANENTLY. I guess they are getting kicked out of just about everywhere these days.... even Hungary.  LOL Kind of like a replay of khazaria.  They simply never learn.

Vatic Note:  Most who read this blog already know about AIPAC and its illegal and unethical practices to garner their candidates as winners in the elections in the USA. I suspect they do it everywhere. What was a real eye opener is when wolf Blitzer interveiwed david Duke, hoping to put him on the spot, resulted in David Duke doing numerous exposures about wolf Blitzer, and one of which that Wolf worked for AIPAC before becoming the anchor on CNN. Now how did he go from a lobbyist to a journalist, damn near overnight??? Answer that one....

See just how wrong we were. We have actually believed for ever that everyone is basically honest in government, that the press would not lie to you or withhold important information from us and that they would investigate wrong doing and act as a fourth Column for the American people and this republic. Not so anymore. Our government is now louded with foreign occupiers who hate us more than death itself, and they will not  stop   until that hatred "eye for an eye" is satisfied.  AIPAC makes Stalin look like a saint.

5 Dirty Tricks AIPAC Uses Against Congress
by Admin, IRmep                                                       

When you're already the biggest stealth lobby of any foreign government, respecting the law just doesn't pay.  Many lobbyists work aggressively to get their way on Capitol Hill by bundling donor contributions, passing inside information that lawmakers can profit from before ordinary investors and creating a favor bank. Some of those activities are unethical, but surprisingly few are actually illegal. 

AIPAC tactics fall into a different category.  The lobbying group never bothered to incorporate until its parent organization was ordered to register as an Israeli foreign agent in 1962.  AIPAC hurriedly spilt off and quietly incorporated just six weeks later in order to continue the public (and secret) work of its defunct parent organization the AZC.  

AIPAC flouts U.S. laws for its foreign patron—the government of Israel—when the stakes are high enough. If other lobbies tried any of these tactics, their executives would go to jail.  Unsurprisingly, few domestic American causes require spying, smearing opponents and fixing elections.  

More worryingly, AIPAC now has enough elected and political appointee friends embedded in high places, along with establishment media power—that warranted investigations can be quickly quashed.

The following five "dirty tricks" are undoubtedly being carefully considered by any Congressmember thinking of voting against AIPAC's drive to entangle the U.S. in wars against Syria and Iran:

AIPAC Fixes Elections & Illegally Coordinates Donations to Beat Opponents

In 1986, AIPAC needed Alan Cranston to win the California senate race.  So ex-AIPAC Director Michael Goland illegally funneled campaign cash to spoiler candidate Ed Vallen.  The crooked ploy worked. 

Vallen drew enough votes from Cranston's opponent for Cranston to win.  Although Goland was later convicted and given a slap on the wrist, Cranston shoveled billions in U.S. aid to Israel, none of which was affected by the criminal boost to his election.

The same year, AIPAC Deputy Political Director Elizabeth Schrayer illegally coordinated supposedly "independent" political action committees (in fact set up by AIPAC) to contribute funds to support AIPAC-favored candidates.  Decades of court actions, which rose to the level of the Supreme Court, resulted in no accountability for AIPAC.  

AIPAC continues to "score" each vote in Congress.

Even as campaign finance laws loosen, all U.S. politicians know AIPAC is willing to use almost any means—legal and not—to get its candidates into office. 

AIPAC Falsely Claims Charitable Religious Status & Ignores IRS Disclosure Regulations

AIPAC applied for tax-exempt status as a religious charity in 1967—essentially by lying to the IRS (PDF).  Omitted from its application was the required disclosure that AIPAC was led by a former foreign agent of the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 

That AIPAC's parent organization folded after being ordered by the Justice Department to register as an Israeli foreign agent.  That AIPAC's start-up funding came from the Jewish Agency (an arms-smuggling organization), laundered through the Near East Report.

Because the IRS never properly investigated or challenged the application, AIPAC received tax-exempt status in 1968.  Instead of opposing legislation of a well-funded "registered foreign government's lobby," Congressional reps have to consider whether they want to be perceived taking on a "religious charity." Since 2009, AIPAC no longer provides donor names and amounts as required to the IRS.

AIPAC Steals & Uses Opponents' Secrets Against Them in the Media

In 1984 the Israeli government wanted the privilege to export—tariff free—into the US market.  The majority of US industry and labor groups were opposed and compiled their most closely held trade and market secrets into a report to the International Trade Commission.  

AIPAC, with the help of an Israeli "diplomat," stole the classified report and used it against the complainants in a massive public relations campaign.  Israel unfairly won the trade concessions, which through May, 2013, have cost the U.S. $100 billion.  The FBI investigated the espionage and theft of government property, but the Reagan administration Justice Department wouldn't prosecute.

What member of Congress (or opposing lobby) wouldn't be terrified of having AIPAC steal their own darkest secrets to be used against them in an orchestrated media campaign?

AIPAC Places U.S. National Defense Secrets into Israel's Service

In 1975, AIPAC director Morris Amitay almost drove Jordan into the arms of the Soviet Union when he obtained and leaked classified Defense Department data on missile sales (According to the State Department).

In 2004, AIPAC employee  Steven J. Rosen passed classified U.S. national defense information to the Washington Post (and "Israeli diplomats") aimed at convincing Americans that Iran was engaged in "total war" against the U.S. in Iraq.

Members of Congress have authorized access to classified briefings, but unlike AIPAC, they are compelled not to leak secrets to constituents or the media for political gain.  What member doesn't fear being "end-run" by a foreign lobby with no restrictions on how it obtains and spreads U.S. national secrets to friends in the media?  

AIPAC requires members of Congress to accept its vetted interns as staff, creating a foreign interest intelligence network unsurpassed on Capitol Hill.  Members of Congress are under constant watch.  (VN: This is more dangerous than any of the other issues, because the staffer can censor what the congressman knows.  He can block any communication between the rep and a constituent.  That is serious power for an intern.  And if its an israeli operative, then its even worse.  I used to work in the legislature in a state and I knew how staffing normally happens and has for decades if not centuries, but this year I saw a major change and tried to find out if Israel was supplying the staff to congress where the elected officials could not bring their trusted advisors from his state, that ran his/her campaign and got them elected. In the past it was always done that way, but no more.)

AIPAC Quashes Prosecutions Gaining an Aura of Criminal Immunity

Back in the 1940s, only a handful of American "smugglers for Israel" funded by the Jewish Agency were prosecuted as investigations were quashed by a "war chest" and movements of highly-placed insiders.  

Fast forward to 2006 when Congresswoman Jane Harman was picked up on a federal wiretap telling an "Israeli agent" she would "waddle into" and quash the Justice Department's espionage prosecution of two AIPAC employees. The Justice Department later dropped the prosecutions, under pressure from a massive Israel lobby pressure campaign.  (VN:  and the thefts and spying with respect to our F-22 fighters and other such serious issues, may well result in us losing WW III if we decide to even fight in it and only because of AIPAC's spying.)

Members of Congress know AIPAC can do almost anything, and never be held to account.  Elected officials wanting to serve broader American insterests must tread carefully.  Those members of Congress opposed to AIPAC's drives to tripwire America into war with Iran and Syria realistically fear a combination of spying, covert action and rigged elections will bring them down if they fail to follow AIPAC—and by extension the Israeli government's—marching orders.

The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.


Anonymous said...

We are truly a subverted nation. Most people are so cowed by the Jewish victimhood myth that their minds are closed to the truth of Jewish Supremacism.

Vatic Master said...

The first thing we need to do is to quit using the term "Jewish" when it comes to the khazar zionists, and start speaking the absolute truth and use the term that fits here with the facts, "Khazars", instead of Jewish and that will solve half our problem. We start saying the "Khazar Zionist bankers" and we are then not talking about the Jews who have had to seek asylum from Israel to save their lives from the khazar immigrants brought into the settlements to displace the Pals, and who literally beat the unarmed real semitic Jews with bats and clubs. The real Jews have no weapon with which to defend themselves.

Anonymous said...

I agree. Simply referring to this as jewish subversion is in fact inaccurate and will quickly get one labeled a bigot. The people behind these crimes are the zionist's and neocon's. From the banksters to AIPAC to 9/11 I really wish there was an adequate way to inform the American people. Perhaps a national network, free of bigotry and hate that could hand out literature and host a website showing merely facts and not opinion or conjecture. Our education system is and always has been polluted. Follow the money people!