2014-05-15

800 Scientists Demand The End To Global GMO “Experiment”.

Vatic Note:  I am going to incorporate the Fundraising start with the vatic notes from now on.  It will save time and reading for the viewer.  Well, let me rephrase that.  I will start with this blog and decide later on the others, depending on how my computer set up goes.   This is the start of this months fund raising and we REALLY do need help this month since the powers that be have destroyed my computer.  I was able to get one from the library and have a computer company upload all the programs we need and we believe this will at the very least, slow down the powers that be.

We must be getting close to time since this is the very worse they have been.  We are doing this blog now from the library, which inhibits my time for doing research and confirmations, and only gives me time to actually post the blogs up for viewing, so we need our normal deficit of $300 plus $125 to buy the computer and software set up and installation.  That is a total of $425, so any help  you can give will be greatly appreciated, so we can stay on the net and continue our work in educating.

Thank you so much for all your support and help in distributing and educating and financial support to keep us going. If you feel you could affort to donate something, please use the pay pal donation button off to the right of this blog.  God bless you and keep you safe.

Now for the GMO issue.   My question is "Why has it taken these scientists years to finally step forward and speak their mind?"  Is it because the issue has now reached global levels and people have taken the lead in boycotting GMO's ?  Is it because many are insisting on Labeling with States beginning to follow suit?   I am just curious, since we also had problems with scientists on global warming as well, so the PTB could tax us, with a thoroughly life style destroying tax.  So, what the heck is up with these scientists?

Is this more manipulation or is it for real?   I will continue to check and see what I can find that will tell us one way or the other.

800 Scientists Demand The End To Global GMO “Experiment”.
http://politicalvelcraft.org/2013/09/02/800-scientists-demand-the-end-to-global-gmo-experiment/

by Political Velcraft,  9/2/13

02SEP
800 Scientists Demand The End To Global GMO “Experiment”.
monsanto gmo
Did you hear about the 800 esteemed scientists who came together and demanded the production of genetically modified crops and products be stopped?
Scientists who called on world powers to re-evaluate the future of agriculture and seek sustainability rather than corporate profits? Don’t be surprised if you haven’t, as the mainstream media won’t touch this one.
Eight-hundred scientists did make such a demand. They made it first over a decade ago and they have updated it over the years, adding signatures and release dates. Still global powers have all but ignored their calls.
The Institute of Science in Society is a non-profit group of scientists from around the world, dedicated to bringing an end to what they refer to as the “dangerous GMO “experiment. In their open letter to the world, they have highlighted why governments need to stop genetically modified crops now – before there are irreversible effects on the health of the people and the health of the earth at large.
Russia's Prime Minister Vladimir Putin hugs a Bulgarian shepherd dog, after receiving it as a present from Bulgaria's Prime Minister Boiko Borisov (not seen) in Sofia, November 13, 2010.   REUTERS/Oleg Popov
Russia’s Prime Minister Vladimir Putin hugs a Bulgarian shepherd dog, after receiving it as a present from Bulgaria’s Prime Minister Boiko Borisov.
The Open Letter from World Scientists to All Governments calls for “the immediate suspension of all environmental releases of GM crops and products, both commercially and in open field trials, for at least 5 years.”
They also want patents on organisms, cell lines, and living things revoked and banned. Such patents (a sort of corporate version of “playing God,”) “threaten food security, sanction biopiracy of indigenous knowledge and genetic resources, violate basic human rights and dignity, compromise healthcare, impede medical and scientific research and are against the welfare of animals.”
And as Anthony Gucciardi recently detailed on NaturalSociety, this would be bad news for Monsanto following the recent Supreme Court decision that they have the ‘right’ to patent life.
Signing A Rule So You cannot Sue Monsanto. Yes Barry Will Stoop To Anything.
Signing A Rule So You cannot Sue Monsanto.
Yes Barry Will Stoop To Anything.

Scientists Speaking Out

In the beginning, after its first draft in 1999, the letter had just over 300 signatures. Since then, it’s grown significantly. At the writing of this article, the document has 828 signatures representing 84 different countries.
While we are told by Monsanto and the FDA that GMOs are nothing to worry about and instead safe tools for the future of agriculture, a growing number of esteemed scientists seem to disagree. So, who’s listening?
The letter has been presented to numerous governments and organizations, including the U.N. Commission on Sustainable Development, the U.N. Convention on Biological Diversity, the World Trade Organization, and yes, even the U.S. Congress. The letter has been shared at these venues, but it doesn’t seem like anyone was listening.
The populous has to dig for information like this. We have to seek out the news sources willing to cover it, because we won’t hear about this letter on the nightly news or through a governmental agency. No, the U.S. government wants you to fear what they want you to fear (“terror” and crime, for instance), but they certainly don’t want you to fear the information and the food they are putting on your table. Or the GMOs they are funding with your taxpayer dime.
Monsanto Missile Strike  2013 Waco Texas
Monsanto Missile Strike 2013 Waco Texas


The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

No comments: