This is one of those where the authors article is the Note that is important. I will reserve my comments for a later time. I do not want to take away from this information below which sounds credible. I am out west in Colorado and worked in the mortgage business, so much of what he says about water rights etc. out here is correct.
Sometimes, we can surprise ourselves when we are willing to die for a cause and take the risks that are required. I am thinking about this ranchers neighbors and the militias since both were at risk for their lives with these brutal animals.
It means getting out of ourselves and our agenda and fighting for someone else. John the beloved said: "You must love your neighbor, as God loved us, in that he gave his only begotten son for us. You must love your neighbor such that you would be willing to die for him." Its not an exact quote, but close enough.
Here is a report by Franchi that I am putting up in the vatic note, because we never covered the arrival of the militia and if we are going to record history, this has to be part of it. This confirms the first of the militia arrived the next day after BLM brutalized the 20 citizens trying to peacefully protest against the BLM's actions, and included tackling an older woman with cancer who was unarmed, and she had to get medical treatment, as well as siking police dogs on other protestors.
NOW YOU CAN SEE WHY THE POWERS THAT BE WANT AND NEED A CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION. DO NOT VOTE FOR IT. You can find the video at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tfOVg5R4ngA
IGNORE PETE SANTILLI, HE IS SUPPOSE TO BE CONFIRMING THE ARRIVAL OF THE MILITIA. INSTEAD HE IS TRYING TO SELL HIMSELF AS USUAL..
Our founding fathers would have been proud of the end results of the militia arriving. Its what they created them for and put it in the Constitution. They knew better than any of us what these evil satanists were capable of doing to us once they took over.
I am very happy to see that we have restored our integrity and character as a people and a nation. Now lets stand against any violent agression against any other nation on this planet. We have diplomacy "IF" its in our best interest and NOT THE BEST INTEREST OF OUR FOREIGN OCCUPYING COUNTRY. And you all know who I am talking about. ITS TIME TO PURGE THE FOREIGN OCCUPYING NATION OUT OF HERE, LIKE ICELAND DID AND PURGE THEM FROM EVERY DEPT IN OUR GOVERNMENT so we can stop this evil darkness from spreading.
BLOCKBUSTER: Straight from a rancher's mouth
by Jim Stone, Freelance Reporter, photos from Here, there are more.
Immediate family friend of the Bundy's tells it all in a mail sent to Jimstonefreelance.com
This is the jackpot of details you have never seen anywhere else, and if you did, they originated here, spread it around, ARCHIVE AND POST! (please link back to here when posting elsewhere)
A Rancher TELLS ALL:
B Hunt wrote:
I live in SW Utah. I grew up on a ranch less than 100 miles from the Bundy's ranch. My father knows Cliven Bundy. I know Cliven's son Ryan. This is not a hoax, it is an action of force by the BLM.
The BLM was going to sell the cattle at one of the smallest cattle markets in Utah. No cattle markets in Nevada would take the cattle without a properly signed brand inspection (which the BLM cannot obtain without Cliven Bundy's signature). The BLM paid the owner of the Utah cattle market $300,000 to do the sale ('R' Livestock Connection in Monroe, Utah, owned by one Scott G. Robbins, according to the Utah Business Entity Search).
Utah Governor Herbert stepped in and forbid them from bringing the cattle into Utah without the legally required health and brand inspections (which again, require Bundy's signature) and that no feral cattle are allowed to be imported at all (per Utah statute). Because Bundy claims ownership over maybe 350-500 head of branded cattle, the other 500-700 estimated head of cattle would all be considered feral.
Cheers: Protesters pump their fists as cowboys herd cattle that belongs to rancher Cliven Bundy
BLM officially backed off, but we suspect they are still secretly shipping them through Utah without any permission to do so, to "private" buyers in Colorado. The contract cowboys that the BLM hired to do the roundup are from Sampson Livestock in Meadow, Utah (traitors one and all).
From what I understand, Cliven Bundy owns both the Water Rights and Grazing Rights to all of the land where his cattle run. If Bundy failed to use them, the Grazing Rights would revert to the BLM and would be retired, while the Water Rights would revert to the State of Nevada, likely to be sold to the highest bidder (which would probably be a bidding war between mineral companies that are behind this action with the BLM and the City of Las Vegas which is thirsty for water and has had multiple attempts to buy water--through eminent domain from Utah farmers and ranchers--from Utah, which were all blocked by the Utah Legislature and Utah Governor Herbert).
Chances are, the BLM has already filed a claim on the water rights so that they can sell to the highest bidder (instead of the state) and are trying to get the cattle off to show that Bundy cannot use the water beneficially (much like what the US Forest Service and BLM both tried to do to Wayne Hage).
Now, for Cliven Bundy, he's not fighting this for his cattle or his own livelihood.
He recognizes that he will probably die before this fight is over. He has said multiple times that he is fighting this to wake people up about the tyranny of the Federal Government and also to help wake up the western states about getting the rights to their own land back from the federal government, which has repeatedly shut down ranchers and closed off land.
1st, get all the ranchers, farmers, Native Americans, and foresters that use the land for positive, sustainable production off of the land;
2nd, grab up all the resources;
3rd, close off the lands to public access including camping, hiking, horseback riding, hunting, fishing, boating, shooting, etc;
4th, sell off the resources to the highest bidder regardless of what that will do to the land, the local environment, or the economy;
5th, collect royalties on the resources in perpetuity;
6th, reduce and eliminate all SLS and PILT payments to the states, impoverishing them beyond belief.)
Anyway, thanks for posting about this. It is important for us to be able to raise the appropriate resistance.
Thank you for sending your valuable insight. This contained the details we were all missing. From this we can now firmly conclude:
1. The BLM's actions are not only flatly illegal, they are unlawful, and not only unlawful, they are so unlawful that it took bribing someone with a $300,000 payoff to get them to accept stolen cattle from a Government agency. I do not think that could be topped ANYWHERE else in the world, other than with something like a Mexican drug cartel.
So we have a clear cut case of unlawful and prosecutable actions by the BLM in this case.
2. The real goal is to shut down public access to these lands. Obviously Cliven Bundy was not a jerk, and he let people go back there to explore. I myself have done a LOT of back country exploring, and noticed in the early 2000's that they closed down all the back roads about a half mile before the destination they used to go to to discourage people from exploring the wilderness.
Rather than drive the whole way, you had to get out and walk a considerable distance to scenes such as Swazy's leap, Paul Bunyans Wood Pile, and practically anywhere else you would want to go while out 4 Wheeling. And in the desert sun, that long of a walk was usually tough to do. This resulted in these types of locations no longer being visited, which effectively equaled a shut down.
3. The motives are for profit. Rather than manage the lands responsibly, the BLM is stealing it from it's rightful holders via corrupt actions and legal loop holes, and selling it off to corporate interests. This is cold hard proof that America is not a democracy, or more importantly a Republic, it is in fact a facist dictatorship where corruption rules and rights, freedom and honor are irrelevant.
The BLM killed hundreds of desert tortoises on purposeThey say they had to kill them because they did not have the funds to care for them. Here are two really good solutions to that "problem."
1. Just take them out in the desert and turn them loose. -OR-
2. They could have taken the three million dollars they said the Bundy raid will cost them, CALLED OFF THE RAID, and SAVED THE TURTLES with that three million. If they had three million to destroy Bundy, they had it for the turtles as well but did not use it for that because tyranny comes first.
Steeped in arrogance and incompetence, once again a Federal agency fails to see the obvious. Or perhaps they do see it but they could care less about nature and instead operate as the enforcement arm of a band of high ranking thugs.
UNCENSORED MEDIA -
To the people serving these, thanks!
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.