This is way too early in their maturation for this to be taking place and if she is a degreed teacher than she knows this. This is totally obscene and that teacher should be ashamed of herself for cooperating in such an uncalled for role as a teacher. She isn't even questioning "why" this has been given to her as an assignment for teaching these kids.
Lets remember what the edict of Satanism is "DO AS THOU WILL"..... without any consideration of consequences for either yourself or others. This psychiatrist below is absolutely correct.
And its how you can tell these are satanists running and controlling this social engineering experiment to prepare these children for being USED AS SEX OBJECTS FOR THE MORALLY HANDICAPPED. They care not one wit, what damage this could do to children so young and not mature enough to handle it.
The end result will be adults with little or no consideration for anyone else but themselves and that is the first step to degrading our civilization and bringing it into a barbaric state of existance. Can you imagine the conflicts when each person simply cares only about what they want with no regard for the subject of their desires or yearnings?
Barbarism will run rampid as it currently does in Israel as we see by the pagan based Talmud. Which says "YOU CANNOT RAPE A CHILD UNDER 3.5 YEARS OLD"! Now think about the assumptions that rule cares with it? In my life time, people would go to jail for even trying to seduce or rape a child that young.
Who ever does this is, to me, the arm pit of the earth and deserves nothing less than total obliteration from society. They should be put in a camp where others are exactly like them and let them do each other. Lets see how long they all survive acting like animals with each other.
Here is a quote from Henry Makow that expresses my feelings on this subject, very well.
"Satanism makes what is sick seem healthy, what is unnatural seem natural. Society is the target of a deliberate Satanic campaign."
Don't forget, this is all contained in the protocols on how to socially engineer our children so that when they are adults, they will willingly allow these Satanic preverts to control the global and accept all the satanic and perverted monstrous acts they choose to enforce on the most helpless of our society.
Don't get me started......
Promiscuity is Hidden Agenda of Sex Education
http://henrymakow.com/2015/02/Promiscuity is Hidden-Agenda-of-Sex-Education.html
Government-funded sex education groups promote promiscuity and homosexuality while downplaying the health and psychological risks associated with premature sexual activity, says psychiatrist Miriam Grossman.
I would go further and say the normalization of pedophilia and "inter generational sex" is the ultimate objective.
"What Advocates for Youth is saying is that ... the notion that we are all either male or female is a repressive ideology."
by Miriam Grossman MD
(abridged by henrymakow.com)
Not long ago, I noticed a steady stream of students, most of them female, who were paying a high price for their sexual choices. I spent hundreds and hundreds of hours with these students, and they are the reason I'm writing this today....
There is a man-made epidemic of ignorance: ignorance of biological truths that should be central in any sex ed curriculum or parent education program.
I put the responsibility for the epidemic of ignorance directly on those organizations that are at the helm of teaching sex education:
SIECUS (Sexuality Education Council of US; Planned Parenthood; Advocates for Youth.) Contrary to their claims and promises, their programs are not comprehensive; they are not science-based or medically accurate or up-to-date.
I'll go even further: They are not about preventing disease. Sex ed is a social movement. Its goal is to change society. Their primary goal is to promote sexual freedom and to rid society of its Judeo-Christian taboos and restrictions.
In this worldview, almost anything goes. Each individual makes his or her sexual choices; each person decides how much risk he or she is willing to take, and no judgments are allowed.
The science that is used is selective. If it challenges this model of human sexuality, if what's seen under the microscope threatens this dream for society, it doesn't exist.
These eminent groups deceive the public and endanger the health and well-being of our children. The list of their crimes is long. Duplicity is one: promising one thing and doing another. ...
- See more at: http://henrymakow.com/#sthash.ByLoB1f0.dpuf
My third example is that of Advocates for Youth and their approach to gender. This past August, in the House of Representatives, there was an amendment that ...would grant $50 million to organizations that promote the type of sex education that I've described. In response to that, the president of Advocates for Youth stated that this move would bring science back into sex education.
I found that astonishing, because when you go to the Web sites of Advocates for Youth--and there are many; this is a very large organization that has a lot of resources--science is one thing that is missing.
Advocates for Youth is telling kids that gender, the internal feeling of whether one is male or female, is completely separate from biology, from one's anatomy and one's chromosomes. It's an internal feeling, they say.
This goes back to the gender theory of John Money, left, a notorious psychologist from Johns Hopkins who introduced these radical ideas in the '50s and '60s. The idea again is that one's identification of being male or female is a result of one's internal feelings.
Advocates for Youth not only promotes this, but it tells kids that gender, being male or female, exists on a spectrum. Male and female are at the extreme ends of that spectrum, but it is a wide spectrum with many possibilities in between male and female.... What Advocates for Youth is saying is that Robert does not become Roberta and Roberta does not become Robert, but that they become neither Robert nor Roberta; that there are many possibilities in between, and that the notion that we are all either male or female is a repressive ideology.
What they're telling kids is that newborns are designated male or female, they're wrapped in the blue or pink blanket, and then they're socialized to fit cultural expectations. Messages from their environment teach them masculine or feminine behaviors, interests, and ways of relating. But when a boy insists he's a girl or vice versa, that should not be a concern, says Advocates for Youth. It is, they claim, "as normal as being alive." (VN: well of course he says that, just look at him. He has hormone imbalance if I ever saw it. LOL)
The premise that there are only two genders, male or female, is inaccurate, they say. It restricts our freedom of gender expression. The idea that an individual must be one or the other, male or female, is an arbitrary, repressive paradigm. It's another noxious "ism," like sexism.
This organization that claims to bring science back into sex education teaches that gender can change. A 10-year-old might be certain she's a girl, but at 20 she might realize she's a man. People can realize their gender at any point in their lives, young people are told. Is this the "science" that they're referring to? Or perhaps instructing children that they could be male, female, both, or neither is an example of the critical sexual health information they need to make responsible decisions about their lives.
CABALIST INSANITY
This lesson on gender is not only unscientific; it's a departure from reality. Here's what real science in this century says about being male or female. Cell biology indicates that the Y chromosome is teeming with units of DNA that are unique to males. There are distinct male and female blueprints from the moment of conception.
Embryology provides evidence of the earliest activity of those genes: Eight weeks after conception, when the embryo is the size of a kidney bean, the Y chromosome directs the testes to produce testosterone. The testosterone travels to the brain, enters the neurons, and propels the development of a distinct boy brain with smaller centers for communication, observation, and emotional processing and larger centers for sex and aggression.
Embryology provides evidence of the earliest activity of those genes: Eight weeks after conception, when the embryo is the size of a kidney bean, the Y chromosome directs the testes to produce testosterone. The testosterone travels to the brain, enters the neurons, and propels the development of a distinct boy brain with smaller centers for communication, observation, and emotional processing and larger centers for sex and aggression.
Neurobiology maps out the complex and widespread differences in male and female brains. MRIs create color images that highlight distinct boy and girl patterns of thinking and feeling. Infant development reveals that at one day of age--presumably before children have been socialized to meet society's expectations--girls show a stronger interest in the face, while boys look longer at a mobile. At one year, girls are drawn to a video of a face moving, and boys prefer the video of cars moving.
I love this one: The typical toy preferences of children are also found in juvenile monkeys. Females like dolls, and males prefer vehicles and balls. Sexual stereotypes in the animal kingdom? Male and female are culturally assigned? Gender is a feeling separate from hormones and chromosomes? I don't think so. Advocates for Youth lesson plans are based on last century's social movements and the wish to blur the distinctions between male and female. Anyone following this century's hard science knows that those moth-eaten theories have been discredited.
But in sex ed class, these discoveries don't exist. Students are being force-fed an ideology from 50 years ago: Gender is man-made, sex ed educators insist. Cultures teach what it means to be a man or a woman. Are they stuck in a time warp or just completely blinded by ideology? Either way, it spells disaster for young people.
CONCLUSION
I was told in a recent interview that I must be exaggerating: that it must be hyperbole when I say sex education is madness, that it teaches untruths and that it exposes our kids to smut. If that's true, I was told, wouldn't there be congressional hearings? (VN: hahahaha)
I am not exaggerating: This is madness. The priority for SIECUS, Planned Parenthood, and Advocates for Youth is not the health and well-being of young people. These federally funded organizations are fighting "repression" and "intolerance," not herpes or syphilis. To them, it appears the blisters and the warts, the worry and the depression, can be tolerated, but the "isms" must go.
From the thousands of hours I've spent with students, I can affirm that when sexual freedom reigns, sexual health suffers. Our kids are being taught that you can play with fire, and the waiting rooms of doctors and therapists are filled with people who've been burned, inside and out. Is every young person going to postpone sex? Of course not, but we are obligated to inform them of the risks they face and to teach them biological truths, even when they are politically incorrect.
The only power that I have to fight this calamity is the power of the pen. While the nation struggles over issues related to health and stands on the verge of supporting organizations like SIECUS with millions of tax dollars, it's my hope that my message will reach the ears and the heart of someone with authority who will have the courage to stand up and put an end to this fiasco.
-----------------------------------------
--Miriam Grossman, M.D., is a board-certified child, adolescent, and adult psychiatrist who writes and speaks to parents, students, educators, and health professionals internationally on the dangers of political correctness and incorrect science in her profession. She is the author of You're Teaching My Child What?: A Physician Exposes the Lies of Sex Education and How They Harm Your Child and Unprotected: A Campus Psychiatrist Reveals How Political Correctness in Her Profession Endangers Every Student.
-------
Thanks to Linda K for sending this!
Related - Five-Year-Olds in England to get Sex ed Ostensibly to Recognize Pedophiles
(VN: England is one of the worse countries for sexually abusing children, but then the Queen is a khazar as is her husband, and they are the leaders of their nation. Khazars were pagans and one of 7 cultures that worshipped the phallic symbol, so it makes sense. I have no doubt this "sex education" is really about preparing these children to be sexually violated.
Remember, Rothschild is also a khazar so that is why the practice of pedophilia is so prevalent internationally, since these perverts have taken over major positions and ownership of so much within our countries that their preverted culture has prevailed and overtaken ours. That must be turned around. As David Icke says, we must preserve our culture and take back control of our various nations.)
- See more at: http://henrymakow.com/#sthash.ByLoB1f0.dpuf(VN: England is one of the worse countries for sexually abusing children, but then the Queen is a khazar as is her husband, and they are the leaders of their nation. Khazars were pagans and one of 7 cultures that worshipped the phallic symbol, so it makes sense. I have no doubt this "sex education" is really about preparing these children to be sexually violated.
Remember, Rothschild is also a khazar so that is why the practice of pedophilia is so prevalent internationally, since these perverts have taken over major positions and ownership of so much within our countries that their preverted culture has prevailed and overtaken ours. That must be turned around. As David Icke says, we must preserve our culture and take back control of our various nations.)
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
No comments:
Post a Comment