Vatic Note: First let me say that I don't always agree fully with Henry, but he is right about most things. In this case, Feminism is defined differently than women developing to their full potential. What is wrong is that the social engineering that Henry is talking about, within our governing, social, and educational system does not allow for the unique job women have in perpetuating the race. As a society we should be accommodating that unique position, through various ways that does not cost the system or anyone else anything.
For instance, every woman who wants to can certainly work, go to school, and develop to her full potential, and given the violence, promotion of alcohol and other such nefarious considerations in our society, many women would not have survived in a violent marriage if she had not had an education so she could support herself and her children.
So, if she has family and school age children, her working hours should be adjusted to allow her to fully be there for her family/children when they get out of school. But this illuminati driven agenda (Remember, they do nothing for the benefit of the goyim) was planned through social engineering to detach our children from their roots, and the only way to do that was to devalue a womans role in the home and to attack her self esteem making it more attractive to seek advancement in employment.
If a boy sees his father doing disrespect and denigrating treatment of his mother, than he grows up with the same set of values exhibited in the home and will continue that on with his own wife, thus chasing her out of that home where she is sorely needed if they have children, so both the wife and the children suffer.
She could actually do both, if social accommodations had been made to benefit the family and the society as a whole. If she could have worked from 8 to 3 daily, she could be home when the children show up after school and thus they could have their cake and eat it too. In many ways it could have also benefitted the children to have an educated mother at home. It would benefit the husband having a happy and fulfilled wife doting on him when he comes home.
I do agree with Henry that the Illums did what they did, promoting "FEMINISM" by tearing down the role of the father, as well as the mother, in a childs life during their formative years, but that was to destroy our foundations so the children would gradually move over to other social choices after school so they belonged to something, rather than being alone and that was the illums satanism and by golly its worked. Just look at the teens with tattoos, body piercing and other evidence of involvement in the occult and satanism. When was the last time an adult watched MTV??? Its all right there and in your face.
Malala - Illuminati Psy Op Wins Nobel "Peace" Prize -
by Henry Makow, October 10, 2014
Part Mother Theresa/Part Nelson Mandela - Malala Yousafzai fills an icon vacuum. Teacher called her out of high school Chemistry class to inform her she had won the Nobel Prize. Oy vey! She joins such peacemakers as Barack Obama and Henry Kissinger.
Malala is another Illuminati Psy Op
("Educating girls will change the world," Malala,17, told the UN in July 2013. "Change" is satanist code for social & cultural degradation. "Peace" is code for total submission to Illuminati world tyranny.)
Malala has the hallmarks of an Illuminati psy op: The mass media rush as one to sanctify her; Illuminati whores, politicians and celebrities alike, endorse her. The article below by Zahar Bangash outlines the Illuminati connection to Malala and confirms once again we live in a de facto Communist regime.
Malala is a champion of education for girls. "Education" today is gendercide (feminism.) The Illuminati use this toxin to destroy traditional societies and reduce population by alienating women from their natural instincts, i.e. marriage and motherhood.
Who says learning only takes place in a classroom, and not in a home where the Illuminati can't control the message? (VN: that is soo very true. We have so many latchkey kids with no one around after school and now so many or our kids are turning into satanism. Just look at all the tatoos on young teens and body piercing. If mothers were home, we would not see that. Not because they are not home, but because they are not there to "teach" and "Preach" as my mother did. My head is filled with all kinds of sayings that she used to say to me. Those sayings because the foundation of my moral character, I now own those lessons, myself.)
Liberal (i.e. Masonic) education has degraded Western society and created many generations of lost souls.
As usual, the Illuminati "do well by doing good." Mulala's father owns a chain of private schools and huge UK/US education corporations are vying for a share of the "Malala Fund" cash grab.
Anyone who watches the Mulala hagiography that passes for TV news can confirm that Western society is run by hypocritical, sanctimonious, shameless intellectual whores and liars.
"One cannot help but wonder whether her father's motive was in promoting girls' education or he feared his income dwindling if the girls' schools he was running were shut down [by Taliban]."
by Zafar Bangash (The Crescent, Nov 2012)(Edited/abridged by henrymakow.com)
The attack on Malala Yousafzai [in Oct. 2012] evoked worldwide condemnation. From US President Barack Obama to UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, all condemned the attack. The question is: why is Malala given so much prominence when other attacks on girls in Pakistan and Afghanistan go virtually unnoticed?
The attempt on the life of Malala Yousafzai, a 15-year-old Pakistani schoolgirl from Mingora in Pakistan's Swat Valley on October 9 has aroused worldwide outrage. Two other girls were also injured in the attack as Malala was returning home in a school bus. There were rallies in her support not only in Pakistan but some very high-powered global players also weighed in on her case. In what must be a first, US President Barack Obama, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon and former British Prime Minister Gordon Brown all condemned the attack on Malala as did most politicians in Pakistan. Hollywood actress Angelina Jolie suggested Malala should be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize while Madonna put Malala's name on her bare back!
Let us get the basic facts straight before we proceed. She was attacked and badly injured when a gunman boarded the school bus she was riding home from school. The gunman demanded to know who Malala was. When another girl student pointed to her, the gunman opened fire, hitting Malala in the head and neck. The gunman also shot and wounded two other girls before escaping. The badly wounded girl was rushed to Peshawar, capital of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province.
After initial treatment at a hospital in Peshawar, Malala was airlifted to the Combined Military Hospital (CMH) in Rawalpindi where Pakistan's top neurosurgeons treated her.
Once her condition stabilized, she was flown to Britain where she is now receiving rehabilitative care at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Birmingham. Doctors have given a good prognosis of her recovery and say she will be able to resume normal life after some reconstructive surgery to her skull.
It is impossible not to sympathize with Malala, a young girl with large beautiful hazel eyes peering from her innocent face, and her naturally distraught parents. It is shocking that a young girl would be targeted for simply wanting to go to school to acquire education, which is her birthright as it is of millions of other young girls in Pakistan as indeed elsewhere in the world. What kind of beasts would want to harm a young girl doing no more than acquiring education?
But who exactly is Malala Yousufzai to attract so much international attention? What about the two other girls that were injured in the same attack? Even their names are not widely known, much less information about their parents.
Apart from the fact that they are out of danger, there is little that we know about their plight. Are they not worthy of attention and sympathy? Within days of the assault on Malala, American troops killed three Afghan children on October 14 in an aerial attack in the Nawa district of Helmand Province in Afghanistan. It may not be adjoining Swat Valley but is not very far either from where Malala was attacked and injured.
Even when reminded of the risks she was courting, Malala said her father, who worked for women's education, supported her fully. Her mother was equally supportive, she said but the irony is that Malala's mother is kept inside the house while the young girl is projected internationally.
As Adam Ellick tells us, Ziauddin Yousafzai "was a bit traditional, and as a result, I was unable to interact with her [Malala's] mother. I used to chide Ziauddin about these restrictions, especially in front of Malala. Her father would laugh dismissively and joke that Malala should not be listening. Malala beamed as I pressed her father to treat his wife as an equal." (emphasis added).
For decades, the Pakistani establishment has been obsessed with the Indian intelligence agency RAW. In the last decade, Pakistan has become a battleground for the CIA, British MI6, Germany's BND and the Israeli Mossad, to name only a few, whose agents roam every nook and cranny of the country, mostly disguised as journalists, aid workers or businessmen.
So it is not surprising to learn that poor Malala was used as a pawn by these monsters that will stop at nothing to advance their nefarious agenda. It does not require a genius to figure out what the US-British-Zionist and their allies' agenda in Pakistan is: to entangle Pakistan in a never-ending conflict with its own people from the tribal area to provide the pretext for grabbing Pakistan's nuclear weapons.
For proof of this, one only has to read the October 21 piece published in the British daily, the Guardian, by Bruce Riedel, a former CIA analyst. He warned, on the eve of the third and final presidential debate that Pakistan's nuclear weapons posed the "greatest security threat" to the US and urged both Obama and his Republican rival Mitt Romney to pay close attention to this.
(Pedophile Gordon Brown, "UN Special Envoy for Education" with Malala)
There is one other dimension worthy of attention and that is what the former British Prime Minister Gordon Brown has done.
He has launched a United Nations petition using the slogan "I am Malala" demanding that all children in the world should be in school by 2015. He plans to present the petition to Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari later this month. Brown's activities on behalf of Malala and indeed other children would sound more noble were it not for the fact he heads the "global campaign for charter, for-profit school systems." There is tons of money to be made in this enterprise.
Brown's campaign is supposed to work in tandem with the UN's scheme run under the alluring title, "Education First." This is a global public/private partnership scheme whereby not-for-profit institutions would be privatized. The "not-for-profit" institutions are run under the label, "Global Business Coalition for Education," and set up by such Western -- mainly American -- corporations as Accenture, Hess, Chevron, Pearson International and others.
Their targeted countries are Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Ethiopia and Nigeria. One is constrained to ask, what interest do these multinationals have in promoting education in the third world, especially Muslim countries?
Let us be clear: the West and its corporations are not in the business of doling out cash to third world countries or care much about the children there unless there is a hidden agenda behind the façade of their good work. One is clearly to re-route the billions of dollars to their own pockets.
The other equally sinister plan is to promote Western culture, thoughts and values by using the label of education. The third and equally sinister plan is to force targeted societies -- in this case Pakistan -- to launch military operations against its own people in North Waziristan to achieve America's geo-political objectives.
Whether Malala knows it or not, if her father has any sense he would realize that his family is being used as dupes for America's criminal enterprise. Malala is a tiny piece in this jigsaw puzzle.
More details - Malala - Neo Liberal Martyr by Scott Creighton (We don't agree that the attack on her was staged.)
"Charities"Gearing Up for Big Malala Haul
Huffington Compost (Illuminati Mouthpiece): 10 Things about Malala Speech that gave us Goosebumps
(left, The Anti Christ?)
First Comment by Dan:
Ah yes. The girl whose fame literally started out with a bang in 2012. Shot in the head by the Taliban!
I usually reach for a loaded gun when people try to write current events into the Bible, but Revelations 13:3 is too close to pass up:
"And I saw one of the heads of the Beast as it were wounded to death; but his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast."
I don't believe Revelations was prophecy for our time, it was all fulfilled long ago. The notion that it's for our time came of the the 'Dispensation theology' of John Neslon Darby, Joseph Smith, and Scofield, that's spread through Churchianity like a virus in the 20th century.
But I do believe this malevolent cult that gives us our 'leaders' love to write themselves into the Bible and the Qur'an when they can. If you believe Revelations is happening today that's alright, but at least read the book and get it right. A lot of people think the one that gets the head wound is the Antichrist, but all John said is "one of the heads of the Beast" - and the Beast is the System, not a person. So it really does fit: Malala is definitely one of the heads of the Beast.
So let's not get excited. Zafar Bangash is exactly right: little girls get shot, in Pakistan all the time - whether by the Taliban, or Obama's drone strikes that splatters Pakistani women and girls all over sidewalks. (see Obama's boast, "I'm really good at killing people".) When Malala had her summit meeting with the President of the United States she only complained that drone warfare "fuels terrorism".
We don't need Bible prophecies or Nostradamus to know who Malala is. Just look at the company she keeps.
See TIME Magazine, April 2014, HILLARY CLINTON (an essay by) Malala Yousafzai
- See more at: http://www.henrymakow.com/#sthash.m7rQWoBh.dpuf
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.