Eric Holder trying to appeal that decision DENYING HIM from throwing out the Fast & Furious case

*** Fundraising Status We wish to thank the people who donated during this particularly difficult time with the powers that be cyber warriors. It has given us some peace of mind and ability to focus more on what we want to share and disclose, so that is more of a gift than just the money.  God Bless you for doing so. We are asking others to Please help us defeat these guys by contributing what you can afford to our humble effort by donating off to the right of the blog at the pay pal button. We depend on you, the reader to partner with us and help us to stay on the net and continue our work. If you agree, please use the pay pal button off to the right. 

We currently have a deficit of $ 90, and we wish to thank those persons who have donated to bring it down to that level from the original $300. We have until the first to obtain the funds we need to stay on the net and continue our efforts to bring you truth as this article does.  I wish to thank all of you who have helped in the past and who have supported our humble efforts.  We are grateful when you notify us of the value this has been to you and yours, it helps us to know that our work is not wasted.  God bless and keep you all safe.

Vatic Note:  This is and has become so typical of this justice dept lately.  This man, Holder, is the highest law officer in the country and is responsible for upholding the law, and prosecuting those that violate it, and yet, he is fighting in the courts to allow his criminal acts to be allowed to stand.  Amazing.  This is exactly what is wrong with this nation right now.

This is what happens when you allow a foreign country to run your government and staff it with foreign dual citizens and American citizens who are traitors, blatantly and profitably.  No wonder no one else is ever prosecuted at the top, when the top law officer is committing major crimes and pushing to  be allowed to continue doing so.  We have seen that with TSA and others working for Homeland Security, which makes this government now look so much like Israels.

Fortunately, we still have courts that declined their request to avoid accountability for their criminal acts.  The court ruled that the court case could move forward.  We will see if Holder ends up in jail as he should for the lives lost due to his giving weapons to drug dealers in Mexico in order to start violence along our border in order to force us to globalize.  Well, it backfired and they got caught, so now we get to see if the system is still working or completely gone.

Eric Holder trying to appeal that decision DENYING HIM from throwing out the Fast & Furious case
by Erika Johnsten, Hot Air, November 17, 2013

While their tremendously incompetent disaster of a healthcare rollout has President Obama more or less making up new rules and interpretations of his crowning legislative achievement as he goes along, you might think that the Obama administration would be ever so slightly humbled and taking care to rein in their usual “we do what we want” attitude on other matters — but alas, that’s still their prevailing modus operandi on their other sidelined disasters, too.

Back in September, a federal judge ruled that the Obama administration could not have the lawsuit over the administration’s executive-privilege pull in the Operation Fast and Furious case (the deadly gunrunning scandal in which the ATF pressed American gun dealers into funneling at least 2,000 weapons to Mexican straw purchasers with no practical efforts to trace the weapons) thrown out, basically because they just didn’t feel like dealing with it.

The Obama administration had invented some argumentative blather about the federal courts having no basis for arbitrating the dispute because it would mean that all document fights between Congress and the administration could end up in court rather than being resolved through good-faith negotiation, or something.

District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson (an Obama appointee, by the way) all but laughed that silly excuse out of court: “Dismissing the case without hearing it would in effect place the court’s finger on the scale, designating the executive as the victor based solely on his untested assertion that the privilege applies. … The Court rejects the notion that merely hearing this dispute between the branches would undermine the foundation of our government, or that it would lead to the abandonment of all negotiation and accommodation in the future, leaving the courts deluged with subpoena enforcement actions,” she wrote — and the Obama administration certainly didn’t like that.

Ergo, on Friday evening, they filed their appeal to that obviously egregious, does-not-apply-to-them enforcement of a little ol’ constitutional mechanism called checks and balances, via Politico:
The new motion (posted here) asks Jackson to allow the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit to weigh in on that question before the case continues.
“Absent settlement (which depends on the willingness of both parties to achieve a negotiated resolution), or an immediate appeal, this Court will proceed toward deciding the scope of the President’s assertion of Executive Privilege in response to a congressional demand, and will do so absent a definitive ruling from the Circuit that such a novel judicial inquiry, in a suit instituted by a Committee of Congress, is appropriate under the law, including the Constitution,” the DOJ motion argues.
“The very experience of participating in such proceedings will cause harm—to the Defendant, the Executive Branch, and the separation of powers—that cannot be reversed if the D.C. Circuit ultimately rules in Defendant’s favor on the threshold questions presented,” the motion says. “In light of the harm to the separation of powers that such an adjudication would entail, including the impact of such proceedings on the negotiation process between the political Branches—a process that has generally proceeded without judicial involvement since the inception of congressional oversight—Defendant’s jurisdictional objections should be resolved by the Circuit before this Court takes such a momentous step.”
These guys just won’t quit.

The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

No comments: