UPDATE: 4/19/2011 - Bush will be the most incompetent President in the History of the US, but Obama will be the most barbaric and virulently violent President in US history to allow this to go on. There goes the credibility of the Nobel Committee and the country it comes from. There were other videos, but these two made the point and it disgusted me sooo much that I couldn't put the rest up... BUT WE BETTER AT LEAST WATCH THESE SINCE THIS IS WHAT IS BEING DONE IN OUR NAME..... MY GAWD, WHERE IS OUR OUTRAGE???? You pieces of crap who are messing with my blog will get yours someday, count on it. These are the khazars you wish to affiliate with? You wish to be part of their vision of a barbaric and perverted society??? You deserve what ever is coming to you. Nuremberg trials won't be enough. OUR RESPONSIBILITY IN ALL OF THIS IS BECOMING MORE AND MORE CLEAR. IF WE DO NOT SPEAK UP ABOUT THIS NOW, THEN WE ARE AS BAD AS OUR LEADERS AND THEIR OWNERS, THE ROTHSCHILD MONGELS, I AM NOT EVEN GOING TO CALL THEM ISRAELI'S ANYMORE AND INSULT THOSE WHO ARE TRUE CITIZENS OF ISRAEL.
My Gawd, are we that barbaric??? This is what happens once you start to think that TORTURE IS AN OK THING TO DO, and you simply go down hill from there. Let me show you what torture looks like, OK? This is from GITMO and what they are doing to a teenage boy. Nice huh? They were not terrorists either, they are being used experimentally to build for mind control assassins. My Gawd. .
ROTHSCHILD KHAZARS SHOULD HAVE TAUGHT US about barbarians slipping as a society down into the satanic muck of torture and devolution as humans into animals, since that is how they started down the path to barbarism and reptililan behavior. AND THEY WANT TO RUN THE PLANET??? THAT SHOULD BE OVER EVERYONES DEAD BODY. That is what happens when you let a barbarian culture run your government. Mongols from Mongolia and Huns are the Khazars who have taken over the damn planet and this is what we get..... WE BETTER FIGHT THEM WITH EVERY BREATH WE HAVE NO MATTER WHAT IF WE WANT TO SAVE THE HUMAN RACE. WATCH THESE VIDEOS: On the first one scroll all the way over to 2:06 and see what they have done. Remember, these guys are not real rebels who are doing this. They work for the oil companies and bankers which is the same thing since the bankers own the oil companies. Here is the video. Damn I am mad.
Video: Libya Rebels Execute, Behead, Mutilate Gaddafi Army who Surrender! Where is CNN now?
uruknet.com, by Pipard
Pro Gaddafi Soldiers who surrender have been Executed by Rebels in Cold Blood ! Blindfolded, hog-tied, beat, Executed, Hung, beheaded, put on fire, had their bodies mutiliated, and in one documented case a Soldier had his heart cut out of his chest when he proclaimed that his "heart is for Gaddafi" and the rebel took a bite out of the heart. In Misrata the Rebels burned some soldiers and then waved and danced around with the charred remains of their corpses.
This is incredible but true facts of the kind of people that comprise the bulk of the benghazi terror gangs, aka "Opposition" forces.
Yes, This is Hillary Clinton, Cameron, Sarkozy and Obama's proxy neocolonial army at work.. Not very "humanitarian" - the favorite word of the day that the imperialists are employing to bomb and invade Libya.
So where is Anderson Cooper and PBS and Rachel Maddow and all the other phony liberal "born - again war-mongers" ? People are being tortured and killed in all sorts of horrible ways but since it is the opposition rebels who are the perpetrators and the Libya Army and Libya Police officers who are the victims, these stories are completely blacklisted from being broadcast in the Imperialist media.
This clip shows the interrogation of captured Libya Army soldiers who are pro-Gaddadi and then the clip cuts away and then cuts back where you will see the soldiers all lying dead in pools of their own blood with their hands tied behind their backs..The clothes all match the clothes of the soldiers who were being interrogated minutes earlier for further forensic evidenc of the execution.
Original blog: American media silent on Libya rebel commander : Khalifa Hifter, long time CIA-Asset (VN: This is the name of the guy working with the British torturer in Kenya and now Bahrain, he's been pulled and is now the leader of the Libyan rebels, they do think we are stupid, don't they. Like we would not remember this name, go check out the other blog, on castration in Bahrain, its there)
Vatic Note: Well, well, such a surprise, just like Egypt, Tunisia and now Libya, we have all Mossad or CIA backed, financed and managed rebels creating that necessary chaos in these countries. What was really interesting is the first thing this CIA backed rebel did when he got control of the north country was to set up a fiat private bank and oil company to take control of both banking and oil, for his handlers/owners, the Khazar Zionist Rothschild international bankers..... That was just reported in the foreign press. It was also the first thing set up in Iraq when Hostilities were over on May 3, 2003 I believe. 9:00 am in the morning, the World Bank and IMF were there to confiscate Iraq's gold for their gold backed currency, fiat currency was delivered, debt was put on the nation and income taxes implemented and all within the first week. They have gotten faster at conversions in these muslim countries that have had great success in grabbing the African markets with their competitive banking system against the rothschilds with their no interest loans. Are we getting the Big Picture yet??? Its never been truly only about oil, its truly been primarily about banking and globalizing under one system in order to globalize. Can't do it with chickens and cows, they must all be one system. Iran is next only because the country began their own oil bourse in competition with Rothschilds london bourse for trading in oil. This is all fascinating to watch it unfold. Is this guy another Smedley Butler??? An ECONOMIC HITMAN FOR THE BANKERS???
American media silent on Libya rebel commander : Khalifa Hifter, long time CIA-Asset
By Patrick Martin, WSWS, Provided to Vatic Project by Dirk Chardet, Kali Yuga Report
30 March 2011
Two days later, another McClatchy journalist, Chris Adams, wrote a brief biographical sketch of Hifter that left the implication, without saying so explicitly, that he was a longtime CIA asset. It headlined the fact that after defecting from a top position in Gaddafi’s army, Hifter had lived in northern Virginia for some 20 years, as well as noting that Hifter had no obvious means of financial support.
The World Socialist Web Site published a perspective March 28 taking note of both the McClatchy articles and earlier reports providing more details of Hifter’s connections to the CIA. These included a 1996 article in theWashington Post and a book published by the French weekly Le Monde diplomatique. (See A CIA commander for the Libyan rebels”)
Both the McClatchy sketch of Hifter’s background and the WSWS perspective have been widely circulated on the Internet. The WSWS perspective has been linked to by a myriad of left-liberal and antiwar web sites, although, significantly, there has been no mention of Hifter in the press of the International Socialist Organization and other pseudo-socialist groups that adapt themselves politically to the pro-Obama liberal milieu.
Hifter has been interviewed and his appointment reported by the European press, including the Independent of Britain, the German weekly Stern, and newspapers in Spain, France, Italy and Turkey (with variant spellings, including Heftar and Haftar). But not in America.
Hifter’s name has not appeared in the bulk of the corporate-controlled US media. The New York Times, the Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal, the Los Angeles Times have all been curiously silent, despite having more journalists in the war zone than McClatchy. The US television networks have likewise kept quiet on the identity of the Libyan rebel commander, with the exception of a brief interview with Hifter on ABC News March 27, which made no reference to his previous long-term residence within five miles of CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia.
There is no credible explanation for this silence from the standpoint of journalism. There is no security reason to keep the name of the Libyan commander secret—it was publicly announced by the Transitional National Council in Benghazi, and Hifter is certainly well known to Gaddafi, who employed him as a commander of Libyan-backed forces in the civil wars in Chad in the 1980s.
The obvious conclusion is that the American media is keeping silent in order to deprive the American people of information that would help clarify the nature of the US military intervention in Libya—and trigger opposition to it. The selection of a longtime CIA collaborator as commander of the rebels makes nonsense of the official claim that the United States is intervening militarily in Libya to protect civilian lives, rather than taking sides in a civil war in order to gain control of Libya’s oil assets and strengthen the position of American imperialism in the region.
Two words that were notably absent from Obama’s Monday night speech on national television were “rebels” and “CIA.” Both the Obama administration and the US intelligence apparatus want to downplay their role in the direction of the rebel ground forces. For the American media, that amounts to a direct order, to which the editors of the Times, Post, etc., salute and say, “Yes, sir, Mr. President.”
Only two months ago, Times editor Bill Keller penned a lengthy screed against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange in the newspaper’s Sunday magazine section. In the course of his denunciation of a genuine journalist, this courtier of the American state declared that the role of “an independent news organization” was “to exercise responsible judgment about what to publish and what not to publish …” (See “The New York Times’ Bill Keller on WikiLeaks: A collapse of democratic sensibility”)
In the case of Khalifa Hifter, this responsibility “not to publish” extends beyond the concealment of the documentary evidence of American war crimes and diplomatic conspiracies uncovered by WikiLeaks. The American media is withholding from the American public basic facts about the war in Libya, widely reported overseas and easily available to those who know where to look. There is no other word for this but censorship.
VN: Here is the article by McClatchy papers that are one of the few MSM not owned by the Khazar Zionists, and thus putting out truth..... thank goodness there is at least one left.
Libyan rebel leader spent much of past 20 years in suburban Virginia
By Chris Adams
WASHINGTON - The new leader of Libya's opposition military spent the past two decades in suburban Virginia but felt compelled — even in his late-60s — to return to the battlefield in his homeland, according to people who know him.
Khalifa Hifter was once a top military officer for Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi, but after a disastrous military adventure in Chad in the late 1980s, Hifter switched to the anti-Gadhafi opposition. In the early 1990s, he moved to suburban Virginia, where he established a life but maintained ties to anti-Gadhafi groups.
Late last week, Hifter was appointed to lead the rebel army, which has been in chaos for weeks. He is the third such leader in less than a month, and rebels interviewed in Libya openly voiced distrust for the most recent leader, Abdel Fatah Younes, who had been at Gadhafi's side until just a month ago.
At a news conference Thursday, the rebel's military spokesman said Younes will stay as Hifter's chief of staff, and added that the army — such as it is — would need "weeks" of training.
According to Abdel Salam Badr of Richmond, Va., who said he has known Hifter all his life — including back in Libya — Hifter -- whose name is sometimes spelled Haftar, Hefter or Huftur -- was motivated by his intense anti-Gadhafi feelings.
"Libyans — every single one of them — they hate that guy so much they will do whatever it takes," Badr said in an interview Saturday. "Khalifa has a personal grudge against Gadhafi... That was his purpose in life."
According to Badr and another friend in the U.S., a Georgia-based Libyan activist named Salem alHasi, Hifter left for Libya two weeks ago. alHasi, who said Hifter was once his superior in the opposition's military wing, said he and Hifter talked in mid-February about the possibility that Gadhafi would use force on protesters.
"He made the decision he had to go inside Libya," alHasi said Saturday. "With his military experience, and with his strong relationship with officers on many levels of rank, he decided to go and see the possibility of participating in the military effort against Gadhafi."
He added that Hifter is very popular among members of the Libyan army, "and he is the most experienced person in the whole Libyan army." He acted out of a sense of "national responsibility," alHasi said.
"This responsibility no one can take care of but him," alHasi said. "I know very well that the Libyan army especially in the eastern part is in desperate need of his presence."
Omar Elkeddi, a Libyan expatriate journalist based in Holland, said in an interview that the opposition forces are getting more organized than they were at the beginning up the uprising. Hifter, he said, is "very professional, very distinguished," and commands great respect.
Since coming to the United States in the early 1990s, Hifter lived in suburban Virginia outside Washington, D.C. Badr said he was unsure exactly what Hifter did to support himself, and that Hifter primarily focused on helping his large family.
Read more: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2011/03/26/111109/new-rebel-leader-spent-much-of.html#ixzz1IHTASOcK
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.