Vatic Note: The section below that talks about google exercising censorship based on THEIR DEFINITION OF TRUTHFULNESS, vs. facts, and thus managing the info that goes on the web, helps the evil ones.... why? Because the evil ones can track us on the net, but if we get off, they lose all sense of what we are doing and they cannot afford that. Thus, this new idea of how to dismantle truth and info on the web while also retaining control of where we are and what we are doing, is the perfect solution to their problem of "control".
Now, why is Google cooperating? Because the two owners of Google are khazars, thats why. Here is a blog we did a few years back on that fact. So, they are in on the game and besides. The CIA lent the two, the money to start the operation, so there had to have been a deal in there, since they are not the relatives of the CIA, rather they are potential sources of info for the CIA from their investment.
Elites Panic As Information Control Flounders
By Admin, Humans are Free, May 7, 2015
Do you want the good news first or the bad news?
by James Corbett, The International Forecaster
Alright, here’s the bad news: Google is about to start ranking sites
according to their conformity with mainstream opinion. Or at least
that’s what the headlines would have you believe.
The usual sources in the controlled corporate media are telling you that this is a good thing and that only “Anti-science advocates are freaking out about Google truth rankings,”
but if that seems like a remarkably blase attitude to take when facing
the prospect of a 1984-like reality where the modern-age Ministry of
Truth (Google) is going to determine the “truth” of controversial
subjects and rank search results accordingly, then keep in mind that
such articles are written by the likes of Joanna Rothkopf, daughter of mini-Kissinger and author of “Superclass,” David Rothkopf.
New Scientist–the website that broke the story with their article “Google wants to rank websites based on facts not links“–also
framed the story, predictably enough, as “science” versus
“anti-science,” starting their article by lamenting the fact that
“Anti-vaccination websites make the front page of Google, and fact-free
‘news’ stories spread like wildfire.”
The article rejoices in the fact that the good chaps at Google have come
up with a bulletproof answer to this mess: “rank websites according to
The slightly good news is that, ironically enough, the New Scientist
article seems to be a perfect example of a fact-free story spreading
around the internet like wildfire.
While the story does link to a research paper
from a Google research team that outlines a “novel multi-layer
probabilistic model” for assigning a “trustworthiness score” to web
pages, it neglects to mention that the idea is still very much a
theoretical work-in-progress at the moment and is nowhere near ready to
If you have a fetish for multivariate equations, dynamically selected
granularity, and line graphs comparing calibration curves for various
data analysis methods, have at it! For the rest of us who are not fluent
in boffin-speak, the gist of it is this:
First, a page is harvested for its “knowledge triples.” These are
connected triplets of information consisting of a subject, predicate and
object. The paper itself helpfully provides the example: Obama –
Nationality – USA. A “false value” (again according to the paper itself)
would be Obama – Nationality – Kenya.
These knowledge triples are assessed for their (Google-determined)
accuracy and the page is assigned a KBT (Knowledge-Based Trust) score,
which Google could use in place of (or perhaps in some combination with)
the traditional PageRank score to determine how high in the search
results the web page should place.
The paper uses a list of 15 gossip websites to demonstrate that using
this method, sites with disputed and often incorrect information (gossip
sites) might rank high in traditional search results, which are
weighted toward popularity, but low in the KBT results.
But even the paper itself admits there’s a long way to go before this
KBT method would be usable by Google to rank billions of web pages.
This is good news for those alt media websites (and their readers) who
realize that they are the ones directly in the crosshairs of this
technology. Given that Google is nothing other than an American
intelligence adjunct (and has been since its inception),
would we expect anything resembling a fair assessment of the
“truthfulness” surrounding the most politically controversial subjects
of our time?
The Federal Reserve
is a private cartel created by the banksters for the express purpose of
manipulating the money supply and controlling the economy? CONSPIRACY
THEORY! No Google for you!
Governments always and throughout history
use false flag terrorism in order to justify their wars of aggression?
SLANDER! Do not pass go, do not collect $200, go directly to the bottom
of the search results!
Google and every other major Silicon Valley firm is in bed with the DOD and/or the CIA and/or the NSA? BLASPHEMY! You have been excommunicated from the church of Google.
You get the idea.
But here’s the really good news: even if Google does launch such a
system, it is doomed to failure. The internet is one of the last, best
bastions of the free market in action that we have in our stultified,
regulated, controlled, manipulated economy. Google’s popularity did not
come about because government goons pointed a gun at everyone’s head and
forced them to use it.
They didn’t even create a licensing system for operating search engines,
a favorite government trick for keeping genuine competition out of the
market. It became popular because it was a million times more useful
than AskJeeves or Yahoo! or any of the other outdated, clunky,
dysfunctional search “portals” that dominated the web in the late 1990s.
Granted, the power of Google’s PageRank may have come directly from the
NSA’s own engineers, as some have speculated, but the fact remains:
people use it because they can find what they want quickly and easily
with minimal fuss.
At that point at which Google stops being useful for its intended
purpose (helping people to look for information), people will start to
look for alternatives. And alternatives do exist.
Ixquick.com is a privacy-protecting search engine that returns results drawn from a wide range of other search engines.
another popular alternative search engine focusing on privacy protection
that uses a number of innovative tools to make searching quicker and
SigTruth is an
“Alternative Media Search Engine for Liberty Minded People” that uses
Google’s own custom search abilities against itself by returning only
alt media website results on various topics.
And even the news that Google might at some point start using its
“truthiness” score to downgrade the alt media has spurred others in the
alt media (like Mike Adams) to announce the creation of their own search engines.
This is how the free market of ideas is meant to work, and if and when
Google starts returning sanitized propaganda, those who are uninterested
in sanitized propaganda will vote with their feet (fingertips?).
But here’s the best news of all: what this urge to categorize sites by
“truthfulness” (and all of the back-slapping, high-fiving articles about
this news from the dying establishment mouthpiece media) really shows
is just how desperate the would-be gatekeepers are becoming in their
fight to put the alt media genie back in the bottle.
And even better yet, this is by no means the first sign that the
gatekeepers are losing their war to keep the people in the dark on the
topics that matter.
In 2008, arch-globalist Zbigniew Brzezinski started lamenting
how, for the first time in human history “all of humanity is
politically activated, politically conscious and politically
This, as he stressed in speeches and articles at the time, means that it is no longer possible to dominate people in the same ways that they have been dominated for centuries.
In 2011, Hillary Clinton admitted that the US was losing the information war to alternative media outlets of all stripes.
In 2013, PopularScience.com had to turn off comments
on all of their articles because, they said, a “decades-long war on
expertise has eroded the popular consensus on a wide variety of
scientifically validated topics” like catastrophic man-made climate
And poll after poll after poll
in year after year after year continues to chart the decline of the
dinosaur print/ radio/ TV media and the rise of the internet as a source
of daily news and information for the majority of the public.
Yes, there are dark skies and reasons to be concerned about what’s
coming in the inevitable digital clampdown. But there are bright spots
as well, and these deserve to be noted, highlighted and celebrated.
After all, the people have had a taste for real information and now more
people than ever before see through the increasingly clumsy propaganda
of the establishment. And that makes the propaganda increasingly useless
for setting the political agenda.
The internet revolution toothpaste is out of the tube, and it’s going to
be one heck of a job getting it back in. And that’s good news.
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.