Vatic Note: So, given this is from Pravda, does this mean its another attempt to make the USA look bad enough to justify a World war against this nation? It appears so. It appears the zionists various propoganda machines are hard at work to make us look like the new nazis' on the block. Its what worked for starting and conducting WW II, so, of course the foreign infiltrators of our nation are doing everything they can to make us look bad by doing all this bad stuff. Remember, they always use what has worked in the past. Its one of their failings. Its how we know who is doing what. I have never read so much gobbeldy gook in my whole life as I am reading below. And its all made up for our consumption. Amazing. They truly do think we are stupid.
Lets not forget who is giving the orders officially, Barack Obama, the touted first Jewish President of the United States. The question is, "Is he a Zionist?" He was pushed and pulled into the public limelight by his khazar handlers in Chicago, with Rahm Emmanual at the forefront. YOu know Rahm, the IDF officer who is an American, and his father was a proud terrorist for the early khazar Israeli's who were given Palestine by the British Monarchy. How cozy!!!! What a coincidence. So now comes the truth about the ISIS, but when reading this, simply substitute the words KHAZAR ZIONISTS everywhere you see the US or the word AMERICA or WASHINGTON. Then you will have the truth.
Why do you think hundreds of top level military officers were purged from the Pentagon during both the Cheney administration and the Netanyahu Administration fronted by Obama??? So that the Khazars put in place could take over and do what was necessary to make the world hate us, and I don't blame them. We have allowed the foreign infiltrators to our military do acts that only fascists and zionists would do.... not Americans. That is how this has been allowed to happen. Its to prep for WW III with us as the designated losers. Then will come the occupation and the purging of Christians from our midst.
Lets also remember a blog we did proving the Saudi's royal family were Khazars, just like the Israeli leaders. Now that explains their cooperation and friendly helping aid against their supposed own people, in favor of the khazar Israeli's. That was also the case for the other minor Arabian peninsula Clans, such as UAE, Bahrain, etc. The KHazar royalty of Britain tied in with the Rothschilds are the ones that saw to it "THE RIGHT PEOPLE WERE PUT IN CHARGE" of the newly created countries, made from the conquored Ottoman empire after WW I. The same Brits that did the same in Israel after WW II.
Read this below and see how this is a major conspiracy to fool "The people", so that the political agenda will be accepted by those being deceived. Its working but slowly its becoming apparent and sheep are waking up.
Washington and ISIS: the evidence
http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/10-03-2015/129996-washington_isis-0/
by Tim Anderson
Reports that US and British aircraft
carrying arms to ISIS have been shot down by Iraqi forces have been met
with shock and denial in western countries. Few in the Middle East doubt
that (VN: the Khazar Zionist bankers in) Washington is playing a 'double game' with its proxy armies in
Syria, but some key myths remain important amongst the significantly
more ignorant western audiences.
A central myth is that (VN: Khazar Zionist Bankers in...) Washington now
arms 'moderate Syrian rebels', to both overthrow the Syrian Government
and supposedly defeat the 'extremist rebels'. This claim became more
important in 2014, when the rationale of US aggression against Syria
shifted from 'humanitarian intervention' to a renewal of Bush's 'war on
terror'.
A distinct controversy is whether the al
Qaeda styled groups (especially Jabhat al Nusra and ISIS) have been
generated as a sort of organic reaction to the repeated US
interventions, or whether they are actually paid agents of (VN: the Khazar Bankers...) Washington.
Certainly, prominent ISIS leaders were
held in US prisons. ISIS leader, Ibrahim al-Badri (aka Abu Bakr
al-Baghdadi) is said to have been held for between one and two years at
Camp Bucca in Iraq. In 2006, as al-Baghdadi and others were released,
the Bush administration announced its plan for a 'New Middle East', a
plan which would employ sectarian violence as part of a process of
'creative destruction' in the region.
According to Seymour Hersh's 2007
article, 'The Redirection', the US would make use of 'moderate Sunni
states', not least the Saudis, to 'contain' the Shia gains in Iraq
brought about by the 2003 US invasion. These 'moderate Sunni' forces
would carry out clandestine operations to weaken Iran and Hezbollah, key
enemies of Israel. This brought the Saudis and Israel closer, as both
fear Iran.
While there have been claims that the
ISIS 'caliph' al-Baghdadi is a CIA or Mossad trained agent, these have
not yet been well backed up. There are certainly grounds for suspicion,
but independent evidence is important, in the context of a
supposed US 'war' against ISIS. So what is the broader evidence on
Washington's covert links with ISIS?
Not least are the admissions by
senior US officials that key allies support the extremist group. In
September 2014 General Martin Dempsey, head of the US military, told a
Congressional hearing 'I know major Arab allies who fund [ISIS]'.
Senator Lindsey Graham, of Armed Services Committee, responded with a
justification, 'They fund them because the Free Syrian Army couldn't
fight [Syrian President] Assad, they were trying to beat Assad'. (VN: please note that both these men are sold out big time and that has been known for sometime now.)
The next month, US Vice President Joe
Biden went a step further, explaining that Turkey, Qatar, the UAE and
Saudi Arabia 'were so determined to take down Assad ... they poured
hundreds of millions of dollars and tens, thousands of tons of weapons
into anyone who would fight against Assad ... [including] al Nusra and
al Qaeda and extremist elements of jihadis coming from other parts of
the world ... [and then] this outfit called ISIL'. Biden's admissions
sought to exempt the US from this operation, as though Washington were
innocent of sustained operations carried out by its key allies. That is
simply not credible. (VN: no, the tail wags the dog.... Israel is who supports them and we fund it for them, since they are poor at generating their own wealth, so they use ours to do so.)
Washington's relationship with the
Saudis, as a divisive sectarian force in the region, in particular
against Arab nationalism, goes back to the 1950s, when Winston Churchill
introduced the Saudi King to President Eisenhower. At that time
Washington wanted to set up the Saudi King as a rival to President
Nasser of Egypt. More recently, British General Jonathan Shaw has
acknowledged the contribution of Saudi Arabia's extremist ideology:
'This is a time bomb that, under the guise of education. Wahhabi
Salafism is igniting under the world really. And it is funded by Saudi
and Qatari money', Shaw said. (VN: another example of the pride Mossad has in their deceptions for conducting war. Once we knew the agenda for Syria, then it was just a matter of finding the right saleable excuse for doing it. You can take it to the bank they do nothing for average people, at all, everything is for their benefit and agenda)
Other evidence undermines western
attempts to maintain a distinction between the 'moderate rebels', now
openly armed and trained by the US, (VN: khazar Israeli's or Mossad) and the extremist groups Jabhat al
Nusra and ISIS. While there has indeed been some rivalry (emphasised by
the London-based, Muslim Brotherhood-aligned, Syrian Observatory of
Human Rights), the absence of real ideological difference is best shown
by the cooperation and mergers of groups. (VN: and all under Israel)
As ISIS came from Iraq in 2013, its
Syrian bases have generally remained in the far eastern part of Syria.
However Jabhat al Nusra (the official al Qaeda (Vn: A Q created by the CIA) branch in Syria, from
which ISIS split) has collaborated with Syrian Islamist groups in
western Syria for several years. The genocidal slogan of the Syrian
Islamists, 'Christians to Beirut and Alawis to the Grave', reported many
times in 2011 from the Farouk Brigade, sat well with the al Qaeda
groups. Farouk (once the largest 'Free Syrian Army' group) indeed killed
and ethnically cleansed many Christians and Alawis. (VN: We have a blog coming up that will fully explain why Christians are so hated by the Jews/Khazars, and it will clarify finally, why they murder Christians every chance they get, its also how we know who the real Muslims are, since they do not kill their own kind because of their religion, only the khazars do and for very good reason you will find out later when you read about who Jesus really was.)
Long term cooperation between these
'moderate rebels' and the foreign-led Jabhat al-Nusra has been seen
around Daraa in the south, in Homs-Idlib, along the Turkish border and
in and around Aleppo. The words Jabhat al Nusra actually mean 'support
front', that is, support for the Syrian Islamists. Back in December
2012, as Jabhat al Nusra was banned in various countries, 29 of these
groups reciprocated the solidarity in their declaration: 'We are all
Jabhat al-Nusra'.
After the collapse of the 'Free Syrian
Army' groups, cooperation between al Nusra and the newer US and Saudi
backed groups (Dawud, the Islamic Front, the Syrian Revolutionary Front
and Harakat Hazm) helped draw attention to Israel's support for al
Nusra, around the occupied Golan Heights. Since 2013 there have been
many reports of 'rebel' fighters, including those from al Nusra, being
treated in Israeli hospitals. Prime Minister Netanyahu even publicised
his visit to wounded 'rebels' in early 2014. That led to a public 'thank
you' from a Turkey-based 'rebel' leader, Mohammed Badie (February
2014).
The UN peacekeeping force based in the
occupied Golan has reported its observations of Israel's Defence Forces
'interacting with' al Nusra fighters at the border. At the same time,
Israeli arms have been found with the extremist groups, in both Syria
and Iraq. In November 2014 members of the Druze minority in the Golan
protested against Israel's hospital support for al Nusra and ISIS
fighters. This in turn led to questions by the Israeli media, as to
whether 'Israel does, in fact, hospitalize members of al-Nusra and Daesh
[ISIS]'. A military spokesman's reply was hardly a denial: 'In the past
two years the Israel Defence Forces have been engaged in humanitarian,
life-saving aid to wounded Syrians, irrespective of their identity.' (VN: I am always amazed at the lies they tell with a straight face. I could never get away with that)
The artificial distinction between
'rebel' and 'extremist' groups is mocked by multiple reports of large
scale defections and transfer of weapons. In July 2014 one thousand
armed men in the Dawud Brigade defected to ISIS in Raqqa. In November
defections to Jabhat al Nusra from the Syrian Revolutionary Front were
reported. In December, Adib Al-Shishakli, representative at the Gulf
Cooperation Council of the exile ' Syrian National Coalition', said
'opposition fighters' were 'increasingly joining' ISIS 'for financial
reasons'.
In that same month, 'rebels' in the Israel-backed Golan area
were reported as defecting to ISIS, which had by this time began to
establish a presence in Syria's far south. Then, in early 2015, three
thousand 'moderate rebels' from the US-backed 'Harakat Hazzm' collapsed
into Jabhat al Nusra, taking a large stock of US arms including
anti-tank weapons with them.
ISIS already had US weapons by other
means, in both Iraq and Syria, as reported in July, September and
October 2014. At that time a 'non aggression pact' was reported in the
southern area of Hajar al-Aswad between 'moderate rebels' and ISIS, as
both recognised a common enemy in Syria: 'the Nussayri regime', a
sectarian way of referring to supposedly apostate Muslims. Some
reported ISIS had bought weapons from the 'rebels'.
In December 2014 there were western
media reports of the US covert supply of heavy weapons to 'Syrian
rebels' from Libya, and of Jabhat al-Nusra getting anti-tank weapons
which had been supplied to Harakat Hazm. Video posted by al-Nusra showed
these weapons being used to take over the Syrian military bases, Wadi
Deif and Hamidiyeh, in Idlib province.
With 'major Arab allies' backing ISIS
and substantial collaboration between US-armed 'moderate rebels' and
ISIS, it is not such a logical stretch to suppose that the US and
'coalition' flights to ISIS areas (supposedly to 'degrade' the
extremists) might have become covert supply lines. That is precisely
what senior Iraqi sources began saying, in late 2014 and early 2015.
For example, as reported by both Iraqi
and Iranian media, Iraqi MP Majid al-Ghraoui said in January that 'an
American aircraft dropped a load of weapons and equipment to the ISIS
group militants at the area of al-Dour in the province of Salahuddin'.
Photos were published of ISIS retrieving the weapons. The US admitted
the seizure but said this was a 'mistake'.
In February Iraqi MP Hakem
al-Zameli said the Iraqi army had shot down two British planes which
were carrying weapons to ISIS in al-Anbar province. Again, photos were
published of the wrecked planes. 'We have discovered weapons made in
the US, European countries and Israel from the areas liberated from
ISIL's control in Al-Baqdadi region', al-Zameli said.
The Al-Ahad news website quoted Head of
Al-Anbar Provincial Council Khalaf Tarmouz saying that a US plane
supplied the ISIL terrorist organization with arms and ammunition in
Salahuddin province. Also in February an Iraqi militia called Al-Hashad
Al-Shabi said they had shot down a US Army helicopter carrying weapons
for the ISIL in the western parts of Al-Baqdadi region in Al-Anbar
province.
Again, photos were published. After that, Iraqi
counter-terrorism forces were reported as having arrested 'four
foreigners who were employed as military advisors to the ISIL fighters',
three of whom were American and Israeli. So far the western media has
avoided these stories altogether; they are very damaging to the broader
western narrative.
In Libya, a key US collaborator in the
overthrow of the Gaddafi government has announced himself the newly
declared head of the 'Islamic State' in North Africa. Abdel Hakim Belhaj
was held in US prisons for several years, then 'rendered' to Gaddafi's
Libya, where he was wanted for terrorist acts. As former head of the
al-Qaeda-linked Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, then the Tripoli-based
'Libyan Dawn' group, Belhaj has been defended by Washington and praised
by US Congressmen John McCain and Lindsey Graham. (VN: get used to it since both of them are owned by the ROTHSCHILD banking mafia)
Some image softening of the al Qaeda
groups is underway. Jabhat al-Nusra is reported to be considering
cutting ties to al Qaeda, to help sponsor Qatar boost their funding.
Washington's Foreign Affairs magazine even published a survey claiming
that ISIS fighters were 'surprisingly supportive of democracy'. After
all the well published massacres that lacks credibility.
The Syrian Army is gradually reclaiming
Aleppo, despite the hostile supply lines from Turkey, and southern
Syria, in face of support for the sectarian groups from Jordan and
Israel. The border with Lebanon is largely under Syrian Army and
Hezbollah control. In the east, the Syrian Army and its local allies
control most of Hasaka and Deir e-Zour, with a final campaign against
Raqqa yet to come. The NATO-GCC attempt to overthrow the Syrian
Government has failed.
Yet violent destabilisation persists.
Evidence of the covert relationship between (VN: khazars running ....) Washington and ISIS is
substantial and helps explain what Syria's Deputy Foreign Minister
Fayssal Mikdad calls Washington's 'cosmetic war' on ISIS. The extremist
group is a foothold Washington (VN: The khazar bankers) keeps in the region, weakening
both Syria and Iraq. Their 'war' on ISIS is ineffective. Studies by
Jane's Terrorism and Insurgent database show that ISIS attacks and
killings in Iraq increased strongly after US air attacks began. The main
on the ground fighting has been carried out by the Syrian Army and,
more recently, the Iraqi armed forces with Iranian backing. (VN: thats because Iran knows who is doing what, and I congratulate them on their insight and aid to their fellow middle east countries. Its all about stealing their oil, since Israel has no substantial resources to call their own, so they steal what they want for garnering their weatlh)
All this has been reported perversely in
the western media. The same channels that celebrate the ISIS killing of
Syrian soldiers also claim the Syrian Army is 'not fighting ISIS'. This
alleged 'unwillingness' was part of the justification for US bombing
inside Syria. While it is certainly the case that Syrian priorities have
remained in the heavily populated west, local media reports make it
clear that, since at least the beginning of 2014, the Syrian Arab Army
has been the major force engaged with ISIS in Hasaka, Raqqa and Deir
eZour. A March 2015 Reuters report does concede that the Syrian Army
recently killed two ISIS commanders (including Deeb Hedjian al-Otaibi)
along with 24 fighters, at Hamadi Omar.
Closer cooperation between Iran, Iraq,
Syria and Lebanon's Hezbollah is anathema to Israel, the Saudis and (VN: Israel controlled...)
Washington, yet it is happening. This is not a sectarian divide but
rather based on some clear mutual interests, not least putting an end to
sectarian (takfiri) terrorism.
It was only logical that, in the Iraqi
military's recent offensive on ISIS-held Tikrit, the Iranian military
emerged as Iraq's main partner. Washington has been sidelined, causing
consternation in the US media. General Qasem Suleimani, head of Iran's
Quds Force is a leading player in the Tikrit operation. A decade after
Washington's 'creative destruction' plans, designed to reduce Iranian
influence in Iraq, an article in Foreign Policy magazine complains that
Iran's influence is 'at its highest point in almost four centuries'. (VN: good job, Israel, could not have done it without you. Just who is stupid??? )
------
Select references
Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya (2006) Plans for Redrawing the Middle East: The Project for a 'New Middle East'
Seymour Hersh (2007) The Redirection
Al Akhbar (2011) Syria: What Kind of Revolution?
The New Yorker (2013) Syrian Opposition Groups Stop Pretending
RT (2014) Anyone but US! Biden blames allies for ISIS rise
Iraqi News (2015) American aircraft dropped weapons to ISIS, says MP
Washington Post (2015) Syrian rebel group that got U.S. aid dissolves
David Kenner (2015) For God and Country, and Iran, Foreign Policy
Reuters (2015) Syrian air strike kills two Islamic State commanders
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/03/07/us-mideast-crisis-syria-islamicstate-idUSKBN0M30F720150307
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
No comments:
Post a Comment