Actually if you read Genesis, there were two creations, it was the second creation where God blew his breath into Adam, and I suspect that was to give man a soul/spirit which the first creation did not have, since in Genesis, it does not say that the first creation God blew his breath into man that he created. I believe that is why God told the second creation "not to inter-marry with the previous creations".
I believe that happened because God was not happy with the first results and if we carry that to further consideration, it would be because the first creation had no soul/spirit and were probably psychopaths, and that is why they have the RH neg factor, but not the compassion and capacity for love that the second creation had. You have to believe the Bible is done in parables for simpler people that would not have understood what was really going on.
The first were the ones that preserved their bloodline and why they hate the "real Jews" so much. I think the second creation were the corrections that solved the problem and maybe even those that enoch described if you take what was written as parables for the ancient astronauts that came down and mated with the daughters of man. Could there have been several species of ancient astronauts that did that? Is this why after every revolution that the real Jews and Christians were massacred by these khazars?
I believe they became the khazars later on, maybe through the line of Esau who then became the "Edomites" of old and turned into the khazars through migration, and its why the khazars hate the "real Jews" and Christians. I hope this makes some sense, if we remember that Enoch told us about all this.
It may also explain why the flood was used to cleanse the earth, but some of the original survived and there was intermarrying which made God mad. I think that is why Enoch was taken out of the Bible by those in control, much later and called Apostasy. How could that be?
Enoch was so favored by God that God walked with him and took him up into the heavens ALIVE, and he did not have to die to join God, along with a whole town of good people to save them from the flood. So how could his writings not be of God? He was more valid than Constantine of the Nicene conference who was a pagan and never converted to Christianity or Judaism.
Well, you read and decide for yourselves. I am sure my theory needs some tweeking, but I think its essentially right on, based on those writings in Genesis and Enoch. In any case, this, below, was a fascinating write up and triggered a creative event within my brain cells. lol
Blood of the Gods, Part 2
http://www.rhnegativeregistry.com/blood-of-the-gods-by-mabel-royce.html
Interesting article by the late Mabel Royce, Copyright 1976
Found at: http://www.labyrinthina.com/sitchen.htm
About a year and a half ago my sister Bonnie and I were discussing some of the unusual characteristics of our family. Bonnie had a problem with infants haemolytic disease.
She has 0 negative blood. She has written a book including this problem called "The Deux" by Venus Thaddeus. One of the questions we asked was why does this haemolytic disease occur?
Why,
along with the Rh negative blood does our family have such a high IQ
(135-140 average). Why so many psychic experiences? Why this urge to ask
"why?" Why the early maturity or the large head and eyes? Why have, we
always felt we were "different" from other people. And so many other
things to set us apart.
We were raised in the church, but we never received answers to the questions we asked. Why doesn't anyone else ask these same questions? We are not satisfied with the answer "just because". Are there others out there who ask the same questions? Then we heard about the possibility of the ancient astronauts and the pieces started to fall into place.
For the past decade many people have been working to prove that the earth has been visited by extraterrestrial beings. Who are these visitors? Why did they come? Why did they leave? Did they leave?
If earth was visited in the ancient past, are there any descendants of these visitors? If all mankind are not descendants of these visitors, which ones are? Who are the "Children of Israel?" Why was their seed blessed? Why were they told not to inter-marry with other people and to circumcise their sons for identification? Why were they told to preserve their geneology? Where did Adam and Eve's sons go to get their wives, if they were the only "humans" on earth?
Many scientists believe that modern man evolved from ape-like primates. They have much proof to back up their theories, including modern blood analysis and comparative studies between modern man and lower anthripoids, such as the chimpanzee and the Rhesus monkey.
It has been proven that the majority of mankind (85%) has a blood factor common with the rhesus monkey. This is called rhesus positive blood. Usually shortened to Rh positive. This factor is completely independent from the A, B, 0 blood types.
In the study of genetics, we find that we can only inherit what our ancestors had except in the case of mutation. We can have any of numerous combination of traits inherited from all our ancestors. Nothing more and nothing less.
We were raised in the church, but we never received answers to the questions we asked. Why doesn't anyone else ask these same questions? We are not satisfied with the answer "just because". Are there others out there who ask the same questions? Then we heard about the possibility of the ancient astronauts and the pieces started to fall into place.
For the past decade many people have been working to prove that the earth has been visited by extraterrestrial beings. Who are these visitors? Why did they come? Why did they leave? Did they leave?
If earth was visited in the ancient past, are there any descendants of these visitors? If all mankind are not descendants of these visitors, which ones are? Who are the "Children of Israel?" Why was their seed blessed? Why were they told not to inter-marry with other people and to circumcise their sons for identification? Why were they told to preserve their geneology? Where did Adam and Eve's sons go to get their wives, if they were the only "humans" on earth?
Many scientists believe that modern man evolved from ape-like primates. They have much proof to back up their theories, including modern blood analysis and comparative studies between modern man and lower anthripoids, such as the chimpanzee and the Rhesus monkey.
It has been proven that the majority of mankind (85%) has a blood factor common with the rhesus monkey. This is called rhesus positive blood. Usually shortened to Rh positive. This factor is completely independent from the A, B, 0 blood types.
In the study of genetics, we find that we can only inherit what our ancestors had except in the case of mutation. We can have any of numerous combination of traits inherited from all our ancestors. Nothing more and nothing less.
Therefore, if man and ape evolved from a common ancestor,
their blood would have evolved the same way. Blood factors are
transmitted with much more exactitude than any other characteristic. It
would seem that modern man and rhesus monkey may have had a common
ancestor sometime in the ancient past.
All other earthly primates also
have this Rh factor. But this leaves out the people who are Rh negative.
If all mankind evolved from the same ancestor their blood would be
compatible. Where did the Rh negatives come from? If they are not the
descendants of prehistoric man, could they be the descendants of the
ancient astronauts?
All animals and other living creatures known to man can breed with any other of their species. Relative size and color makes no difference. Why does infant's haemolytic disease occur in humans if all humans are the same species? Haemolytic disease is the allergic reaction that occurs when an Rh negative mother is carrying a Rh positive child.
Her blood builds up antibodies to destroy an ALIEN substance (the same way it would a virus), thereby destroying the infant. Why would a mother's body reject her own offspring? Nowhere else in nature does this occur naturally. This same problem does occur in mules - a cross between a horse and donkey. This fact alone points to the distinct possibility of a cross-breeding between two similar but genetically different species.
No one has tried to explain where the Rh negative people came from. Most, familiar with blood factors, admit that these people must at least be a mutation if not descendants of a different ancestor. If we are a mutation, what caused the mutation? Why does it continue with the exact characteristics? Why does it so violently reject the Rh factor, if it was in their own ancestry? Who was this ancestor? Difficulties in determining ethnology are largely overcome by the use of blood group data, for they are a single gene characteristic and not affected by the environment.
The Basque people of Spain and France have the highest percentage of Rh negative blood. About 30% have (rr) Rh negative and about 60% carry one (r) negative gene. The average among most people is only 15%-Rh negative, while some groups have very little. The Oriental Jews of Israel, also have a high percent Rh negative, although most other Oriental people have only about 1% Rh negative. The Samaritians and the Black Cochin Jew also have a high percentage of Rh negative blood, although again the Rh negative blood is rare among most black people.
Could the Basque people be one of these colonies? Or could it have been the original colony on earth? The origin of the Basques is unknown. Their language is unlike any other European language. Some believe that Basque was the original language of the book of Genesis. Some believe it was the original language of the world and possibly of the creator.
Genesis 6:2 "The sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and took them wives, all of which they chose." Who were the children of these marriages? Genesis 6:4 "God came into the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, and the same became mighty of old." From the King James Bible dictionary we find: "menchildren - men of Israel, male children of God, not children of man - Ex. 34:23." Ex. 34:7 states "The iniquity of the father will be unto the children unto the fourth generation." It is plain that something is inherited, could it be the blood?
Blood is mentioned more often than any other word in the Bible, except God. These two words you will find on almost every page, blood and God! (The blood of the Gods?) This message has been written for thousands of years. There is a connection between the blood and the Gods.
The American Indians had the tradition of making good friends, "blood brothers", if they thought they were worthy. Could this tradition.have been for a reason? Could they have actually been checking to see if they were blood brothers (the same type blood)? The clumping (aggulation) that occurs when Rh positive and Rh negative blood are mixed is visible to the naked eye.
All animals and other living creatures known to man can breed with any other of their species. Relative size and color makes no difference. Why does infant's haemolytic disease occur in humans if all humans are the same species? Haemolytic disease is the allergic reaction that occurs when an Rh negative mother is carrying a Rh positive child.
Her blood builds up antibodies to destroy an ALIEN substance (the same way it would a virus), thereby destroying the infant. Why would a mother's body reject her own offspring? Nowhere else in nature does this occur naturally. This same problem does occur in mules - a cross between a horse and donkey. This fact alone points to the distinct possibility of a cross-breeding between two similar but genetically different species.
No one has tried to explain where the Rh negative people came from. Most, familiar with blood factors, admit that these people must at least be a mutation if not descendants of a different ancestor. If we are a mutation, what caused the mutation? Why does it continue with the exact characteristics? Why does it so violently reject the Rh factor, if it was in their own ancestry? Who was this ancestor? Difficulties in determining ethnology are largely overcome by the use of blood group data, for they are a single gene characteristic and not affected by the environment.
The Basque people of Spain and France have the highest percentage of Rh negative blood. About 30% have (rr) Rh negative and about 60% carry one (r) negative gene. The average among most people is only 15%-Rh negative, while some groups have very little. The Oriental Jews of Israel, also have a high percent Rh negative, although most other Oriental people have only about 1% Rh negative. The Samaritians and the Black Cochin Jew also have a high percentage of Rh negative blood, although again the Rh negative blood is rare among most black people.
Could the Basque people be one of these colonies? Or could it have been the original colony on earth? The origin of the Basques is unknown. Their language is unlike any other European language. Some believe that Basque was the original language of the book of Genesis. Some believe it was the original language of the world and possibly of the creator.
Genesis 6:2 "The sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and took them wives, all of which they chose." Who were the children of these marriages? Genesis 6:4 "God came into the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, and the same became mighty of old." From the King James Bible dictionary we find: "menchildren - men of Israel, male children of God, not children of man - Ex. 34:23." Ex. 34:7 states "The iniquity of the father will be unto the children unto the fourth generation." It is plain that something is inherited, could it be the blood?
Blood is mentioned more often than any other word in the Bible, except God. These two words you will find on almost every page, blood and God! (The blood of the Gods?) This message has been written for thousands of years. There is a connection between the blood and the Gods.
The American Indians had the tradition of making good friends, "blood brothers", if they thought they were worthy. Could this tradition.have been for a reason? Could they have actually been checking to see if they were blood brothers (the same type blood)? The clumping (aggulation) that occurs when Rh positive and Rh negative blood are mixed is visible to the naked eye.
Could they have been told, by their
ancestors, that their blood was different from that of the rest of
mankind except for their brothers and sisters, from other tribes,
scattered throughout the earth. Indian tradition declares that their
ancestors were of cosmic origin. The Indian totem pole is actually a
family genealogy.
Why all this preoccupation with genealogy among different people scattered throughout the earth? No other animal on earth has this preoccupation with ancestry. Where did this tradition come from? People scattered throughout the earth, who have had no-known contact with each other all simultaneously got the urge to chart their family tree. Why?
Why all this preoccupation with genealogy among different people scattered throughout the earth? No other animal on earth has this preoccupation with ancestry. Where did this tradition come from? People scattered throughout the earth, who have had no-known contact with each other all simultaneously got the urge to chart their family tree. Why?
How important could this have been to primitive cave
men? Struggling to survive, to chart their genealogy? They had no
understanding of modern genetics and inheritance. So why should they
preserve their genealogy? Were they told, by the ancient astronauts, to
preserve their heritage, until a future date when they would return and
it would be understood? Until a time, like now, when their descendant
would be able to understand the message they were leaving.
Although they probably didn't realize the importance of preserving their genealogy, they were told that future generations would understand. Are we that future generation? Was there a message left for us to understand? Do we have the courage to look for the answer?
Do we really want to know or would we rather keep our heads buried in the sand? What we don't know will still affect us. You will not see unless you look. Only through knowledge will we find truth. I have searched, in vain, for scientific proof that the Rh negative blood was a natural earthly occurrence. Instead I have found proof that the Rh negative had not evolved on earth in the natural course of events.
Although they probably didn't realize the importance of preserving their genealogy, they were told that future generations would understand. Are we that future generation? Was there a message left for us to understand? Do we have the courage to look for the answer?
Do we really want to know or would we rather keep our heads buried in the sand? What we don't know will still affect us. You will not see unless you look. Only through knowledge will we find truth. I have searched, in vain, for scientific proof that the Rh negative blood was a natural earthly occurrence. Instead I have found proof that the Rh negative had not evolved on earth in the natural course of events.
For many years
people have been searching for the wrong thing. Could the true "missing
link" actually be man himself? The unknown link between earth and the
stars - hybrid man. Man may be the missing link between primate and
extraterrestrial. It seems inconceivable to me that those working on the
evolution theory have overlooked this possibility.
How can they state,
that these people are lacking a factor contained in all other earthly
primates, including the naked ape, and not ask why? What other
characteristics are common among these people that are uncommon to other
people? Is there a real difference other than just a different blood?
A very good comparative study between man and the primates can be found in Max Flindt's book "Mankind, Child of the Stars," Fawcett publisher, Books 1 and 2. He has documented many of the characteristics we may have received from our cosmic ancestors. It does show quite conclusively that mankind is a hybrid between our cosmic ancestor and our earth ancestor.
A very good comparative study between man and the primates can be found in Max Flindt's book "Mankind, Child of the Stars," Fawcett publisher, Books 1 and 2. He has documented many of the characteristics we may have received from our cosmic ancestors. It does show quite conclusively that mankind is a hybrid between our cosmic ancestor and our earth ancestor.
I have merely carried this idea to its logical conclusion. If
mankind is a hybrid descendant of the ancient' astronauts, surely there
would be some, appearing periodically, who would be genetically very
similar to them. Would this not include their psychic powers? Could the
great sleeping prophet, Edgar Cayce, have been one of these? Could Jesus
Christ also have been one of these? A true descendant of the ancient
astronauts. If he was a true genetic duplicate of them he would also
have their powers and possibly their knowledge.
I cannot say whether he
was born with this knowledge or whether he established psyphic
communication with our cosmic family, but it is plain that he had powers
far beyond those of mortal man. Could he have been an example of what
the ancient astronauts were like? Jesus stated that the Father and him
were one. Could he have actually meant that literally? He may have been
an exact duplicate of his (our) ancient Father.
He may have even been a clone of the cosmonauts. Everyone knows the story of his virgin birth and the heavenly intervention. Could this have been implanting a clone into Mary's sterilized egg? Could the whole egg have actually been an implant?
The Rh negative blood, which appears not to have originated on earth, may prove to be a major factor in proving mankind is a hybrid. It is not the whole answer but it is a key for unlocking the genetic puzzle of our heritage. Tissue factors will also prove to be quite revealing. Scientists are now able to determine the tissue factors of 5000 year old mummies. Could some of these mummies have been the ancient astronauts? Why were these mummies preserved well enough for us to analyze their blood and tissue factors? Could there be a message in the genetic factors of the mummies themselves?
There is an interesting fact found in the book "X-Raying the Pharaohs" by James Harris and Kent Weeks, 1973 (Scribners). Upon x-raying the tomb of Makare, high priestess of Ammon, it was found that the infant buried with her labeled Prince Moutenihet was actually a female hamadryas baboon. An examination of Makare showed she had given birth shortly before dying. Could she have given birth to the baboon found with her? Why else would it have been buried with her? A genetic throwback?
My research has shown that the majority of those with psychic powers also have Rh negative blood. Most psyphic and faith healers also have this blood. Strangely enough, many of those doing research into the ancient astronaut theory and other phenomea also have Rh negative blood.
Erich von Daniken has Rh negative blood and a thirst for the truth. Brad Steiger also has Rh negative blood. His new book "Gods of Aquarius" considers this possibility. Robert Antone Wilson, author of "Illuminus", also has this blood. There are many others too numerous to list here.
Why is there such a large percentage of negative in these unusual fields? Could we have a vague memory of what we are looking for? It has been said that a question is not asked until the answer is known.
There are about 5000 known blood factors and all of these must contribute to the complete picture. But the Rh negative blood is the place to start our search.
A comparative analysis is now being done and we need your help. If you are reading this, you must be one of the lost children of Israel. Anyone else would not have read this far.
He may have even been a clone of the cosmonauts. Everyone knows the story of his virgin birth and the heavenly intervention. Could this have been implanting a clone into Mary's sterilized egg? Could the whole egg have actually been an implant?
The Rh negative blood, which appears not to have originated on earth, may prove to be a major factor in proving mankind is a hybrid. It is not the whole answer but it is a key for unlocking the genetic puzzle of our heritage. Tissue factors will also prove to be quite revealing. Scientists are now able to determine the tissue factors of 5000 year old mummies. Could some of these mummies have been the ancient astronauts? Why were these mummies preserved well enough for us to analyze their blood and tissue factors? Could there be a message in the genetic factors of the mummies themselves?
There is an interesting fact found in the book "X-Raying the Pharaohs" by James Harris and Kent Weeks, 1973 (Scribners). Upon x-raying the tomb of Makare, high priestess of Ammon, it was found that the infant buried with her labeled Prince Moutenihet was actually a female hamadryas baboon. An examination of Makare showed she had given birth shortly before dying. Could she have given birth to the baboon found with her? Why else would it have been buried with her? A genetic throwback?
My research has shown that the majority of those with psychic powers also have Rh negative blood. Most psyphic and faith healers also have this blood. Strangely enough, many of those doing research into the ancient astronaut theory and other phenomea also have Rh negative blood.
Erich von Daniken has Rh negative blood and a thirst for the truth. Brad Steiger also has Rh negative blood. His new book "Gods of Aquarius" considers this possibility. Robert Antone Wilson, author of "Illuminus", also has this blood. There are many others too numerous to list here.
Why is there such a large percentage of negative in these unusual fields? Could we have a vague memory of what we are looking for? It has been said that a question is not asked until the answer is known.
There are about 5000 known blood factors and all of these must contribute to the complete picture. But the Rh negative blood is the place to start our search.
A comparative analysis is now being done and we need your help. If you are reading this, you must be one of the lost children of Israel. Anyone else would not have read this far.
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
3 comments:
sheuestsNII have read that the blood of the Turin (which would be Jesus blood) is actually AB blood type,and all other blood types are a mutation of the AB bloodtype,(that this mutation is actually due too the poisoning through metals)suggesting that all offspring from creator or prime source should thus be of AB bloodtype, excluding of course all others which failed to read the entire article.In conclusion I throw out any reference to the Apes as a possible point of ancestry.The Pharos did a good job of spreading THEIR demon seed in THEIR goal of keeping THEIR bloodline alive by forcing it upon all races,And I will and do disavow any knowledge or recognition of such bloodtype should it course through my vsins.
I read the whole article...
but I'm O positive! lololol
Well, so am I. My mother was full o negative, so I have one gene. I was the first born, so no problems, but I am a mule, no children. You may well have one too, so check it out. Its important to you to do so.
Post a Comment