It means they have a shadow pageup and that is what you are seeing on all the caps. I still don't show it on my work sheet, so it has to be on theirs and THAT is what you are seeing. WHAT THE FOREIGN OCCUPIERS DON'T WANT YOU TO "GET" ABOUT ALL THIS IS, THEY ARE CONDUCTING A WAR TO OCCUPY AND TAKE OVER THIS COUNTRY WITHOUT FIRING A SHOT. Lets not let them get away with that. It must cost them to do this.
Khazar Rothschild/Rockefeller Bankers ATTEMPTING an "ECONOMIC HIT" on the USA to obtain total control of the nation, industries, land, and natural resources just like Bosnia and old Yugoslavia.
Commentary by Vatic Master, February 4, 2011
An article about third world countries being raped and pillaged triggered an awareness that all this massive expenditure in our country and throwing away of trillions of dollars on war, bailouts, derivatives, and the proposed carbon tax, was for a specific purpose as these high bonus men and women knew exactly what they are doing, if their objective was to bring down the economy for a reason. The objective of the article is to show where all this spending and throwing money around and wars, and bails outs are really all about, which is the stealing of the assets of the American people as a nation once shoved into insolvency INTENTIONALLY. And to show how its being done exactly the same way as these "same" Goldman sachs rothschild vampires did to third world nations, leaving them worse than third world if that was even possible. Its the agenda for us now that all that practice is completed and ready for us in the big time. The war games are over and the real McCoy is about to begin. I can't imagine what the bonuses will be if these cretins pull this one off. Probably in the trillions.
It all began when I ran across an article on the Intel Hub that grabbed my memory of a similar scenario sometime back, showing how the IMF got third world countries into serious debt for whatever promised growth they would experience from it, and the experts for the IMF hired to do this, were from "GOLDMAN SACHS" which were SUMMERS AND GEITHNER. Ring a bell??? Remember Argentina? Remember Indonesia screaming bloody murder about this? What they did was "exactly" the same as Bernanke and Geithner are trying to do to us right now and have been since taking office, which is raise the debt ceiling, obtain more and more debt to meet obligations that the bankers encouraged us to take on. To increase that debt requires massive spending. Its been difficult to extract all the wealth this nation has..... that we, our forefathers and all Americans have built over all these past 250 years.
Then, by giving massive benefits to the people and outrageously and simultaneously increasing military spending , borrowing in order to make insolvent, Social Security, they create a massive debt level that becomes impossible to pay, resulting in runaway "NAZI TYPE" inflation, which then threatens the peoples benefits with collapse if they did not raise the debt ceiling. If they do not raise the debt ceiling millions will go into the streets either freezing to death, dying of hunger, or as a result of violence. If they do raise the debt ceiling then HYPERINFLATION, JUST LIKE GERMANY IS ASSURED, then what happens? OVERTHROW OF THE GOVERNMENT. That was the object all along as they did in Russia, Germany in WW II, and in all those third world countries in the past decade. Clever, psychopathic, and evil.
Once that worked, then the war game on these third world countries who could not fight back, was used for the purpose of perfecting the technique before trying it on heavily armed first world countries who could fight back. THOSE HITMEN WERE THEN PUT INTO OUR TREASURY TO DO THE SAME THING TO US. That is what we are watching. This link http://www.redicecreations.com/article.php?id=9072 in this vatic commentary shows how all this was done. WATCH AND READ THIS LINK FIRST AS A FOUNDATION, Scroll down to the video and watch it, then read below it. ITS THAT IMPORTANT FOR COMPLETE UNDERTANDING!!!! You can skip the part up on top of the video, since its not really germane to this discussion.
Once you read and see this.... then read the article we have put up called "Another Economic 'Martial Law' in the Streets Moment Approachees", from intel Hub and look at the similarities. This is exactly why the Congress UNDER THE CONTROL OF THE ISRAELI, KHAZAR BANKERS, HAVE BEEN SPENDING LIKE DRUNKEN SAILORS ON HOLIDAY. It was to get us to the point WHERE THE PEOPLE OF THIS NATION WILL EXPERIENCE A TRANSFER FROM THEIR OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL TO PRIVATE CORPORATIONS OWNED BY THE BANKERS, OF ALL OUR NATIONAL TREASURES (SUCH AS PARKS, WATER WAYS, NATIONAL FOREST ETC) , RESOURCES SUCH AS OIL, GOLD, URANIUM, ETC, AND INFRASTRUCTURE SUCH AS FREEWAYS, BRIDGES ETC.... ALL AS A RESULT OF THAT SPENDING THE BANKER CONTROLLED FED RESERVE DID AND THEY WILL BE ABLE TO DECIDE WHERE THEY CAN DRILL AND WE WILL HAVE NO SAY.
THEY WILL PUT UP TOLLS on bridges we already paid for, TAKE CONTROL OF OUR WATER SUPPLY AND "PUT IN IT WHATEVER THE HELL THEY FEEL LIKE" PUTTING IN IT, (DOES FLUORIDE RING A BELL, TO KEEP US COMPLACENT AND ACCEPT ALL THIS?) ETC.... in other words, GLOBALIZATION of all land, natural resources, anything owned by the people purchased and developed using our taxes will now belong to the private rapists and pillagers. Now we know what Jefferson meant WHEN HE SAID THE BANKERS WOULD DEPRIVE THE PEOPLE OF THE LAND OF THEIR ANCESTORS. Please read the above link first, , THEN THIS ARTICLE BELOW LAST.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Another Economic 'Martial Law in the Streets' Moment Approaches
http://www.activistpost.com/2011/02/another-economic-martial-law-in-streets.html
Friday, February 4, 2011, Eric Blair, Activist Post
In the fall of 2008, during the lead up to the TARP bailout of the financial industry, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson warned members of Congress that there will be Martial Law in America should they fail to pass the multi-trillion dollar looting of the taxpayer. Well, despite the American public being overwhelmingly against the bailout, the blackmail worked and the banks got their money. If it worked once, why not try it again?
With the economy no better off for having borrowed trillions to "stabilize" criminal financial institutions, the national debt ceiling is rapidly approaching. As some Republicans begin to float the notion of blocking this extension of credit, the Treasury Department, Democrats in Congress, and Ben Bernanke issued apocalyptic warnings clearly showing how pathetically fragile the U.S. economy is.
These threats, reminiscent of Paulson's 2008 ransom demands, once again appear to be offering two black-and-white choices: Armageddon or more debt. The coordinated pitch for higher debt levels is echoing the same urgency as the TARP looting, as Treasury Secretary Geithner said the government is insolvent and will run out of money in about two months' time unless Congress votes to raise the federal debt ceiling.
The AFP reported Thursday that Senate Democrats warned that the government would "shut down" if the debt ceiling was not raised. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) explained what that would mean if a shutdown were to occur: "citizens couldn't get their checks, veterans couldn't get their benefits, military payments would stop."
Ben Bernanke doubled down on the debt-fear campaign in a rare press conference where he said, "Beyond a certain point . . . the United States would be forced into a position of defaulting on its debt. And the implications of that on our financial system, our fiscal policy and our economy would be catastrophic."
Fiscal conservatives who oppose raising the debt ceiling say it is just delaying necessary belt-tightening and massive spending cuts, and say that raising the debt ceiling further only forestalls needed austerity moves to avoid a more catastrophic collapse in the future. House Republicans presented a plan to cut $32 billion from the budget, which is laughable given the impossible-to-pay-off debt levels.
The U.S. national debt is approaching the ceiling of $14.29 trillion; unfunded liabilities like Social Security and Medicare are estimated to be around $100 trillion; and the total cost of stabilizing the financial industry is reportedly upwards of $23.7 trillion. And these numbers say nothing of the fraudulent $600-trillion derivatives scam. No amount of tax increases, spending cuts, or economic growth will be sufficient to satisfy this equation. (VATIC NOTE: LET THEM GO DOWN, regardless, we can weather it and start over and kick them all out of the country, its past time)
The notion that America can somehow pull itself out of this mess if average citizens, who had no part in creating the national debt, would only "tighten their belts," seems preposterous.
None of the options are exactly attractive to the already over-burdened taxpayer. Indeed, the people are being given a lose-lose-lose scenario: 1) the status quo of slow economic demolition through raising the debt ceiling; 2) crippling austerity cuts and public asset looting; or, 3) catastrophic collapse.
Although the banks and their pocket-change politicians describe market conditions that would result in a collapse should the ceiling not be raised, it seems obvious that the only power capable of drastically changing economic conditions are the banks themselves. Therefore, market conditions appear to be an increasingly insignificant part of a bigger illusion.
As if the sun would not rise if a piece of legislation was not passed, the gun-to-the-head urgency will likely result in raising the debt ceiling. If the level of resistance comes close to the near unanimous public disgust over the TARP bill, you can bet we'll hear new warnings of "martial law in the streets" in order to keep the illusion in tact. If for some reason collapse is unavoidable, the U.S. military is actively war gaming "large scale economic breakdown" and "civil unrest" should they choose otherwise.
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
The AFP reported Thursday that Senate Democrats warned that the government would "shut down" if the debt ceiling was not raised. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) explained what that would mean if a shutdown were to occur: "citizens couldn't get their checks, veterans couldn't get their benefits, military payments would stop."
Ben Bernanke doubled down on the debt-fear campaign in a rare press conference where he said, "Beyond a certain point . . . the United States would be forced into a position of defaulting on its debt. And the implications of that on our financial system, our fiscal policy and our economy would be catastrophic."
Fiscal conservatives who oppose raising the debt ceiling say it is just delaying necessary belt-tightening and massive spending cuts, and say that raising the debt ceiling further only forestalls needed austerity moves to avoid a more catastrophic collapse in the future. House Republicans presented a plan to cut $32 billion from the budget, which is laughable given the impossible-to-pay-off debt levels.
The U.S. national debt is approaching the ceiling of $14.29 trillion; unfunded liabilities like Social Security and Medicare are estimated to be around $100 trillion; and the total cost of stabilizing the financial industry is reportedly upwards of $23.7 trillion. And these numbers say nothing of the fraudulent $600-trillion derivatives scam. No amount of tax increases, spending cuts, or economic growth will be sufficient to satisfy this equation. (VATIC NOTE: LET THEM GO DOWN, regardless, we can weather it and start over and kick them all out of the country, its past time)
The notion that America can somehow pull itself out of this mess if average citizens, who had no part in creating the national debt, would only "tighten their belts," seems preposterous.
None of the options are exactly attractive to the already over-burdened taxpayer. Indeed, the people are being given a lose-lose-lose scenario: 1) the status quo of slow economic demolition through raising the debt ceiling; 2) crippling austerity cuts and public asset looting; or, 3) catastrophic collapse.
Although the banks and their pocket-change politicians describe market conditions that would result in a collapse should the ceiling not be raised, it seems obvious that the only power capable of drastically changing economic conditions are the banks themselves. Therefore, market conditions appear to be an increasingly insignificant part of a bigger illusion.
As if the sun would not rise if a piece of legislation was not passed, the gun-to-the-head urgency will likely result in raising the debt ceiling. If the level of resistance comes close to the near unanimous public disgust over the TARP bill, you can bet we'll hear new warnings of "martial law in the streets" in order to keep the illusion in tact. If for some reason collapse is unavoidable, the U.S. military is actively war gaming "large scale economic breakdown" and "civil unrest" should they choose otherwise.
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
Ben Bernanke doubled down on the debt-fear campaign in a rare press conference where he said, "Beyond a certain point . . . the United States would be forced into a position of defaulting on its debt. And the implications of that on our financial system, our fiscal policy and our economy would be catastrophic."
Fiscal conservatives who oppose raising the debt ceiling say it is just delaying necessary belt-tightening and massive spending cuts, and say that raising the debt ceiling further only forestalls needed austerity moves to avoid a more catastrophic collapse in the future. House Republicans presented a plan to cut $32 billion from the budget, which is laughable given the impossible-to-pay-off debt levels.
The U.S. national debt is approaching the ceiling of $14.29 trillion; unfunded liabilities like Social Security and Medicare are estimated to be around $100 trillion; and the total cost of stabilizing the financial industry is reportedly upwards of $23.7 trillion. And these numbers say nothing of the fraudulent $600-trillion derivatives scam. No amount of tax increases, spending cuts, or economic growth will be sufficient to satisfy this equation. (VATIC NOTE: LET THEM GO DOWN, regardless, we can weather it and start over and kick them all out of the country, its past time)
The notion that America can somehow pull itself out of this mess if average citizens, who had no part in creating the national debt, would only "tighten their belts," seems preposterous.
None of the options are exactly attractive to the already over-burdened taxpayer. Indeed, the people are being given a lose-lose-lose scenario: 1) the status quo of slow economic demolition through raising the debt ceiling; 2) crippling austerity cuts and public asset looting; or, 3) catastrophic collapse.
Although the banks and their pocket-change politicians describe market conditions that would result in a collapse should the ceiling not be raised, it seems obvious that the only power capable of drastically changing economic conditions are the banks themselves. Therefore, market conditions appear to be an increasingly insignificant part of a bigger illusion.
As if the sun would not rise if a piece of legislation was not passed, the gun-to-the-head urgency will likely result in raising the debt ceiling. If the level of resistance comes close to the near unanimous public disgust over the TARP bill, you can bet we'll hear new warnings of "martial law in the streets" in order to keep the illusion in tact. If for some reason collapse is unavoidable, the U.S. military is actively war gaming "large scale economic breakdown" and "civil unrest" should they choose otherwise.
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
No comments:
Post a Comment