Vatic Note: Hmmm, does the Gulf ring a bell? Everyone is thoroughly convinced the horror they are selling us for whatever agenda they have, is real and fear is the result. They are changing the name because they are AFRAID WE WILL UNDERSTAND THE PURPOSE BASED ON THE NAME. LOL That Phrase alone proves the point that we know EXACTLY why they are changing it and what the purpose of it is and THE PROGRAM won't work if we know what it is. That is obvious since we have figured out a lot of these programs already and nothing is working like it used to exactly because we now know and the few or minority that doesn't know, DOES KNOW that something is wrong and are no longer as suseptible to the propoganda, disinformation or provocateuring that used to work on us. Here is something thought provoking to keep us properly centered....
"Neither a man nor a crowd nor a nation can be trusted to act humanely or to think sanely under the influence of a great fear."
~ Bertrand Russell (1872-1970) philosopher, mathematician, author, Nobel laureat
(Sound familiar? Gulf Coast? extinction event?)
Remember that and never forget it, since this is not the last of this we are going to see. But if we know, then it won't work. No more. Too bad, sooooo sad. Truly, I am almost beginning to feel sorry for them since all this work they did represents years and years of planning, funding studies, etc and somebody down the line messed up and forgot to tell them it doesn't work if we know that is what is going on. OH, well, maybe next time around, IF THERE IS ONE. We shall see. PLEASE read the examples after this article of the specifics that we have done in this field in 5 or 6 different situations including WACO and Operation "Just Cause" in Panama. Its truly important to read these because that is how we will know when its being used on us and we can then turn around and use it on those they are trying to bring over to their side. We then study how they do it and use their weapons against them.
Definition of PsychOPs
http://allpsych.com/journal/psyops.html
Excerpt:
This overview will describe the objectives of PSYOPS and how (mostly) military and non-military users have used conventional and unconventional tactics or techniques to reduce the opponent's will to resist or fight. (Soooo, do we have some psychops going on right now?)
“Psychological Operations” Are Now “Military Information Support Operations”
http://publicintelligence.net/psychological-operations-are-now-military-information-support-operations/print/
Posted July 3, 2010 @ 2:08 am In Featured
By Kevin Maurer
Associated Press
July 2, 2010
The Army has dropped the Vietnam-era name “psychological operations” for its branch in charge of trying to change minds behind enemy lines, acknowledging the term can sound ominous.
The Defense Department picked a more neutral moniker: “Military Information Support Operations,” or MISO.
U.S. Special Operations Command spokesman Ken McGraw said Thursday the new name, adopted last month, more accurately reflects the unit’s job of producing leaflets, radio broadcasts and loudspeaker messages to influence enemy soldiers and civilians.
“One of the catalysts for the transition is foreign and domestic sensitivities to the term ‘psychological operations’ that often lead to a misunderstanding of the mission,” McGraw said.
Fort Bragg is home to the 4th Psychological Operations Group, the Army’s only active duty psychological operations unit. Psychological operations soldiers are trained at the post.
The name change is expected to extend to all military services, a senior defense official said in Washington. The official, who has direct knowledge of the change, spoke on condition of anonymity because not all services have announced how they will revamp or rename their psychological operations offices.
The change was driven from the top, by Pentagon policymakers working for Defense Secretary Robert Gates. It reflects unease with the Cold War echoes of the old terminology, and the implication that the work involved subterfuge.
The change, however, left some current practitioners of psychological operations cold. Gone is the cool factor, posters to online military blogs said. With a name like MISO, one wrote, you might as well join the supply command.
Alfred H. Paddock, Jr., a retired colonel who was Director for Psychological Operations in the Office of the Secretary of Defense from 1986 to 1988, said the term has always had some baggage and been difficult to explain.
“Somehow it gives a nefarious connotation, but I think that this baggage can be overcome,” said Paddock, who also served three combat tours with Special Forces in Laos and Vietnam.
He said the military was giving in to political correctness by changing the name.
Psychological operations have been cast as spooky in movies and books over the years portraying the soldiers as master manipulators. The 2009 movie “The Men Who Stare at Goats,” staring George Clooney, was about an army unit that trains psychic spies, based on Jon Ronson’s nonfiction account of the U.S. military’s hush-hush research into psychic warfare and espionage.
But the real mission is far more mundane. During the 2003 invasion of Iraq, psychological operations units dropped leaflets urging Iraqis to surrender.
In Vietnam, a psychological operations effort called the Open Arms Program bombarded Viet Cong units with surrender appeals written by former members. The program got approximately 200,000 Viet Cong fighters to defect.
McGraw said the name change was approved by Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Adm. Eric Olson, the Special Operations commander, in mid-June.
Many in the psychological operations community, including Paddock, dislike the new name.
“Military Information Support Operations, or MISO, is not something that rolls off the tip of your tongue,” Paddock said. “It makes it even more difficult for psychological operations personnel to explain what they do. That they still have the capability to employ programs and themes designed to influence the behavior of foreign target audiences.”
© 2010 Associated Press
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://allpsych.com/journal/psyops.html
An Overview of Psychological Operations
The purpose of psychological operations (PSYOPS) is to influence, reinforce, and demoralize an opponent to secure the originator's objective. PSYOPS is a planned operation(s) to communicate select information to foreign governments, groups, organizations, and individuals in order to influence their emotions, motives, objective reasoning, and behavior.
When considering unconventional methods of PSYOPS, such as beating an opponent on a tennis court or football field, there are similar but less conservative methods that are used. A football team may try to taunt the opposing team the night before by defacing the team's mascot and thus making the opponent feel less focused on strategy and more on a win based on revenge. Muhammed Ali was notorious for demoralizing his opponents in the ring, not only with his punch but also with his words, "I am the greatest. Not only do I knock 'em out, I pick the round!" (Ali) Most citizens of North America are affected and influenced by an effective and powerful but bad example of PSYOPS. While negative campaign advertising does not actually look like PSYOPS, it does achieve the same results. The message is, "While you may not like our candidate, the other candidate is a skunk and here is why...". The purpose is to demoralize the candidate and cut his or her support system.
Psychological operations (PSYOPS) is usually thought to be a part of a military objective but is sometimes used in other parts of a country's arsenal of weapons of influence. US military is not the only place where PSYOPS is taught and used. In this report, the reader will view examples of conventional military PSYOPS.
In conventional military PSYOPS, there are several essential actions that considered when planning a line-of-attack as defined by the Joint Chiefs of Staff (1996). They are: 1) clearly defined mission, 2) analysis of all targets, 3) actions that are evaluated for psychological implications, 4) reliable medium or media for transmission, 5) rapid exploitation of PSYOPS themes, and 6) continual evaluation of the results of PSYOPS are considered relevant to the mission and goals.
Military operations have a psychological impact on both offensive and defensive forces. Moving an aircraft carrier off a rival's shores, conducting amphibious landing training or surgical air strikes, or executing an underground special operations into an adversary's heartland all influence attitudes, emotions, motives, objective reasoning, and ultimately the behavior of foreign governments, their leaders, groups, and individuals. (Joint Chiefs, 1996) Imagine how a soldier must feel when he looks up in the sky and sees the sky filled with enemy or opposition airplanes; the soldier's confidence in his nation and security has just been lowered. PYSOPS can reinforce the perceptions of the opponent and plant the seed of doubt about the opponent's leadership.
Because morale is both an individual and group experience, and no two soldiers or individuals are alike, their breaking points are not alike. Many soldiers have endured such horrific conditions for prolonged periods of time without losing faith in their cause or confidence. Others fall deeply into despair and hopelessness in less grueling circumstances. PSYOPS had little effect on those with exceedingly high levels of morale. (Gilmore, 1998)
Military PSYOPS
The following are different applied examples of military psychological operations. Some were very effective at achieving their objectives, while another had failed miserably.
Kingdom of Judah
One of the earliest recorded descriptions of battlefield PSYOPS is recorded in II Chronicles 20 of the Old Testament. During the reign of Jehoshaphat (871-850 BC) the city-state armies of Ammon, Moab, and Mount Seir, formerly friendly to Judah, were scouring the countryside for plunder and made their approach to attack Jerusalem. Armies of that day consisted of poorly trained citizen-soldiers. Vastly outnumbered, King Jehoshaphat turned to prayer. The prophet Jahaziel delivered divine instructions, promising a miracle like no other ever seen before.
Being told where the attack was to originate, Jehoshaphat was also told to line up his army on the ridges and to stand firm but not fight. Instead the army was to sing and praise God. Normally the military band is only used after a fight but Jehoshaphat staged the band in the front line for all to hear.
Seeing the army of Judah not in a fighting posture, the armies of Ammon and Moab attacked and wiped out the army of Mount Seir. Then Ammon and Moab attacked one another and fought until no one remained. The army of Judah merely walked down to the battlefields and spent the next three days collecting all the booty from the dead armies. After rejoicing and celebrating in the Valley of Beracah, the army of Judah returned home with their new wealth.
World War II - Pacific Theatre
In the World War II Pacific Theatre, Allied personnel involved in PSYOPS, wanted to understand and also communicate with Japanese soldiers on a personable level rather than view them as fanatical devotees to a lost cause. The Allied personnel's purpose was to reduce their will to fight and encourage the Japanese to surrender. Allied forces knew that the Japanese soldiers were most concerned with the necessities of combat survival such as food, water, ammunition, weapons air and naval support and capable leadership. As the war progressed, the necessities became very low in supply. The continuing victories of the Allied forces caused the Japanese soldiers not only to worry about their survival, but also the safety of their family and home.
"Allied PSYOPS had two policies they followed when executing PSYOPS: tell the truth and do not criticize the Japanese emperor." (Gilmore, 1998) Trust was essential in maintaining credibility of information that was distributed by the Allies. It established trust between the Allies and the Japanese soldiers who they hoped to influence. "Rather than blaming the emperor for devastating results of the war, which would've alienated the target audience, Allied Propaganda portrayed the emperor as an unwitting victim of militarists who controlled Japan, whose policies were leading down the path to destruction." (Gilmore, 1998)
The soldier's diaries and the interrogations of prisoners provided a large body of neglected evidence so that many soldiers experienced not only a crisis in confidence but a collapse of faith in themselves, their leaders, and their nation's ability to achieve victory. (Gilmore, 1998)
Viet Nam -- Tet Offensive
A large and well-equipped military coalition joined with the forces of the Republic of Viet Nam (South Viet Nam) and largely defeated the forces of the Viet Cong in this veiled civil war by 1968. Supplies and some personnel from the Peoples Republic of Viet Nam (North Viet Nam) continued to flow in the South to support the Viet Cong. The Communist leadership decided to make one last fight and attacked Government targets and facilities all over the country during the holiday truce of Tet. The attacks were briefly effective but most combatants were killed or captured. There was no effective fighting force left in Viet Nam for the Communists.
For four years the US Government had been exaggerating battlefield successes and much remaining credibility was removed when the US public saw on their living room television sets the robust attacks of this "defeated" foe. It was a psychological turning point in the United States for military involvement in Southeast Asia. Other nations had already left the coalition and the political leaders in an election year promised an honorable way out of the war. As US forces declined the Communists began to send in soldiers from North Viet Nam to fight. A major military defeat to the Communists was turned into a victory when the major supporter of the continuing succession of weak South Viet Nam governments departed.
Operation Just Cause - Panama
Loudspeakers, leaflet drops, radio and television broadcast, wanted posters as well as posters to turn in weapons for money, were all used in Operation Just Cause in 1989-1990 in the arrest of Manual Noreiga. It has been reported that heavy metal music playing 24 hours a day hindered Noreiga and his camp to think, plan, and sleep. (Clancy, Stiner, Klotz, 2002) This is an example of PSYOPS success.
Waco, TX
On April 19, 1993, in Waco, TX, David Koresh's Branch Davidian center was attack by the US Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms and the Federal Bureus of Investigation. According to the documentary, Waco: Rules of Engagement, and several accounts by surviving members, there were several tactics, which were used to demoralize the members. For almost two months, loud speakers played sounds of rabbits being slaughtered, the sound of a dentists drill, and clips from talk shows about how David Koresh is much hated, played 24 hours a day; flashing bright lights was another technique used. Very few did leave, while others stayed in fear for their lives, and because of their beliefs. This is an example of a PSYOPS failure.
Persian Gulf I
"Planning for psychological operations began immediately after the [Iraqi] invasion of Kuwait. Leaflet, radio, and loudspeaker operations were combined and this combination was key to the success of PSYOPS. Leaflets were the most commonly used method of conveying PSYOPS messages. Twenty-nine million leaflets consisting of 33 different messages were disseminated in the Kuwait theatre of operations.
A building block approach for leaflet operations was used, with the first leaflet themes being ones of peace and brotherhood. Leaflet themes began by emphasizing the UN's deadline and after the deadline passed, Operation Desert Storm began themes change emphasizing the abandonment of equipment and desertion were used. Exploiting the effects of specific munitions leaflets were also used to inform Iraqi units that they were going to be bombed. Feedback from interviews with enemy prisoners of war validated the success of leaflet operations.
"Voice of the Gulf" was the Coalition's radio network that broadcast from ground based and airborne transmitter, 18 hours per day for 40 days. The radio script was prepared daily and provided news, countered Iraqi propaganda and disinformation, and encouraged Iraqi defection and surrender." (Joint Chiefs of Staff, 1996)
"The broadcast would open with a call to prayer... then essentially news, sports, weather and interviews with detainees. " PSYOPS veteran Rick Hoffman told NPR's David Kestenbaum. "And then at some point during the broadcast day, the next day's B-52 targets were announced but never at the same time. When Iraqi soldiers wanted to know what was on the list, they'd have to listen all day, exposing all the propaganda we cared to deliver, " Hoffman said. "It was an amazingly effective campaign." (Kestenbaum, 2001)
Conclusion
PSYOPS takes many shapes and forms. It can be used at a national or regional level or down to a small group or personal level. The purpose is always to promote the objectives of the originator and diminish the will of the opponent to resist or fight. Most conventional methods require some degree of trust or belief by the opponent in the originator's message. Some unconventional methods work when no trust or connection exists. As shown in the Viet Nam example, the originator can unwittingly self-inflict PSYOPS against itself.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
References
Ali, Muhammad (n.d) Quote. Retrieved from website: http://www.cyber-nation.com/victory/quotations/authors_ali_muhammad.html
Clancy, Tom; Stiner, General Carl (Ret.), Klotz, Tony (2002) Shadow Warriors. G.P. Putnam's Sons. New York
Gazecki, William (1997) Waco: Rules of Engagement (1997) Documentary. (VN: whether you know it or not, there has never been a time in the history of this nation that we would have allowed a WACO to ever occur., not ever).
Gilmore, Allison B. (1998) You Can't Fight Tanks with Bayonets: Psychological Warfare against the Japanese Army in the Southwest Pacific. University of Nebraska Press. Lincoln & London.
Holy Bible (n.d.) Referencing the Kingdom of Judah
Joint Chiefs of Staff (1996) Doctrine for Joint Psychological Operations (Joint Pub 3-53) Retrieved from Dudley Knox Library, Naval Postgraduate School website: http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/jel/new_pubs/jp3_53.pdf
Joint Chiefs of Staff (1996) Referenceing the Final Report to Congress
Conduct of the Persian Gulf War, April 1992. Retrieved from Dudley Knox Library, Naval Postgraduate School website: http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/jel/new_pubs/jp3_53.pdf
Kestenbaum, David. (2001) Selling the War: Psychological Warfare Not So Far Removed From Advertising. Article retrieved from National Public Radio (NPR) website: http://www.npr.org/programs/atc/features/2001/nov/psyops/0111109.psyops/html
Schwartz, Jerry (1999) Waco's 'Dark Questions' Elude Answers, Solace; Davidians: After 6 1/2 years, investigation into the siege is beset with conflicting reports, missing evidence, distrust.
Associated Press. Los Angeles Times (9/26/99). Retrieved from website: http://www.waco93.com/latimes9_26_99.html
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
"Neither a man nor a crowd nor a nation can be trusted to act humanely or to think sanely under the influence of a great fear."
~ Bertrand Russell (1872-1970) philosopher, mathematician, author, Nobel laureat
(Sound familiar? Gulf Coast? extinction event?)
Remember that and never forget it, since this is not the last of this we are going to see. But if we know, then it won't work. No more. Too bad, sooooo sad. Truly, I am almost beginning to feel sorry for them since all this work they did represents years and years of planning, funding studies, etc and somebody down the line messed up and forgot to tell them it doesn't work if we know that is what is going on. OH, well, maybe next time around, IF THERE IS ONE. We shall see. PLEASE read the examples after this article of the specifics that we have done in this field in 5 or 6 different situations including WACO and Operation "Just Cause" in Panama. Its truly important to read these because that is how we will know when its being used on us and we can then turn around and use it on those they are trying to bring over to their side. We then study how they do it and use their weapons against them.
Definition of PsychOPs
http://allpsych.com/journal/psyops.html
Excerpt:
This overview will describe the objectives of PSYOPS and how (mostly) military and non-military users have used conventional and unconventional tactics or techniques to reduce the opponent's will to resist or fight. (Soooo, do we have some psychops going on right now?)
“Psychological Operations” Are Now “Military Information Support Operations”
http://publicintelligence.net/psychological-operations-are-now-military-information-support-operations/print/
Posted July 3, 2010 @ 2:08 am In Featured
By Kevin Maurer
Associated Press
July 2, 2010
The Army has dropped the Vietnam-era name “psychological operations” for its branch in charge of trying to change minds behind enemy lines, acknowledging the term can sound ominous.
The Defense Department picked a more neutral moniker: “Military Information Support Operations,” or MISO.
U.S. Special Operations Command spokesman Ken McGraw said Thursday the new name, adopted last month, more accurately reflects the unit’s job of producing leaflets, radio broadcasts and loudspeaker messages to influence enemy soldiers and civilians.
“One of the catalysts for the transition is foreign and domestic sensitivities to the term ‘psychological operations’ that often lead to a misunderstanding of the mission,” McGraw said.
Fort Bragg is home to the 4th Psychological Operations Group, the Army’s only active duty psychological operations unit. Psychological operations soldiers are trained at the post.
The name change is expected to extend to all military services, a senior defense official said in Washington. The official, who has direct knowledge of the change, spoke on condition of anonymity because not all services have announced how they will revamp or rename their psychological operations offices.
The change was driven from the top, by Pentagon policymakers working for Defense Secretary Robert Gates. It reflects unease with the Cold War echoes of the old terminology, and the implication that the work involved subterfuge.
The change, however, left some current practitioners of psychological operations cold. Gone is the cool factor, posters to online military blogs said. With a name like MISO, one wrote, you might as well join the supply command.
Alfred H. Paddock, Jr., a retired colonel who was Director for Psychological Operations in the Office of the Secretary of Defense from 1986 to 1988, said the term has always had some baggage and been difficult to explain.
“Somehow it gives a nefarious connotation, but I think that this baggage can be overcome,” said Paddock, who also served three combat tours with Special Forces in Laos and Vietnam.
He said the military was giving in to political correctness by changing the name.
Psychological operations have been cast as spooky in movies and books over the years portraying the soldiers as master manipulators. The 2009 movie “The Men Who Stare at Goats,” staring George Clooney, was about an army unit that trains psychic spies, based on Jon Ronson’s nonfiction account of the U.S. military’s hush-hush research into psychic warfare and espionage.
But the real mission is far more mundane. During the 2003 invasion of Iraq, psychological operations units dropped leaflets urging Iraqis to surrender.
In Vietnam, a psychological operations effort called the Open Arms Program bombarded Viet Cong units with surrender appeals written by former members. The program got approximately 200,000 Viet Cong fighters to defect.
McGraw said the name change was approved by Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Adm. Eric Olson, the Special Operations commander, in mid-June.
Many in the psychological operations community, including Paddock, dislike the new name.
“Military Information Support Operations, or MISO, is not something that rolls off the tip of your tongue,” Paddock said. “It makes it even more difficult for psychological operations personnel to explain what they do. That they still have the capability to employ programs and themes designed to influence the behavior of foreign target audiences.”
© 2010 Associated Press
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://allpsych.com/journal/psyops.html
An Overview of Psychological Operations
The purpose of psychological operations (PSYOPS) is to influence, reinforce, and demoralize an opponent to secure the originator's objective. PSYOPS is a planned operation(s) to communicate select information to foreign governments, groups, organizations, and individuals in order to influence their emotions, motives, objective reasoning, and behavior.
When considering unconventional methods of PSYOPS, such as beating an opponent on a tennis court or football field, there are similar but less conservative methods that are used. A football team may try to taunt the opposing team the night before by defacing the team's mascot and thus making the opponent feel less focused on strategy and more on a win based on revenge. Muhammed Ali was notorious for demoralizing his opponents in the ring, not only with his punch but also with his words, "I am the greatest. Not only do I knock 'em out, I pick the round!" (Ali) Most citizens of North America are affected and influenced by an effective and powerful but bad example of PSYOPS. While negative campaign advertising does not actually look like PSYOPS, it does achieve the same results. The message is, "While you may not like our candidate, the other candidate is a skunk and here is why...". The purpose is to demoralize the candidate and cut his or her support system.
Psychological operations (PSYOPS) is usually thought to be a part of a military objective but is sometimes used in other parts of a country's arsenal of weapons of influence. US military is not the only place where PSYOPS is taught and used. In this report, the reader will view examples of conventional military PSYOPS.
In conventional military PSYOPS, there are several essential actions that considered when planning a line-of-attack as defined by the Joint Chiefs of Staff (1996). They are: 1) clearly defined mission, 2) analysis of all targets, 3) actions that are evaluated for psychological implications, 4) reliable medium or media for transmission, 5) rapid exploitation of PSYOPS themes, and 6) continual evaluation of the results of PSYOPS are considered relevant to the mission and goals.
Military operations have a psychological impact on both offensive and defensive forces. Moving an aircraft carrier off a rival's shores, conducting amphibious landing training or surgical air strikes, or executing an underground special operations into an adversary's heartland all influence attitudes, emotions, motives, objective reasoning, and ultimately the behavior of foreign governments, their leaders, groups, and individuals. (Joint Chiefs, 1996) Imagine how a soldier must feel when he looks up in the sky and sees the sky filled with enemy or opposition airplanes; the soldier's confidence in his nation and security has just been lowered. PYSOPS can reinforce the perceptions of the opponent and plant the seed of doubt about the opponent's leadership.
Because morale is both an individual and group experience, and no two soldiers or individuals are alike, their breaking points are not alike. Many soldiers have endured such horrific conditions for prolonged periods of time without losing faith in their cause or confidence. Others fall deeply into despair and hopelessness in less grueling circumstances. PSYOPS had little effect on those with exceedingly high levels of morale. (Gilmore, 1998)
Military PSYOPS
The following are different applied examples of military psychological operations. Some were very effective at achieving their objectives, while another had failed miserably.
Kingdom of Judah
One of the earliest recorded descriptions of battlefield PSYOPS is recorded in II Chronicles 20 of the Old Testament. During the reign of Jehoshaphat (871-850 BC) the city-state armies of Ammon, Moab, and Mount Seir, formerly friendly to Judah, were scouring the countryside for plunder and made their approach to attack Jerusalem. Armies of that day consisted of poorly trained citizen-soldiers. Vastly outnumbered, King Jehoshaphat turned to prayer. The prophet Jahaziel delivered divine instructions, promising a miracle like no other ever seen before.
Being told where the attack was to originate, Jehoshaphat was also told to line up his army on the ridges and to stand firm but not fight. Instead the army was to sing and praise God. Normally the military band is only used after a fight but Jehoshaphat staged the band in the front line for all to hear.
Seeing the army of Judah not in a fighting posture, the armies of Ammon and Moab attacked and wiped out the army of Mount Seir. Then Ammon and Moab attacked one another and fought until no one remained. The army of Judah merely walked down to the battlefields and spent the next three days collecting all the booty from the dead armies. After rejoicing and celebrating in the Valley of Beracah, the army of Judah returned home with their new wealth.
World War II - Pacific Theatre
In the World War II Pacific Theatre, Allied personnel involved in PSYOPS, wanted to understand and also communicate with Japanese soldiers on a personable level rather than view them as fanatical devotees to a lost cause. The Allied personnel's purpose was to reduce their will to fight and encourage the Japanese to surrender. Allied forces knew that the Japanese soldiers were most concerned with the necessities of combat survival such as food, water, ammunition, weapons air and naval support and capable leadership. As the war progressed, the necessities became very low in supply. The continuing victories of the Allied forces caused the Japanese soldiers not only to worry about their survival, but also the safety of their family and home.
"Allied PSYOPS had two policies they followed when executing PSYOPS: tell the truth and do not criticize the Japanese emperor." (Gilmore, 1998) Trust was essential in maintaining credibility of information that was distributed by the Allies. It established trust between the Allies and the Japanese soldiers who they hoped to influence. "Rather than blaming the emperor for devastating results of the war, which would've alienated the target audience, Allied Propaganda portrayed the emperor as an unwitting victim of militarists who controlled Japan, whose policies were leading down the path to destruction." (Gilmore, 1998)
The soldier's diaries and the interrogations of prisoners provided a large body of neglected evidence so that many soldiers experienced not only a crisis in confidence but a collapse of faith in themselves, their leaders, and their nation's ability to achieve victory. (Gilmore, 1998)
Viet Nam -- Tet Offensive
A large and well-equipped military coalition joined with the forces of the Republic of Viet Nam (South Viet Nam) and largely defeated the forces of the Viet Cong in this veiled civil war by 1968. Supplies and some personnel from the Peoples Republic of Viet Nam (North Viet Nam) continued to flow in the South to support the Viet Cong. The Communist leadership decided to make one last fight and attacked Government targets and facilities all over the country during the holiday truce of Tet. The attacks were briefly effective but most combatants were killed or captured. There was no effective fighting force left in Viet Nam for the Communists.
For four years the US Government had been exaggerating battlefield successes and much remaining credibility was removed when the US public saw on their living room television sets the robust attacks of this "defeated" foe. It was a psychological turning point in the United States for military involvement in Southeast Asia. Other nations had already left the coalition and the political leaders in an election year promised an honorable way out of the war. As US forces declined the Communists began to send in soldiers from North Viet Nam to fight. A major military defeat to the Communists was turned into a victory when the major supporter of the continuing succession of weak South Viet Nam governments departed.
Operation Just Cause - Panama
Loudspeakers, leaflet drops, radio and television broadcast, wanted posters as well as posters to turn in weapons for money, were all used in Operation Just Cause in 1989-1990 in the arrest of Manual Noreiga. It has been reported that heavy metal music playing 24 hours a day hindered Noreiga and his camp to think, plan, and sleep. (Clancy, Stiner, Klotz, 2002) This is an example of PSYOPS success.
Waco, TX
On April 19, 1993, in Waco, TX, David Koresh's Branch Davidian center was attack by the US Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms and the Federal Bureus of Investigation. According to the documentary, Waco: Rules of Engagement, and several accounts by surviving members, there were several tactics, which were used to demoralize the members. For almost two months, loud speakers played sounds of rabbits being slaughtered, the sound of a dentists drill, and clips from talk shows about how David Koresh is much hated, played 24 hours a day; flashing bright lights was another technique used. Very few did leave, while others stayed in fear for their lives, and because of their beliefs. This is an example of a PSYOPS failure.
Persian Gulf I
"Planning for psychological operations began immediately after the [Iraqi] invasion of Kuwait. Leaflet, radio, and loudspeaker operations were combined and this combination was key to the success of PSYOPS. Leaflets were the most commonly used method of conveying PSYOPS messages. Twenty-nine million leaflets consisting of 33 different messages were disseminated in the Kuwait theatre of operations.
A building block approach for leaflet operations was used, with the first leaflet themes being ones of peace and brotherhood. Leaflet themes began by emphasizing the UN's deadline and after the deadline passed, Operation Desert Storm began themes change emphasizing the abandonment of equipment and desertion were used. Exploiting the effects of specific munitions leaflets were also used to inform Iraqi units that they were going to be bombed. Feedback from interviews with enemy prisoners of war validated the success of leaflet operations.
"Voice of the Gulf" was the Coalition's radio network that broadcast from ground based and airborne transmitter, 18 hours per day for 40 days. The radio script was prepared daily and provided news, countered Iraqi propaganda and disinformation, and encouraged Iraqi defection and surrender." (Joint Chiefs of Staff, 1996)
"The broadcast would open with a call to prayer... then essentially news, sports, weather and interviews with detainees. " PSYOPS veteran Rick Hoffman told NPR's David Kestenbaum. "And then at some point during the broadcast day, the next day's B-52 targets were announced but never at the same time. When Iraqi soldiers wanted to know what was on the list, they'd have to listen all day, exposing all the propaganda we cared to deliver, " Hoffman said. "It was an amazingly effective campaign." (Kestenbaum, 2001)
Conclusion
PSYOPS takes many shapes and forms. It can be used at a national or regional level or down to a small group or personal level. The purpose is always to promote the objectives of the originator and diminish the will of the opponent to resist or fight. Most conventional methods require some degree of trust or belief by the opponent in the originator's message. Some unconventional methods work when no trust or connection exists. As shown in the Viet Nam example, the originator can unwittingly self-inflict PSYOPS against itself.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
References
Ali, Muhammad (n.d) Quote. Retrieved from website: http://www.cyber-nation.com/victory/quotations/authors_ali_muhammad.html
Clancy, Tom; Stiner, General Carl (Ret.), Klotz, Tony (2002) Shadow Warriors. G.P. Putnam's Sons. New York
Gazecki, William (1997) Waco: Rules of Engagement (1997) Documentary. (VN: whether you know it or not, there has never been a time in the history of this nation that we would have allowed a WACO to ever occur., not ever).
Gilmore, Allison B. (1998) You Can't Fight Tanks with Bayonets: Psychological Warfare against the Japanese Army in the Southwest Pacific. University of Nebraska Press. Lincoln & London.
Holy Bible (n.d.) Referencing the Kingdom of Judah
Joint Chiefs of Staff (1996) Doctrine for Joint Psychological Operations (Joint Pub 3-53) Retrieved from Dudley Knox Library, Naval Postgraduate School website: http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/jel/new_pubs/jp3_53.pdf
Joint Chiefs of Staff (1996) Referenceing the Final Report to Congress
Conduct of the Persian Gulf War, April 1992. Retrieved from Dudley Knox Library, Naval Postgraduate School website: http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/jel/new_pubs/jp3_53.pdf
Kestenbaum, David. (2001) Selling the War: Psychological Warfare Not So Far Removed From Advertising. Article retrieved from National Public Radio (NPR) website: http://www.npr.org/programs/atc/features/2001/nov/psyops/0111109.psyops/html
Schwartz, Jerry (1999) Waco's 'Dark Questions' Elude Answers, Solace; Davidians: After 6 1/2 years, investigation into the siege is beset with conflicting reports, missing evidence, distrust.
Associated Press. Los Angeles Times (9/26/99). Retrieved from website: http://www.waco93.com/latimes9_26_99.html
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
3 comments:
As regards Noriega, it's my understanding that the live-in staff at the Vatican Embassy, some of whom were quite elderly, suffered far more from the blaring heavy metal than he did. The technical word for this is collective punishment. It's my understanding that the general surrendered out of consideration for their welfare. I was very intrigued when I discovered this was a PSYOPS technique. I went through a period in 1987 when I experienced phone harassment, break-ins and car gangs that bombarded my neighbors at 2:30 am with heavy metal and Martin Luther King speeches (I don't think Noriega got the MLK speeches). I write about the experience in my recent memoir THE MOST REVOLUTIONARY ACT: MEMOIR OF AN AMERICAN REFUGEE.
Oh, my Gawd, I am so sorry you have gone through that. I have had a bit of an experience on that myself, but laughed at them and actually exposed them as they were doing their thing and they ran like the wind and finally left me alone since I dont' respond in fear, rather anger and thus make fun and laugh and that kills them.
Once you know what it is, it doesn't work anymore and that is why we post this info on the board so others can see and then recognize when its done to them. I hope this all helps some, since we are definitely at a distinct disadvantage due to our ignorance.
Changing “psychological operations” to “Military Information Support Operations” (MISO) -- besides from being Orwellian -- will shoot them in the foot eventually, thanks to the USA Patriot act that condemns giving "material aid & support to terrorism", which includes expert advice. A goal of terrorism is to instill fear in the target population. That is also what MISO does, and certainly when MISO hypes terrorism fears and when MISO operations go beyond propaganda which they'd like us believe was the extent of MISO.
The point is, with "support" now in the MISO (PYSOP, PSYWAR) name, it becomes easier to tag their activities as "material support" for terrorism.
Post a Comment