British SAS Special Forces “Dressed Up as ISIS Rebels” Fighting Assad in Syria

Vatic Note:  Add this below to this story out in August, we can conclude that Israel,  the United States and Britain are all involved with the creation, financing, training and orders of ISIS and ISIL.   If so,  then we can deduce  that those three countries,  are manipulating the entire terrorist threat,  given there are no muslim terrorists, rather they have been created to do the job of justifying the police state that is emerging everywhere, but especially in the United States.

From what we are reading below, it appears all the commonwealth countries leaders are also in on the scam of ISIS, including Canada.  The people of all those countries are being lied to by their leaders,  in order to justify STARTING WW III and beginning the process of implementing a police state, similar to that done in WW II since now we know on a blog we did that it was the same players lying about Germany as opposed to the truth being exposed. 

In fact, I remember someone comparing Homeland SEcurity to the structure of the Storm Troopers organization in WW II.   Is that why DHS purchased billions of rounds of body armour piercing ammo?   Does that sound like "gestapo" to you?   Is that why all this false flag work to try and trick us into wanting war and fighting it for the 1 percenters???

I am beginning to believe that all these wars are a serious part of the fiat currency system.   It appears they need these wars to extract more wealth from the taxpaying sucker who buys into all these bogus enemies and created events and then blaming them on the Muslims, just like Israel did with the 1967 USS Liberty that failed.... they tried to blame it on the Egyptians, but there were survivors and they told us the truth as to who killed our sailors, and it wasn't the Muslims.

My final Question is "Why are the British so active in this deception?  Is it because they are khazars and posing as British royalty????  Please read and you decide.

British SAS Special Forces “Dressed Up as ISIS Rebels” Fighting Assad in Syria
By Steven Lendman, Global Research, August 4, 2015

On August 2, Britain’s Sunday Express newspaper headlined “SAS dress as ISIS fighters in undercover war on jihadis,” saying:

“More than 120 members belonging to the elite regiment are currently in the war-torn country” covertly “dressed in black and flying ISIS flags,” engaged in what’s called Operation Shader – attacking Syrian targets on the pretext of combating ISIS.
Maybe covert US special forces and CIA elements are involved the same way. During Obama’s war on Libya, Britain deployed hundreds of Special Forces Support Group (SFSG) paratroopers – drawn from SAS (Special Air Service) and SBS (Special Boat Service) personnel.
Around 800 Royal Marines and 4,000 US counterparts were on standby to intervene on short notice if ordered.

The latest revelation comes two weeks after learning Prime Minister David Cameron last year approved British warplanes joining US ones in bombing Syria despite parliamentary rejection in August 2013.
At least part of its current covert ground operation is under US command – so-called “smash” units traveling in pickup trucks able to launch mini-UAVs to scan terrain for targets to attack.
Over 250 UK (and perhaps US) specialists are involved to provide communications support, the Sunday Express explained.
British Defense Secretary Michael Fallon said “(o)ur actions and surveillance capabilities are freeing up other countries to strike in Syria.”
UK SAS forces are in Saudi Arabia training anti-Assad terrorists along with US operatives doing the same thing – including in Turkey, Jordan, Qatar and perhaps Israel.
US and UK claims about training so-called “moderate” rebels reflect smoke-screen cover for working directly with ISIS terrorists – trained, armed and funded abroad, funneled cross-border into Syria to fight Assad, now with US/UK and Canadian air support along with covert commandos on the ground.

The Express cited former British Army General David Richards saying “tanks will roll” as part of UK operations in Syria.
A separate article discussed US airstrikes defending ISIS terrorists serving as US foot soldiers against Assad.
The Wall Street Journal reported what appears ominously like prelude to Libya 2.0 – falsely claiming Obama authorized airstrikes against Syrian forces if they attack (nonexistent) US-supported “moderate” rebels.
Separately, Turkish media reported President Recep Tayyip Erdogan saying Putin may have softened on Assad. (H)e may give up on” him.

Obama said he was “encouraged by the fact that Mr. Putin called him (in late June) and initiated the call to talk about Syria.”
I think they get a sense that the Assad regime is losing a grip over greater and greater swaths of territory inside of Syria and that the prospects for a (jihadist) takeover or rout of the Syrian regime is not imminent but becomes a greater and greater threat by the day. That offers us an opportunity to have a serious conversation with them.
Putin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said both leaders discussed combatting terrorism – especially the Islamic State.
“The Russian view is well-known,” he explained. “(I)t was reiterated by (Putin) during (his) conversation” with Obama. It hasn’t changed.
Putin opposes outside interference by any nations in the internal affairs of others. He supports the sovereign right of Syrians and other people to choose their own leaders and legislators.
Putin aide Yury Ushakov said “the current leadership of Syria is one of the real and effective forces confronting the Islamic State.”

Nothing indicates less Russian support for Assad.
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.

His new book as editor and contributor is titled “Flashpoint in Ukraine: US Drive for Hegemony Risks WW III.”

Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com

Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network.
It airs three times weekly: live on Sundays at 1PM Central time plus two prerecorded archived programs.

The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

No comments: