U.S. Congress Introduces Measure To Limit Civilian Body Armor Sales

Vatic Note:  This is just another of many indications that the powers that be intend to violently go after the American people, in a treasonous effort to globalize all nations and to do so with the cooperation and collusion of the traitors who vote for this bill, in our congress. If they vote for it, then they are right behind the khazars in our efforts. So, I hate to say it, but its getting close to time to "LOCK AND LOAD".   

Finish up all your preps as soon as possible and lets take on these khazars and stop this foolishness.   Tell the Brits to get rid of the current royalty or this will never stop and ARREST EVERY SINGLE ROTHSCHILD ON THE PLANET AND PUT THEM IN THE SAME PRISON THAT ICELAND HAS PUT THEIR BANKERS. 

I think we have found our line in the sand.   They do not want us protecting ourselves from their violence and overthrow of our republic.  This was one way to do it.   They are trying to set up our population here, the same way they set up our military overseas, by leaving them unprotected and vulnerable to maiming, death, destruction, humiliation etc.  We talked about this before.  This is my line in the sand.  I don't know about anyone elses. 

U.S. Congress Introduces Measure To Limit Civilian Body Armor Sales

Congressman Mike Honda of California has introduced legislation to the U.S. Congress that bans “enhanced” body armor sales to civilians. Cosponsored by Robin Kelly of Illinois and Alcee Hastings of Florida, H.R. 5344 prohibits the purchase, ownership, or possession of enhanced body armor by civilians, with certain exceptions. 

The confusing language of the bill and stiff penalties for violating the law have body armor manufacturers and vendors up in arms. (VN: all very treasonous states to our republic.  And all three have heavy populations of dual citizens to our foreign occupied country that hates us with a passion.  Israel needs to stop making enemies and start trying to cultivate friends while they still can.  The illum  families intend to blame everything on Israel and people will believe them, if Israel does not change her ways towards her friends.)

Section 2(b) of the bill, which also covers helmets and shields, defines enhanced body armor this way:

36) The term `enhanced body armor’ means body armor, including a helmet or shield, the ballistic resistance of which meets or exceeds the ballistic performance of Type III armor, determined using National Institute of Justice Standard-0101.06
The language of the bill has left many in the industry scratching their heads, including overseas manufacturers. The bill also specifies the newer Standard-0101.06 instead of the old Standard-0101.04, leaving many armor manufacturers wondering if they would have to recertify products already on the market. The question also looms whether body armor makers would be able to label a product Level III and simply not test to the higher standard to have their products certified for military sales.

According to statements from Congressman Honda’s office the intent of the bill is to keep military grade body armor out of the hands of those who would use it to thwart police response but it’s not clear whether such a ban would actually make the public safer.  (VN: actually it would do the opposite, the public is the target here.   Its to protect the traitors from their betrayed citizens, since they would not be able to kill them with hard kill methods if they had the advanced body armour.)

Adding to the confusion are the exceptions included in the bill. As it’s currently written the legislation provides exceptions for purchases authorized by any department or agency of the United States or a state department, agency, or political subdivision of a state. What that means is even more obtuse and could be interpreted to mean that a political operative could authorize a Level IV tactical body armor purchase.

Possession of body armor by felons is already covered under U.S. law and it’s not clear which agency would be in charge of implementing the new law. The new law further adds prison time of up to 10 years for offenders, a significant punishment for possession of a product that’s primarily defensive in nature.

In September the bill was referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations. At this writing it’s not clear when the subcommittee might schedule a vote.

The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

No comments: