Is Putin Part of the NWO?

Vatic Note:   Its possible that Putin is betraying his sponsors at this point.  Hitler did, but that is not proven for Putin.  How come he is still alive?  Given the expertise these MI6, US CIA, and Mossad have in doing in a leader of another country.

I find it difficult to believe they can't get to him either directly or through some fellow official of Putins, since buying off insiders is a skill they have refined beyond anything else.  Assassinations are their forte, and they  have proven it time and time again.  So, I find it difficult to see how he can remain alive, IF IN FACT HE HAS BETRAYED THE BANKERS.

If he is an insider, then its no different than WW I, WW II, etc,  just the same game with different individual players.   Control both sides of the conflict and direct the outcome with traitors in charge who are paid off. Unfortunately, we have proven on here through other blogs that we are the designated losers of WWIII, and then we will be occupied until the nation is fully under the bankers control.  We must NEVER let that happen.    

It came to light that Putin has billions of dollars sitting in bank accounts, now how did he manage that and from who?   I will leave it to you to guess or deduce based on circumstantial evidence.  No matter what, this was a good article.

How Putin is Part of the NWO
by Alex Newman, Before It's news,   September 25, 2014
(Original by Henry Makow)

Putin does not represent a bulwark against the
New World Order, as many hope.


The Plan is to create regional blocks as a transitional 
step to one-world government. Putin is an active
exponent of this process.

Putin Key Player in the New World Order 

(from- The New American-Edited/ abridged by henrymakow.com)
What if — despite the “East vs. West” and “New Cold War” hysteria whipped up by politicians and the mainstream media — both sides are actually working toward the same goals using largely the same means?  

(VN: As Vatic project has been saying all along in almost all blogs about Putin. Its what the evil bankers did in WW I and WW II, so why change now when its worked so well in the past?  Putin is also in on the WW III plan by the cabal. They will be our occupiers in the "planned" loss by the bankers.  And we know just how barbaric they were in WW II against the unarmed German people including civilians.  They violated just about every condition of the Geneva Convention for treatment of POW's.  To this day, there are still German soldiers working as slaves in Russia. That will be our future if we allow it.  DO NOT GIVE UP YOUR GUNS, NO MATTER WHAT. )

Despite the sabre rattling, globalists on both sides of the East-West divide refer to their goal as the creation of a “New World Order.”

This “order” they speak of, as we shall show, represents, essentially, a global system of political and economic control over humanity. And Putin, a former KGB boss, is following precisely the strategies toward world order outlined openly by the same Western establishment he purportedly stands as a bulwark against. He often refers to his vision as the imposition of a new, “multi-polar” world order. But it is exactly the same order sought by globalist Western power brokers.

Rather than foisting a full-blown totalitarian global government on the world all at once, top globalists have outlined a different strategy. In essence, the plot aims to divide the planet’s people and nations into massive “regions” ruled by supranational institutions — such as the European Union.

henry-kissinger90.jpgIndeed, former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger,left,  has explained the strategy on numerous occasions. Most recently, writing in the Wall Street Journal on August 29, Kissinger said,  

“The contemporary quest for world order will require a coherent strategy to establish a concept of order within the various regions and to relate these regional orders to one another.”   (VN: this from a man charged and convicted of Crimes against Humanity.  I would believe absolutely nothing of what this "lizard" has to say.  He is just looking for a good human meal and a few teens to steal their organs so he can live forever.  Just look at him. He is clearly a lizard, and his organ harvesting is not going to hide what he really is.)

But the strategy is nothing new. In 1995, Zbigniew Brzezinski, architect of David Rockefeller’s infamous Trilateral Commission, outlined essentially the same plan. “We cannot leap into world government in one quick step,” he said. “In brief, the precondition for eventual globalization — genuine globalization — is progressive regionalization, because thereby we move toward larger, more stable, more cooperative units.”

Putin’s saber rattling over Ukraine is providing a rationale for continued Western integration — via the EU, NATO, and the “transatlantic partnership” — to counter the Russian bear.

But in addition, Putin is also pursuing a “New World Order” via the regionalization approach. Chief among the schemes is the “Eurasian Union,” which brings together the regimes ruling Russia, Belarus, and Kazakhstan. Eventually, Putin and his counterparts hope to expand the union to include other former Soviet regimes in the region, particularly members of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS).

In 2011, Putin wrote: “We suggest a powerful supranational association capable of becoming one of the poles in the modern world and serving as an efficient bridge between Europe and the dynamic Asia-Pacific region. Alongside other key players and regional structures, such as the European Union, the United States, China and APEC, the Eurasian Union will help ensure global sustainable development.”

“Sustainable development,” of course, represents the pinnacle of the Western globalist vision for its new order — centralized, global control over every facet of human life.

Eventually, as part of the globalist strategy, the quest for world order will have to “relate these regional orders to one another,” as Kissinger recently put it.

Again, Putin follows the line. “Russia and the EU agreed to form a common economic space and coordinate economic regulations without the establishment of supranational structures back in 2003,” he wrote.  

“In line with this idea, we proposed setting up a harmonized community of economies stretching from Lisbon to Vladivostok, a free trade zone and even employing more sophisticated integration patterns. We also proposed pursuing coordinated policies in industry, technology, the energy sector, education, science, and also to eventually scrap visas. These proposals have not been left hanging in midair; our European colleagues are discussing them in detail.”

Putinparttwo.jpg(Putin and BRIC leaders, that creepy expression again)

In July Putin traveled to Brazil to help establish Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC), which includes all governments in the Americas except the United States and Canada.

It is not just CELAC, founded in recent years by Latin American socialists with strong Sino-Russo support as a “counterweight” to U.S. “imperialism,” that Putin is interested in. In fact, the Russian strongman said Moscow is “open to substantive interaction with all integration formations in the Latin American region.” That would include the Union of South American Nations (UNASUR), the Common Market of the South (Mercosur), the Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our America (ALBA), the Pacific Alliance, the Central American Integration System (SICA), and the Caribbean Community (CARICOM), Putin said in Havana.

Ultimately, as Putin makes clear, the whole world will be involved. “We believe that a solution might be found in devising common approaches from the bottom up, first within the existing regional institutions, such as the EU, NAFTA, APEC, ASEAN inter alia, before reaching an agreement in a dialogue between them,” he wrote. “These are the integration bricks that can be used to build a more sustainable global economy.”

Thanks to Bill!

Source: http://henrymakow.com/2014/09/putin-is-part-of-the-nwo.html

The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

No comments: