As you notice we have not one single ad on the entire blog, so we are not distracting you from the information which is the purpose of the blog, but also from the "thinking" part of educating. Its one thing to get info, but quite another to try and digest and comtemplate what you are reading, while being assaulted with massive ads all over the place. So much of what is out there requires seeing the subtle, as well as the obvious. I know, it happens to me when I visit other sites. That means I have to ask for help once a month.
If we have contributed in anyway to you and you wish for us to continue, and you can afford it, we ask that you contribute to this effort, over on the right hand side of the blog. Thank you so much and Bless you for all your support in this massive effort. We could not do this without you.
Vatic Note: Lets see if I understand this correctly.... Clinton was SOS when these were diverted to Libya and Benghazi ambassador was murdered. Clinton is a pet of Israel, who saw to it she received what was necessary for her to run for the Senate seat that launched her into the SOS position as their "man" at point in State. So, who diverted the missles and who were they for? Who got their hands on them and made them go missing? How did that happen if they were delivered to the distribution center who then distributed them somewhere?
Not one word that would answer any of those questions and all we get told is that the administration is worried that embassies would be attacked? I just don't believe anyone at that level of government that has been smart enough to turn this country into a police state, and is not involved in these missing nukes, would not be screaming these questions to someone, but obviously if they are, its not to newsmax. And if they are not, then they already have the answers and this is beginning to smell like another major false flag in the making.
Its the Zionists who would do this. They did 9-11 and were arrogant enough to say that "9-11 was good for Israel".Well, that would be the case here as well if an embassy is destroyed which would also be good for Israel. They want to attack Iran, which has THE LARGEST JEWISH POPULATION IN THE MIDDLE EAST OUTSIDE OF ISRAEL. You mean these zionists are willing to murder their own people to obtain their agenda? Oh, thats right, they have a history of doing that, don't they?
Israel is the only one who benefits and could pull off such a loss of that many bulky missles and launchers right smack dab in the middle East and in the middle of the murder zone. They need us to attack Iran for them, and our military are refusing to do so. That would push the issue over the edge, very nicely for them. 9-11 did the same for them in invading Iraq. They almost got away with the same thing with the USS Liberty.
There is a saying "You would cut off your nose just to spite your face". This is what Israel is acting like. Think about it, 400 surface to air missles. Notice also the whistle blower made a point not to say who those ".... very ugly people" were. Now, why is that, I wonder out loud. If it were Libyan rebels there would be no hesitation to say so. There would be nothing to hold that opinion back. but their might be if the ugly people were the Israeli's. You read and decide. Something just doesn't smell right here.
Report: 400 US Surface-to-Air Missiles Went Missing in Benghazi
http://www.newsmax.com/newswidget/surface-air-missing-missiles/2013/08/12/id/520026?promo_code=11EFB-1&utm_source=11EFEBefore_Its_News2&utm_medium=nmwidget&utm_campaign=widgetphase1
By Cathy Burke, Newsmax
Monday, 12 Aug 2013 10:12 PM
More . . .
In an interview with Washington, D.C., radio station WMAL on Monday, Beltway lawyer Joe diGenova said he "does not know whether [the missiles] were at the annex, but it is clear the annex was somehow involved in the distribution of those missiles," Breitbart.com reported.
Saying his information "comes from a former intelligence official who stayed in constant contact with people in the special ops and intelligence community," diGenova said the U.S. intelligence community is terrified the missiles might be used to shoot down airliners — and that fear, in part, fueled the closing of embassies in the Middle East last week.
"They were afraid that there was going to be a missile attack on one of the embassies," he said, The Daily Mail reported.
"Remember, you can take a shoulder-held missile and shoot it into an embassy. Not just into the sky."
"That's what this was all about," diGenova insisted. "That's why they're so worried. That's why they have lied repeatedly about what happened in Benghazi, because they are now responsible for all of the stepchildren of violence that happens as a result of this. This is a very serious matter."
DiGenova's wife, Victoria Toensing — a former deputy assistant attorney general — also represents Benghazi witnesses and others with knowledge of the terror attack, according to the Mail.
"A lot of people have come forward to share information with us," he said during the radio station's "Mornings On The Mall" program.
"We have learned that one of the reasons the administration is so deeply concerned" is that "there were 400 surface-to-air missiles stolen, and that they are ... in the hands of many people, and that the biggest fear in the U.S. intelligence community is that one of these missiles will be used to shoot down an airliner," diGenova said, adding that his sources have told him the missiles are in the hands of al-Qaida operatives.
"And it's pretty clear that the biggest concern right now are 400 missiles which have been diverted in Libya and have gotten in the hands of some very ugly people," he said.
DiGenova was U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia for four years beginning in 1983, and later was an independent counsel appointed to investigate a State Department official who ordered politically embarrassing searches of the passport files of Bill Clinton, Clinton's mother, and Ross Perot before the 1992 presidential election.
In 2007, the New York state Senate retained him to investigate then-Gov. Eliot Spitzer over allegations that he ordered the State Police to track the whereabouts of Republican State Senate Majority Leader Joseph L. Bruno when he used police escorts to travel to and around New York City.
Now, diGenova and Toensing, a former chief counsel for the Senate Intelligence Committee, represent Gregory Hicks, the deputy chief of mission at the U.S. Embassy in Libya at the time of the Benghazi attacks; and Mark Thompson, a former Marine who serves as deputy coordinator for operations in the State Department's counterterrorism section, the Mail reported.
The lawyers say Hicks' and Thompson's superiors subjected them to an intimidation campaign after then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's Accountability Review Board ignored their accounts of the Benghazi attack.
Toensing told Fox News in April one of the two men was warned about the impact on his career if he cooperated with Republican investigators in Congress.
"It's frightening, and they're doing some very despicable threats to people," Toensing said, the Mail reported. (VN: well, its about time these cretins started doing this kind of garbage to each other instead of to us all the time. No difference between the parties, they both suck)
"Not 'we're going to kill you,' or not 'we're going to prosecute you tomorrow,' but they're taking career people and making them well aware that their careers will be over." (VN: so how come this publication did not say anything when the Constitutional supporting officers and employees were treated the same way for being patriotic and refusing to engage in treason? Is this a case of "we speak up now since its our ox being gored?")
President Obama has said he is unaware of any witnesses from Benghazi who have been prohibited from working with Congress. Secretary of State John Kerry has attributed such stories to "an enormous amount of misinformation."
In a May 30 letter, CIA Director John Brennan told personnel stationed in Benghazi that they were free to speak with Congress, but that they should involve their chain of command and follow specific procedures, the Mail reported, adding the measure was seen by some as a subtle warning that CIA agents must not approach lawmakers on their own.
© 2013 Newsmax. All rights reserved.
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
No comments:
Post a Comment