...don't like what we put up yesterday, huh? They crashed us and now I am in a coffee house doing it from their computer and writing a bad check for the computer and coffee.... lol So, lets put up another one to show them we are
STUBBORN AND WILL NOT BE DEFEATED.
(PLEASE DONATE AT THE PAY PAL BUTTON SINCE WE ARE SERIOUSLY being
pursued and they are trying to get us off the blogshpere........ its the
only place we are ever going to get the truth or at least close to it. So help us do that.)
THis below fits perfectly with these series we have done on Child abuse and why its big news now. The state wants to take over control of the children and raise them. We covered this below on a previous blog Remember we discussed the artificial womb, and test tube babies brought to term in the artificial womb. They will use our DNA and we will never know who our offspring are.
This guy below sounds like he was the first turn out of a bad experiment. I wonder if he is a clone. LOL He wants to do away with criminal pedophilia by circumventing the process of authority to negate control over kids by their parents. SICKO's MUCHO Sicko's par excellent.
Michael Gove calls for hundreds more vulnerable children a year to be
taken into care, and for an end to 'preoccupation with rights of
biological parents'
Oliver Wright,
Hundreds more vulnerable children a year could be removed from their
parents and placed in care or adopted to prevent them suffering “a life
of soiled nappies, scummy baths, chaos and hunger”, Michael Gove has
signalled.
Tearing up two decades of child protection orthodoxy Mr Gove said the
state had for too long exposed children to “appalling neglect and
criminal mistreatment” because of its “preoccupation with rights of
biological parents”.
And he called for social workers to be “more
assertive with dysfunctional parents, courts to be less indulgent of
poor parents, and the care system to expand to deal with the
consequences”.
Mr Gove’s intervention – his first on child
protection policy – comes after the publication of an independent report
on children’s services at a council which sparked David Cameron’s
pronouncement that Britain had become a “broken society”.
But his
comments drew sharp criticism from social workers who questioned whether
the Government would commit the resources necessary to expand effective
state care. They also warned that there were long term psychological
effects of taking children away from their families.
But In his
speech in London Mr Gove said the case in Edlington brought home the
need for the state to intervene faster and more decisively in child
protection issues.
“The state is failing in its duty to keep our children safe,” he said.
“It
may seem hard to believe - after the killing of Victoria Climbie, after
the torture of Peter Connelly, after the cruel death of Khyra Ishaq –
but we haven’t.
“We are not taking the necessary actions, to
prevent thousands of children growing up in squalor, enduring neglect in
their infancy, witnessing violence throughout their lives and being
exposed to emotional, physical and sexual abuse during the years which
should be their happiest.”
Aides to Mr Gove said evidence
suggested that many social workers had an inbuilt “optimism bias” when
dealing with problem families.
“You might have a mother who is a
drug user with a violent boyfriend but when the social worker visits she
says she has got rid of the boyfriend and trying to come off the drugs.
“When
you look at the case reviews where things have gone seriously wrong you
see that social workers honestly want to believe that things can
improve because it’s a difficult thing to say that I’m going to start
proceeding to take your child away.”
To get round this problem
officials are looking at tightening the thresholds at which child
protection proceedings are begun with further guidance to the courts on
how to deal with cases.
But Mr Gove said the state also had an
obligation to improve the services that young people in care received
along with a push to open up adoption and fostering services.
He
announced a new drive to improve the quality of social workers –
modelled on the Teach First programme which has been successful in
attracting high calibre graduates to teaching.
“I won't deny there
are many things we must do urgently to improve the treatment of and
prospects for children and young people in care,” he said.
“Not
least, to improve the education they receive, to make sure that they
leave school and college with good, valuable qualifications, ready to
progress into HE, work and adult life
.
“But those who point to the
numbers in prison, or suffering mental health problems, or in poor
schools, or without qualifications, or who are unemployed and who are,
or have been in care, and conclude that it is always care that is
responsible for these terrible outcomes are making a terrible error
.
“They
are confusing correlation and causation. It’s as foolish as concluding
that because so many die in hospital, hospitals are bad for your
health.”
But Bridget Robb, acting chief executive of the British
Association of Social Workers, said Mr Gove’s analysis of the problems
and strategy was simplistic.
“Social work professionals will
concur with Mr Gove in recognising that the voice of children should be
heard first and foremost, and ahead of any professional or other
interest,” she said.
“What his analysis overlooks, however, is
that protecting children also involves learning from evidence from
around the world telling us that simply cutting them off from their
birth families is not always in their best interests.
“We need to
be careful to resist taking a punitive approach to struggling families –
an approach that may play well with the media but may fail vulnerable
children who need protection.”
Ms Robb added that none of his solutions – at a time of huge pressure on local council budgets would be cheap.
“The
minister's speech offers no recognition of how part of the state's
‘failure in its duty to keep our children safe’ lies in a refusal to
understand that it requires sustained investment in better services,
whether this is done through intensive work with parents in the family
or by taking more children into care.
“The latter option is not
cheap, and to pretend that social workers can take on ever greater
caseloads with ever diminishing resources is a miscalculation that Mr
Gove surely must recognise.”
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
No comments:
Post a Comment