We had an incident here in Pagosa with someone I know and have known for a long time. A friend of mine applied for a management job at the new Walmart store here, and she was massively qualified. She had been in Pagosa for 19 years and ran her own business here in her field of expertise., was well known and loved, and she started from scratch and grew it into one of the largest of its kind companies, because of her customer service mentality. She retired, and got bored, so she decided to go back to work and applied to Walmart for a management position in the store.
She applied, went through a number of serious interviews, filled out an extensive list of questions with respect to managing staff, and did so well, that Walmart scheduled her for background check and drug testing. They do not do that since its expensive to do, unless they have determined that they would hire her. Well, one of the questions on the background check was age. "What year were you born?"
She believes it was either that question that killed her hire, or it was the answers to her management questions. In either case, Walmart lost an opportunity to hire someone with a proven record of success in managing a business that was a start up and she grew it to the largest in the area, and all of it through customer satisfaction and trust.
Today, the biggest complaint about Walmart, here in our town, is that they have zero customer service for the shopping public. Various depts are laid out weirdly, check out is a joke, and no one around to ask questions to by a needy customer. Since then I noticed just how empty the parking lot is compared to when it first opened. It appears their "top management" are not aware of just how important customer service is in this part of the country, and they are trying to shift the results/consequences of their ignorance in customer service, to the suppliers, by shifting profitability from Walmart's poor management, to the suppliers, as you will see below.
I am also wondering just what kind of impact on Walmart shoppers, the exposure that Walmart was acting as a protected supplier for the globalists to protect military supply routes, using Walmart trucks, facilities, and to also act as a holding facility for those patriots willing to resist the New World Order, especially, if there were no FEMA camps in close proximity? Well, you read and decide. Keep in mind that Pagosa is the new area 51.
FUND RAISING TIME AGAIN. This time we are in a bigger bind than we have anticipated, so we are begging you to donate as soon as possible to help us out of it. I can't go into it right now, but suffice it to say, We can not do our blogs or fund raising campaign, if we are out of business.
Now we are asking for donations toward our $190 deficit this month. If you can afford it, we appeal to you to donate to our cause to keep truth exposed and lies distroyed so we can prepare based on reality.... so help us do that, please use the pay pal button off to the right of this bog.
Thank you for all your support over these many years. I am still trying to find a way to fund this deficit without fund raising. So far, no luck, but I am not giving up, so hang with us until we do. Thank you again and God bless you and your family.
Walmart Collapse Spreads!
By Nathan Layne, Reuters, October 19, 2015
(Reuters) - Suppliers of everything from groceries to sports equipment are already being squeezed for price cuts and cost sharing by Wal-Mart Stores . Now they are bracing for the pressure to ratchet up even more after a shock earnings warning from the retailer last week.
The discount store behemoth has always had a reputation for demanding lower prices from vendors but Reuters has learned from interviews with suppliers and consultants, as well as reviewing some contracts, that even by its standards Wal-Mart has been turning up the heat on them this year."The ground is shaking here," said Cameron Smith, head of Cameron Smith & Associates, a major recruiting firm for suppliers located close to Wal-Mart's headquarters in Bentonville, Arkansas. "Suppliers are going to have to help Wal-Mart get back on track."
For the vendors, dealing with Wal-Mart has always been tough because of its size – despite recent troubles it still generates more than $340 billion of annual sales in the U.S. That accounts for more than 10 percent of the American retail market, excluding auto and restaurant sales, and the company increasingly sells a lot overseas too. To risk having brands kicked off Wal-Mart’s shelves because of a dispute over pricing can badly hurt a supplier.
On Wednesday, Wal-Mart stunned Wall Street by forecasting that its earnings would decline by as much as 12 percent in its next fiscal year to January 2017 as it struggles to offset rising costs from increases in the wages of its hourly-paid staff, improvements in its stores, and investments to grow online sales.
This at a time when it faces relentless price competition from Amazon.com Inc , dollar stores and regional supermarket chains. Keeping the prices it pays suppliers as low as it can is essential if it is to start to claw back some of this cost hit to its margins.
Helped by investments to spruce up stores and boost worker pay, Wal-Mart believes it can grow sales by 3 to 4 percent a year over the next three years, or by as much as $60 billion, offering suppliers new opportunities to boost their own revenues.
QUESTIONS NOT ALLOWED
The squeeze on suppliers was clear to those selling to Wal-Mart’s Sam’s Club warehouse clubs around April this year. Sam’s Club’s buyers summoned major vendors to meetings and told them a "cost gap analysis" showed they should be delivering at a lower price, and demanded millions of dollars in discounts on future purchases, according to emails reviewed by Reuters and interviews with suppliers and consultants involved in the talks.
Unlike in prior talks, which featured give and take, vendors were told they could not ask questions at the meetings, with queries to be handled later via email, according to suppliers and consultants involved in or briefed on the meetings. One food supplier, for example, eventually agreed to cut costs by a few percent, after being asked for a much larger reduction, people familiar with those talks said.
Sam's Club said it is continually talking with suppliers in an effort to save costs and lower prices. Spokesman Bill Durling said the company, whose merchant teams are separate from those at the Walmart chain, had recently changed its structure so that one account head now manages the relationship across various products, with the ability to see across the work of multiple buyers. This was done with the aim of improving merchandise and wringing out efficiencies, he said.
"There might be unpleasant conversations but ultimately we want to do right by our suppliers because we want to create strategic relationships," Durling said. "We want them to be along with us for the ride as we continue to grow.”
NEW FEES SOUGHT
In June, vendors to Walmart stores got word of sweeping changes to supplier agreements that seek to extend payment terms in some cases and introduced new fees to warehouse goods and place product in new stores. Then, in recent weeks, Wal-Mart told suppliers producing in China they should share any benefit gained from the decline in the value of the Chinese yuan.
Wal-Mart spokeswoman Deisha Barnett stressed that it sees its relationships with suppliers as critical to the company's success. "We will work with every supplier to ensure that terms and agreements are mutually agreed upon," she said.
Wal-Mart has told suppliers the new terms are aimed at helping it keep prices low, applying fees more consistently across vendors and bringing its practices in line with industry norms. The charges to store goods in distribution centers and for delivery to new stores are common at other retailers but had not normally been the case at Wal-Mart.
The moves followed February’s announcement that Wal-Mart would hike the minimum pay rate for its workers to $9 an hour by April, and to $10 by February 2016. The first move is costing $1.2 billion this year and the second an additional $1.5 billion next year, including other labor costs, such as placing more department managers in stores.
The additional expense for its workers is accounting for 75 percent of the projected earnings decline in fiscal 2017. Chief Executive Doug McMillon, who became CEO 18 months ago, and other executives said they are seeing a payoff in the form of improved customer service. (VN: not in our store.)
Greg Foran, head of the U.S. business, said on Wednesday the company has assessed that two-thirds of its 4,500-plus stores now have a "passing grade" in problem areas - cleanliness, checkout speed, and other factors affecting customer satisfaction. That is up from just 16 percent in February.
With its stores in better shape, Wal-Mart now is redoubling its focus on beating competitors on price. Over the next three years, the company said it would spend several billion dollars on keeping prices low.
Foran said vendors will benefit. "We lower the cost of goods, which in turn generates savings and we invest that in price. Lower prices see an increase in traffic and basket, which in turn grows sales and gains share," Foran said.
Late last year Wal-Mart broke a stretch of six straight quarters without growth in same-store U.S. sales, and logged a 1.5 percent gain in its second quarter ending in July. But that falls short of Target Inc’s 2.4 percent growth, and Kroger’s 5.3 percent increase, excluding results from sales of gasoline.
Wednesday's announcement sent ripples through the supplier community in the Bentonville area, where more than 1,000 have offices to stay close to Wal-Mart.
"Now we know why they have been pushing so hard," said an executive at a major consumer goods supplier to both Walmart and Sam's Club, adding that his team was shocked by the projected decline in profits. "Maybe they were banking on more suppliers rolling over on the terms."
Wal-Mart's success in boosting profits could hinge in large part on the willingness of suppliers to sign on to its new terms and agree to its price demands. Despite signs of resistance, one consumer goods supplier reckons most will eventually give in to Wal-Mart’s market power, though not without a fight.
He pushed back after the retailer asked him for new terms that cut 2 percent off his annual sales. They settled on 1 percent, but he fears further demands down the road.
“I just worry that this is a slippery slope of them going in this direction," he said.
(Reporting by Nathan Layne in Chicago; Aditional reporting by Tim Aeppel in New York; Editing by Martin Howell)
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.