If it is a false flag, then we cannot count on the test being a valid test, since we maybe the last in a series of major violent attempts to take over our country, we can assume that lying will be used along with trickery to confine us and take our weapons and when that happens, just like other nations and countries, they will have complete ownership of our natural resources. That will be done by the same people who are running the worlds fiat currency system, usury scam and genocide of their indigenous population.
This simply reminds me of more of their deception that they have continually promised us, through various subtle ways, like the sign on their wall in Mossads office "and by deception we will conduct war"...... So, never believe anything they say, even when it is the truth, because that means they are telling us what they intend to do to us. If that is the case, then we probably already know about it and have prepared for it.
As I have stated before, if there is to be a world war, then let it be against the international bankers and the 13 families who use them to finance and coordinate their movement toward a New World Order. Its the most direct way to deal with them. Anything else may well not work. AND DO NOT TAKE ANY VACCINES FROM THE GOV OR CDC, rather go to other outlets not run by our government that have always had ebola shots and use them.
FDA AUTHORIZES USE OF AN UNAPPROVED EBOLA TEST WHICH MAY NEVER SHOW NEGATIVE FOR EBOLA, STATISTICS SHOW
by Admin, Case about Bird Flu, 8/11/2014
*PSEUDO SCIENCE TAKES ON GROTESQUE DIMENSIONS
Dr Strangelove would be proud. The FDA has authorized the use of an unapproved Ebola virus test under a special emergency provision, which may never show a negative result for Ebola no matter how healthy you are, according to the FDA’s own figures.
An instruction booklet issued by the FDA shows that the two PCR systems to be used for Ebola testing in “emergency situations” have never tested negative.
The diagnostic tests developed by the U.S. military have never, in fact, been tested on healthy people without Ebola to see if they accurately identify people without Ebola.
Tables 40 and 54 show that the Ebola diagnostic kit was never tested on any negative specimens and yet the booklet claims a 100% accuracy in detecting people without Ebola in both cases. False.
Refraining altogether from testing Ebola negative blood does not mean the test tube kit is accurate in detecting people without Ebola. It just means there is absolutely no data on its effectiveness in detecting people without Ebola. For all we know, the Ebola tests could give false positive results on healthy people 100% of the time.
Why is not a single negative specimen included in the mock clinical study summary statistics?
Indirect confirmation that the unapproved Ebola PCR tests do not detect healthy people comes from an interview with Matt Boisen, Program Director of Infectious Disease & Emerging Technologies at Corgenix Medical Corp, which is supplying Ebola diagnostic tests to Sierra Leone together with Tulane University.
“PCR testing can also fail to detect EVD cases that have survived the acute viral infection and have developed post-acute or convalescent antibody titers,” says Boisen.
That means the Ebola PCR test is so inaccurate, it cannot detect people who have survived Ebola or who have convalescent antibody titers as someone who is vaccinated with Ebola might have.
In fact, the Sierra Leone government ordered Tulane University to stop ebola testing. These tests are also unapproved.
Jon Rappoport points on that the US diagnostic kits are utterly unreliable.
|Table 40. Mock Clinical Study Summary Statistics|
|EZ1 Detection Assay on the ABI 7500 Fast Dx Platform||Positive Results||Negative Results|
Positive Specimens (2.25 x LoD)
|Positive Specimens (3 x LoD)||15||0|
|Positive Specimens (MAX)||15||0|
|Negative Specimens (100)||0||100|
|Positive Percent Agreement||45/45||100%||92.13%-100%|
|Negative Percent Agreement||100/100||100%||96.38%-100%|
The EZ1 assay correctly identified 45 of 45 specimens spiked with inactivated Ebola Zaire virus at the concentrations shown, including concentrations near the limit of detection of the assay. No negatively spiked specimen rendered a positive reading.
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.