The second thing I want to point out, is there is absolutely NO AUTHORITY WITHIN THE CONSTITUTION for him to do an executive order that violates our rights drafted to protect us from just such action by an out of control government.
This is exactly how the revolution occurred and a revolution is exactly what they need to weaken the nation in every way, in order for us to lose WW III that they are trying to start, poorly, I might add. No one I know is buying into this "poor Ukraine" until after the US, Israel and the EU got their man in who immediately signed a deal with Exxon and BP for their oil and gas.
That is when the entire world reacted and everyone knew it was the Rothschild bankers and probably Britain. Oops, I typed Rothschild and Britain and that error message came up again, after I got rid of it before. I figured it out. When ever I tell you in writing, then it disappears right after I tell you what they did. It just went away again. Thanks for letting me do this. Back to the story......
Several points here:
1. The constitution is clear, THE PRESIDENT IS THE "EXECUTIVE BRANCH RESPONSIBLE FOR "IMPLEMENTING" POLICY PASSED BY CONGRESS. He has no legislative authority of any kind anywhere in the Constitution and that is why they want a constitutional convention.... so they can change all that. The only way he has that authority is if he declares Martial law and he can't do that until we do something outside of our legal rights under that document. That is why I keep saying, wait, do not do any violence until they do. Let them break the law first.
2. Read Zbig Breszinki's Book, "The Grand Chessboard: American primacy and its Geostrategic Imperatives". Its a blueprint for surrounding Russia to isolate her so then they can gain control of all her oil and gas fields along with her diamond, URANIUM and gold mines. Putin works for the bankers or he would never have made it to being KGB, just like Obama worked for the CIA and neither of them have quit yet. So they both still work for the British created and controlled CIA and the Zionists CREATED and controlled KGB, remember, it was the zionist bankers of wall street that did the overthrow of the Czar, and they have had control of Russia ever since and no one moves up the ladder without their say so.
Everything they are doing right now since the invasion of Georgia into Odessa, and now Ukraine, and control of the black sea, fits with what Zbig wrote. This book was actually a very detailed blue print of how to do what they wanted and you can see them following it to a tee. Why do you think Zbig was made Obama's NSA advisor? Take a look at a map and see how this is working except for Iran. They need Iran to complete the surrounding of Russia. Its the Russian people they fear, not Putin. Just a reminder, Hitler worked for the Rothshcilds, and was slated to lose WW II.
3. It is legitimate for everyone to hide their assets and to organize a response between you all for anyone who tries to come and confiscate your guns, food storage and gold and silver. Its an "ILLEGAL ACT" without due process to take anything that belongs to you. You can "LEGALLY" respond. We already have a court ruling recently where the judge said that "A citizen may respond in self defence to a police officer threatening him without due process, such as a fully signed warrant that requires proof to a judge of probable cause.
That was a judge explaining why he threw the case out of court on prosecuting a homeowner who shot a cop who illegally enter his home without a warrant and without identifying himself. The ruling is in part why they need that CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION or a brand new system with no Constitution.
4. World war III is the objective of all this dance around the Ukraine. Its the Russian people who will be fooled, as were we, since the leadership is in on it. They need Russia to stand against American nazi actions created by the zionist infiltrated foreign agents occupying our government. Then the USA will be the one to do the first attack, making us the bad guys, and Russians the good guys as they did in WW II with the Nazi's vs the Allies. Its only now that the true story of Hilter has finally come out and Germany can finally take that anchor off their backs. They needed a revolution by us in order to weaken ourselves so we would lose that war.
5. Finally, "Assets" means food storage, Gold, Silver, guns and ammo. That is why they neglected to list those assets. Depopulation is the goal so that rebellion is dead forever and the elite do not have to worry once they take control and do their golfing, fishing or any other life style pleasure they intend to engage in.
Slavery or Feudal service is the goal for those of us who remain, with no rights protected, with us herded into very tightly controlled limited housing complexes, sort of like an ant colony, or a concentration camp similar to what the Pals are going through, and not enough income to build a life for ourselves. We work, sleep, eat, and die at 40 from GMO slow death attacks on our bodies, radiation from the smart meters in the 300 SFt units they planned for us, along with other soft kill strategies, some of which they have already implemented.
6. Elections are coming up for senate seats and rep seats. They cannot bogus up the election count unless there is a close race. So to avoid a corrupted vote count by the electronic machines, we have to vote together as a group (left and right together) and vote massively bigger for one candidate, than for the other. Do NOT under any circumstances believe a single word the two party candidates say.
I highly recommend voting for a non politician running on either independant or unaffiliated ticket. The other party controlled candidates, you can be sure, are either neocons or neolibs. We have to refuse to listen to ANY ads paid for by either major party. Does the "Party of Change" ring a bell? That is what the big money into these campaigns are all about. Remember, everything they tell you is a lie as we learned from both Bush and Obama.
And for heavens sake, do not let the boogie man "Muslims did it and are our enemy" get into your head either. That arguement was a deep insult to our intelligence. Some bought it, yes, but they are the ones that do not have critical thinking skills or they have an IQ just above 0, or they would NEVER have bought that cannard.... Hope all this above helps. You read this below and decide.
New Executive Order: “Obama Has Just Given Himself the Authority to Seize Your Assets”
http://www.infowars.com/new-executive-order-obama-has-just-given-himself-the-authority-to-seize-your-assets/
Mac Slavo, SHTFplan.com, March 20, 2014
On Monday the U.S. government took steps to seize the US-based assets of Russian lawmakers and anyone else that the US government deemed complicit in supporting the Crimean secession movement.
Image: Barack Obama (Wiki Commons).
We’ve seen the U.S. government do this in countless cases surrounding drug and financial crimes, and sometimes even against foreign leaders like Saddam Hussein and Manuel Noriega.
What makes this particular instance so unprecedented and terrifying is that President Obama went so far as to issue a new Executive Order to give himself the authorization to do so, because the laws of the United States are such that our government is not allowed to simply take someone’s bank assets, home or business without due process.
Here’s the kicker.
The new Executive Order doesn’t just apply to just Russians or foreigners. It gets blanket coverage, so even American citizens could now face asset forfeiture if their actions are deemed to be “contributing to the situation in the Ukraine.”
Be careful what you say. Be careful what you write. President Obama has just given himself the authority to seize your assets.
According to the president’s recent Executive Order, “Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Ukraine” (first reported by WND’s Aaron Klein), the provisions for seizure of property extend to “any United States person.” That means “any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person in the United States.” (VN: As you can see WND is telling you the truth, but directing you away from what the "reason" is for it. WND is an Israeli funded conservative "controlled opposition" publication. They even have one reporter full time in Israel, and they banned me and others for even mentioning Israel or Zionist bankers. So that tells you a lot, it certainly told me a lot. The real reason is the confiscation of food storage and the gold, silver, and weapons. Time to find a place to bury them in such a way as to hide them, but also allow you to have ready access to what you need.)
Via: The Ron Paul InstituteLike most Executive Orders and government legalese, the definitions for why an individual would have their assets seized under this directive are extremely broad and they could, for all intents and purposes, be used against anyone who supports Russian interests, or simply argues against those of the United States.
You can read the full Executive Order at the White House web site. The key points are noted below:
All property and interests in property that are in the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within the possession or control of any United States person (including any foreign branch) of the following persons are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in: any person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State: (VN: Geithner is SOT and would control such assets, and Kerry (kohen) is SOS and both work for our foreign occupying gov. What does that tell you? Its time to start prosecuting these bankers, like Iceland, and Ireland are doing. They were smart and did it before they could not. Then prosecute anyone who tries to enforce that EO. Its treason. Freedom of speech is a God given right protected under our Bill of Rights. )
(i) to be responsible for or complicit in, or to have engaged in, directly or indirectly, any of the following:This new Executive Order has crossed a very dangerous line. It’s one that turns the notions of property rights and due process upside down by effectively bypassing the U.S. Constitution.
(A) actions or policies that undermine democratic processes or institutions in Ukraine;
(B) actions or policies that threaten the peace, security, stability, sovereignty, or territorial integrity of Ukraine; or
(C) misappropriation of state assets of Ukraine or of an economically significant entity in Ukraine
While we’re sure the President and his staff would argue that such a law would never be used against Americans who are protected by free speech, the fact is that the Executive Branch now believes it has the self-manifested authority to target any individual who engages in activities that undermine US interests abroad or at home.
If a President of the United States believes he has the authority to make it illegal for you to provide support to Russia by way of political commentary, charitable donations or other methods, could he also use similar directives to push forward other agendas?
President Obama has already re-authorized an E.O. giving him the ability to seize farms, food, processing plants, energy resources, transportation, and skilled laborers during national emergency.
The next Executive Order could come in the form of restrictions on firearms advocacy or target those who speak out against policies like government mandated health care. All it would take is the declaration of a national emergency and they can essentially do as they please.
Is it prudent to give a single person the ability to force such actions down the throats of the American people without Congressional oversight or Judicial review?
This article was posted: Thursday, March 20, 2014 at 6:32 am
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
No comments:
Post a Comment