Michael Hastings,The reporter who brought down General McCrystal, OBVIOUSLY murdered by bomb on gas tank

Vatic Note: We just scheduled a blog for the next day after this one, or maybe its the same day, but its called the "boston brakes", and its about the assassination technique of using the car computer to take control of the vehicle of the target and do with the car that which you wish in order to assassinate them.... its what happened with Diana and others you will read in that blog.  In reading it, this one came to mind.  
Again we don't know and those in charge of the investigation will either be part of the conspiracy or too afraid to go against those controlling it. Anyway.... read that blog and think about the elements of this one as well. Its amazing how much we do not know.  I keep saying that, but one good thing about all this disclosure, is, is expanded our knowledge of our world and holy toledo, it is so much more than we ever dreamed.  Much of which we did not know could exist, much less would exist.

He does an excellent job because he downloaded the original news photos from the accident, and was able to pull them up after they were gutted from the public access.  It is the definitive proof that this was another false flag, as you will see clearly below.  There is no doubt that one scene was the production scene (day time photos) and the other the real McCoy (night time photos right after it happened).

As is typical for most of the recent false flag attacks, early on, we get all kinds of speculation as to what happened.  Then comes the researchers who try to put what happened together and why it happened and we are in that phase right now.  This is one of three I have read so far.   A different one, that reported early, has it as just an accident with some speculation that it could be something more sinister.

Then there was one that speculates that a wolf drone is what blew him away, since that would easily explain the drive shaft being blown so far away from the car, and then there was this one below.   I picked this one since he is right on about the car and the differences between them and the positioning of the trees.  Also it was late at night and people were conveniently there to take photos supposedly.

But its the official photos before and after that make this suspect and now for why?  Apparently Hastings was working on some story and we are trying to find out which story and why. So far, it has to do with Petreas, but I can't confirm that so we will have to wait til someone else gets more info on it.  Will update as we find out more.  As of today, this is the best documented and analyzed critique of what happened.

Be sure and check back as more info comes in.  I have no doubt this will be fully cleared up given the talent that pursues these issues.   We are millions and the evil ones are only a few thousand, plus they are handicapped with their egos, arrogance and total lack of spirit life, adaptability, and creativity......  We win.

Michael Hastings OBVIOUSLY murdered by bomb on gas tank 
http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/hastingsmurdered.html
by Jim Stone, freelance Reporter

This report is now finished and VASTLY improved. Please re-copy and paste, after a LOT of analysis it's really damning.

Permalink

"For all 3 of those normal reasons, which account for virtually all car fires in modern cars, the fire would have started in the engine compartment, progressed slowly, and scorched the hell out of the paint before ever reaching the gas tank. That clean paint is the be all tell all, Michael Hastings was murdered, and the rest is detail."

UPDATE: Accident scenes switched. They swapped cars and locations to hide explosive damage, PROOF IS BELOW

UPDATE: It seems to me that Hastings may have been dead, his car parked there, and then blown up with him in it. This is because the flames are way too fresh for the car to have been there long, there is no impact damage where the car "struck the tree" to cause a gas tank explosion, and there are no flames on the road behind the car to indicate it was blown up while it was moving.

This appears to be a classic mafia hit, where you are killed and then burned in a car to hide the evidence. In this case, they obviously used a bomb to blow the gas tank as evidenced by the fact that the rear portion of the car is blown open and shredded with the rest of the car nicely intact, read the initial analysis below. And obviously, there was no high speed crash as reported by the lie factory. I will be working on this throughout the day.

It was perfect to have this happen on a late late Tuesday night, the quietest night of the week, one so quiet that many restaurants will not open. This would have helped ensure a proper setup with few witnesses.
Take a look at the following screen capture of this "crash" and observe a few things:

 















(VN: this is the most important photo of the initial crash.  As you can see off to the left a resident is putting water on the flames as its burning, while a news photographer was taking photos, but look at the front end of the car, and the side, which is smooth and no serious bumps or damage. There is even a sheen to the side door up front. The front end is not even lined up with the base of the tree anywhere, he is near a street light that has something around the base and the front end of the car is on the back side of the street lamp. The back side of the car is missing and its why no fire, nothing there to burn. This is important to remember as you travel down into the other photos.)

1. There is no impact damage to this car. The only damage there is BLOWN OUT in the back, not smashed in the front and it obviously missed the tree as it rolled to a stop. The front bumper is obscured by the tree, all the way to the tire, OOPS! (VN: Worse, its not even a tree, its a street lamp)

2. This was a Mercedes, not a Pinto, which means it did not burst into flames on its own. One (seldom quoted) eyewitness said the car "exploded". Interesting stuff.

3. Here is where it starts to get REALLY damning - LOOK AT THE FRONT PASSENGER DOOR. The paint is PERFECT yet the entire car is ablaze. This means that whoever photographed this was on scene right away, with a camera ready to film this in the wee hours of the morning, and nail it before the fire scorched the paint. HMMMMMM . . . . . .

4. Unlike what the so called single "eyewitness" report says about a high speed crash, the car did not impact a tree. The car did not impact ANYTHING. Look at where the car stopped. The car went off the road at a few miles an hour and missed the tree as it rolled to a stop. 

5. There is no damage to the front of the car, it has no frontal impact damage AT ALL, it is blown out in the back and not crunched in from the front. HOW ON EARTH DID THAT BLOWN OUT BACK END HAPPEN?

AND FINALLY, THE MOST DAMNING THING OF ALL - 

Here we have a car FULLY, and I mean FULLY in flames, from front to back, with NO SCORCHED PAINT because the flame is too new, which means the flame went from the back of the car to the front of the car instantaneously, at the same time it breached the floor and engulfed the passenger compartment before it had a chance to scorch anything, which means ONE THING - A BOMB ON THE GAS TANK, and a PHOTOGRAPHER READY TO SNAP THE PHOTO VERY EARLY ON. 

Even rapid car fires take time to progress through the car, and totally scorch the paint as they progress. Only a bomb could have blown gas through the floor to the inside of the passenger compartment and under the car all the way to the front of the engine compartment and lit the whole thing up at once. 

That's the only explanation for the shiny paint while it sits completely engulfed in flames. That flame did not progress through that car, it was blown through it with force and the photographer was on the scene the moment it happened and bagged a perfect shot. I'd like to know how that happened - early morning walk?  (VN: with a camera, serendipitously?)

I'd like to also mention something here - Sheriff Larry Dever was most likely killed by an ECM hack, because he was driving something big and needed a serious high speed accident. With me, when they tried, the incident was with a semi because I was driving a Geo Metro. 

And in the case of Michael Hastings, his car was such a safe one that you could not guarantee a death in an incident with a semi, and also could not guarantee a death in a high speed crash. I'd bet Hastings wore his seat belt all the time, and Dever did not, and the murderers would know these details before doing it. So to have Hastings definitely dead, kill him first, put him in his car, and blow the gas tank. 

It may have been possible to remote control the car to where it is with the engine computer via an ECU hack with the oh so convenient Federally mandated always on 3g cell connection to the heart of the car's control computer with Hastings dead the entire time, and just blow the bomb when the car was where they wanted it. Mercedes are extremely advanced, and it is possible Hasting's car was full drive by wire.

No matter how you slice this particular pie, a Mercedes is not just going to explode into flames without a little assistance. Car fires in new cars happen for three main reasons - running the engine out of oil, or running the engine out of coolant, or after an absolutely huge car mangling accident, having the hot side of the battery short out against the frame before it reaches the fuse panel. And for all 3 of those normal reasons, which account for virtually all car fires in modern cars, the fire would have started in the engine compartment, progressed slowly, and scorched the hell out of the paint before ever reaching the gas tank. That clean paint is the be all tell all, Michael Hastings was murdered, and the rest is detail.

Update: LOCATIONS CHANGED AND PHONY WRECK USED TO HIDE EXPLOSIVE DAMAGE FOR DAY TIME PHOTO OP

Here is what they want you to believe

But that is not consistent with this: And notice the trees.

All of these photos are from the same news video. One question - Why is there a sheet on the front of the car in the photo below? Why are the trees not the same as in the original photo above? Where is the blown out section at the rear of the car, which is CLEARLY visible in the original photo above?

 

The answer is obvious. THEY SWITCHED CARS AND LOCATIONS FOR THE DAY TIME PHOTO OP. Look at both of these pictures, you can clearly see the car is not the same. The location is not the same. On top of that, why is the car still there the NEXT DAY, 10 hours after the crash, when wrecks always get towed away within a couple hours, as soon as the flames are out? Why is the front end not mangled in the original photo, or even the tree for that matter?(VN: This car is also not a mercedes)

For the day time photo op which should not have been possible anyway (it would have been towed long before) they used a different location with different trees, and interspersed the night time fire photos and the daytime shots with those of a different wreck to show pictures of a car that was not destroyed by a bomb. Just look and think, it is OBVIOUS.

This is so far out there that I had to double and triple confirm I did not screw this up, and indeed I did not, ALL of the photos are frame captures from the exact same news video. They TOTALLY blew it with this one. This is as screwed up as Woolwich.

A note to the setup crew: When you produce your garbage, REMEMBER, it is going to be analyzed by a LOT of brilliant people, and if you are STUPID your efforts won't cut it. I am ashamed of you, SURELY the old world Russia or maybe East Berlin would have done this A LOT BETTER. 

A note to the world: Take a look at what is here, and REMEMBER THIS THE NEXT TIME YOU SEE A BUNCH OF HYPE ABOUT WHAT A GREAT FREE COUNTRY AMERICA IS. THEY DO THIS TO JOURNALISTS AND WHISTLEBLOWERS HERE.  (VN:  and dissidents now, as well as left and right activists, and gun manufacturers)

For those of you who do not know, Michael Hastings was the Rolling Stone reporter who interviewed Assange, brought down General McChrystal, and did several other high level exposures of government corruption.

UPDATE: The original newscast videos have been entirely expunged from the web, and entirely replaced with the LoudLabs video.

The Loudlabs video STILL intersperses two car wrecks, but they try to explain it away by repeatedly showing different angles of the crash, to make you think you did not see it right at first. But look at the FIRST SHOT in the Loudlabs video, you can see the entire intact car that is not crunched AT ALL, with the front of the car obviously missing the tree and obscured behind the tree.

The Mexican guy the police talk to said the car was on fire before it arrived at the tree, and in the LoudLabs video they do a close up, and you can see bullet holes shot in the car, two in the drivers door and several just behind the drivers door. Something is really strange here. Remember, this happened in Hollywood. Who knows what is real? Bullet holes in the drivers door followed by a high speed crash are just as damning as no crash and a gas tank bomb. If Loudlabs faked this, what good did it do?

Farganne keeps asking why I think the crunched car is fake. Here is my answer:

In the first shot, even in the loudlabs video, that car is intact, with no parts thrown from the front of the car anywhere in sight. It's a clean scene, except for debris surrounding the back of the car as would be if a bomb went off back there. It is in normal condition with the door seams matching as if there was no crash, sitting there burning, with the frame straight and the front passenger tire straight.

Then later, loudlabs intersperses another wreck, where you can clearly see the passenger door is badly crumpled, the front passenger side wheel is bent, and the front of the car is totally obliterated with shredded metal high in the air, and the car totally rammed into a tree.

Those two images DO NOT MATCH AT ALL.

Photo 1. No passenger side impact, no mangled front end, perfectly straight door and fender, and no debris from the front end:
                                                   

Photo 2. SEVERE PASSENGER SIDE IMPACT and extreme carnage, with lots of debris
                                                           

That means that ONE of them is special effects. Guess which one? And if there are ANY special effects, LoudLabs is BUNK.

And what about this tree? Why is the bottom not burnt at all? Why did they scrape off the char at the bottom? To provide an "impact mark"? Furthermore, if this was a 100 mph crash as fronted, that tree would have a lot more than just surface damage that could be scraped off.
                                                         

---

The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.