*** this was purged and I found it again and reput it up, but shortly after, by about 3 hours, there has been a complete shift in reporting with everyone now saying this was a hoax or false flag. Now Veterans Today has come out with an article saying the same thing and videos.
Story #1
I have decided to put one of the most interesting videos by CNN, up on the blog because this is the whole family of supposedly one of the victims who was a teacher.Watch the families reactions to the questions and note how smiling they are, and not traumatized at all. Its seriously bizarre.
These people doing all this are absolutely insane and need to be committed to an institution for life. Read what the uploader said. He/she said it better than I could. I believe the problem is, psychopaths have no clue how real humans would react to such horrific acts against their children... so they can't pretend and that is how they get caught.
Not a word about any of what you will read below, by Gordon Duff and he saw the same thing I saw and this uploader saw. I think you will see it too so why didn't he say something? Another thing that should have been said. If we can see this is a false flag than so can the police and any fed investigators, so that means they are in on the scam.
If that is the case, we should be demanding an independant investigation and prosecution of those committing the murders, or frauding the public, which ever it turns out to be. I think the disinfo guys are being exposed and I find it interesting that its happening on 12/21/12. Just a thought
Uploader Dropzip, Published on Dec 19, 2012
So I've been watching videos lately on how big news events in America and around the world are all staged (not all but most of them), but back to this Incident dealing with Vicki Soto and the Sandy Hook shooting...Honestly I think the whole Sandy Hook Incident was staged, but this video is one of the most important reasons why and other important reasons.
First of all pay attention to the way Vicki's family is reacting in this interview, mainly her father , but notice the playful smirks and body language from her brother and sister around the 20 sec and 31 sec mark, the body language of the youngest sister and brother are not even of a person that just lost a sister and notice the constant blink rate of all the family members (tons of blinking means lies). (Watch video and especially the father.... rest of comments after video)
CHECK OUT THIS VIDEO AT :58 AND LOOK AT THE OLD GUY OFF TO THE LEFT OF THE SCREEN. He gives the BAPHOMET HAND SIGN-(HAND SIGN OF SATAN - WHAT THE HECK IS GOING ON HERE?
CHECK OUT THIS VIDEO AT :58 AND LOOK AT THE OLD GUY OFF TO THE LEFT OF THE SCREEN. He gives the BAPHOMET HAND SIGN-(HAND SIGN OF SATAN - WHAT THE HECK IS GOING ON HERE?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=SmMnFUJhLA8
Now to the father, anyone can tell that this man doesn't want to be apart of this video his body language is negative throughout the whole interview, how could a father be so disgruntled and annoyed from questions asked about his supposedly daughter (Vicki Soto).
Notice at the 2 30 mark when Piers ask about the green ribbons and the father instantly looks like its all a bunch of made up bologna he even drops his head, looks down, and constantly blinks over and over. To make things worse at the 2:40 mark when Piers mentioned that the snow was a sign from their sister notice the father smirk, it was like he was thinking (really Piers you couldn't come up with any more better scripted bologna than that) the supposedly father doesn't even look like he belongs with that family.
Notice at the 2 30 mark when Piers ask about the green ribbons and the father instantly looks like its all a bunch of made up bologna he even drops his head, looks down, and constantly blinks over and over. To make things worse at the 2:40 mark when Piers mentioned that the snow was a sign from their sister notice the father smirk, it was like he was thinking (really Piers you couldn't come up with any more better scripted bologna than that) the supposedly father doesn't even look like he belongs with that family.
Now on to Carlee, go to her twitter page @ICarlee23 and look at her photos look at the one with her best friends and check out there twitter pages and look at the weird post and whats even more weirder is that half of her followers and friends followers are fake.
Some of the girls in the pics claiming to be carlee best friends are not even following her and they all make weird post to what are clearly bots, but back to the last thing I have for you and this is one of carlee supposedly best friends she tweeted a photo up with four but one I am focused on is @MelindaAnn__.
I thought this was pretty strange click followers on her name and once that is done go up to the url and you should see this twitter(dot)com/MelindaAnn__/followers but what I want you to do is remove followers and backslash from the name remember stay on that page because it only works when you click on her followers for some reason, but after you remove the followers characters and the backslash, hit enter and watch what happens.
I know weird as fuck right? The name pops up as the same name of one of Carlee supposedly best friends but the only thing is the page is a bot and had the same first name of the follower I told you to just look up but the bot first name was Melinda, middle Ann, and guess what, the last is Soto, I don't know if its gonna work for you guys because I tried to go back previously and it didn't work for me but here is the bot facebook account link facebook(dot)com/melindaannsoto.
You will arrive to a page with no post and a bunch of fake friends and pics, and the strange thing about carlee friends Melinda she has two first names as her first and last name on twitter Melinda David, now doesn't that seem pretty fishy to you, I dont know what will. By the way I do not own any copyrights to this video, and I will leave on this note "YOU BE THE JUDGE"!!!!!
If you don't believe that CNN or other major outlets would do something like this just watch this vid youtube(dot)com/watch?v=jTWY14eyMFg more staging done by the media and this was years ago, WAKE UP PEOPLE this is the only way we will survive.
STORY #2 -
This below was the original blog that got purged and I have redone it, and added on an update above)
Vatic Note: I put this up because all that he says until the last paragraph is true. Then he proceeds at the end to completely change what was said by our founding fathers and interprets it the way the power structure would want it to be interpreted. Only those serving in the national guard have the right to bear arms and guard the liberties of the people.And the people do not. Gee, what a surprise.
It is a surprise that military people would EVER say that since they are the ones that have to defend that document and the country it covers. Yup, disappointed actually. No one knows better than he does that tyranny raises its ugly head when a citizenry are unarmed. Switzerland requires every household have a gun and they fashioned their constitution after ours.... what does that tell you? The state of Georgia mandated every household have a gun and since that happened, crime has dropped 74%. Wow.
I have said all along that these disinfo manipulators do this... all the time. They tell the truth through the majority of the discourse and at the end they now want you to trust them becuase they told the truth, and then do what they recommend.
THIS GUY IS RECOMMENDING UNARMING ALL OF US EXCEPT THE NATIONAL GUARD. lol Sorry, but that was soooo obvious, that I had to put it up for you see. Now watch this become the theme through out the propoganda campaign. See if I am not right about this. I hope I am wrong, but I doubt it.
He is also perpetuating the myth that the poor dupe who got shot was the perp, and not a word about the other two guys and all the guns that were in the car. If I remember correctly, the one in the trunk of the car was the one that shot the kids. Then I have a blog up showing this may well not have even occurred and the entire thing is a production.
He also doesn't mention that if that is the case, that changes his scenario to fit our right to bear arms. If our own government is occupied by a foreign power and they did this, then we better damn well have our guns for sure. Because it shows how far they are willing to go to kill children to get their agenda. We, then are on our own, and must defend ourselves and our children.
I state clearly that I do not know which one it is, but there was clear and solid evidence it was not the shooter they say it was. He also doesn't mention the coincidence of both this so called shooter and the one in Aurora both had fathers supeonaed to testilie in the Libor scandel currently underway globally.
This is a big deal and a very big case... that no one is talking about, ESPECIALLY THE MSM, is that why this was done??? But why didn't he mention any of that since its all out there with proof all over the place including police radio calls that support that it was a false flag and proof about both fathers...a coincidence?
The Wait just a g*dd*m Second Amendment
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/12/19/the-wait-just-a-goddam-second-amendment/
By David Swanson, Veterans todayThe Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution reads:
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
George Mason’s original draft reads:
“That the People have a Right to keep and to bear Arms; that a well regulated Militia, composed of the Body of the People, trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe Defence of a free State; that Standing Armies in Time of Peace are dangerous to Liberty, and therefore ought to be avoided as far as the Circumstances and Protection of the Community will admit; and that in all Cases, the military should be under strict Subordination to, and governed by the Civil Power.”
Mason’s Virginia Declaration of Rights had put it this way 12 years earlier:
“That a well-regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defense of a free state; that standing armies, in time of peace, should be avoided as dangerous to liberty; and that in all cases the military should be under strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil power.”The Right-To-Bring-Assault-
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State … “Bearing arms in a well-regulated militia did not mean bearing guns that can reliably shoot well, since such didn’t exist. It certainly didn’t mean bearing guns that can kill entire crowds of people without reloading. It didn’t mean bearing arms outside of the well regulated militia. Much less did it mean bearing arms in school and church and Wal-Mart. (VN: IT meant exactly what it said and it consider protection against "ENEMIES DOMESTIC" and "FOREIGN INFILTRATORS TO OUR GOV TRYING TO DO A COUP". And they have all those weapons you mention in the paragraph, which means we are to be similarly armed. Our founding fathers meant that we should be equally armed and proved it by the fact that these massacres are done by our foreign infiltrated government and thus "THE SECURITY OF A FREE STATE" IS AT HAND. It was not meant just to protect against foreign invasion but also against domestic warfare as that which is going on right now as we speak. its been proven who killed those children of ours and it was not the militia, it was state sponsored. WE WILL NOT GIVE UP OUR ARMS.)
By “free state” many supporters of this bill of rights meant, of course, slave state. And by “people” they meant, of course, white male people — specifically people who would be taking part in well regulated militias.
The Third Amendment reads:
“No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.”The Second and Third amendments originated as restrictions on what we would later create and come to call a Military Industrial Complex, a permanent war machine, a federal tool of abusive power.
The militias of the Second Amendment are meant to protect against federal coercion, popular rebellions, slave revolts, and — no doubt — lunatics who try to mass-murder children.
The descendants of those militias that we call the National Guard are meant, in contrast, to recruit ill-informed young people who imagine they’ll be rescuing hurricane victims into endless occupations of oil-rich lands far from our shores.
To comply with the Second Amendment we must end federal control over the National Guard, regulate such state militias and police forces well, regulate their weapons well, and deny such weapons to all others and for any other use.
The Second Amendment has been made to mean something very different from what was originally intended or what any sane person writing a Constitution would intend today. This means that we must either reinterpret it, re-write it, or both.
David Swanson’s books include “War Is A Lie.” He blogs at http://davidswanson.org and http://warisacrime.org and works as Campaign Coordinator for the online activist organization http://rootsaction.org. He hosts Talk Nation Radio. Follow him on Twitter: @davidcnswanson and FaceBook.
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
No comments:
Post a Comment