We want to reassure you that we work very hard to find and ferret out truth and with so much deception, its been almost a full time job. While this is a work of love, we need your support to be able to continue. We will put up a fundraising report the next time donations come in to let you know how we are doing. Thanks and bless you all.
UPDATE: 11/16/12 - I think we were spot on in our analysis below. New news report just out says that the replacement for Petraeus as head of CIA is non other than the big spy for Israel in America, JANE HARMON. Oh, my, is that blatant? That means AIPAC is who got the General removed and their own deep embedded spy in, so they don't have to flirt with the law anymore. They can get it all from the Horses mouth. Apparently they made a deal with her that if she spied, they would promote her for the job of director. That means the entire petraeus affair was a complete set up planned way in advance. I wonder if the Broadwell woman was a plant???
Vatic Note: While Rockwell makes very good points and a valid speculation on what has gone on behind the scenes, I have a gut feeling it is different than what he supposes. Its the Israeli's that set Petraeus up, and yet, it was the neocons that work for Israel that did Libya Ambassador, and it was the Israeli team in our White House, sitting and watching the so called murder of the ambassador as if they knew about it in advance.
Hillary, Panetta, and Geithner, who is the Obama handler for Israel, were the ones watching the entire episode from scratch. Cameras were there, ready and rolling. Military men tried to go to the ambassadors aid and were either arrested, or ordered to stand down. That is why the neolib Panetta, a civilian, was placed in charge of the Dept of defense, so the political agenda could be met, rather than doing what was right.
It was Petraeus that was removed from head of DOD and replaced by Panetta. Then shortly after that, it was Panetta that told congress, when asked about invading these countries, that he was waiting on the UN and international community to get the decision to invade.
That upset some, and only a few of the congressmen, that the power to make those decisions were no longer in the hands of Congress, or the White House rather in the hands of the international or (NWO) leaders. We did a whole blog on that. Basically, Panetta was rejecting the Constitution without proper methods for doing so. The military was beginning to realize the NWO was controlling our nation and that it is treason.
So, I believe there was a whole battery of these men who know that Obama is a pawn for the neocons and neolibs and Israel; and their agenda did not include a powerful military with a win in WW III, rather we are the designated losers of that war like Germany was in WW II and Russia in WW I.
The neocons, neolibs, and Israel, have been trying to instigate a local national civil war, revolution or something to weaken the nation so it would be easy to bring it down in order to lose WW III. I proved it with documentation to all of the things they have done to affect our military readiness, and to weaken the resolve of the armed militia. In fact we put up a blog today about the real possibility that the explosions that happened in Indiana and killed someone was in fact a drone attack against just such a leader.
Its not proven at this point, but the evidence is compelling and is being updated all the time. I honestly believe it was done without the knowledge of either Petraeus or other pentagon officials. Remember, PRIVATE CONTRACTORS IN WAR, HAVE BEEN HIRED and the military is completely out of the loop on what is happening. Its treason if I am right and the military would have known that and acted.
I believe that is why McCrystle and Petraeus had to go. They were adament about saving the ambassador militarily and they were shut down by the state dept. Didn't Hillary, Geithner and Panetta say they were not coming back during Obama's second term? Not sure on that one since I have not seen anything since the first I heard about it. If so, then they did it because they got caught and not because it was wrong, and we all know how Israel feels about getting caught. Deception is the name of the game and that means they did not deceive as the khazars would have done, bad goyim. As usual, you read and decide.
Petraeus and the Fierce Struggles for Imperial Power
http://lewrockwell.com/douglas/douglas67.1.html
by Jack D. Douglas
Recently by Jack D. Douglas: The Lull Before the Social Storm
Even totalitarian regimes in which "one man dictatorship" is what people outside see are riven with fierce struggles at the top. Hitler by the late 1930's was about as close to being a one-man dictator as anyone ever is. He is still referred to that way routinely in the U.S.
But that was the Public Front he worked furiously to maintain while carrying out fierce struggles of many kinds against the SA heads, against most of the General Staff of the Wehrmacht which was led by the top General Ludwig Beck, and against many other plotters, some of whom eventually joined von Stauffenberg's Valkyrie plot to kill Hitler and sue for peace with the West.
I and many other people have been writing about these struggles at the top in the U.S. for many years. They were fierce in the Vietnam era of the 1960's and into the 1970's and involved many conspiratorial groups from the generals to the FBI, the Kennedy and LBJ coalitions, and so on. They are every bit as fierce now.
The U.S. government, Fed, et al., have produced The Greatest Financial Crisis in history and are digging this Black Hole deeper and deeper; they have triggered vast catastrophes in the Middle East and Central Asia, especially in Afpak; they have pushed Western investment in China which has transformed China from a poverty stricken cauldron of civil wars into the most mighty industrial power and a great power in general; they have recently been threatening a Global Financial Implosion by threatening a Great War against Iran which can shut down the Persian Gult oil, and wars against Russia and China that could become nuclear showdowns.
There are vast political and military and secret police conflicts over all of these. These are life-and-death issues for the U.S. Empire and nation and it is impossible to get agreement among all the elites who are "All In" on the Empire and nation in such life-and-death issues, especially in a nation as torn as the U.S. is, just like totalitarian Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy, Stalin's USSR, Imperial Japan and FDR's U.S. Anyone who has seen historically truthful movies about any of these will remember some of the striking portrayals of political revolts against the "one man dictators" or "party dictators."
Though the conflicting elites and agencies are carrying all of these vast struggles out in great secrecy, with leaks in the vast Media Warfare involved in all of this, and struggles cut in many directions and change over time, some general properties of the Big Picture of the struggles for power now seem reasonably clear.
The top U.S. military people in the Army and Navy and many officers and grunts at all levels are clearly extremely angry at the political leaders who are largely fighting each other to a state of near paralysis. The Army brass and to a lesser extent the Navy brass have in recent years been largely making the decisions about the wars and potential wars. I have argued, for example, since Bush 2 and his Neo-Con conspirators began strangling Iran that the military brass has been quietly opposing such a vast war that could produce a global implosion, that this has continued for the most part in opposition to the Obama conspirators and Israelis conspirators who keep tightening the nooses around Iran. [For one thing, I cannot imagine the Navy admirals have become so incompetent that they would actually support having their most vital ships in the Persian Gulf pond with vast Russian-Chinese, top-grade missiles and much else within striking range from the vast nation of Iran.] I think they have mostly been appalled by Obama's flip-flops in the Middle East and his support of utopian schemes like "Democracy in Syria" which are producing vast chaos and possible armageddon at the middle of all that oil and gas and vast populations.
These subterranean struggles broke out into the open when Gen. Petraeus' subordinate in Afghanistan, Gen. McChrystal, went along quietly with his top staff officers openly making fun of political leaders around Obama which got into Rolling Stone. I believed then and believe now that those officers were just expressing the secret views of almost all competent officers from the field to Petraeus at Central Command and that they directed their contemptuous spoofing at Biden only to avoid directly showing contempt for the Emperor. Biden is actually knowledgeable about foreign affairs, while Obama knows very little and entered the White House very ignorant.
I think the officers, especially those top brass in Afghanistan, have gotten more furiously opposed to the politicians recently as the politicians moved quietly behind the scenes to try to get a Fig Leaf Agreement with the Taliban and other major guerrilla groups of Afpak so the U.S. can withdraw behind the fig leaf to avoid looking like losers right away and deserters of the totally corrupt and incompetent Karzai regime the U.S. imposed by corruption on the Afghans.
This would make Obama et al. popular at home and allow them to deal with bigger, more deadly crises at home, but it would make the "All In" brass the "Losers," very much like Westmoreland et al. were hung out to dry and swing in the winds in Vietnam by LBJ, Nixon et al. [N.B. I totally support getting out--and never getting ALL IN anywhere. But I can understand how the brass and so many lower officers and grunts and their families feel--betrayed.]
Petraeus has been one of the top, secret opponents of the politicians, in my estimate the "top dog" of what has been emerging slowly as the Real U.S. government behind the political front in Washington. The politicians and the FBI, probably the only secret police agency they can count on along with the Secret Service, set out certainly by the time of the McChrystal eruption, to secretly set up these conspirators to regain control over them. They did this with all the SOPs of secret police from the early days of the Soviets, Hitler and the Gestapo and special ops, FDR and Hoover, et al. They use "honey pots" to lure them into crimes and scandals, informants to spy on them, traitors to lie about them, and on and on.
When Benghazi erupted into massive public view Obama et al. quickly started a SOP op to shift blame to others, such as the CIA, by lying in all necessary ways. Petraeus made it clear he was not going to take the blame as Director of the CIA and the latest internecine struggle was on. The Obama-FBI plot to get Petraeus by giving him a deal he can't refuse was set in rapid motion to keep him from testifying as head of the CIA to the Senate Intelligence Committee, an admiral in command of an attack carrier Task Force near Iran and Libya was summarily removed from command, the Seal officers who revealed some of the Lies of Obama's Hero Story about killing bin Laden were strongly reprimanded and their careers almost certainly ended in the near future, and it keeps erupting.
I think the politicians immediately seized their reelection as a proof of their power to try to put down the military and secret police conspiracies and they were flying sky high with hubris so they did not think much of the dangers of doing this.
No one who is not at the heart of these vast, conspiratorial struggles for power at the top of the U.S. can have any clear idea of where they are now headed. I doubt the conspirators really do, though anyone sky high on Hubris may think he knows and can make whatever he wants happen.
I certainly do not have prophetic powers to predict the outcomes of such vast power struggles at the top of the Greatest Empire in history. My best guess is that anything can happen. This seems very explosive and seems to be getting more so in the midst of these vast crises the U.S. and the world are trapped in now. I keep wondering what might have happened to Hitler when he managed to outwit and betray Beck and most of the other top staff officers of the Wehrmacht and Abwehr [military intelligence], if those officers had commanded many thousands of Special Ops killers and Hitler had not long before started the vast SS with their personal allegiance all down the line to him. And what might have happened to De Gaulle as Pres. of France when he pulled out of Algeria and let the brass take the blame as "Losers," if the brass in Algeria had had their own jets and Special Ops and helicopter assault ships and Hell Fire drones.
Oh, of course, such things cannot happen in the happy Let's Pretend land of the U.S., no matter what happened to people like JFK and Nixon who tried to get control of the brass and CIA and negotiate a withdrawal from Vietnam and a detente with the Soviets that they fiercely opposed. Things like that can't happen in the U.S. any more than Great Financial Crises and military defeats by small peasant nations can.
Perish such thoughts and have a nice day.
Still, I have to admit all of this makes me a bit queazy and glad I'm not in the White House. Maybe knowing the history of other empires and this one makes me a wimp.
_______________________________________________
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
No comments:
Post a Comment