http://www.legitgov.org/FBI-Thriller-Published-1999-References-911
Last updated: 03/10/2011, provided to vatic by Lori Price, Editor, CLG Newsletter
The CLG received an email, including an interesting observation by Suz. Suz notes that the events of 9/11 were mentioned in a thriller published two years earlier. An FBI thriller, The Edge, by Catherine Coulter, was published in 1999. The book is part of Coulter's ongoing 'FBI Thriller Series.' The Edge reached number six on The New York Times Best-Seller List for fiction on the 5th of September 1999.
Given the contents of the book, one wonders whether or not the FBI deserves credit for collaborating on the plot. A scan of Coulter's thriller includes the following sentence on page 19: “Maybe I had a chance not to be, in the Counter-Terrorism section; particularly after 9/11 when the world had changed” (19, emphasis added).
The Edge was copyrighted by Catherine Coulter in 1999. The paperback version was released in 2000. The events of 9/11 hadn't happened yet.
The vaticinations of Catherine Coulter’s book beg several questions. How did this writer predict that a major terrorism event would occur on 9/11? Who is this author? What if any connections does she have to the government?
If this modern Nostradamus is not a government agent, we wonder why she hasn’t been tapped to deliver advanced notice of other major world events. (VN: or shot since that is what they do to those that can ruin their plans)
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
6 comments:
I just came back from the library where there was an original hard copy of The Edge, dated 1999. It was page 22 in this one and there was no 9/11 reference.
So, the author added the line about 9/11 and also the al Qaeda mention later or it’s a hoax right on up to the google books version.
Good point, ON THE SURFACE, but ask yourself some questions that definitely would need answering before drawing those conclusions that you limited. First question is the library copy a reprint and what year? Was it after 2001? Further question would be "Who is the publisher" of the reprint and who is on the board of directors?
After those are answered, you can begin to see a third option with certain answers. The third option is they caught the reference or even planned the reference like they do with movies now that tell us what they plan on doing. Why? Because its a very big part of their covenant with satan. They must tell us what they intend to do and thus its our responsibility if we do nothing about it. For some reason they get extra bonuses for doing that. Since I am not a Satanist I don't really understand why.
Oh, forgot to say, "and that is why they may have pulled it after the fact on all subsequent reprints. The key would be to find one in a used book store somewhere from the original printing and check it out then. You could well be right, but we would not know that until we get the other questions answered.
I asked the librarian if she could determine if it was a first edition. She said to the best of her knowledge it was. The only date in it was 1999. The publisher was Penguin Putnam.
For what it's worth an ebook version from 4shared did not contain the 9/11 reference.
http://www.4shared.com/document/7_toxGfe/Catherine_Coulter_-_FBI_04_-_T.html
But the google books version does.
http://tinyurl.com/49wlmwk
I can find nothing in my searches to indicate Penguin Putnam had more than one hard cover printing.
I'm wondering where the scan of page 19 came from and what year the google books version was put in place?
I suppose the next step would be to find a first edition 2000 paperback and see how it reads.
I know this is not a major 9/11 issue but right now my inclination is that this is a Cass Sunstein type infiltration just for a little diversion.
You know, after reading your first comment and having time to think about it, I started to wonder as well, "who would be messing around with something like that and for what purpose" and then it hit me. There are blogs and articles all over the place that now assume Israel through mossad in conspiracy with the big mogel money players on wall street, did 9-11 and this may well be a way to deflect the focus from them back onto something else.
Now, having said that, remember their were war games on the 9-11 type attacks back as early as 1996, so its not out of the realm of possibility that someone did get ahold of that fact and decided to use it in the book as an interesting factoid. Or they knew about the plans and stuck it in there to warn us, or it was intentional as I mentioned before.
But what you said about the Khazar Sunstein, fits perfectly with what I thought after reading your comment. Good going. I like critical thinkers.
Post a Comment