Vatic Note: Yes, the military does use private contractors because they can kill people willy nilly without accountability, however, each state is sovereign when it comes to crimes and if they are not military, then they are "private" and the state or local government can prosecute them under criminal local and state laws and enforce those laws. I believe that is why the military had the NDAA bill make sodomy legal in the military.
Remember in Iraq early on in the invasion, soldiers were filmed sodomizing children in front of their parents to get them to talk, and that was illegal, so the military soldiers were prosecuted and jailed. They had been working with the CIA who has been using such tactics in black ops an d done so for decades. Gradualism is occurring right before our eyes.
They are slowly legalizing practices that are criminal. Katrina and blackwater was also another such scandel. If they are not military they can be shot for using military tactics against us and we would be legal in defending our lives against private individuals attacking us. That is the good news.
But the military is different, so they legalized such practices to keep from being held accountable for them. I pointed that out when the bill passed, but no one had read it and that is why it was shoved down their throats without reading it. Same happened with the patriot act, where ISRAEL WAS GIVEN IMMUNITY FOR WHAT SHE HAD DONE ON 9-11 AND IT WAS ALSO PASSED WITHOUT READING IT.
Lately, I have begun to realize that those who refuse to see what is going on with all the evidence attached, and won't take a stand either verbally or in any other way, are the reason the evil ones are able to succeed and therefore, those in heavy denial are actually responsible for the nations demise and thus are our enemies as well. Its time to change how we see these things and let those in denial know it. That may wake them up.
Blackwater Scandal | The Shadow Military
Remember in Iraq early on in the invasion, soldiers were filmed sodomizing children in front of their parents to get them to talk, and that was illegal, so the military soldiers were prosecuted and jailed. They had been working with the CIA who has been using such tactics in black ops an d done so for decades. Gradualism is occurring right before our eyes.
They are slowly legalizing practices that are criminal. Katrina and blackwater was also another such scandel. If they are not military they can be shot for using military tactics against us and we would be legal in defending our lives against private individuals attacking us. That is the good news.
But the military is different, so they legalized such practices to keep from being held accountable for them. I pointed that out when the bill passed, but no one had read it and that is why it was shoved down their throats without reading it. Same happened with the patriot act, where ISRAEL WAS GIVEN IMMUNITY FOR WHAT SHE HAD DONE ON 9-11 AND IT WAS ALSO PASSED WITHOUT READING IT.
Lately, I have begun to realize that those who refuse to see what is going on with all the evidence attached, and won't take a stand either verbally or in any other way, are the reason the evil ones are able to succeed and therefore, those in heavy denial are actually responsible for the nations demise and thus are our enemies as well. Its time to change how we see these things and let those in denial know it. That may wake them up.
Blackwater Scandal | The Shadow Military
Published by Military Channel on Jul 23, 2013
Because they lack the rigidity of the military and have been hired in part for the flexibility they possess, the government contractor, Blackwater, may gone too far in an incident at Nisour Square, Baghdad in 2007.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=EEchS3sdldc
For More, Visit .....
http://military.discovery.com/tv-show...
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
4 comments:
Tried watching this video. Screen went completly black on me. Had to power off and then on again to get back to your website.
Yes, Beth, they are seriously messng with us indeed. Our count is way down, so you are not the only one they are not allowing on. Its not our government, I found out, its Israel. So, they can't do it permanently, they do not control the net, but they can do enough to thwart and make it hard to read and see what we are putting up. We must be hitting right on the nub of the issues. I believe this blackwater scandel is key to a lot of things. First of all they work under contract with the Zionist bankers on American soil, AGAINST AMERICANS. I did not know that when I started this, but I am researching and more is coming out, if I can hang onto what I am finding.
Tonight they logged me out of my own site, and I had to log back in again. That means they have direct access to my blog. That is another rabbithole I intend to go down. Are you ready, Google?
Yep!
I have had my PC been taking over and trawled for information, but what they don't realize is, I sent my stuff right into their ball park.
If I do stuff on Jews an Israel, I send it to Jewish papers, Jewish Rabbis:
WHY DO NON JEWS HATE JEWS?
GENTILES IN HALACHA
Foreword -- Daat Emet
For a long time we have been considering the necessity of informing our readers about Halacha's real attitude towards non-Jews. Many untrue things are publicized on this issue and the facts should be made clear. But recently, we were presented with a diligently written article on the subject, authored by a scholar from the Merkaz HaRav yeshiva -- so our job was done by others (though we have already discussed some aspects of this issue in the weekly portions of Balak and Matot). Since there is almost no disagreement between us and the author of the article on this issue, we have chosen to bring the article "Jews Are Called 'Men'" by R' David Bar-Chayim (in Hebrew) so that the reader will be able to study and understand the attitude of the Halacha towards non-Jews.
In this article R' Bar-Chayim discusses the attitude towards "Gentiles" in the Torah and in the Halacha and comes to an unambiguous conclusion:
"The Torah of Israel makes a clear distinction between a Jew, who is defined as 'man,' and a Gentile."
That is to say, any notion of equality between human beings is irrelevant to the Halacha. R' Bar-Chayim's work is comprehensive, written with intellectual honesty, and deals with almost all the aspects of Halachic treatment of non-Jews. It also refutes the statements of those rabbis who speak out of wishful thinking and, influenced by concepts of modern society, claim that Judaism does not discriminate against people on religious grounds. R' Bar-Chayim shows that all these people base their constructs NOT on the Torah but solely on the inclinations of their own hearts. He also shows that there are even rabbis who intentionally distort the Halachic attitude to Gentiles, misleading both themselves and the general public.
For the English readers' convenience we will briefly mention the topics dealt with in R' Bar-Chayim's article:
Laws in regard to murder, which clearly state that there is Halachic difference between murder of a Jew and of a Gentile (the latter is considered a far less severe crime).
A ban on desecrating the Sabbath to save the life of a Gentile.
A Jew's exemption from liability if his property (e. g. ox) causes damage to a Gentile's property. But if a Gentile's property causes damage to a Jew's property, the Gentile is liable.
The question of whether robbery of a Gentile is forbidden by the Torah's law or only by a Rabbinic decree.
WHY DO NON JEWS HATE JEWS?
PART 2
A ban on returning a lost item to a Gentile if the reason for returning it is one's sympathy towards the Gentile and compassion for him.
The sum which a Gentile overpays in a business transaction due to his own error is forfeit; whether a Jew is permitted to intentionally deceive a Gentile is also discussed.
One who kidnaps a Jew is liable to death, but one who kidnaps a Gentile is exempt.
A Jew who hurts or injures a Gentile is not liable for compensation of damage, but a Gentile who hurts a Jew is liable to death.
One who overcharges a Gentile ought not return him the sum that the Gentile overpaid.
A Gentile -- or even a convert to Judaism -- may not be appointed king or public official of any sort (e. g. a cabinet minister).
One who defames a female proselyte (claiming that she was not virgin at the time of her marriage) is liable to neither lashes nor fine.
The prohibition to hate applies only to Jews; one may hate a Gentile.
One may take revenge against or bear a grudge towards Gentiles; likewise, the commandment "love your neighbour" applies only to Jews, not to Gentiles.
One who sees Gentile graveyards should curse: "Your mother shall be greatly ashamed..."
Gentiles are likened to animals.
If an ox damaged a Gentile maidservant, it should be considered as though the ox damaged a she-ass.
The dead body of a Gentile does not bear ritual impurity, nor does a Gentile who touches the dead body of a Jew become impure -- he is considered like an animal who touched a dead body.
One is forbidden to pour anointing oil on a Jew, but there is no ban on pouring that oil on a Gentile because Gentiles are likened to animals.
An animal slaughtered by a Gentile is forbidden, even if the ritual slaughter performed was technically correct, because Gentiles are deemed like animals. (Daat Emet does not agree that this is the Halachic reason for invalidating a Gentile's ritual slaughter -- but this is not the place to delve into the subject).
Their members (PENIS) are like those of asses" -- Gentiles are likened to animals.
Between the Jews and the Gentiles -- In the Aggadah, the Kabbalah, and in Jewish Thought
R' Bar-Chayim's arguments and conclusions are clear, Halachically accurate, and supported by almost all the existent major Halachic works. It would be superfluous to say that R' Bar-Chayim fully embraces this racist Halachic outlook as the word of the Living G-d, as he himself pointed out in the "Conclusion" of his article:
"It is clear to every Jew who accepts the Torah as G-d's word from Sinai, obligatory and valid for all generations, that it is impossible to introduce 'compromises' or 'renovations' into it."
On the other hand, we want to make it clear that Daat Emet -- as well as any reasonable people who do not embrace Halachic laws as the word of the Living G-d -- are repulsed by such evil, racist discrimination.
In the Hebrew text we have abridged the second part of R' Bar-Chayim's article,
"Between Jews and Gentiles -- In the Aggadah, the Kabbalah, and in Jewish Thought," because, in our view, the Halacha is the law which obligates every religious Jew while concepts of the Aggadah, the Kabbalah, and Jewish thought are not binding on anyone, as our rabbis have already written:
"And so the Aggadic constructs of the disciples of disciples, such as Rav Tanchuma and Rabbi Oshaya and their like -- most are incorrect, and therefore we do not rely on the words of Aggadah" (Sefer HaEshkol, Laws of a Torah Scroll, p. 60a); we have expanded on this issue in the portion of Vayeshev.
Post a Comment