Vatic Note: Ok, something strange is going on here. First of all, Both the United States, European countries, and Israel have underground nuke hardened bunkers. Further, Goldman Sachs practically owns China, since they got such a huge foothold in that country sometime after the Nixon Kissinger team went in and sold us out to the internationalist bankers. Nixon didn't know what they were doing, but when he found out he rebelled and that is why they brought him down. Goldman Sachs also runs our country. I laugh whenever anyone says "Obama is authorizing this, or he is doing that, or he said this "..... why? Becuase he has absolutely no say in anything, he is used to blame and take the heat for what Goldman Sachs decides through their infiltrators in the Federal Reserve and the US Treasury dept.
Geithner was serious when he told the G-20 that "Obama doesn't make decisions, I do". Remember, Geithner is the "tax evading criminal" that works for Goldman sachs and his father worked for the CIA. Now, having said all that, what is going on with this accusation as if this were news. That was exposed way back early on shortly after it happened. Now we also know that Putin is minor Royalty in Russia and is in on the game. The head of China is a Oxford graduate. British control, does this begin to sound vaguely familiar? It was Britain that pushed for the UN, it was Britain that pushed for Israeli recognition as a country, it was Britain that gave Rothschild the City of London as his very own little feifdom. It was Britain that helped to create the CIA who reports to no President, and they did it through MI6. In July 2009 Kissinger was sent to Russia to reassure Putin that Americans would be under control by Sept. Why? And why did Obama send him and not Hitlery??? Because Obama decides nothing, it was Rockefeller that sent Kissinger. Shortly after that Russia took military occupation of the Arctic Circle. Why? Lots of questions with no answers. Now, all of a sudden after this was discussed for months, the Japanese reporters are now saying something??? Is it to stir up the pot??? Is it because we ARE REFUSING TO FIGHT IN WORLD WAR III EXCEPT AGAINST THE INTERNATIONAL BANKERS AND ISRAEL OR UNLESS FOREIGN SOLDIERS TOUCH THEIR FEET ON AMERICAN SOIL, AND THEN WE WILL SEE WHAT WE WILL SEE.. Drones won't help them.
Japanese Journalist Accuses Israel Of Fukushima Sabotoge
http://theintelhub.com/2011/10/24/japanese-journalist-accuses-israel-of-fukushima-sabotoge/
American Free Press
By Richard Walker
October 24, 2011
A leading Japanese journalist recently made two incredible claims about the Fukushima power plant that suffered a nuclear meltdown in March 2011, sending shockwaves around the world.
First, the former editor of a national newspaper in Japan says the U.S. and Israel knew Fukushima had weapons-grade uranium and plutonium that were exposed to the atmosphere after a massive tsunami wave hit the reactor.
Second, he contends that Israeli intelligence sabotaged the reactor in retaliation for Japan’s support of an independent Palestinian state.
According to Yoishi Shimatsu, a former editor of Japan Times Weekly, these nuclear materials were shipped to the plant in 2007 on the orders of Dick Cheney and George W. Bush, with the connivance of Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert.
The shipm
ent was in the form of warhead cores secretly removed from the U.S. nuclear warheads facility BWXT Plantex near Amarillo, Texas. While acting as the middleman, Israel transported warheads from the port of Houston, and in the process kept the best ones while giving the Japanese older warhead cores that had to be further enriched at Fukushima.
Shimatsu credits retired CIA agent and mercenary Roland Vincent Carnaby with learning the warheads were being transported from Houston. In a strange twist, Carnaby was mysteriously shot dead less than a year later by Houston police at a traffic stop.
He was shot once in the back and once in the chest. He did not have a weapon in his hands. Intelligence sources said he had been tracking a Mossad unit that was smuggling U.S. plutonium out of Houston docks for an Israeli nuclear reactor.
In an even more explosive charge, the journalist says that 20 minutes before the Fukushima plant’s nuclear meltdown, Israel was so upset with Japanese support for a Palestinian declaration of statehood that it double-crossed Japan by unleashing the Stuxnet virus on the plant’s computers.
The virus hampered the shutdown, leading to fallout from a section of the plant housing uranium and plutonium retrieved from the warheads supplied in 2007.
While it is impossible to verify some of Shimatsu’s claims, there was a massive cover-up at the time of the Fukushima disaster in March. Explosions at the site were immediately downplayed. While it was subsequently reported that three reactors suffered meltdowns, Japanese authorities tried to rate the disaster as a Level 4 on the International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale, although outside experts declared it a 7, which is the highest level.
Something worth noting is how in 2009, two years after Shimatsu says the warheads were secretly moved to Japan, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) issued a veiled warning to Japan not to abandon its anti-nuclear weapons policy.
The IAEA had to know, however, that Japan has long retained the potential to build nuclear weapons. That was made clear as far back as 1996 when a leaked Ministry of Foreign Affairs document exposed how Japan had been promoting a dual strategy in respect to nuclear weapons since the mid-1960s.
It would often publicly profess a non-nuclear policy while maintaining the ability to build a nuclear arsenal. The Liberal Democratic Party, which has dominated Japanese politics, has always said there is no constitutional impediment to nukes.
A factor that undoubtedly would have encouraged the Bush-Cheney White House to provide Japan with the means to secretly build nukes was the growing power of China. Cheney and Bush sought to arm Japan and India with nuclear weapons as a means of curbing China.
H/T Zen Gardner
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
1 comment:
These charges seem rather far out. It is too easy to make charges but there should be hard evidence to support them.
Post a Comment