*** OK, they switched the times on the schedule for this one on me burying it behind another blog. I have redone it back to where it was, but that means overseas has missed out on the news. That also means we have struck on something here and they do not want anyone to even think abuot this since that is the only time they do this to us. Its how I can always tell when we have hit on something. Check it out for sure now..... there is something in here they do not want us to see since its been in all the papers so its not trying to hide the actual news report. Could it be that its the vatic note about her refusal to do something they wanted done? So they did this either in reality or a bogus arrest in order to slur her good name? Remember they did this very same thing to Krauss of the IMF in NY with the rape of a housekeeper for the hotel and it turned out she was an agent of some sort for the Powers that be. I don't know, they never tell us why they do this to us. However, we can read and deduce for ourselves what best fits the truth in this case. .
Vatic Note: This is how bad things have gotten in our lack of trust of all our institutions. Its not just the United States, either, its every western nation that has this Satanism at the very top. The first thing I asked myself when reading this was what horrors the elite wanted her to do that she refused resulting in the creation of this story with the complicity of the MSM that does the khazars bidding?? Another thought that came to mind, was, "She is a Satanist" and Satanic Ritual Sex Abuse is a part of their power grab from the ruination of innocence. Big pay off for that act." Ask Jon Bennet Ramsey. Sex today, has taken the place of animal sacrifices and child sacrifices by burning that went on in the old days under the Pagan God Molech.
Then it hit me she is just part of the leadership cabal of Satanism, however, the press and law enforcement never go after those doing this, (or both Bushes would be in jail right now) so, again, I asked myself, "What did she refuse to do that resulted in this exposure that other leaders never suffer?" Whatever it is, it must have been really bad because she was involved in helping to try and pass along the live avian flu virus in the vaccines that were being pushed on us. If the court had not ruled against the forced innoculations, we would probably all be dead or sick as dogs by now.
So, just how horrible is their push for weapons, biologically to use against us, remember the 89 dead microbiologists and the PAX American report from the neocon think tank run by Cheney that says to use bioweapons for political purposes??? Makes one question the level of disease they had planned that she was willing to take the heat for this by not agreeing to doing whatever it was. Somehow, I think we may never know unless they go forward with it anyway, but at least given this happening, we will know its a false flag and respond appropriately to those doing it.
See how things are turning against them? Its not certain they will prevail since nothing is working for them anymore. EXPOSURE HAS INCREASED and transparency is dominating the entire polical landscape. No wonder Rockefeller (Jay) was waving his arms about screaming "The internet is ruining everything", but what he does not know is without it, they can't track what we are finding out, and doing about it and it keeps us at the keyboard and off the streets. That is what they need. Us talking instead of out in the field acting. If we ever do, then it has to be underground and leaderless. THIS is your NWO, how do you like it so far????
Vatic Note: This is how bad things have gotten in our lack of trust of all our institutions. Its not just the United States, either, its every western nation that has this Satanism at the very top. The first thing I asked myself when reading this was what horrors the elite wanted her to do that she refused resulting in the creation of this story with the complicity of the MSM that does the khazars bidding?? Another thought that came to mind, was, "She is a Satanist" and Satanic Ritual Sex Abuse is a part of their power grab from the ruination of innocence. Big pay off for that act." Ask Jon Bennet Ramsey. Sex today, has taken the place of animal sacrifices and child sacrifices by burning that went on in the old days under the Pagan God Molech.
Then it hit me she is just part of the leadership cabal of Satanism, however, the press and law enforcement never go after those doing this, (or both Bushes would be in jail right now) so, again, I asked myself, "What did she refuse to do that resulted in this exposure that other leaders never suffer?" Whatever it is, it must have been really bad because she was involved in helping to try and pass along the live avian flu virus in the vaccines that were being pushed on us. If the court had not ruled against the forced innoculations, we would probably all be dead or sick as dogs by now.
So, just how horrible is their push for weapons, biologically to use against us, remember the 89 dead microbiologists and the PAX American report from the neocon think tank run by Cheney that says to use bioweapons for political purposes??? Makes one question the level of disease they had planned that she was willing to take the heat for this by not agreeing to doing whatever it was. Somehow, I think we may never know unless they go forward with it anyway, but at least given this happening, we will know its a false flag and respond appropriately to those doing it.
See how things are turning against them? Its not certain they will prevail since nothing is working for them anymore. EXPOSURE HAS INCREASED and transparency is dominating the entire polical landscape. No wonder Rockefeller (Jay) was waving his arms about screaming "The internet is ruining everything", but what he does not know is without it, they can't track what we are finding out, and doing about it and it keeps us at the keyboard and off the streets. That is what they need. Us talking instead of out in the field acting. If we ever do, then it has to be underground and leaderless. THIS is your NWO, how do you like it so far????
CDC Director Arrested for Child Molestation and Bestiality
By Dr. Mercola
Dr. Kimberly Quinlan Lindsey, a top official with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has been arrested and charged with two counts of child molestation and one count of bestiality.Dr. Lindsey, who joined the CDC in 1999, is currently the deputy director for the Laboratory Science Policy and Practice Program Office. She's second in command of the program office.
__________________________________________
Story at-a-glance
- A high-ranking CDC official, who played a significant role in the 2009 H1N1 propaganda campaign, has been arrested and charged with two counts of child molestation and one count of bestiality (VN: now you know why the Germans and the Dutch wanted pedophilia legalized)
- As an official in charge of CDC health recommendations for all American children, her actions raise troublesome questions about her level of concern for the health and well-being of children in general
- Other recent stories raising questions about the ethics and integrity of the agency include documentation showing that the CDC has never obtained any input from toxicology experts to assess the health effects of water fluoridation, and the recent fraud indictment of Dr. Thorsen—hired by the CDC to debunk the link between thimerosal in vaccines and autism
__________________________________________
"Authorities also charged Lindsey's live-in boyfriend, Thomas Joseph Westerman, 42, with two counts of child molestation. The two are accused of 'immoral and indecent' sexual acts involving a 6-year-old ... The bestiality charge says Lindsey 'did unlawfully perform or submit to any sexual act with an animal.'"Prior to that role, she was the senior health scientist in the Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response, an office that oversees the allocation process for $1.5 billion in terrorism preparedness.
Some of you may wonder why I've chosen to discuss this story. Some may think it's in poor taste and doesn't belong in a newsletter about health. However, I believe it's relevant to be aware that someone in charge of your child's health is allegedly engaged in child abuse. Her actions raise serious questions in my mind about her level of concern for the health and well-being of children in general.Between January and August last year, Dr. Lindsey and her boyfriend allegedly involved the child during sex, and DeKalb County police claim they discovered photographs of Lindsey performing sex acts on a couple of her pets.
Dr. Lindsey Played Primary Role in Bogus Swine Flu Propaganda Campaign
As you may recall, the 2009 H1N1 swine flu pandemic turned out to be a complete sham, with a fast-tracked and particularly dangerous vaccine being pushed as the sole remedy. Children and pregnant women were the primary targets of this dangerous vaccine. The H1N1 flu was a perfect example of how the CDC can brazenly distort reality, and often ignore and deny the dangerous and life-threatening side effects of their solution. As a result of this bogus propaganda campaign, thousands of people were harmed (and many died) worldwide.
In August, it was revealed that the 2009 H1N1 influenza vaccine increased the risk for narcolepsy—a very rare and devastating sleeping disorder—in Swedish children and adolescents by 660 percent.
Finland also noticed a dramatic increase in narcolepsy following vaccination with Pandemrix. There, an interim report issued in January of this year found that the H1N1 vaccine increased the risk of narcolepsy by 900 percent in children and adolescents below the age of 19. In the US, the H1N1 flu vaccine was statistically linked with abnormally high rates of miscarriage and stillbirths. As reported by Steven Rubin on the NVIC's blog, the US H1N1 flu vaccine was SIXTY times more likely to be reported to VAERS to be associated with miscarriage than previous seasonal flu vaccines.
The only "winners" in this game were the pharmaceutical companies that received millions of dollars for this never-proven-effective and highly reactive vaccine, while being sheltered by our government from liability for any harm it caused.
Dr. Lindsey played an important role in that campaign, which ended in tragedy for countless many—not from a killer flu (statistically, the 2009 H1N1 flu was MILDER than usual) but from the dangerous and expensive "remedy" to this oversold non-threat.
All of that said, I do want to stress that Dr. Lindsey has not yet been found guilty, and there are still many unanswered questions relating to this case. But this is not the only shocking story raising questions about the ethics of those involved in creating the CDC's health recommendations.
The CDC's Stance on Water Fluoridation—Another Misleading Recommendation
Take water fluoridation for example.
Documents released under the Freedom of Information Act show that since the 1970's, the dental health professionals in the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) have had sole control over the agency's stance supporting water fluoridation.
The CDC is part of a larger administrative structure that provides intra-agency support and resource sharing for health issues that require the input from more than one area of expertise. Other offices that share information and expertise with the CDC include the National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office of Minority Health and Health Equity, and the Agency for Toxic Substances. The general assumption has been that the agency used a broad range of expert input to evaluate fluoride before reaching the decision to support water fluoridation.
After all, since fluoride is swallowed, it stands to reason it may have an impact on your whole body, not just your teeth.
Yet the documents show that no CDC toxicologists, minority health professionals, experts in diabetes, or others outside the Oral Health Division had any input into the agency's position.This flies in the face of what the agency claims, and what water-, health- and political leaders have believed about the way the CDC operates. Without these additional experts from other fields, can we reasonably believe that the agency has properly assessed the research on whole-body harm from fluoridation? The documents have drawn attention once again to the CDC's and EPA's fluoride safety statements, which appear completely at odds with current scientific knowledge, and the fact that no outside experts from related fields were ever included may very well explain this discrepancy.
CDC Doctor who "Debunked" Vaccine-Autism Link Indicted on Fraud
Another shocking case involving the CDC is that of Dr. Poul Thorsen, who, after being found to have falsified documents, was indicted on fraud, money laundering and tax evasion after stealing somewhere between $1-2 million in research grant money from the CDC.
Here you might wonder why I'm faulting the CDC, as the organization was the victim of fraud. The reason I fault them is because they hired Dr. Thorsen to debunk the link between thimerosal in vaccines and autism—which he did to their satisfaction. However, CDC officials may have played a significant role in "guiding" this research to their desired end, and now that Thorsen has been exposed as a fraud, the agency still upholds his research as being of high caliber.
As explained in a 2010 article by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.:
"Thorsen was a leading member of a Danish research group that wrote several key studies supporting CDC's claims that the MMR vaccine and mercury-laden vaccines were safe for children. Thorsen's 2003 Danish study reported a 20-fold increase in autism in Denmark after that country banned mercury based preservatives in its vaccines. His study concluded that mercury could therefore not be the culprit behind the autism epidemic.
His study has long been criticized as fraudulent since it failed to disclose that the increase was an artifact of new mandates requiring, for the first time, that autism cases be reported on the national registry. This new law and the opening of a clinic dedicated to autism treatment in Copenhagen accounted for the sudden rise in reported cases rather than, as Thorsen seemed to suggest, the removal of mercury from vaccines.
Despite this obvious chicanery, CDC has long touted the study as the principal proof that mercury-laced vaccines are safe for infants and young children. Mainstream media, particularly the New York Times, has relied on this study as the basis for its public assurances that it is safe to inject young children with mercury -- a potent neurotoxin -- at concentrations hundreds of times over the U.S. safety limits."
Were CDC Officials in on the Fraud?
Emails released in response to FOIA filings by parents also show that Kreesten Madsen, one of Dr. Thorsen's research partners, had acquiesced to the wishes of CDC officials who wanted to cherry pick facts in order to prove vaccine safety. Furthermore, according to an April 28 report by Natural News:
"From February 2004 through June 2008, says the DOJ indictment, Thorsen allegedly submitted over a dozen fraudulent invoices requesting reimbursement for expenses that were fabricated. Interestingly, these allegedly fraudulent invoices were signed by a laboratory section chief at the CDC, indicating that someone inside the CDC was either duped by Thorsen or potentially involved in the alleged fraud.
… This is the great untold story of an alleged criminal ring operating inside the CDC, with the purpose of falsifying research that would "disprove" any links between vaccines and toxic side effects."
Why Does the CDC Not Invalidate Dr. Thorsen's Research?
Dr. Thorsen's studies are frequently quoted in rebuttals to the claim that vaccines may play a role in the disorder. The studies in question were riddled with flaws, yet despite the fact that Thorsen's studies may actually be a complete sham, the CDC has not officially declared them invalid. In fact, they're still listed on the CDC website as part of the scientific backing of their stance on autism and vaccine safety.
Nor has the media jumped on this story and exposed how vaccine-safety claims have been based on junk science by a scam artist. They've also failed to question why none of the journals have denounced Dr. Thorsen's studies, which support the claim that vaccines are safe, while Dr. Wakefield's research was denounced after the mere insinuation of wrong-doing.
Furthermore, according to research by Dan Olmsted and Mark Blaxill writing for AgeOfAutism.com, Dr. Thorsen has also been working with the American Psychiatric Association (APA) on an updated definition of "autism" for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), which is slated for release in May 2013. I believe it would be prudent to take a deeper look at his input, to make sure his connections to the CDC and his role in protecting vaccine safety has not tainted the new definition of autism.
The sad fact is that conflicts of interest color most of the ties between our government and the pharmaceutical industry, and conventional media repeatedly fails to report the truth on these matters.
So, who can you trust?
I would recommend trusting yourself. Do your own research, and make your own decisions accordingly. The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) is an excellent resource on all things relating to the controversial topic of vaccines. They have been compiling objective evidence showing both sides of the issue and have been one of the strongest voices for vaccine safety and true informed consent.
Source: CNN October 11, 2011
Source: The Inquisitr October 11, 2011
Source: Age of Autism April 2011
Related Links:
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
2 comments:
Best critical thinking award for this comment.
I am glad that someone is brave and honest enough to expose these activities. Thank you. I just wish they could be published more openly.
Post a Comment