http://www.jpfo.org/NaziLawGerman.htm
Now that should chill your bones. Remember we hauled hundreds of gestapo and nazi's over here after the war and set up a program as a black ops called "Paper Clip". Remember that? Well , now we get to live with the culmination of the resurrection of the fascist police state that they created. They mind controlled so many of those assassins and each time they take away a bit more..... CREATE THE PROBLEM, SOLVE THE PROBLEM. Create the assassin, send him to shoot someone and immediately say "Gun Control".
That is how it worked in germany and now those same nazis' are here doing it just like the military feared back in 1919 when they wrote up the Russian revolution and who funded it, lead it, and massacred so many afterwards. That report which said that the internationalists Khazars who did the Russian revolution were indeed a threat to the United states and Wilson declared that report top secret and classified it and it was declassified until a good 50 years later. If we had had that report we would not be where we are today.
REMEMBER THESE ARE SATANISTS AND NO ONE IS SAFE FROM THEM IF UNARMED.
Why Not Gun Control for the GOVERNMENT
http://beforeitsnews.com/story/350/699/Why_Not_Gun_Control_for_the_Government.html
ActivistPost, Tuesday, January 11, 2011
Anthony Gregory
The Independent Institute
Whenever someone commits a particularly shocking crime with firearms—especially a horrific mass murder—there are calls for gun control. The reasoning seems to be that a law prohibiting the ownership or carrying of certain weapons will prevent or reduce the number of such atrocities. Although most other laws targeting ownership of contraband—such as drug laws—do not really work in keeping the barred items out of determined people’s hands; and although people bent on committing mass murder do not tend to be the more law-abiding members of society; we are supposed to believe that the way to stop violent crimes is simply to make it illegal to be armed.
On the other hand, government commits violence against the innocent on a daily basis. In foreign lands, hundreds of thousands have died in the last decade, in a killing spree unleashed by the U.S. government in response to 9/11. On the local level, police frequently brutalize the accused and taze, beat and shoot innocent people. The TSA has become an agency of routine sexual molestation. In detention centers at home and abroad, the criminal justice system has become an accessory to mass rape and gang violence. The feds commit torture.
Yet rarely do people suggest that gun control is the answer to these atrocities. And of course, what would that even entail? Disarming the police? That would be part of it, yet even that would not suffice, for so long as there is political power at all, we can say that Mao was right that it flows from the barrel of a gun. Government is institutionalized violence.
The state will necessarily abuse the coercive tools we allow it to have. The overwhelming majority of private individuals, however, will use guns responsibly, and in many cases defensively. Violent private criminals can never be stopped with gun control, which only empowers the state and predators, both private and governmental, while disarming the victims.
Despite all these truths, a truly terrible crime as the one that occurred in Arizona is used to bolster the case for tipping the scales of power further toward those who do not feel bound by the law. This, also despite the fact that the government did not fulfill one of its purported functions here in preempting or rapidly stopping a massacre. Trillions of dollars of government. Millions of prisoners. Thousands not returning from war. But safety as the government promises it is an illusion, and its inevitable failures to secure total safety will always be twisted into reasons for giving it more power.
What matter most are culture and a respect for innocent life. And the killer in Tuscon had no respect for innocent life—this, more this his alleged hatred of government, is the clear value that we can assume from his behavior. This is more important than his reported fondness for Ayn Rand, Mein Kampf, or the Communist Manifesto; his obsession with literacy or the fact that people can legally carry guns in Arizona. They cannot legally commit murder, after all, and that law didn’t stop him.
But the state does not promote a respect for life. Yet after an atrocity like this, few suggest that it be limited, controlled or disarmed.
source:
VN: HERE IS WHY WE SHOULD HAVE GUN CONTROL FOR THE GOV AND NOT FOR THE PEOPLE.
Gun Control- NOTICE A PATTERN HERE BELOW?????
Whether you agree or not, it's an interesting lesson in history.
Something to think about...
In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control. From 1929 to
1953, about 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
------------------------------
In 1911, Turkey established gun control. From 1915 to 1917, 1.5
million Armenians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and
exterminated.
------------------------------
Germany established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, a total of 13 million Jews &others who were unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated.
------------------------------
China established gun control in 1935. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
------------------------------
Guatemala established gun control in 1964. From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
------------------------------
Uganda established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000
Christians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
------------------------------
Cambodia established gun control in 1956. From 1975 to 1977, onemillion 'educated' people, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
-----------------------------
Defenseless people rounded up and exterminated in the 20th
Century because of gun control: 56 million.
------------------------------
It has now been 12 months since gun owners in Australia were forced by new law to surrender 640,381 personal firearms to be destroyed by their own government, a program costing Australia taxpayers more than $500 million dollars. The first year results are now in:
Australia-wide, homicides are up 3.2 percent
Australia-wide, assaults are up 86 percent
Australia-wide, armed robberies are up 44 percent (yes, 44%)!
In the state of Victoria alone, homicides with firearms are now up 300 percent.
(Note that while the law-abiding citizens turned them in, the criminals did not, and criminals still possess their guns!)
While figures over the previous 25 years showed a steady decrease in armed robbery with firearms, this has changed drastically up ward in the past 12 months, since criminals now are guaranteed that their prey is unarmed.
There has also been a dramatic increase in break-ins and assaults of the ELDERLY.
Australian politicians are at a loss to explain how public safety has decreased, after such monumental effort and expense was expended in successfully ridding Australian society of guns. The Australian experience and the other historical facts above prove it.
You won't see this data on the American evening news or hear our president, governors or other politicians disseminating this information.
Guns in the hands of honest citizens save lives and property and, yes, gun-control laws affect only the law-abiding citizens.
Take note my fellow Americans ... before it's too late! The next time someone talks in favor of gun control, please remind them of this history lesson.
With guns, we are 'citizens'.
Without them, we are 'subjects'.
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
10 comments:
I was with you until the mention of the Jewish Preservation of Firearms Org. How many within that organization are Zionists, and would you think they would tell you? How many that subscribe are Hassidic, or Orthodox? Is the spectre of Nazis the only concern of the JPF? Did the gentile/goyim interest in preserving their firearms ORIGINATE with fears of the Nazis?
Playing both sides is a method of deep subterfuge based upon the Jewish Masonic concept of the Twin Pillars.
The Jew, though “non religious” gives tacit compliance to the vision of their rabbis who foresee an earthly messiah who will establish a messianic kingdom in which the Jews will be the supreme heads of the nations. This is only a sampling.
‘In one of his most infamous Zionist coverup statements, Alex Jones stated: “Hollywood Is Owned By The Arabs’ - The Arabs Own Everything!” That stunning statement simply shattered the credibility meter. It’s simply a matter of connecting the dots.’
All of this is not mean as 'anti-semitism'. These are only statements of fact or questions to be aware of.
Did the American concern for the right to bear arms stem from fears of the nazis? I don't think so. The automatic reference pointing to the JPF is obfuscation at best. Just giving you the benefit of the doubt.
Jay, I did not say that Americans concerns for the second Amendment stemmed from Nazi Germany. I know that it stemmed from the same concern as we had as result of nazi german which you would have seen had you read the rest of what I wrote.
The situation pre-revolution was exactly the same with the british as it was about nazi germany. Repression, taxation not for the benefit of hte poeple but to increase the coffers, wealth and power of the king. Different players (some say, the same players) than Germany, but the same dictatorship and bondage as the British.
Now some say and I agree with them, that the original founders of our nation were very much elitists and their document they developed addressed only their rights being protected and not those of the whole nation at the time. But it was a beginning and in the end the result ended up being the same with some tweeking through the amendment system both good and bad.
Its still better than any other system in place at the time or since. I only used the JPFO as a reflection of the ultimate that can happen if we ignore what is going on around us as they remind us and how important NOT GIVING up your guns are since that is what created the end result in germany at that time. That is all I was doing, nothing else.
Thanks, but I don't any jewish point of view a la the "nazis" is needed on the right to bear arms. All this does is promote their religion of "holocaustianity" and the jews being forever pure and blameless in all things, forever in our faces, which is yet another means of keeping alive gentile/goyim "guilt".
We all know about fascism and totalitarianism via Corporatism and government intrusion and the whole ball of wax. I don't need the JPF's opinion dregging up why they are sainted people and then telling us why we need to bear arms.
To be sure what the nazis did was horrific. The images caused me to become an atheist. But not only the jews suffered under it, which they would have you believe. And the rise of nazism I don't think even had to do with the jews to begin with.
It is only the obfuscation of this JPF angle that makes the article slanted, and causes people who don't understand the deep raison d'etre of their mindset, their survival strategy, that causes a deflection in the gentile/goyim, which is the purpose to begin with because it is based on the hidden jewish masonic twin pillars concept in operation. This is very deep stuff, and too difficult to get into here.
In other words, as a result the jew will *always* triumph over the gentile/goyim so long as the gentile/goyim does not understand the nature of Judaism.
Of course, not all jews are bad. They are in fact a highly intelligent people -- and this is why they are in control of all key positions of power. They also practice Eugenics (the Hassidim, the Orthodox mostly) and no one DARES even telling them not to do it. They in fact DO what they are forever accusing the nazis of doing -- keeping their own race pure. And Judiasm bases this on the OLD TESTAMENT. Only the gentiles/goyim are not allowed to practice Eugenics, and its the jews that see to it they don't -- with the willing help and participation of the ignorant gentile/goyim no less.
Jay, I agree, as I said, I simply brought it up because it goes with seriousness of the issue and sometimes its a way to validate for the sheeple who need it. but you are right in your analysis and maybe I should not have brought it up but that link to the german law passed doing this was in their publication, so I felt it appropriate to connect the two since they have done a lot of research and work on this.
In fact, as another poster pointed out, it could be just another controlled opposition organization. We just never know. However, the link was valuable and real, so its internet protocol to let others know who supplied the info. Notice on my list of countries, that it was not just exclusively Germany or Jews for that matter. IT CAN HAPPEN ANYWHERE TO ANYBODY IF WE ARE NOT VIGILANT AND RIGHT NOW i AM VERY HAPPY AT THE LEVEL OF VIGILANCE i SEE.
I DON'T CARE THAT THE TRAITORS IN OUR GOV HAVE BROUGHT IN CHINESE AND RUSSIAN TROOPS UNDER THE UN FLAG TO TRY AND CONFISCATE THESE GUNS.... it will matter not at all who they try to use to obtain them, they will die trying to take them.
GOOD! I'm glad to feel that deep sense of they will only take our guns from our cold, dead hands!
I don't own a gun, and broke two nails trying to handle one while trying to learn. I dropped the (unloaded) gun and the teacher turned and flared at me that I "just killed him!" aye carumba...that's when I realized I'd probably kill myself or someone else accidentally if I did get one.
So I'm counting on y'all.
MAN...Give me a license to kill...I'D LOVE IT!!!
Same old problem reaction solution,order out of chaos crap.They will keep using this until more people catch on.JFK,Martin Luther,Oklahoma,Waco,John Lennon and the list goes on. The latest massacre.When do the masses wake up?? That's the short list.More Guns in the citizen hands less crime.How about in the latest massacre, had there been a few people with guns,do you think this mind controlled, satanic looser could have shot so many innocent people!Interesting what a good shot he was.That's a sign of mind control.MK ultra subjects have 6 times the visual acuity,as normal people.Of course none of us are "normal" we are much higher than we know.And those are old statistics.Who knows where the programming has evolved to.I also think this is a distraction from other things that are happening!Earth changes perhaps,among other things.Brock
Blue Rose, thats ok, not everyone has to have a gun.... in fact we are still working on ways to turn things around before it gets to that point, so you will have plenty to do when that time comes. lol
Wow, Brock, I did no know all that. Good insite on it all. Thanks.
You can find all this in on little but very moving book called Trans-formation of America by Cathy O'Brien.Or the first video from Texas at Clay Douglas's Freedom Seminar.He was the editor of the Free America newspaper.This Shows Cathy in the video,talking about MK ultra amongst other horrors she and her child were forced to endure,by the likes of George Bush senior,Clinton,Aquino and so many others.Brock
Post a Comment