NEW 9/11 VIDEO MISSILE STRIKE PENTAGON

Vatic Note:   Well, this must have been leaked by someone from the inside.  Otherwise how did we get it and why?  Why not earlier?  Some interesting pictures here.   Some were sufficient to prove this was in fact done by the military or Israel,  both have similar military facilities and uniforms and faces are blocked out so you can't tell who is what.   Notice the missle is competely redressed to look like an American Airlines plane with all the markings, albeit smaller by a bunch from a Boeing 767.  But it was sufficient to fool the cameras and those noticing the plane markings without realizing the size was off.   What is important is now we know for sure and there can be no debunking this one.  No way, Jose.  

NEW 9/11 VIDEO MISSILE STRIKE PENTAGON

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NeLcE0sht-M
energycondensed
May 02, 2010

Newly released footage shows possible missile strike on Pentagon on 9/11 suggests that US government deliberately attacked on Pentagon by Cruise missile, According to some theories, the U.S. administration deliberately chose not to shoot down a plane that was heading for the Pentagon, while others contend that no plane hit the Pentagon at all.

Theories that allege deliberate inaction by the U.S. administration cite former transportation secretary Norman Mineta's testimony to the 9/11 Commission, in which he stated that an aide asked then Vice President Dick Cheney whether the "orders still stand". Cheney answered that they did. Mineta assumed that the orders were to shoot down the plane, while conspiracy theorists see this as an indication that the orders were not to shoot down the plane.

Thierry Meyssan and Dylan Avery argue that American Airlines Flight 77 did not crash into the Pentagon. Instead, they argue that the Pentagon was hit by a missile launched by elements from inside the U.S. government. Reopen911.org says that the holes in the Pentagon walls were far too small to have been made by a Boeing 757: "How does a plane 125 ft. wide and 155 ft. long fit into a hole which is only 60 ft. across?" Meyssans book, LEffroyable Imposture (published in English as 9/11: The Big Lie) became an instant bestseller in France and is available in more than a dozen languages. When released, the book was heavily criticized by the French press. The French newspaper Liberation called the book "a tissue of wild and irresponsible allegations, entirely without foundation.





According to Mete Sozen, a professor of structural engineering at Purdue University, a crashing jet doesn't punch a cartoon-like outline of itself into a reinforced concrete building. When Flight 77 hit the Pentagon, one wing hit the ground and the other was sheared off by the Pentagon's load-bearing columns.[82] According to ArchitectureWeek, the reason the Pentagon took relatively little damage from the impact was because Wedge One had recently been renovated. (This was part of a renovation program which had been begun in the eighties, and Wedge One was the first of five to be renovated.

Airplane debris including Flight 77's black boxes, the nose cone, landing gear, an airplane tire, the fuselage,[citation needed] an intact cockpit seat, and the tail number[citation needed] of the airplane were recovered at the crash site. The remains of passengers and crew from Flight 77 were found at the Pentagon crash site and their identities confirmed by DNA analysis.[citation needed] Many eyewitnesses saw the plane strike the Pentagon. Further, Flight 77 passengers made phone calls reporting that their airplane had been hijacked. For example, passenger Renee May called her mother to tell her that the plane had been hijacked and that the passengers had been herded to the back of the plane. Another passenger named Barbara Olson called her husband (U.S. Solicitor General Theodore Olson) and said that the flight had been hijacked, and that the hijackers had knives and box cutters.

A year before the attacks, a massive casualty (MASCAL) exercise was conducted in which a hijacked plane crashed into the Pentagon, which has raised suspicion amongst some.

---

The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.