Is the Gulf disaster being misrepresented? Has it been controlled from the first?

Vatic Note:  As we mentioned before,  both Katrina and Haiti suffered from their respective false flag events in the loss of property by those less well off than those who lust after it and who can afford to finance the scam that would ensure they obtain it.  Here are a couple of examples and we are researching to see if we could find more.   Katrina, resulted in these findings:   An eminent domain obtained warehouse taken by the mayor of New Orleans for FEMA use.   Then on Nexus, we find this story.......about the historical record of such actions instead of paying those who had the property, a fair market price.   Then we found this about Haiti and their misfortunes that lead to drawing the blood sucking useless feeders to their shores and stealing what was prime real estate property, water front no less, but then again, the oil slick should provide retribution to the thieves for their work. Karma or poetic Justice finally showing up? 

Is the Gulf disaster being misrepresented? Has it been controlled from the first?

by Dick Eastman, commentator, Yakima, Wa. USA
June 24, 2010

Is the leak a controlled disaster by crooked foreign Gulf land developers and disaster capitalists. The US is in debt. It must sell its prime assets. Gulf ocean front real estate is a good asset to sell, except that it belongs to a lot of struggling poor Americans who live off the bounty of the Gulf. Ordinarily such people cannot simply be evicted en masse.

To what extent are we being deceived? The origins of the leak? The nature of the leak (what is leaking into the Gulf, how much etc.)? The ability/inability to stop the leak? The ability/inability to eliminate the oil by serious application of all known effective means? The probable long-run effect? The effect of marine life? The effect on humans exposed to the Gulf atmosphere? The effect on crops and livestock? The effect of Federal restrictions on effecting/inhibiting damage minimization efforts? The plans to relocate, dispossess and displace local inhabitants of this former (and shortly future) prime beachfront real estate? Is the nature and true danger level of this event a controlled deception?

Is the disaster being misrepresented? Has it been controlled from the first?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SbwenqQ3928&NR=1

Evergreen Air (CIA air) distributing deadly chemicals allegedly for control?
Was oil rain from Evergreen Air?
This makes sense.

It explains how they gain and why they have been behaving as they have. They get the Florida property from the poor just as with Katrina and Sumatra. The rich love tropical beaches and they love owning them. If organisms can clean this up after the people are pushed our or killed by aerial distribution of poisons -- then they get it all for free. Whether this is good news or not depends on whether you are a direct victim or not. If you are a direct victim then it is bad news because the whole world is no longer as concerned as they were (since their own food supply is not really threatened from the dangers that I have been visualizing and talking about. I am most happy to be wrong about the end of the world -- but I regret that this just becomes one more super crime that people, not in immediate danger, will just let slip buy.

Tsunami Helpers

Hurricane Helpers

Earthquake helpers

Disaster Capitalism and Real Estate Development over the dead bodies of the poor -- always prime tropic beach real estate, always killing lots of poor people who live there.

Katrina was a method of clearing the poor from lands with potential for high-end development. There are strong indications that the hurricane was steered and that the dyke was deliberately blown up.

In addition to weather warfare their is also technology for wagine seismic warfare -- causing earthquakes by various means.

Sumatra Quake: The abrupt shift -- sudden overcoming of resistance to the shift along a 200 hundred mile front of the India techtonic plate subducting under/against against the Burma microplate off Sumatra December 26th, 2004 and the tsunami which resulted, cleared an area of prime beachfront land in eastern India, Sumatra, the Andaman and Nicobar islands and Thailand. In Indonesia (Sumatra) alone 320,000 were killed and 700,000 displaced. More than a million were displaced from the land in the other countries affected. Interestingly, of the tourists killed Germany lost the most (619) followed by Sweden (575) Britain (248) Italy (210) New Zealand (209) US (169) Austria (114) Japan 93 Norway (84) Denmark (47) Austrailia (41) Candada (36) Ukraine (17) Poland (11) China (18) Israel (none reported.) President Bush picked his father, former CIA director and President George Herbert Walker Bush and former president Bill Clinton to receive and distribute all of the financial help Americans wished to send to the victims. Similarly, after that Haitian earthquake -- which concentrated in poor areas, avoiding the Dominican Republic almost entirely, President Obama chose Bill Clinton and George W. Bush as the recipients and disbursers of money aid to Haiti. In George W. Bush's words -- heard by me over National Public Radio -- "Don't sent water or blankets, just send cash." Send it to, as Clinton added, "the Clinton Fund. Their nationwide fund-raising drive was not monitored by the media. It is the old "reconstruction game" -- good in war (like the "reconstruction era" after the US Civil War and in occupied Iraq) as well as in man-made weather-warfare and seismic-warfare disaster events such as Katrina and other hurricans, various droughts, and the quakes in Haiti and Sumatra.

---

The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.