Grand Jury Investigates Breath Test Accuracy – Throws D.A. Out

Vatic Note:  Wow, this almost fits in with Vatic Projects People to people initiative strategy and tactics.  We had one where we said that citizens could impanel their own grand jury, but this is a good start, by citizens taking over a grand jury and holding the prosecutor accountable.  I like it. Maybe, just maybe, the citizens of this nation are taking their country back and believing they are in charge and not the system that was suppose to serve them.  Ya think?  If true, then its something to celebrate.  That is,  a group  of thoughtful men and women who took the time to decide they would not be complicit in harming a fellow American citizen if they believed there was a problem with the evidence, just because the prosecutor had no problem doing the "wrong thing" and treated the process as if it were a Prosecutors cheering section in a game.  It is the citizens who make the system work and in this case they did. 

We should celebrate and use this as an example of what to do on a jury in every area of jurisprudence.  That means not only the evidence but the law as well.  Is the law breaking a civil or criminal offense?  If civil, not guilty on criminal.  Its that simple and then a man or woman's life is not ruined because privatized prisons are paying judges to fill them for profit without regard to the impact on society and the individuals wrongly convicted, when a civil trial was all that was required.  I keep thinking about IRS cases that used to be civil that are now criminal.   According to the Constitution, there is no criminal case with respect to acts against the government, except those innumerated in the Constitutions such as sedition and treason.  Criminal is only with respect to acts against another person and/or their property. That is it, and all else is civil.  Lets get back to that and maybe, just maybe,  our prisons will not be the most crowded in the world.  What an indictment against  our system.   Ironically, the corruption is in the enforcement side of our laws as well as the legislative side.   

Grand Jury Investigates Breath Test Accuracy – Throws D.A. Out

http://www.duiblog.com/2011/10/26/grand-jury-investigates-breath-test-accuracy-throws-d-a-out/
Posted by Lawrence Taylor on October 26th, 2011

Hmmm….Maybe the citizens of this country are beginning to wake up to the fact that those infallible breath machines aren’t so infallible.  And prosecutors don’t like it.

Controversy in BAT Van Investigation

Houston, TX.  Oct. 21 – There are new questions about just what a grand jury is investigating after prosecutors were thrown out of the grand jury room.

In an incredibly rare move this week, the foreperson of a Harris County Grand Jury asked a bailiff to remove prosecutors so jurors could hear from a witness on their own about potentially faulty DWI tests.

13 Undercover first raised questions about the accuracy of the Houston Police Department’s so-called BAT [Breath Alcohol Test] vans, but now it’s the investigation into how those problems were handled that’s causing controversy.

For months, some of the people closest to HPD’s breath testing vans have told you and us that the vans are unreliable — meaning the roadside tests they do on alleged drunk drivers may not be accurate.

Now the controversy has spilled over into a grand jury investigation, and it’s become so heated that a prosecutor working for Harris Co. District Attorney Pat Lykos was thrown out of the grand jury room earlier this week under the threat of arrest.

Amanda Culbertson worked for HPD for four and a half years as one of the supervisors overseeing mobile breathalyzer machines known as the BAT vans. She quit when she says HPD’s poor maintenance was leading to unreliable test results.

But her real trouble started when she spoke out about it. After Culbertson told a judge about her concerns, the DA questioned her credibility and pushed the county to cancel a contract with her new employer, in essence firing her.

Culbertson told her lawyer Chip Lewis that the DA is targeting her.

"She has not only thought it herself, but been told by people very close to the fire that the District Attorney’s Office is after you," said Lewis.

This week a Harris County Grand Jury wanted to hear from Culbertson as well as Brent Mayr, a former prosecutor who previously alleged the DA is bullying Culbertson to force her silence.

"Clearly retaliation for these individuals expressing opinions that the DA’s office didn’t like," Mayr said on October 4.

When Mayr walked in to testify before the grand jury on Tuesday, the foreperson told prosecutors to get out. They wanted to hear from Mayr and Culbertson without a DA in the room.

"They obviously believe that the DA’s Office played a role in this case and that they can’t be independent," said KTRK Legal Analyst Joel Androphy.

While it is rare — and legal — the DA’s Office threw a fit. Court records show top assistants to the elected DA refused to leave the room until a bailiff threatened to arrest them. The DA tried to force a judge to let them back in, but it was denied. An appeals court said the same thing.

"The grand jury is a function of independent people from the community. It’s not supposed to be the vote of the DA’s office," said . "This is rare and it would happen one out of a hundred times that a grand jury would have the courage enough to basically say to the DA’s Office get out of here or you’re going to get arrested."

We tried to ask the DA about it Friday, but they refused repeated interview requests. We’d love to ask what they knew about the BAT van problems, when, and what they did about it. It may be the same thing the grand jury is looking at on its own; and it may be the reason the DA was so angry about being thrown out of a supposed independent investigation.

"It’s clear to me that the grand jury has questions about how this was handled from a law enforcement standpoint. Now, I don’t know if that’s specifically confined to how HPD treated her or if they have some beef with what the District Attorney’s Office did as well," said Lewis.

Androphy told us in cases like this it would be best for the DA to ask for an independent prosecutor, but the DA’s Office said they haven’t. It would’ve been one of the questions we asked if anyone at the DA’s Office would’ve been willing to join us for an interview, but no one was.

13 Undercover and Wayne Dolcefino exposed the potential maintenance problems with the BAT vans back in March. We found documents detailing electrical problems that kept some of the very expensive mobile breath vans from ever being used. We showed you emails showing some cops were worried it might affect criminal cases. HPD didn’t tell the DA’s Office.

Funny, when I was a Los Angeles Deputy D.A., we understood our duties as they are set forth in the Canons of Ethics:  the prosecutor’s job is not to win, but to seek truth and justice.  I guess times change….

(Thanks to Art Weiner.)

This entry was posted on Wednesday, October 26th, 2011 at 12:21 pm and is filed under Duiblog. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

1. […] DUI BLOG […]
   Pingback by millerboycott.com» Blog Archive » Grand Jury Investigates Breath Test Accuracy – Throws D.A. Out — October 26, 2011 @ 1:54 pm
2. […] 2011 at 12:21 pm and is filed under Duiblog. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 […]
   Pingback by Grand Jury Investigates Breath Test Accuracy – Throws D.A. Out – The Low Down — October 26, 2011 @ 11:29 pm
3. […] DUI Sobriety Checkpoints: Unconstitutional? « Grand Jury Investigates Breath Test Accuracy – Throws D.A. Out […]
   Pingback by DUI BLOG: Houston Grand Jury Subpoenas DAs in Breathalyzer Cover-Up — October 27, 2011 @ 9:11 am
4. […] up on yesterday’s post (Grand Jury Investigates Breath Test Accuracy – Throws D.A. Out), here are the latest fascinating developments in a Houston grand jury’s investigation into […]
   Pingback by Houston Grand Jury Subpoenas DAs in Breathalyzer Cover-Up – The Low Down — October 27, 2011 @ 11:43 am

---

The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.