Prince William, Baphomet, and the NWO

Vatic Note:   Pretty doggone good rant by Alex Jones, if I do say so myself.  This touches on the entire concept of monarchy since that is what will happen if globalization occurs.  It was the British that got the United Nations started, Israel made into a country out of Palestine, an already existing country, and it was the British who have always wanted the USA back under thier umbrella.  Why???  Because the USA proved that freedom and independance for their people was the most affluent way to run a country.  Abundance, creativity, engenuity, and hard work, all came from the belief that all people were free.... whether they are or not is irrelvant,  its the belief that matters.   So, it made all monachies and dictatorships look like the useless parasites that they were.  Draining all the wealth and goodness out of the people of their nation and add to that the Satanic nature of their beliefs,  combined to literally choke their countries to death compared to America.  Now its our turn to be  raped and pillaged and then choked to death.  More and more is coming out about this so called British Royal family that are in fact, Usurpers to the British throne.  They are not even real Brits.  We will be covering more and more about them as info emerges.  Stay tuned.  

Alex Jones,  Uploaded by civilian42 on Apr 26, 2011

Alex Jones breaks the spell surrounding British royalty and Prince William's supposed fairytale wedding. The House of Windsor name did not surface until the WWI-era, when they opted to drop Saxe-Coburg and Gotha to keep the British from focusing on their German overlords.


The U.S. fought a war of independence against the British control of its government and economy, yet modern day Americans fawn over the royal family, whom they identify with. This is the result of deliberate social engineering campaigns to build celebrity and importance around a parasitic and tyrannical gang that has led and funded Eugenics, carbon taxes, population reduction and much more.


Modern British Royalty: Eugenicists, Nazis and Neo-Feudalists

The upcoming royal Wedding of William Mountbatten-Windsor, heir in waiting to the British throne has the UK media in a frenzy of vomit inducing worship and stomach churning sycophantic fawning. Even the US media is pouring over the royals to such an extent that commentators have pointed out that had the modern day corporate media covered the Revolutionary War, it would have firmly supported the British.

The US fought a bloody war of independence against British control of its government and economy, yet the American media has fast become fascinated with an institution that represents everything America is not. This despite the fact that in a recent poll only 6% of Americans said they were at all interested in the event.

Two billion people are estimated to watch this weekend's royal wedding. Despite the three war fronts, radioactive meltdown in Japan, the evolving 2012 presidential field and any number of other stories, the media's collective lens will be turned exclusively on a snobbish pompous ceremony that is costing already extremely strained British taxpayers tens of billions to stage.

While the British government balks at the unfolding events in Syria and elsewhere where protests and demonstrations are being brutally curbed, those wishing to protest the antiquated old world elitist values Britain is still forced to accept as "cultural" under the monarchy will be met with stern resistance and a gargantuan police presence this weekend on the streets of London.

Meanwhile, over 40 monarchs from around the world will take their seats at the wedding, among them the dictators and ambassadors from countries with appalling human rights records such as Swaziland, Saudi Arabia and Zimbabwe.

Though he was invited, the Crown Prince of Bahrain, whose Gulf state has violently suppressed democracy protests in recent months, has respectfully declined, in order to avoid a public relations scandal. The leaders of Kuwait, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates and Oman, whose military forces have aided the vicious crackdown will all be there, however. The Libyan Ambassador to Britain had his invitation rescinded when it was recently decided that Libya should be bombed back into the stone age.

In addition, a gaggle of "celebrities" have been invited, blatantly in an attempt to whip up more media hype and place a 21st century context on what is essentially a medieval ceremonial show of power.

As London Independent writer and noted Republican Johann Hari has highlighted, the frenzy surrounding the royal family has "a subtly deforming effect on Britain's character that the ultimate symbol of our country."

"Our sovereign, is picked on the most snobbish criteria of all: darling, do you know who his father was? Kids in Britain grow up knowing that we all bow and curtsy in front of a person simply because of their unearned, uninteresting bloodline. This snobbery subtly soaks out through the society, tweaking us to be deferential to unearned and talentless wealth, simply because it's there."

The pomp and hype of this occasion is part of a deliberate ongoing social engineering campaign to rebuild celebrity and importance around a parasitic and tyrannical elite that still pulls all the strings on the world stage.


Queen Elizabeth II (wikipedia)
.....Elizabeth became Head of the Commonwealth and the queen of seven independent Commonwealth countries: the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, Pakistan, and Ceylon. Her coronation service in 1953 was the first to be televised.[2] During her reign, which at 59 years is one of the longest for a British monarch, she became queen of 25 other countries within the Commonwealth as they gained independence. Between 1956 and 1992, half her realms, including South Africa, Pakistan, and Ceylon (renamed Sri Lanka), became republics.

VN:  Now here is a further analysis of the wedding and it what it bodes for Kate.  Notice that Both Edward and brother Harry,  had satanic symbols on their uniforms in service.   They are hiding these connections less and less.   As a Satanist once pointed out and we published it.   "Soon we will rule the world and it will all be out in the open.   What in the world did the "witch Queen"  do to these boys after she killed Diana???
Is Prince's Wedding Ring Refusal a Satanic Sign?

by Byron Molynieux, (for henrymakow.com  Source)

Satanists observe Christian rituals for one reason only, to tear them down. Everything a future king does is symbolic and an example to his people.

Prince William will not wear a wedding ring to symbolize his marriage to Kate Middleton April 29. Explaining William's decision, a royal source told the Daily Mail, 'It is quite common for men in that strata of society not to wear a traditional wedding band.'

A wedding ring symbolizes marriage, an institution that the Illuminati --"that strata of society" -- wish to destroy, along with the family.

In breaking the rules of a Christian marriage ceremony and in light of the Satanism practiced by the Illuminati, we ask; Is William signaling his Satanism? He has done it before, notably by having a logo of Baphomet's head on his RAF uniform. (see below)

It would support the arguments of those who believe Prince William is the antiChrist. Perhaps a ring less ring finger is an occult prerequisite.  One women says he is Satan. Perhaps a ringless ring finger is an occult prerequisite.

Other public figures who don't wear wedding rings have revealed themselves to be Satanists. Tony Blair doesn't wear one.(The Sarkozy's and Obamas do.)

In a recent article in the Guardian entitled, 'Yours for £150: Tony Blair's memoirs as gospel' we see Blair blaspheming by releasing a version of his autobiography in the style of the Bible.
Neither Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper nor his wife, ostensible Christians, wear a wedding ring. Here is a photo of Harper and his family meeting Pope Benedict XVI in the Vatican. His wife is dressed all in black with a hood, as if attending a black mass!


Despite refusing a ring, William has placed symbolic significance on the engagement ring given to Kate.

He has given her the same blue sapphire engagement ring his mother Diana had on her engagement. The blue sapphire is the gemstone of the planet Saturn. In The 13 Illuminati Bloodlines, Fritz Springmeier writes of Saturn:

"Saturn is an important key to understanding the long heritage this conspiracy has back to antiquity. The city of Rome was originally known as Saturnia or City of Saturn. The Roman Catholic Church retains much of the Saturn worship in its ritual. Saturn also relates to Lucifer. In various occult dictionaries Saturn is associated with evil."
Sapphire is important in Satanic circles. 'Mauri' grew up in a Satanic family and suffered frequent sexual abuse as a child. She was conditioned with BETA Programming sex training and put to work in the child pornography industry. She notes that one Christmas, in between different sadistic tricks played on her, she received, 'a gold heart shaped necklace with a tiny blue sapphire stone. There was a matching bracelet.'

Grace Powers, of helpfreetheearth.com  believes that the wedding date of April 29th also fits into the astrological clock of Saturn:

"Prince William and Kate Middleton will be married while the planet Saturn is in Libra, just as William's parents Prince Charles and Princess Diana did. Prince Charles and Lady Diana Spencer wed on July 29, 1981. Thirty years later after one Saturn Return, their son, Prince William will marry Kate Middleton on April 29, 2011. This means that both royal couples will have the same Saturn/Venus influence in their marriage charts."

Unlike his parents, William's marriage chart has Saturn in retrograde. According to astrologers, this signifies a return to the past and explains the seemingly unending comparisons between the two couples and their weddings.

Given that Diana suffered a torturous marriage before being murdered by British Intelligence, Kate's being cosmologically aligned with her and presented her engagement ring is hardly a cause for celebration. Kate might worry. A wedding ring is a symbol of everlasting love and her fiancé won't wear one!


It is worth noting that the wedding date of 29th April is surrounded by Satanic holidays.

The 'Grand Climax' takes place between April 26-May 1 and is characterized by sexual interaction with female victims between the ages of 1-25. 'Walpurgisnacht Roodmas Day' takes place on April 30th and contains animal and/or human sacrifice of any age. 'Beltane Eve' also takes place on April 30th and is a fertility rite.

A Satanic holiday of special relevance to the Royal wedding is the 'Feast of the Beast'. According to Fritz Springmeier, it is a year-long event that occurs every 28 years and is attended by Illuminati leaders from around the world. It is a very high level ceremony, and would not be recognized at the anarchy ritual level of the Illuminati.

The last two Feast of the Beast ceremonies occurred in 1954 and 1982, the last one was supposed to start in 2009 or 2010 meaning that it could still be going on and coincide with the royal wedding. Springmeier's description of the event resonates somewhat with a Royal wedding:

At the Feast of the Beast, a beautiful bride is trained and presented to Satan, and she may well be a virgin. This ceremony is most likely held at a castle or palace, and is also likely to be held over in Europe for the principle ceremony.

Lesser ceremonies may be held here in the states. Witnesses claim that Satan appears and interacts with his human leadership. He provides them with detailed instructions for what he wants done until the next Feast of the Beast. In other words, he provides the top Illuminati hierarchy with their future long-range plans.

Given that our leaders are practicing Satanists, is it a coincidence that the Royal wedding is in the middle of a host of Satanic holidays?


We know that Royal weddings are generally loveless affairs, the participants marrying to keep wealth and royal genealogy in the family (William and Kate are 'kissing cousins'), but for William not to wear a wedding ring is a brash statement. Millions will tune in worldwide to see the Royal wedding and all will see William's heartless decision to refuse the universal symbol of marital commitment.

The Satanic connotations have to be considered. The Illuminati do not marry out of love, or the joy of creating a loving family. They are predators who do deliberate evil to honor their dirty deity.

The brutality of these arrangements can be found by researching the ritualistic murder of Princess Diana. The Illuminati exist in a cut-throat dog-eat-dog world.

William's refusal to wear a ring is a sign of more horror to come.

The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.


psieve2 said...

Racist comments are not allowed but bashing a faith in the article is? Interesting.

Vatic Master said...

What religion are you talking about? We have not bashed any religion. Rather we have told the truth about who is running a particular country. So, please be more specific. Thanks