2011-03-29

US Supreme Court Issues Landmark Decision: Constitution is Void

Vatic Note: Now, that IS TREASON. That isn't even arguable. Its blatant on its face without any dispute. There has been no process contained in the constitution that changed the LEGAL WAY YOU CAN DO AWAY WITH IT. You can't do away with it by fiat, dictatorial edicts or illegally passed laws in conflict with it. Heck, it even says that right in the Constitution and if that decision is recorded, they are guilty without even a trial. So, now what??? Once we accept it by not responding, they can then treat it as a waiver of all our rights and that is the end folks. Bye bye, land ownership, taxation without representation, etc etc etc. Well, it was coming, just a matter of time. So I guess the line has been drawn in the sand. Now we cross it.  Remember, we must denounce any forewarning on any actions, so lets do it right here again.  We did it before on retaining a person found innocent, in prison for as long as the emperor determines. 

WE DO NOT RECOGNIZE YOUR ILLEGAL DECISION TO MAKE THE CONSTITUTION NULL AND VOID BY JUDICIAL EDICT.   THERE IS A PROCESS CONTAINED WITHIN THE CONSTITUTION ITSELF TO LEGALLY CHANGE IT.  ANYTHING NOT DONE BY THAT PROCESS WILL NOT BE RECOGNIZED BY US, THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, CITIZENS, AND VOTERS  AS WELL AS SILLY TAX PAYERS FOR EVER  GIVING YOU OUR MONEY.  THIS IS OUR " OFFICIAL RESPONSE " TO YOUR FOREWARNING OF YOUR INTENT TO ONCE AGAIN DO US HARM. 

US Supreme Court Issues Landmark Decision: Constitution is Void
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=xprnw.20110118.CL31921&show_article=1
ATLANTA, Jan. 18, 2011 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ --


"IMPEACHMENT IS NOW AN OPTION".

The U.S. Supreme Court issued a landmark decision that serves to allow judges to void the Constitution in their courtrooms. The decision was issued on January 18, 2011, and the Court did not even explain the decision (Docket No. 10-632, 10-633, and 10-690). One word decisions: DENIED.

Presented with this information and massive proof that was not contested in any manner by the accused judges, at least six of the justices voted to deny the petitions:

"There is no legal or factual basis whatsoever for the decisions of the lower courts in this matter. These rulings were issued for corrupt reasons. Many of the judges in the Northern District of Georgia and the Eleventh Circuit are corrupt and violate laws and rules, as they have done in this case. The Supreme Court must recognize this Petition as one of the most serious matters ever presented to this Court."

The key questions answered negatively by the U.S. Supreme Court was:

"Whether federal courts must be stopped from operating corruptly and ignoring all laws, rules, and facts."

By denying the petitions, SCOTUS has chosen to sanction corruption by federal judges and to allow federal judges to void sections of the Constitutional at will.

William M. Windsor has been involved in legal action in the federal courts in Atlanta since 2006. Windsor was named a defendant in a civil lawsuit (1:06-CV-0714-ODE) in which Christopher Glynn of Maid of the Mist in Niagara Falls, swore under oath that Windsor did a variety of things including the crimes of theft and bribery. Windsor stated under oath that Christopher Glynn made it up and lied about absolutely everything that he swore. Windsor then obtained deposition testimony from Glynn and the other managers of the Maid of the Mist boat ride, and they admitted, under oath, that charges against Windsor were not true.

Despite this undeniable proof, 32-year federal Judge Orinda D. Evans declared that the grandfather of three should not have fought the lawsuit, and she forced him to pay a fortune in legal fees of Maid of the Mist. Windsor appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, but federal judges Dubina, Hull, and Fay rubber-stamped Judge Evans' ruling. Windsor then took his appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court where the justices said the appeal was not worthy of their consideration (cert denied).

After attempting to get the case reopened with new evidence that proved fraud upon the courts and obstruction of justice, Judge Evans and Judge William S. Duffey committed a variety of crimes and violations of Constitutional rights, as did judges with the Eleventh Circuit. All of this was detailed for the Supreme Court.

Windsor says: "I have discovered that the federal judges in Atlanta, Georgia, Washington, DC, and the justices of the United States Supreme Court function like common criminals intentionally making bogus rulings against honest people while covering up the crimes of their fellow judges. I have been contacted by people from all over the country and around the world with their stories of judicial corruption with judges all over the U.S.

"My charges have been totally ignored by the United States Attorney's Office, the FBI, and Congress. I do not believe there is a shred of decency, honesty, or Constitutional rights in our federal courts. In my opinion, we now live in a police state. Judges are free to do absolutely anything they want. Our laws are meaningless. Your life savings can be stolen by a federal judge, and they have no risk in violating every law in the books.

"In my opinion, this is the most serious issue that our country has ever faced. Our rights have been stolen. And the mainstream media refuses to cover this story because they are afraid of the judges. Heaven help us.

"I believe our only hope in America is if the masses become aware of what is taking place. I am writing an expose, and my book will be available at Borders, Barnes & Noble, and on amazon.com soon. The publisher will decide if the title is Lawless America or Screwed, Glued, and Tattooed."

For more information, see www.LawlessAmerica.com.
Contact: William Windsor, +1-770-578-1094, bill@lawlessamerica.com

SOURCE William M. Windsor
Copyright 2011 PR Newswire. All Rights Reserved.


The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

No comments: