Depopulation - Mass Sterilization of men by Ultrasound

Vatic Note: I don't know if he is in this country, but they better leave until their friends in Israel finish us off. They are no longer safe here. Read this and beware. I do not know any antidote for this new horror they have dreamed up that they are directing at men in this country to sterilize them. This is what happens when you have nothing to do with your time, but dream up perversions such as this, rather than "creating" something useful. The man is just too damn wealthy. He needs to find a productive use of his time if he lives long enough. Maybe he should volunteer to be the first to go. What a great gesture that would be. His sicko wife right behind him.  Sorry, its getting harder and harder to be objective in the face of such blatant evil.

I am going to try and research alternatives to counter any such attempts to sterilize our men.  To have children has been a choice and there are ways that are civilized to deal with the issue of population where the public can join in the discussion and the resulting solutions we can all live with HUMANELY.  He should never have gone to Israel as we see today, humanity and "civilized are words  the Khazars cannot comprehend.

If ultrasound destroys sperm, why is it safe for a fetus?
http://www.naturalnews.com/z028853_ultrasound_fetus.html
NaturalNews.com printable article,   provided to Vatic by Jeff Maehr, Southwest Press, Colorado, USA
Originally published May 23 2010
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor

(NaturalNews) Ultrasound is extremely damaging to the health of any unborn child (fetus). The natural health community has been warning about ultrasound for years, but mainstream medicine, which consistently fails to recognize the harm it causes, insists ultrasound is perfectly safe and can't possibly harm the health of a fetus.

Now, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is funding a project that aims to temporarily sterilize men by blasting their scrotums with ultrasound. The burst of ultrasound energy, it turns out, disrupts the normal biological function of the testes, making the man infertile for six months.

Ultrasound, in other words, contains enough energy to temporarily deaden the testes and basically destroy sperm function for half a year. So why is it considered "safe" to blast an unborn baby with the same frequencies?

Ultrasound is loud. It no doubt causes tissue disruption and damage in a fetus, and it certainly creates stress and shock for the baby. And yet conceited yuppie parents just can't get enough of it! They want to SEE a picture of their little baby before it's even born, so they subject it to tissue damage and ultrasound trauma in order to get a snapshot they can show off to their yuppie friends. Just to clarify, I'm not opposed to medically necessary ultrasound that has a reasonable justification concerning the health of the mother of the baby. What I'm strongly opposed to is ultrasound used to take pictures of the fetus or to satisfy the curiosity of the parents. This "recreational" ultrasound is extremely selfish, conceited and may pose a very real danger to the health of the baby.

It's so American, isn't it? Damage the baby so we can get a snapshot to post on Facebook. What a way to welcome a baby into the world: Blast it with piercing high-frequency energy in order to impress your friends! Don't forget to vaccinate them, too, as soon as they are born. (And yes, some parents-to-be seriously subject their babies to ultrasound just so they can take pictures. It's demented!)

Sound is very easily transmitted through fluids, by the way, and the fetus is floating in a sac of amniotic fluid that transmits the ultrasound energy right at them.

Ultrasound harms the fetus

Here's what some other website have to say about how ultrasound harms the health of the fetus:

From The Independent   (http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u... )

Frequent ultrasound scans during pregnancy may result in growth restriction in the womb and the birth of smaller babies, according to a study of almost 3,000 Australian women, writes Liz Hunt.

The findings, reported in the Lancet, have led to calls for more research into the effects of ultrasound, and a leading obstetrician warns that 'prenatal ultrasound by itself can no longer be assumed to be entirely harmless'.

From Midwifery Today (http://www.midwiferytoday.com/artic... )

The safety issue is made more complicated by the problem of exposure conditions. Clearly, any bio-effects that might occur as a result of ultrasound would depend on the dose of ultrasound received by the fetus or woman. But there are no national or international standards for the output characteristics of ultrasound equipment. The result is the shocking situation described in a commentary in the British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, in which ultrasound machines in use on pregnant women range in output power from extremely high to extremely low, all with equal effect. The commentary reads, "If the machines with the lowest powers have been shown to be diagnostically adequate, how can one possibly justify exposing the patient to a dose 5,000 times greater?" It goes on to urge government guidelines on the output of ultrasound equipment and for legislation making it mandatory for equipment manufacturers to state the output characteristics. As far as is known, this has not yet been done in any country.

From NaturalNews (http://www.naturalnews.com/019910_u...)

...pregnant mice exposed to ultrasound gave birth to some offspring that suffered brain abnormalities. The mice exposed to ultrasound for 30 minutes or longer experienced a small but significant migration of brain neurons to improper places in the brain.

Sources for this story include:

BBC
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8...%7BSubscribeHealthRangerBlock}
BILL GATES FUNDS TECHNOLOGY TO INDUCE INFERTILITY

---

The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.