Michael Savage: Romney Forced Out to Ensure Hilary Wins in 2016

Vatic Note: Sounds like what Romney did to Ron Paul in 2012 election primary for the GOP.  If Ron Paul would have won the nomination, the poles showed that he would have beat Obama. 

Aaah, so now we "KNOW" that the elite select our candidates for us, so the election is a farce.   What would be best is to not show up to vote.  Either give up the nation or fight for it.   Its the only choice we have any more.  There is no doubt that Mitt would have won, against Hitlary.  Mitt is part of the elite, but apparently must have some limits he would not exceed, where Hitlary has none.
Its the only reason I can think of that they would care one wit that Hitlary must be the winner.  They aren't blackmailing her, since everyone knows her chief of staff, who is a mossad agent, is also her lover.   So, what is she willing to do that Mitt would not?  That is a very big question. 

Its the damn Bilderbergs again, run by the International Bankers.  I want a photo of every single person who attended this past Bilderberg meeting.  Its time to turn the tables on these guys. We must expose every single co-conspirator that goes to those meetings and partakes of treason against their own country. 

Michael Savage: Romney Forced Out to Ensure Hilary in 2016
By Kurt Nimo,  February 6, 2015

Mitt Romney. Click to enlarge
Mitt Romney. Click to enlarge
Radio talk show host Michael Savage believes Massachusetts Republican and failed presidential candidate Mitt Romney was told by the global elite to step down as the Republican presidential candidate in order to allow Democrat Hillary Clinton to win the 2016 election.
“It’s very sad, but the Republican Party purged Mitt Romney for one reason. He’s announced he’s not going to run for president,” Savage writes.

According to the popular radio talk show host and author, the decision was made during the Davos meeting.
“The Bilderbergs met in Davos, and the decision was made that Hillary Clinton will be the next president,” Savage writes. “Romney was doing too well in the polls, so they threw him out. They want to make sure that another Bush – or an incompetent moron like Rubio – will be chosen to lead the Republicans, to ensure that Hillary becomes president.”

 Savage believes elections are arranged by the elite and, like a rigged horse race, the outcome is predetermined.  (VN: we have been saying that for a very long time.  But now the game is up.  Its time for Americans to decide how to handle this. Don't forget who the Israeli's work for... its Rothschild and the royal families of Europe who are selling out their own people to the bankers in return for serfdom, for the peasants,  to serve the royals as it used to be hundreds of years ago, only this time under a satanic banner so your kids will be used and abused as they wish.) 
“There are no elections in America anymore, because this selection process determines the elections,” he writes.

“Hillary will be the third administration of Obama, who was the second administration of Jimmy Carter. Otherwise Romney might have won this time. During the first debate in 2012, he wiped the floor with Obama. But they called Romney into the back room and the boys who run the world said, ‘Listen: we’re sorry but you’ve got to take a fall.’”
Hillary Clinton is shaping up to be the preferred choice of the neocon war faction of the ruling elite.

In July, The New York Times and other corporate media outlets reported that high level neocons are aligning themselves with Clinton.
“Even as they castigate Mr. Obama, the neocons may be preparing a more brazen feat: aligning themselves with Hillary Rodham Clinton and her nascent presidential campaign, in a bid to return to the driver’s seat of American foreign policy,” the newspaper reported.

 Robert Kagan, Max Boot and other neocons have sided with the Democrat Clinton primarily in response to her actions as Secretary of State, including overseeing the Libya intervention, sending arms to the so-called Syrian rebels, likening Russian leader Vladimir Putin to Hitler, and her unflagging support for Israel.
“It’s easy to imagine Mrs. Clinton’s making room for the neocons in her administration. No one could charge her with being weak on national security with the likes of Robert Kagan on board,” averred the Times.

For the ruling elite, it does not matter who is in office so long as the agenda stays firmly on track.
Obama’s assignment was to blindside liberals as he continued the war agenda of his predecessor. Due to his inexperience and the fumbling of his advisers and staff, Obama has proved to be a public relations disaster.
Despite the negative perception and the sharp criticism of Republicans, Obama has faithfully executed the prescribed agenda, including taking out Libya, making tweaks to the Syrian proxy war, and confronting Russia. On the foreign policy front, the Obama administration has stuck relatively closely to the script.

 Hillary is an ideal candidate despite her age and medical issues. The global elite will continue to push the liberal race and gender based shell game in order to fool gullible progressives and put their agenda forward.
Liberals undoubtedly prefer Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren. Despite her anti-Wall Street cred, Warren supports the war on terror with its interminable conflict and military interventions.
In essence, she is a kinder and gentler version of Hillary Clinton. Democrats, regardless of their rhetoric, have yet to impose substantial reforms on Wall Street, as these will not be permitted and only the illusion of change will be allowed.


The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

No comments: