*** - We wish to extend a welcome to our new visitors from China. We hope you will read the news we are able to bring you about what is going in the US and around the world. We hope you enjoy your stay here.
Vatic Note: This is going to be another strategy of our "people to people" Initiative. We need to understand that originally in this country, it was stated in the Federalist papers that freedom under the Constitution meant that the only time you should be arrested is for crimes against another person or property. Now we are imprisoned for what used to be civil offenses handled by civil courts with no imprisonment.
It was clearly stated that there are no crimes against the state. When you stop and think about it carefully, that statement is very true, since we are the state. Example: During most of the time and into my life time, IRS issues were handled by the tax court which was civil. But they have now been criminalized and imprisonment is the sentence. That is totally against everything our founding fathers fought for. When you make dissent criminal, you are going against everything our forefathers intended for us as a free people.
Heck, drugs were legal until the 1930's. And yet, we did not have a drug problem until they made them illegal. How strange is that? Now again, its criminal and yet, it does not hurt anyone but the drug user. We now have the largest prison population in the world on a per capita basis, so that belies our idea of being free in a world that is beginning to scoff at us for our ignorance about our own situation.
"A Layman's Guide To Jury Nullification" - The Jury can refuse to enforce unjust laws
Vatic Note: This is going to be another strategy of our "people to people" Initiative. We need to understand that originally in this country, it was stated in the Federalist papers that freedom under the Constitution meant that the only time you should be arrested is for crimes against another person or property. Now we are imprisoned for what used to be civil offenses handled by civil courts with no imprisonment.
It was clearly stated that there are no crimes against the state. When you stop and think about it carefully, that statement is very true, since we are the state. Example: During most of the time and into my life time, IRS issues were handled by the tax court which was civil. But they have now been criminalized and imprisonment is the sentence. That is totally against everything our founding fathers fought for. When you make dissent criminal, you are going against everything our forefathers intended for us as a free people.
Heck, drugs were legal until the 1930's. And yet, we did not have a drug problem until they made them illegal. How strange is that? Now again, its criminal and yet, it does not hurt anyone but the drug user. We now have the largest prison population in the world on a per capita basis, so that belies our idea of being free in a world that is beginning to scoff at us for our ignorance about our own situation.
"A Layman's Guide To Jury Nullification" - The Jury can refuse to enforce unjust laws
Published by on Sep 21, 2012
The last stand against tyranny can take place in the jury box. The legislative branch may pass unconstitutional laws and the judiciary branch may uphold them.
However, the individual citizen has the last say in the jury box. Learn your rights as a juror. Most likely, you will not be told about them in the courtroom. http://www.LibertyPen.com
Commenters Note: If the judge asks potential jurors if they agree w/ the law, he is acting to negate the legal rights and obligations of the jurors to decide the case based on their own judgement.
In other words, the judge is acting in a deceitful manner by not fully informing them of their legal rights and obligation to judge the law as well as the suspect. Tyrants exploit the timidity and good will of otherwise good people to wreak injustice on society.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=mxYUr6CNopQ
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
No comments:
Post a Comment