Vatic Note: Google's double standard was a surprise to me, since they fought like cats and dogs against censorship and spying by the government and did so in court. They lost the battle, and had to comply with the FISA warrants written by the FBI and approved by the fisa courts that never denied a request, so you can tell what that was really all about.
Eventually, the FBI quit bothering with FISA warrants and simply issued an order and most would comply, but not google, they refused to honor their demand for spying and forced them to go back and get the court order for every single one of their spying requests which was a horrific job given the numbers the FBI was dealing with.
I am going to continue to give them the benefit of the doubt because if the FBI did not tell them to take the video down, I do not believe they would have taken it down, and thus the same would go for the video discussed below. Having said that, I also think Google should look at the issue in a modified light since partial censorship based on race, is just as bad as full censorship, therefore they should have removed this video below until such time as fairness had been restored.
Heck, having said all this above, the fact is, the video was government/Israel approved, produced and probably funded by them and the actual riots were McCain induced when he brought over all that money to give to the governments/mossads operatives in Libya to pay them to do what they did. We documented all that on here when it occurred. Google needs to do more research now and act more like the caretakers of truth, since our MSM is gone and the alternative press is the only vehicle left to inform citizens of what is going on. Google could be a big help in that dept without violating their court order.
The good news is Google has never blocked or censored our site where others have. WE probably have the most indicting site on the net about Israel and her behavior and who she really is, which is not REAL DNA or religious Biblical Jews.
Jews & Muslims: Google’s Double Standard Policy for Removing Hateful Videos
http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2012/09/jews-muslims-googles-double-standard-policy-for-removing-hateful-videos-2471292.html
Tuesday, September 25, 2012 11:12
by Dear Dirty America, Before Its News
"In the private sector, when Google was asked to remove the highly inflammatory YouTube video, it immediately and correctly cited its long established policy of supporting freedom of speech, including all despised speech (though it reluctantly agreed to suspend it in Egypt and Libya.)
But as the Jewish Press reported on August 1, Google had no problem removing 1,710 videos and closing their affiliated accounts because “A substantial number of those videos concerned Holocaust denial and defense of Holocaust deniers.” According to the newspaper report, Google “closed the user’s account within 24 hours” of receiving the complaint by a group that monitors anti-Semitism in Australia.In July 2011, Facebook was pressured by Israeli authorities to close the accounts of many Palestinian activists. Israel complained that the activists were coordinating their plans to travel to Israel and cause disruptions. In reality, the activists were trying to make a strong political statement online.
Needless to say, the Israeli government could have easily rescinded any visas it might have issued to these activists or prevented any person from entering the country had they actually traveled. There was no call for incitement or violence by the activists to justify closing their accounts."
The solution is not to get Google to remove more videos that people find offensive, but instead to highlight the double standard of the decisions made about which videos are removed. Why is Israel so much more influential over Google? Why is a Holocaust denial film more incendiary than a cheap hack job of the Prophet? (VN: Very good question, I would love to hear the answer on that one! Someone from Google please respond?)
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
No comments:
Post a Comment