Vatic Note: If this is approved by the court, then we have finally succumb to a FASCIST POLICE STATE without a doubt. We have always been free to self sustainment in both food, natural remedies and water.... now the state will control all three as we saw in the water videos. Add to that the restriction of movement through the TSA satanic perversion of sexual transgression that is criminal in nature, but now state sanctioned, which does not surprise me since the ADL and the SPLC are on the HLS board making policy and we all know the sexual abuse of children that is prevalent in Israel, so of course it would raise its ugly head here THROUGH THOSE TWO ORGANIZATIONS, now wouldn't it? Then add to that the price of gas that also restricts our movement and slowly but surely we are no longer free in any aspect of our lives. That is revolution time when that happens.... so its time to think about how we want to deal with all of this. Take it and live with it, or resist it. That is where we are going with this. How they get the guns will be the key. The more tightly they squeeze, the more control they lose. How stupid, but then arrogance has historically ALWAYS been the curse that brings tyrants down. They should have had "TAVISTOCK" pay for a grant to study the elite instead of us to find out what self sabotage the elite will engage in to self destruct through their arrogance, which has ALWAYS defeated their efforts????
FDA Says You Have No Right To Real Food Unless They Give You Permission First
http://members.beforeitsnews.com/story/532/650/FDA_Says_You_Have_No_Right_To_Real_Food_Unless_They_Give_You_Permission_First.html&NL
By The Intel Hub, Before Its News
Monday, April 04, 2011 12:07
Natural News
by David Gutierrez
April 3rd, 2011
In a response to a lawsuit filed by the Farm-to-Consumer Legal Defense Fund (FTCLDF), the FDA has articulated its belief that there is no such thing as a right to health or to purchase or consume any given food.
The FTCLDF has sued the FDA for banning the interstate shipment or sale of raw milk products, alleging that the policy deprives consumers and a food buying group owner “of their fundamental and inalienable rights of (a) traveling across State lines with raw dairy products legally obtained and possessed; (b) providing for the care and well being of themselves and their families, including their children; and (c) producing, obtaining and consuming the foods of choice for themselves and their families, including their children.”
In a legal response, the FDA countered that “there is no ‘deeply rooted’ historical tradition of unfettered access to food of all kinds.” As evidence for this position, the agency cites “the dietary laws of biblical times.”
The FDA goes further, stating that “there is no absolute right to consume or feed children any particular kind of food [because] comprehensive federal regulation of the food supply has been in effect at least since Congress enacted the Pure Food and Drugs Act of 1906. … Thus, plaintiffs’ claim to a fundamental privacy interest in obtaining ‘foods of their own choice’ for themselves and their families is without merit.”
In other words, the agency has stated that because Congress has given FDA the authority to regulate food, there is no such thing as a right to acquire any given food.
Furthermore, the FDA says, “there is no generalized right to bodily and physical health.”
“Finally, even if such a right did exist, it would not render FDA’s regulations unconstitutional because prohibiting the interstate sale and distribution of unpasteurized milk promotes ‘bodily and physical health.’”
Sources for this story include: www.thecompletepatient.com/j… www.thecompletepatient.com/j….
Learn more: www.naturalnews.com/031934_FDA_food_freedom.html#ixzz1IX0oUEKi
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
No comments:
Post a Comment