Remember, we also found out Libya was also a controlled rebellion. It was for Rothschild and we know this because the first thing the rebels did when they gained control was to create a whole different and separate banking system that coincidentially was right in line with Rothschild style banking.... FIAT CURRENCY, WORTH NOTHING. The second thing they did was to set up negotiations with British and American oil companies to take over Egypts oil drilling and distribution. Yup, that was a bogus rebellion too. Now read this below and see if you see any similarity. Remember ITS ARROGANT OF US TO BELIEVE THEY COULD NOT DO THIS TO US. Do I believe there are good honest rebels, yes, I do, but not in leadership positions. The control of it is firmly in Soros hands. NOT ONE SINGLE SIGN ABOUT AUDITING THE FED OR DOING AWAY WITH IT. NOT ONE. Don't you find that odd??? Do I think the real protestors could take it over? Yes, I do, but then no more Soros's donation of free food and drinks. Its when you pay out of your pocket and aren't working, that rebellion becomes a very different animal.
(original article 2-5-11)
Vatic Note: This will come as no surprise to Vatic Readers. On one of our blogs about this issue we stated that if the powers that be wanted to crush this rebellion they could easily have done so with very little cost to them. So I asked 'Why have they not crushed it?" Two speculations were; 1. The powers that be were using this as an excuse to disappear into their underground facilities for some cosmic reason, such as nibiru is here or coming, polar shifts getting ready to occur, and 2. It was a trial run for pretending to rid the country of an elite bad guy, only to replace him with an elite controlled good guy, who would serve his masters while also fooling the people. I mentioned that this was a ploy to overthrow governments so the khazar bankers could fully take them over. Remember, studies by the various mass psych groups hav e shown that its far less expensive to manage a large group of slaves IF THEY BELIEVE THEY ARE FREE, even if they are not, than to have them KNOW THEY ARE SLAVES and end up costing much more to control and keep down. However, this is a mix of reasons. I based my speculation on surrounding facts and written plans that were almost 100 years old, and on the past 10 years and recent renewal of the Patriot Act that they were not going to renew, remember???? But this one is even better since he has facts that lead us to believing that in fact, the elite khazars are indeed in control of the opposition that created this revolution. We still don't know "why"? Notice the "Economist" is making remarks about this and guess who owns the economist??? ROTHSCHILD. So now we know the rest of the story.
All is not What is Seems in Egyptian Clashes
http://beforeitsnews.com/story/383/570/All_is_not_what_it_seems_in_Egyptian_Clashes.html
by Activist post, author is Tony Cartalucci, contributing writer, Before Its News
January 28, 2011
It was nearly a week ago on January 16th that respected geopolitical analyst Dr. Webster Tarpley warned prophetically, "Arab governments would be well advised to keep an eye on ICG operatives in their countries," in his piece covering the Tunisian upheaval and regime change.
CBC report "Mohamed ElBaradei: Egypt's President-in-waiting?" just about says it all in regards to ElBaradei's proposed role. CBC profiles his stint with the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the Nobel Prize he won in the process. (VN: Yes, the well respected Nobel prize, including the Peace prize given to a man who not only expanded all wars but started a couple of more while he was at it. That is how well respected that prize is) Similar mainstream news media stories can be found by news-searching the term "Mohamed ElBaradei."
Wired reports "Nuke Watchdog Wants to Lead Egypt Revolt. No, Really." While they propose ElBaradei's aspirations to be peculiar because of his employment with the IAEA, it is his position at the ICG that makes this gambit very believable indeed. The ICG has been recently seen meddling and contributing to other color revolutions, most notably the "red" color revolution in Thailand. George Soros, who sits on the ICG's executive committee, is no stranger to funding color revolutions, fueling class warfare, and backing a laundry list of NGO's working as agents for the globalist agenda.
The (Rothschild) Economist suggests that ElBaradei may not be of America's liking because of his work in the IAEA regarding Iran. Again, they fail to mention his other job; the one in which he works with some of the most prominent American geopolitical strategists who often, very literally have the undivided attention of America's political establishment via forums like the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission and the Bilderberg Group which the Economist has also recently reported on. Surely they must have bumped into ElBaradei during one these meetings the Economist claims their editor attends. (VN: Remember, Rothschild owns the Economist that also gave Assange, an award for his work, hehehe and we know what that was, don't we? THERE IS LITTLE THESE DAYS THAT IS REAL. Be on the look out and aware at all times for the masterful deception before your very eyes. Remember, Mossad has a sign on its wall.... "by deception we will conduct war", and win as they are doing in all these countries. Is the US next??? )
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
No comments:
Post a Comment